Babies’ lives matter, too

SugarDaddy1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Posts
1,904
The shockwaves from the revelation that the Supreme Court might finally overturn Roe v. Wade have caused many liberals, Democrats, and other left-wingers to go into violent rage across the country.

They have proclaimed that a potential reversal is an attack on women. They have declared it is an abuse of power. They have bemoaned that it is an infringement of rights. They have labeled it nearly every type of grievance possible without ever acknowledging any concern for those that suffer the most from abortion — babies.

Proponents of baby-killing frequently claim the government has no rights over the female body and should not deny a woman's right to choose. But why is a woman's right to choose given precedent over an innocent baby's right to live? Why is the potential for sexual promiscuity prioritized over the respect and sanctity of innocent life? Because, ultimately, that is what the pro-choice movement is about — even if they try to hide such or refuse to admit it.

Using abortion as a method of birth control is an immoral practice. Just as every person has a right to live outside the womb, so do babies inside the womb. It is time to switch the narrative on abortion and prioritize protecting those that are at risk of being killed. Babies' lives matter, and that is something that should never be ignored or forgotten. That is why Justice Samuel Alito is correct in his draft opinion and Roe v. Wade should be overturned.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/babies-lives-matter-too
 
The supreme court does not have a case about babies before it.
 
Yes from the moment the cord is cut before that no not so much
 
This is more than an attack on women and men. It is an abdication of responsibility on the part of the court. By reversing the decision in Roe v Wade, the court has literally pulled the rug out. It allows special interest groups to literally attack the citizens of the US. It allows these groups say, 'we believe in x. Therefore, you should too and we're going to use the law as a bludgeon to make sure you comply with our beliefs.'
 
"Why is the potential for sexual promiscuity prioritized over the respect and sanctity of innocent life? Because, ultimately, that is what the pro-choice movement is about — even if they try to hide such or refuse to admit it."


Why its it so unfathomable to some people that mistakes are made for a variety of reasons. Without rights to abortion no one who is fertile who does not want to have kids should have hetero-sex, ever.

A fifty year old mother with adult children should never have sex with a man.

Casual sex should never happen - birth control is not 100% effective. If a condom is only 95% effective you're rolling the dice every time.


There is nothing that has ever been done to better discourage heterosexuality among young and old and everyone in between.
 
You should create a post about Roe instead of a non existent case about babies.
 
This historical record on antiabortionists and babies is that they are only something to worry about until they are born.
 
"Why is the potential for sexual promiscuity prioritized over the respect and sanctity of innocent life? Because, ultimately, that is what the pro-choice movement is about — even if they try to hide such or refuse to admit it."
Seems exactly the other way. The "pro-lifers" do not care about the life of any fetus, they only want to control sexual behavior and refuse to admit it.
 
Babies do matter so thank sweet baby budda that they are not being attacked like women's healthcare.
 
There are clinical terms for different stages of development in the womb (zygote, embryo, fetus), and there is a more commonly used word that most parents embrace when a pregnancy is determined. The word is baby.

Very few pregnant women refer to the thing they’re carrying as a fetus. Very few moms and dads refer to the subject of the ultrasound images as a fetus. Most of us call those unborn things babies. Even most physicians use the word “baby” when speaking with expectant moms and dads. Some folks, such as President Biden, call them children.

This bothers abortion industry supporters immensely.
 
There are clinical terms for different stages of development in the womb (zygote, embryo, fetus), and there is a more commonly used word that most parents embrace when a pregnancy is determined. The word is baby.

Very few pregnant women refer to the thing they’re carrying as a fetus. Very few moms and dads refer to the subject of the ultrasound images as a fetus. Most of us call those unborn things babies. Even most physicians use the word “baby” when speaking with expectant moms and dads. Some folks, such as President Biden, call them children.

This bothers abortion industry supporters immensely.
I doubt that.
 
babyboomer has no opinion on the topic but is blindly following his dear leader because that's what sheep do.
 
There are clinical terms for different stages of development in the womb (zygote, embryo, fetus), and there is a more commonly used word that most parents embrace when a pregnancy is determined. The word is baby.

Very few pregnant women refer to the thing they’re carrying as a fetus. Very few moms and dads refer to the subject of the ultrasound images as a fetus. Most of us call those unborn things babies. Even most physicians use the word “baby” when speaking with expectant moms and dads. Some folks, such as President Biden, call them children.

This bothers abortion industry supporters immensely.
And the baby doesn't exist until after birth

And that bothers pro-lifers immensely
 
A specialized field of medicine is not an "industry."

Medicine as a whole is.
Guess that’s another word that triggers abortion fans. It’s been described as an industry by some organizations such as business industry research firm IBIS World and health care service providers like Care Net. Happy to go with “market segment” or some other term that describes entities cashing in on the abortion practice.
 
There are clinical terms for different stages of development in the womb (zygote, embryo, fetus), and there is a more commonly used word that most parents embrace when a pregnancy is determined. The word is baby.

Very few pregnant women refer to the thing they’re carrying as a fetus. Very few moms and dads refer to the subject of the ultrasound images as a fetus. Most of us call those unborn things babies. Even most physicians use the word “baby” when speaking with expectant moms and dads. Some folks, such as President Biden, call them children.

This bothers abortion industry supporters immensely.

And the baby doesn't exist until after birth

And that bothers pro-lifers immensely
“Baby” is used during pregnancy almost exclusively in the future tense. They’re going to have a baby, or they will have a baby, always future tense. Likewise, nobody considers themselves parents until birth. A husband will say that he’s going to be a father, right up to the very moment of birth.
 
Guess that’s another word that triggers abortion fans. It’s been described as an industry by some organizations such as business industry research firm IBIS World and health care service providers like Care Net. Happy to go with “market segment” or some other term that describes entities cashing in on the abortion practice.
No doctor goes into that field for the money.
 
Back
Top