Be Warned: Where Fake News Is Born...Wikipedia

Is Rightguide a russian agent?
:):rolleyes::D
lol. I think it's just a combo of idealism & working in related areas
RG is legit.

The Sugardaddy/Counsellor/TalkRadio alts, on the other hand
whoever they belong to - Q, miles or someone else
look like the typical paid propaganda poster to me
 
what source did you pull the $1 BILLION-A-DAY trip that Obama took to the middle-east from?

I don't know what you're talking about. I've written very little about Obama except for his criminal activity in weaponizing the the intel, the FBI, and the DOJ in trying to undermine the Trump campaign and his political enemies. Other than that he's a disappearing footnote to history.
 
I don't know what you're talking about. I've written very little about Obama except for his criminal activity in weaponizing the the intel, the FBI, and the DOJ in trying to undermine the Trump campaign and his political enemies. Other than that he's a disappearing footnote to history.

lol, the first black president, 2 terms at that, is gonna be a footnote? plus his many accomplishments? you're nothing but a partisan shit bird, vette.
 
:):rolleyes::D
lol. I think it's just a combo of idealism & working in related areas
RG is legit.

The Sugardaddy/Counsellor/TalkRadio alts, on the other hand
whoever they belong to - Q, miles or someone else
look like the typical paid propaganda poster to me

I'm real as rain, a pleasant enigma.:D;)
 
Did you personally confirm every aspect of their reporting before you posted the link here or anywhere else?

I wasn't the one who challenged it. If one wants to say it's false one should be able to say how, or why it is false.
 
I wasn't the one who challenged it. If one wants to say it's false one should be able to say how, or why it is false.

Briebart is known for subjective content posing as fact. Please personally confirm that you've verified the reporting.
 
Thank you.

I've mentioned this in the past but now the subject is being pursued in detail:


Where Fake News Is Born: How Wikipedia Spreads Hoaxes

T.D. Adler5 Aug 2020

As Big Tech suppresses conservative views in the name of fighting “fake news,” tech titans like Google and Facebook turn to Wikipedia to provide another “fix” to the problem. Despite messaging from Wikipedia’s owners encouraging this trend, over the years, Wikipedia and its sister sites have pushed hoaxes and false information into the media and academia.

There are multiple notable cases in which media reports and academic studies copying off Wikipedia were used to support the claim on the online encyclopedia in a form of circular sourcing named “citogenesis.”

Ever since its inception, Wikipedia has sold itself as the online encyclopedia “anyone can edit” and its owners have attributed the site’s reputed reliability to this factor. Past academic studies have presented Wikipedia as a reliable source of information and Silicon Valley has seized on this reputation to assuage concerns about their platforms being used to disseminate false information. However, various incidents in Wikipedia’s history show that its open-editing model not only has an abysmal track record for preventing long-running falsehoods, but also that it has been a source of fake news itself. There are notable cases in which media reports and academic studies copying off Wikipedia were used to support the claim on the online encyclopedia in a form of circular sourcing named “citogenesis.”

Breitbart News has collected examples of hoax data on Wikipedia that then became fake news in the media, in some cases even in medical journals:

Read the fake news list here:

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/05/where-fake-news-is-born-how-wikipedia-spreads-hoaxes/

Thanks for putting a spotlight on these frauds.
 
yet another beautiful saturday spent morning through evening arguing with people smarter than you on the internet. sad :(

Jism666 always trying to start some shit. You'll note I've been absent 10 hours or more today off and on since leaving this morning. There are no smart people on your side of the argument. That's why everywhere your people govern, they govern over an American version of the Third World shit hole.:rolleyes:

PS: Next time you want to step up, out on some elevators, your mewling is hard to hear.
 
Wiki is fine when it supports your narrative :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Rightguide is a romanian woman pisting day and night for moscow.
 
95% of fake news comes out of CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC, CBS.

:rolleyes: just a partisan response by a Rightie! Your thinking I'd absurd and is actually clinical. Good news is you can get help for it if you want.

Even Fox and Briebart, among other sources, gets things right in their reporting. All the above mentioned get it mostly right, sometimes not, nobody is perfect all the time.

If you are concerned with factual accuracy in Media the only way for any of us is to read or view multiple vetted, professional sources over time. Facebook news, Wikipedia, and others like this are not news outlets. Imbedded in news reporting outlets like Fox and Cnn are commentary shows (Hannity, Carlson, Cuomo, Lemon) where they "interpret" the facts if the day. This is not news, rather, it's political opinion.

Most folks mistake opinion and commentary for factual news...one learns the difference in school by paying attention.
 
Back
Top