Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 62,004
Breaking as we speak
Baldwin Indicted for Involuntary Manslaughter
- Thread starter Rightguide
- Start date
Rotadom
Satan's Plaything
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 8,713
A dumb ammosexual killed someone due to their negligence.
Rotadom
Satan's Plaything
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 8,713
Thanks but we'd rather hear from someone who is actually familiar with the law.
Oh the RWCJ here had a major hardon for Baldwin to get convicted on the first go round on the Rust shooting. Their hatred of him all goes back to Baldwins portrayal of Trump on SNL. They took great personal offence around here to those skits...
Here's a link to just one of the many threads started about Baldwin....
https://forum.literotica.com/threads/alec-baldwin-in-a-heap-of-trouble.1554656/
Last edited:
It's a disgrace.
A person points a gun at someone's head and discharges it; 'Oh my, oh my. I didn't know it was loaded.'
Should get life every time.
If a movie studio can't find a plastic replica for the set they should be put out of business.
A person points a gun at someone's head and discharges it; 'Oh my, oh my. I didn't know it was loaded.'
Should get life every time.
If a movie studio can't find a plastic replica for the set they should be put out of business.
Is there any action to betaken against the props manager who was presumably responsible for loading the gun with a blank round or not?
I think it's already established that she had been promoted beyond the level of her incompetence.
Unqualified, multiple complaints on her CV, allowed the crew to play cowboys and injuns with the guns during break using live ammo. What the hell was live ammo doing on a movie set at all? The words 'gross' and 'negligence' come to mind.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 38,138
This isn't relevant. What it is, is an attempt to shift the focus away from the actor.
Baldwin isn't a gun neophyte. He's had training with arms on movie sets many many many times over many many many years. That means he knows what the protocols are.
That this happened is entirely on Baldwin because if he'd followed the protocols the chambered live ammo would have been discovered at the time Baldwin signed the gun out.
Had the protocols been followed, the gun would have been unloaded, the set immediately frozen and an investigation initiated. The result of that investigation would likely have shown that the armorer wasn't doing her job to the required standard of care and she'd have been fired. NO ONE would have died, there wouldn't have been a negligent discharge, and Baldwin wouldn't now be facing criminal prosecution.
As the producer, the fault lies with Baldwin. As the shooter, the fault lies with Baldwin. No one else. However, please note that I'm not giving the armorer a pass, she fucked up too but her fuckup wasn't the cause of death. It contributed, but wasn't the cause.
I’m going to take this one step further:
1) The armorer was obviously a right wing gun nut, so there was probably some animus towards Alec Baldwin present. And there was admitted animus from the crew on the set towards the producers.
2) Ignoring the fact that live rounds weren’t allowed on the set, what are the odds that the one live round that was "randomly" loaded into the defective gun Alec Baldwin "fired" would be in the chamber in the cylinder directly under the hammer???
3) What are the odds that a live round would be "randomly" loaded into the chamber of the cylinder directly under the hammer in the defective gun that Alec Baldwin "fired”, just before the filming of a scene that calls for Alec Baldwin to quick draw the defective gun from a shoulder holster, cock the hammer, and point it directly at the camera???
4) I don’t believe in those kinds of "coincidences", considering all the available facts in evidence.
I honestly believe Alec Baldwin was set up. Maybe the perpetrators of the setup didn’t expect anyone to get hurt or killed, but anyone that would have been involved in the setup obviously didn’t / wouldn’t care one way or the other.
The real investigation should be into the crew, and the "coincidental” appearance of a live round, in the chamber under the hammer, “coincidentally", when Alec Baldwin was being filmed quick drawing a defective gun from a shoulder holster and cocking the hammer while pointing it directly at the camera operator and the director.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 62,004
Alec Baldwin charged with involuntary manslaughter after initial charge dropped over movie set shooting
CARLOS GARCIAJANUARY 19, 2024
https://www.theblaze.com/news/alec-baldwin-2nd-manslaughter-charge
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 62,004
Prove it's not a fact, dipshit.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,514
Now that wasn't so hard, was it?
jomar
chillin
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Posts
- 26,931
Of course it's relevant. If someone is going to be filmed pretending to shoot someone in the head, there shouldn't be live ammo or a real gun anywhere near. But the crew were clowning around shooting tin cans during a break, using the movie props. Then they handed Baldwin the gun.
Every single one of them should be charged with something, plus banned for life from holding a gun and being present on a movie set.
The only trouble is, the ammosexuals will line up and bleat that 'it could have been me'.
LLCox
wall flower
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2019
- Posts
- 7,836
You come to expect only blanks in movie set guns. Guns have been going off in movies since there are movies. Baldwin is the producer/director on Rust, it not like he was trying to sabotage his own movie. All blame should be put on that female armorer as far as I am concerned. In the history of film there have been four or five deaths by gunshot on a movie set (some AI told me). There have been millions of blanks fired. (My guesstimation)
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 62,004
Originally I heard it on the radio and hadn't seen a article yet. Is that so hard to understand?
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,514
Not hard to understand that you couldn't provide actual sources of information when it was readily available.
white_bB must be rubbing off on you.
Note: there is no actual contest to see who can post about something first.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 62,004
If there were a contest of blatant racism you would be the clear winner. It's always on your mind. There's no actual history of you posting anything except race tainted lazy low-class invective.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,514
How the fuck did you jump to racism from my comment?
DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 15,947
No, it is not. You even admit to that.
The protocols were broken before Alec got involved, Derpy.
Yes, had the protocols been followed before Alec got involved, this would not have happened.
God damn, you struggle.
lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 43,939
Can't have anything to do with his history of abuse and other d-baggery though, right?
Ah, the left, they yell "metoo" unless the abuser does a funny Trump imitation.
I bet if he did that horrible drunken threatening rant he left on his daughter's answering machine in his Trump voice it would be big ha ha to you idiots.
If we had his track record we'd be in jail a long time ago.
