Biden wants State & Local Officials to Hire more Police: Defund the Police is Dead

[score_keeper]

Biden wants State & Local Officials to Hire more Police: Defund the Police is Dead

White House memo to state and local officials discussed the need 'to put more police officers on the beat.'

"Our strategy provides, including funding for law enforcement through the American Rescue Plan for states, cities, and to be able to hire police and pay them overtime in order to advance community policing," the president said, adding that the administration’s plan also will "invest in community violence intervention."

I'd like to remove on from this topic, but everyday, another D-bag politician reminds us of just how idiotic, moronic, and diabolic the 'defund the police' campaign was.

Defund the police is a dead chant; deal with it.

 

[ll74]

White House memo to state and local officials discussed the need 'to put more police officers on the beat.'

"Our strategy provides, including funding for law enforcement through the American Rescue Plan for states, cities, and to be able to hire police and pay them overtime in order to advance community policing," the president said, adding that the administration’s plan also will "invest in community violence intervention."

I'd like to remove on from this topic, but everyday, another D-bag politician reminds us of just how idiotic, moronic, and diabolic the 'defund the police' campaign was.

Defund the police is a dead chant; deal with it.

Reforming of policing and redistributing budgets towards non-police efforts like mental health is not dead.

The whole messaging that Trumpies held onto can certainly die in a fire as it was a dumb one to begin with.

 

[KeithD]

Biden never supported the defund the police campaign.

 

[score_keeper]

Reforming of policing and redistributing budgets towards non-police efforts like mental health is not dead.

The whole messaging that Trumpies held onto can certainly die in a fire as it was a dumb one to begin with.

You do not comprehend things well.

Hire more police, in addition to those strategies. Not, defund the police while relying solely on other strategies that haven't worked for the big D-bag cities.

What Biden needs to do is step up like a leader and tell his party, to their faces, and their voters, that defunding the police has failed, but, telling his people to hire more police is still a victory that can be seen for what it is: D-bag policy failure.

More police are needed, not less, says Biden.

Police: 1, Democrats: 0

 

[ll74]

You do not comprehend things well.

Hire more police, in addition to those strategies. Not, defund the police while relying solely on other strategies that haven't worked for the big D-bag cities.

What Biden needs to do is step up like a leader and tell his party, to their faces, and their voters, that defunding the police has failed, but, telling his people to hire more police is still a victory that can be seen for what it is: D-bag policy failure.

More police are needed, not less, says Biden.

Police: 1, Democrats: 0

You don't understand how hiring police in areas that are staffed low and changing budget distributions towards more mental health aren't at odds with each other.

What Biden needs to do is exactly what he's doing

And having a mental health response team has been successful in cities it's been tried...so don't give me that bullshit of it not working

 

[score_keeper]

You don't understand how hiring police in areas that are staffed low and changing budget distributions towards more mental health aren't at odds with each other.

What Biden needs to do is exactly what he's doing

Yes, by insisting that the states and local officials hire more police, he's telling the world that 'defund the police' doesn't work.

He doesn't have much of a brain left, but when it emerges from time to time, it's his Conservative side, which happens to be the side of common sense.

 

[ll74]

Yes, by insisting that the states and local officials hire more police, he's telling the world that 'defund the police' doesn't work.

He doesn't have much of a brain left, but when it emerges from time to time, it's his Conservative side, which happens to be the side of common sense.

I get that you think that, but that's because defund the police only means one singular thing to you...you're incapable of understanding how you can take away funding and still hire more police.

Common sense means whatever anti-Democrat thing you can find to Trumpies, such as yourself...it's a game and all you care about it some bullshit score you made up.

 

[score_keeper]

I get that you think that, but that's because defund the police only means one singular thing to you...you're incapable of understanding how you can take away funding and still hire more police.

Common sense means whatever anti-Democrat thing you can find to Trumpies, such as yourself...it's a game and all you care about it some bullshit score you made up.

You don't listen to what the democrats want when they say, 'Defund the police,' do you? Part of their goal is less police, not more.

Idiot.

 

[ll74]

You don't listen to what the democrats want when they say, 'Defund the police,' do you? Part of their goal is less police, not more.

Idiot.

Yes, I get that you are simpleminded and don't understand the diff aspects and factions promoting defund the police.

