schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,557
95% of fake news comes out of CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC, CBS.
what source did you pull the $1 BILLION-A-DAY trip that Obama took to the middle-east from?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
95% of fake news comes out of CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC, CBS.
Is Rightguide a russian agent?
what source did you pull the $1 BILLION-A-DAY trip that Obama took to the middle-east from?
I don't know what you're talking about. I've written very little about Obama except for his criminal activity in weaponizing the the intel, the FBI, and the DOJ in trying to undermine the Trump campaign and his political enemies. Other than that he's a disappearing footnote to history.
Did you find any errors in their reporting?
lol. I think it's just a combo of idealism & working in related areas
RG is legit.
The Sugardaddy/Counsellor/TalkRadio alts, on the other hand
whoever they belong to - Q, miles or someone else
look like the typical paid propaganda poster to me
Did you personally confirm every aspect of their reporting before you posted the link here or anywhere else?
I wasn't the one who challenged it. If one wants to say it's false one should be able to say how, or why it is false.
Briebart is known for subjective content posing as fact. Please personally confirm that you've verified the reporting.
I've mentioned this in the past but now the subject is being pursued in detail:
Where Fake News Is Born: How Wikipedia Spreads Hoaxes
T.D. Adler5 Aug 2020
As Big Tech suppresses conservative views in the name of fighting “fake news,” tech titans like Google and Facebook turn to Wikipedia to provide another “fix” to the problem. Despite messaging from Wikipedia’s owners encouraging this trend, over the years, Wikipedia and its sister sites have pushed hoaxes and false information into the media and academia.
There are multiple notable cases in which media reports and academic studies copying off Wikipedia were used to support the claim on the online encyclopedia in a form of circular sourcing named “citogenesis.”
Ever since its inception, Wikipedia has sold itself as the online encyclopedia “anyone can edit” and its owners have attributed the site’s reputed reliability to this factor. Past academic studies have presented Wikipedia as a reliable source of information and Silicon Valley has seized on this reputation to assuage concerns about their platforms being used to disseminate false information. However, various incidents in Wikipedia’s history show that its open-editing model not only has an abysmal track record for preventing long-running falsehoods, but also that it has been a source of fake news itself. There are notable cases in which media reports and academic studies copying off Wikipedia were used to support the claim on the online encyclopedia in a form of circular sourcing named “citogenesis.”
Breitbart News has collected examples of hoax data on Wikipedia that then became fake news in the media, in some cases even in medical journals:
Read the fake news list here:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/05/where-fake-news-is-born-how-wikipedia-spreads-hoaxes/
Thanks for putting a spotlight on these frauds.
You're welcome. Somebody ought to do Snopes next, Snopes is for dopes.![]()
yet another beautiful saturday spent morning through evening arguing with people smarter than you on the internet. sad![]()
Obama weaponized the FBI? What were they using before?
95% of fake news comes out of CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC, CBS.
Wiki is fine when it supports your narrative![]()
Rightguide is a romanian woman pisting day and night for moscow.
Is Rightguide a russian agent?
95% of fake news comes out of CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC, CBS.