Bad Day For D.C. Gun Controllers

Well, duh. It means the Second Amendment means what it says. Maybe this will give honest citizens more of a fighting chance against the criminal element, who didn't care one way or another about the law.
 
This is the face of gun fanatics, folks.

And old white racist kiddy diddler, and mister can of corn.
 
It's absolutely great reading that a federal judge is obeying his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution with such a ruling...

...but you still haven't answered why you champion a federal Court disobeying their same oaths in unquestionably regulating free speech when they are enumerated absolutely no constitutional power to do so.

What's up with this clear line of contradiction you've chosen to squat upon, vette?
 
Which one is which?

bwahahahahahaha

tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
 
Good. Now a law-abiding citizen in DC can stick a Smith and Wesson pistol in his pocket and walk down the street and the gun will be legal.

You fucking asshat now nobama can walk the streets of dc and threaten people who arent socialist the last thing we need is government people walking around with guns

Scotty
 
I was told you used to be funny. I was lied to.

What the fuck are you some time traveler how would you know if Scotty was funny in the past based on what Scotty just posted in the present either stop traveling through time or learn how to make your language work right

Scotty
 
You fucking asshat now nobama can walk the streets of dc and threaten people who arent socialist the last thing we need is government people walking around with guns

Scotty

They already do that. :eek: You omitted the part about criminals being armed already because they didn't care about the law.
 
What is amazing is that the plaintiff apparently lived in DC for the five years this case drug on without being shot while unarmed or arrested for carrying.

The idea that you can only defend yourself inside your home was always Ludacris. That is like saying free speech is only available around your own dinner table.
 
Gawd, it took them what? all of five posts to get to gun owners = Klan...

;)

No wonder there can be no reasonable discourse or compromise.

Where's CrackerJack? I just addressed the phenomena in another thread...
 
Cracker thinks everyone other than us fits his definition of "reasonable."

:eek:

∴ Any time we see a potential abuse, it is tin foil hat because of how reasonable everyone else is and nobody he knows would use every trick in the book to end gun ownership; they only exist in our imagination. Of course, it goes without mention that reasonable people need protection from us, so knowing who "us" are is a reasonable idea.

;) ;)
 
Back
Top