1. It's not the entire party
2. It's not one group with one goal, it's multiple groups with many differing ideas
3. The core party establishment/majority is barely on board for a small portion

Localities differ, obviously....and that movement is even less "one voice"

 

[score_keeper]

Yes, I get that you are simpleminded and don't understand the diff aspects and factions promoting defund the police.

1. It's not the entire party
2. It's not one group with one goal, it's multiple groups with many differing ideas
3. The core party establishment/majority is barely on board for a small portion

Localities differ, obviously....and that movement is even less "one voice"

You've gone from strongly defending your Democratic Party's views on things to making excuses for the 'core party.'

Good.

 

[ll74]

You've gone from strongly defending your Democratic Party's views on things to making excuses for the 'core party.'

Good.

I haven't done either of those things. I've gone from explaining that you're a simple minded fool to saying it two or three more times. I might have used diff words

 

[KeithD]

What Biden needs to do is step up like a leader and tell his party, to their faces, and their voters, that defunding the police has failed,

He stepped up from the get go and told his party he didn't support defunding the police--he did this even during the primaries. If you hadn't sold out to the powers of evil, you would know that.

 

[ll74]

In the simplest terms for you....the movement is not dead. That's not a defense of anything ..just a fact.

 

[phrodeau]

Yes, by insisting that the states and local officials hire more police, he's telling the world that 'defund the police' doesn't work.

He doesn't have much of a brain left, but when it emerges from time to time, it's his Conservative side, which happens to be the side of common sense.

Biden didn’t tell me that. Which world are you on?

 

[KeithD]

It's clearly the Republicans and the Trumpettes who have shown, by action, that they do not support either the police or law and order.

 

[YDB95]

You don't listen to what the democrats want when they say, 'Defund the police,' do you? Part of their goal is less police, not more.

No, it isn't. Their goal is to redirect duties the police have been saddled with but shouldn't have been in the first place, to make it easier for them to do the job they were intended to do in the first place.

I will grant you, the slogan itself makes it all too easy for the likes of you to vilify the whole thing. But there's a reason why it resonates so in urban communities of color. If you don't like that, the thing to do is take a hard look at why there's so much distrust for the cops there. But we know you don't see the need to do that, because you think the abuse cops have been doling out for decades is just dandy.

 

[score_keeper]

No, it isn't. Their goal is to redirect duties the police have been saddled with but shouldn't have been in the first place, to make it easier for them to do the job they were intended to do in the first place.

I will grant you, the slogan itself makes it all too easy for the likes of you to vilify the whole thing. But there's a reason why it resonates so in urban communities of color. If you don't like that, the thing to do is take a hard look at why there's so much distrust for the cops there. But we know you don't see the need to do that, because you think the abuse cops have been doling out for decades is just dandy.

99.9% of police interactions on a daily bases are done without conflict other than the criminal resisting arrest.

Cops that do abuse the system are brought to justice. Those that don't are exonerated, but, the Liberal Media and their Democratic Idols, who feed their base lies in order to retain their vote, vilify all police encounters while turning career criminals like George Floyd into heroes.

Democrats like to tell minorities, and the poor, that it's not your fault. Blame someone else and we'll help you rise above your situation. That's story telling, and not just because they feed people what they want to hear, Democrats, in the end, never do help anyone who hasn't already helped themselves.

I can see. I can hear. I can think. I can understand. I can deduce conclusions without caving to the pressure of Democratic Politicians and their constituents on their soapboxes who need to find an enemy in anything that hampers their pursuit of absolute authority.

You're a blind man, YDB95, and each of your posts only further proves that you can't see the fault in the party you support.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

99.9% of police interactions on a daily bases are done without conflict other than the criminal resisting arrest.

99.9%? Is that an exact number? Do you have a shred of proof of that?

How many bases we talking? First and second? Second and third?

 

[Rightguide]

No, it isn't. Their goal is to redirect duties the police have been saddled with but shouldn't have been in the first place, to make it easier for them to do the job they were intended to do in the first place.

Please stop lying to protect the non-existent credibility of your fellow leftist idiots. Now, let us return to June 8, 2020 when Rep. Ilhan Omar explained the meaning of "defund the police" in enough sufficient detail to completely destroy your attempt to rewrite history:

“We need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Because here’s the thing, there’s a cancer,” she said, continuing that amputation is needed so it doesn’t spread.

