Benghazi Time line

VaticanAssassin

God Mod
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Posts
12,390
9/11/2012

4:05 Eastern: White house situation room is made aware of attack.

4:54 Eastern: second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel

5:00 Eastern: White house calender shows scheduled meeting with Obama and Sec. of Defense.

6:07 Eastern: A third email, also marked SBU was sent and carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack."



Given the above facts. How does anyone justify the president of the united states, blaming this on the a video, Hillary and the the intelligence community?

How do you justify Obama standing in front of the UN and lying to the world when he mentions the Video 6 times!?
 
he has NO respect for America and FREE SPEECH


the PERSECUTED COPTIC CHRISTIAN is still in jail



(Bush was a FAG as well)


You like my new name?:confused::D
 
RobDownSouth
This message is hidden because RobDownSouth is on your ignore list.


STFU, NIGGER POOP
 
Not even the "WHITE" House stands by their own statements
 
Here you go then BB.

hey NIGGER

1-Mother FUCKING Jones is NOT credible

2-WAPO, especially a PUSSY SUCKER like Ignatious is NOT credible

3-Its from 10/19.....new info shows it to be a LIE


You keep posting OLD SHIT......POON...........Poster of old news...........and you quote POOP...........poster of old polls/posts is not credible
 
Last edited:
Thanks for quoting the fat ass.

But you did get he posted opinion pieces and that they came out before the emails were leaked? :rolleyes:

DERP!!!

NO!

He didnt BOTHER with teh FACT that it was 10/19.....and its NOW A LIE.....he is NIGGER POON......POON=Poster Of Old News!

and he would be the first MOTHERFUCKER screaming at MOTHER FUCKING JONES as a CREDIBLE source


if these assholes were smart, they would STFU and NOT MENTION IT AT ALL and hope it dies away
 
With 2 words, Drudge evokes Watergate for Obama's Libya troubles.


The linked story is "White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails."

The famous question from Watergate was "What did the President know and when did he know it?"

In 1973 and 1974 [Howard] Baker was... the influential ranking minority member of the Senate committee... that investigated the Watergate scandal. He is famous for having asked aloud, "What did the President know and when did he know it?", a question given him to ask by his counsel and former campaign manager, future U.S. Senator Fred Thompson.
 
BLACKFIVE: The Consequences of Benghazi.“The President made the decision to not use F18s (even in a flyover to shake the resolve of the terrorists). The President made the decision to go to Vegas to a campaign dinner. So what is worse than our State people now knowing that the President will do nothing if they are attacked? Al Qaeda knows that now, too.”
 
FUCKED UP




Why Would the US Ask Libya if We Could Enter Their Airspace?



by
Bryan Preston

Bio





October 24, 2012 - 1:35 pm


















This may sound like a small point, but I think it exposes one of the many lies told to the American people in the wake of the Benghazi assault. According to CBS’ Sharyl Atkisson, Secretary of State Clinton requested permission from the Libyan government to enter their airspace at some point during the attack.

Question: Why was the request made at all?




The US used fighter aircraft and armed Predator drones during and after the Libyan revolution. We have been using Predators, at least, in Libya long after the revolution. On the night of the attack, there was at least one Predator overhead along with other recon aircraft. Why would we need to ask the interim and weak Libyan government for permission to do something we were already doing, probably as a matter of routine?

The Obama administration does not have a habit of asking other countries for permission when we use their airspace. To take one prominent example, when the SEALs flew deep into Pakistan aboard US military helicopters, the Obama administration did not ask for permission to fly into Pakistan, land troops in Abbottabad, and take out Osama bin Laden. The Pakistanis were given no warning at all, out of legitimate concern that they would blow the mission and possibly get American troops killed.

The US uses drones to strike terrorists at times and places of our choosing. But the Obama administration asks permission to enter the airspace of a nominally friendly government in order to rescue Americans under attack at the US consulate? In a city right on the Libyan coast? When time was of the essence and lives were on the line, Hillary Clinton was on the phone asking if we may please fly in and help them?

This makes no sense.
 
I disagree

I believe he is NOT ONE OF US

Is on the other side
 
So this was all Obama's doing?

He takes full credit for the loss of lives?
 
Thanks for quoting the fat ass.

But you did get he posted opinion pieces and that they came out before the emails were leaked? :rolleyes:

DERP!!!

Uh oh...

UPON FURTHER REVIEW, THOSE "SMOKING GUN" EMAILS CONTAINED INCORRECT INFORMATION

GOP's Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke

There's only one problem—well actually there's many, but one big one: The email appears to have been incorrect. Ansar al-Sharia Benghazi, the group suspected of attacking the consulate, never claimed responsibility for the assault.

LINK

Of course, the coward known as VatAss won't even acknowledge this.
 
Condi Rice Pours Cold Water On ‘Benghazi-Gate’

Greta Van Susteren asked Rice repeatedly about a set of emails uncovered by Reuters. The conservative media has jumped on the emails as "definitive proof" that the Obama administration has been lying about what it knew and when in the aftermath of the attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Rice’s response was not what Van Susteren expected:


Condi Rice said:
But when things are unfolding very, very quickly, it’s not always easy to know what is really going on on the ground. And to my mind, the really important questions here are about how information was collected. Did the various agencies really coordinate and share intelligence in the way that we had hoped, with the reforms that were made after 9/11?

So there’s a big picture to be examined here. But we don’t have all of the pieces, and I think it’s easy to try and jump to conclusions about what might have happened here. It’s probably better to let the relevant bodies do their work.

In other news today, Literotica's Vettebigot has announced plans to revoke Condi Rice's "Acceptable Negro" status, effective immediately.
 
Back
Top