Bernie!

Sanders already has 29 super delegate pledges and Clinton already has primary votes, so the scenario of Clinton holding all of the super delegate votes at the same time that Sanders holds all of the primary votes is already utterly ridiculous. You guys are off in lalalala land.
 
Sanders already has 29 super delegate pledges and Clinton already has primary votes, so the scenario of Clinton holding all of the super delegate votes at the same time that Sanders holds all of the primary votes is already utterly ridiculous.


The only person who's said anything about Sanders holding all the primary votes and Clinton holding all the super delegates is you.

If you ever develop some reading comprehension skills you'll note the discssion was about the possibility of Sanders winning the popular vote and still loosing because super douches back HRC anyhow.

It's a very real possibility that could happen. Even the most extreme limits of which SeanR so kindly outlined as remote as they are could still theoretically happen. Which is about as close as it got to the all and all bidnizz that's got your panties in a bunch that ONLY YOU are talking about.

You guys are off in lalalala land.

http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt112/ausador/IronyMeterSplode.jpg~original
 
Last edited:
The actual question at hand is where is the line between fucking the voter and them doing their job. I mean they exist for a reason (like or not, I do not) and that reason is not to let the will of the voter run all willy nilly. So at what percent are they allowed to tip the scales for who they believe can win an election? Or is their soul purpose to step in closer to the end and prevent a knock down drag out fight like we're seeing happen over on the right. I bet the PTB in their party are currently wishing they had the power to at least knock out one of the competitors.
 
That is indeed the question.

I don't like it either, at best I think they should be tie breakers vs the people, not a tool for billionaires to say "you don't know what you're talking about fuck you." because we an flat out overabundance of that shit.
 
That is indeed the question.

I don't like it either, at best I think they should be tie breakers vs the people, not a tool for billionaires to say "you don't know what you're talking about fuck you." because we an flat out overabundance of that shit.

If they would be a tie breaker it seems more inteligent to do one of two things. A make ties impossible. Give Guam or Puerto Rico or one of those other places that gets to vote and we forget about have a literal "Break encase of Emergency" hammer.

Or you know pull an Iowa. Encase of tie flip coin.

Mostly because if we're being honest an actual tie when it comes voting is akin to to a coin landing on edge. If it happens something has gone horribly wrong and the correct answer is
 
If they would be a tie breaker it seems more inteligent to do one of two things. A make ties impossible. Give Guam or Puerto Rico or one of those other places that gets to vote and we forget about have a literal "Break encase of Emergency" hammer.

Or you know pull an Iowa. Encase of tie flip coin.

Mostly because if we're being honest an actual tie when it comes voting is akin to to a coin landing on edge. If it happens something has gone horribly wrong and the correct answer is

We should indeed do that.

We need to reform our political process, or the beatings will continue until morale has improved.

If they won't give it to us the correct answer still gets to be

So it's truly winning all around LOL
 
Last edited:

This is really not that much of a surprise. Bernie has a small but fanatical following, and they will spend a day standing up and being counted for him. However, most states have primary elections, where voters go to the polling place, vote and are done until Nov. For that reason, and because NV is a small state, SC will be a much more accurate test.

Personally, I'd rather see Bernie win the nomination because it would mean a GOP president beginning in 2017, since the general election would be such a landslide.
 
This is really not that much of a surprise. Bernie has a small but fanatical following, and they will spend a day standing up and being counted for him. However, most states have primary elections, where voters go to the polling place, vote and are done until Nov. For that reason, and because NV is a small state, SC will be a much more accurate test.

Personally, I'd rather see Bernie win the nomination because it would mean a GOP president beginning in 2017, since the general election would be such a landslide.

Assuming you guys can deal with Trump I'd rather lose this one on principle than pick up the easy win. Now if it's Trump I'll dig straight to hell so we can run the first guy I run into.
 
Assuming you guys can deal with Trump I'd rather lose this one on principle than pick up the easy win. Now if it's Trump I'll dig straight to hell so we can run the first guy I run into.

If it came down to Trump vs. either Bernie or Hilly, I would try to write in "None of the above."
 
If it came down to Trump vs. either Bernie or Hilly, I would try to write in "None of the above."

Just out of principal? Might as well stay home....shiiieeeet....cook a rib eye up and watch the country burn the house down from the couch posting in the shit talk storm sure to be happening here.

Honestly I'm hoping for a Trump v Sanders general....that would be some exciting fuckin' shit.

Capitalist pig v Socialist Jew.....

I mean what a no holds bar point blank head shot election...it would ALL be on the table my GOD the anticipation!!
 
If Sanders is the nomination I'd vote for him. First time I'd have voted for a major party candidate in over 30 years.
 
I am officially holding out hope through Super Tuesday.

I am too.

But I'm not getting them too high.

The top 5% Bought and paid for Clinton....and I just can't discount the power of mega bux and the level of corruption in (D).

I think there is a good chance they will give her to them if there is any legal way possible for them to do it. And by legal I mean not getting caught.
 
I am too.

But I'm not getting them too high.

The top 5% Bought and paid for Clinton....and I just can't discount the power of mega bux and the level of corruption in (D).

I think there is a good chance they will give her to them if there is any legal way possible for them to do it. And by legal I mean not getting caught.
She is the chosen one for a reason. She is the Queen of the Liars. The left look at themselves in the mirror and lie, she is their Queen of the Quislings.
 
Bitch stop using that word. You don't know what it even means.

I hope I'm wrong but I still can't see the Super Delegates REALLY being the difference but we are minutes away from getting new results so hopefully you'll all have good news for Renaud about how he was wrong.
 
Bitch stop using that word. You don't know what it even means.

I hope I'm wrong but I still can't see the Super Delegates REALLY being the difference but we are minutes away from getting new results so hopefully you'll all have good news for Renaud about how he was wrong.

So far Trump is ahead with ~5% reporting. If Rubio and Cruz were combined they would be beating Trump, but since they are splitting the vote, Trump is triumphing.
 
That is making the assumption they would combine however which thus far does not appear to be the case. I was part of team never with Trump but he seems to be picking up spares.
 
Republican Caucuses
Last updated: 10:45 PM
17.8% reporting
318/1,784 precincts
Votes Pct.
Donald Trump 5,509 46.5%
Marco Rubio 2,801 23.7%
Ted Cruz 2,387 20.2%
Ben Carson 662 5.6%
John Kasich 445 3.8%
Other 39 0.3%
 
Back
Top