“The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the root, and so when we dismantle it, we get rid of that cancer, and we allow for something beautiful to rise, and that reimagining allows us to figure out what public safety looks like for us."

I don't recall a single Antifa leftist, BLM member, or Squad member, rushing to the rescue with a correction resembling your attempted revision.

 

[ll74]

Please stop lying to protect the non-existent credibility of your fellow leftist idiots. Now, let us return to June 8, 2020 when Rep. Ilhan Omar explained the meaning of "defund the police" in enough sufficient detail to completely destroy your attempt to rewrite history:

“We need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Because here’s the thing, there’s a cancer,” she said, continuing that amputation is needed so it doesn’t spread.

“The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the root, and so when we dismantle it, we get rid of that cancer, and we allow for something beautiful to rise, and that reimagining allows us to figure out what public safety looks like for us."

I don't recall a single Antifa leftist, BLM member, or Squad member, rushing to the rescue with a correction resembling your attempted revision.

I forgot where Ihan Omar defines a movement she is a part of for a party she has little power over.

Does Jim Jordan dictate policy for the Republican party?

 

[Rightguide]

I forgot where Ihan Omar defines a movement she is a part of for a party she has little power over.

Does Jim Jordan dictate policy for the Republican party?

There are dozens of quotes explaining the meaning but here is the head Communist herself:

https://i.imgur.com/o93E8GQ.jpg

 

[KeithD]

Does Jim Jordan dictate policy for the Republican party?

It certainly would seem so. It certainly seems like the Republicans in Congress would have no problem looking the other way while hundreds of young men they were responsible for were being sexually assaulted by a professional colleague. Seems a lot like the tack they are taking on the 6 January coup attempt by the leader of their party.

 

[YDB95]

Please stop lying to protect the non-existent credibility of your fellow leftist idiots. Now, let us return to June 8, 2020 when Rep. Ilhan Omar explained the meaning of "defund the police" in enough sufficient detail to completely destroy your attempt to rewrite history:

“We need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Because here’s the thing, there’s a cancer,” she said, continuing that amputation is needed so it doesn’t spread.

“The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the root, and so when we dismantle it, we get rid of that cancer, and we allow for something beautiful to rise, and that reimagining allows us to figure out what public safety looks like for us."

I don't recall a single Antifa leftist, BLM member, or Squad member, rushing to the rescue with a correction resembling your attempted revision.

It's not a revision. Omar was not saying Minneapolis shouldn't have a police department at all, she was arguing that it should be rebuilt from the ground up, because the existing force was too drenched in bigotry to be salvaged. And she may well have been right. And that's neither here nor there with respect to 'defund the police' overall.

99.9% of police interactions on a daily bases are done without conflict other than the criminal resisting arrest.

Cops that do abuse the system are brought to justice. Those that don't are exonerated, but, the Liberal Media and their Democratic Idols, who feed their base lies in order to retain their vote, vilify all police encounters while turning career criminals like George Floyd into heroes.

You've already been called on your statistic there, which we all know you pulled out of your ear. And calling for justice when a suspect is murdered by the cops is not the same as turning that suspect into a hero.

Democrats like to tell minorities, and the poor, that it's not your fault. Blame someone else and we'll help you rise above your situation.

Change "minorities" to "whites" and you've got exactly what Trump did to win the adoration of the right. No wonder you're seeing it in others. And there's a difference between recognizing personal responsibility, and using it as an excuse for bigotry. But the right either doesn't understand that or doesn't care.

Does Gym Jordan dictate policy for the Republican party?

I fixed the spelling of his first name for you.

 

[Rightguide]

It's not a revision. Omar was not saying Minneapolis shouldn't have a police department at all, she was arguing that it should be rebuilt from the ground up, because the existing force was too drenched in bigotry to be salvaged. And she may well have been right. And that's neither here nor there with respect to 'defund the police' overall.

When DeBlasio proposed a $1billion cut of the police budget of NY was his intention to make the force smaller or larger?

 

[ll74]

There are dozens of quotes explaining the meaning but here is the head Communist herself:

https://i.imgur.com/o93E8GQ.jpg

lol, you're stuck on "defund the police" to be some perfectly defined movement led by the core Democratic base.

AOC and Omar ....oh right the squad........they must define everything.

lmao....Whatever you think it is, it's not. And Biden saying anything doesn't dictate what the movement wants or does....and certainly doesn't kill it.