Awl Bidness

The meek shall inherit the earth— but not its mineral rights.
-J. Paul Getty


Attendance at this year’s Offshore Technology Conference in Houston was the largest in thirty years reflecting strong global oil prices, a booming domestic shale oil and gas business and rising optimism about foreign exploration. The following observations/commentary are based on meetings with about twenty integrated oil, exploration/production and oilfield service companies:

• Domestic shale exploration continues to boom with focus on such “oily” plays as the TX Eagle Ford, MT/ND Bakken, TX Granite Wash, and CO/WY Niobrara Chalk. Activity would be even stronger but for shortages developing in pressure pumping and proppant capacity. Accordingly, operating costs are rising but not as rapidly as prices for both crude oil and natural gas liquids. Prime beneficiary; Halliburton.

• Foreign shale development will be the next major focus. Although the Paris Basin development has been halted by local environmental opposition, majors and independents are moving quickly to accumulate prospective acreage in North Africa, South Africa, Poland/Hungary, Argentina, Australia and China. We will see a major surge in directional drilling and fracturing business directed to foreign shales as soon as next year. Prime beneficiaries; Halliburton and Schlumberger.

• International service margins remain depressed as companies work-off average three year contracts signed during 2008-2009, a time of low activity and excess capacity. As new contracts are signed in 2012-2013, assuming activity is as strong as currently, margins will rise significantly. Prime beneficiaries; Halliburton, Schlumberger and Baker Hughes.

• Deep offshore drilling outlook improving. Brazil continues to debate whether Petrobras should either attempt to construct 28 new drillships domestically, in yet-to-be built shipyards, or tender for available capacity in the global fleet. Our guess has them seeking about eight rigs in the near future with possible additional requirements booked in 2012. The reasoning is that offshore discoveries need to be delineated as quickly as possible in order to plan costly development projects. This cannot be accomplished effectively by waiting an entire three years for locally built vessels to be delivered versus a lower cost and immediate alternative – the underutilized and available global fleet. Perhaps even more significant are signs that the ultra-deep pre-salt deposits offshore Angola (that were formed simultaneously with Brazil’s Campos Basin before the continents separated) now appears to be every bit as attractive as Brazil’s mammoth reserves. As a result, over six major IOCs are planning exploratory programs in partnership with Sonangol as early as late this year and into 2012. Were there to be discoveries, the news would be very positive for the deep offshore drillers (Noble, Transocean, ENSCO, Seadrill) and the aforementioned major service companies.

• Arctic drilling moving forward. Royal Dutch Shell expects to receive permission soon to initiate drilling on prospective acreage in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas offshore Alaska. While vigorous opposition continues from environmental lobbies, the possible existence of 25B bbls of oil reserves makes this a politically viable answer for the Obama Administration under pressure to find domestic alternatives to declining production in the lower 48 states. If regulatory approval is received, an initial wildcat well could be spudded before year end. Primary beneficiary; Noble Corp.

• Massive natural gas discovery offshore Israel. The Tamar and Leviathan fields are located 60 miles offshore in 5,000 feet of water. With over 16 TCF of reserves to date, Noble Energy has made the largest such discoveries in over a decade. They will make Israel natural gas self-sufficient, and also supply a prospective LNG facility in Cyprus for export to European markets. Prime beneficiaries; Noble Energy, KBR, and offshore drillers.

• Questionable Saudi Arabia reserves. For over three decades, Saudi Aramco has used proven reserves of about 265B bbls despite producing over 85B bbls during that time frame. I have questioned the accuracy of this number since the 1980s and now find additional evidence that Saudi reserves may be significantly overstated. Recent comments by two of their largest service companies, and their decision to develop the huge, ultra-low quality Manifa field, all suggest that natural decline rates in legacy oil fields are accelerating, making it increasingly difficult to maintain 9MM bpd much less reach their promised 12MM bpd capacity. Prime beneficiaries; all international service companies. Primary implication; eventual higher global oil prices.

• Markets for domestic shale gas. As new discoveries in the PA Marcellus and TX Eagle Ford add to surplus capacity from the TX Barnett, AR Fayetteville and LA Haynesville shales, new markets are developing rapidly. The first will be to replace coal as fuel for eastern power plants, a market that could add 5B cfd (cubic feet per day) by 2020 to current 64B cfd production. Companies are now also studying whether to convert three LNG regasification facilities (Cove Point MD, Cheniere LA and Freeport TX) to liquefaction plants and export (rather than import) LNG to world markets. Potential beneficiaries; E&Ps with large N/G reserves, pipelines, and engineering/construction industry.

• New technologies introduced at OTC. One of the most interesting was Halliburton’s new Clean Wave Water Treatment Service that won the new technology award. Based on electrocoagulation, it removes suspended solids, oil, other insolubles and bacteria from produced water after a well has been fractured. The water is then totally reusable for further drilling and completions while greatly reducing the need to send waste water to treatment plants or to use additional fresh water in the drilling/completion process. This is a positive response to many environmental opponents of gas shale drilling and, upon becoming widely available, should greatly reduce incidents of stream pollution.
 
Last edited:
http://www.petrobras.com.br/ri/Download.aspx?id=12137



Statement by the CEO
Petroleo do Brasil, S.A.
José Sergio Gabrielli de Azevedo


Dear shareholders and investors,

We are pleased to announce our results for the first quarter of 2011, which was marked by continuing challenges and important operational and corporate achievements, leading to record net income of R$10,985 million.

Our operating performance improved substantially, particularly in the Exploration and Production segment. At the beginning of 2011, we announced that our proven oil and gas reserves had reached 15.986 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe) in 2010, in accordance to SPE, 7.5% more than the previous year. This means that, for every boe extracted in 2010, we added 2.29, corresponding to a reserve replacement ratio of 229%. The reserve/production ratio (R/P) closed 2010 at 18.4 years, an exceptionally comfortable figure for our industry.

We continue to make progress in our development of the Santo pre-salt frontier, approving the chartering of two new FPSO platforms (oil and gas floating production, storage and offloading units) for the pilot projects in the Guará-Norte region and the Cernambi field.

Continuing with our strategy of ensuring key equipment for the development of our operations, we approved the construction of the first lot of seven drilling rigs to be built in Brazil. The rigs will be chartered from Sete Brasil S.A., which will be responsible for the construction contract with Estaleiro Atlântico Sul (EAS), in Pernambuco. This represents the first stage of a project involving up to 28 rigs, the first of which is scheduled for start-up by 2015. It is worth highlighting that the contracting of these rigs is fully compatible with a policy of local construction at internationally competitive costs.

Continuing with our exploration program, we announced several new and important discoveries, including the area known informally as Carioca Nordeste, where preliminary analyses indicate an accumulation of oil with an API gravity of 26° in a high-quality 200 meter reservoir, and the Macunaíma area, where the Company identified an oil accumulation also with an API gravity of 26° in the Santos Basin pre-salt reservoirs.

We began extended well tests (EWTs) in the Tracajá reservoir in the Marlim Leste field, and the Brava region of the Marlim field, both of which located in the pre-salt area of the Campos Basin, the latter being connected to the P-27 platform, avoiding the need for an additional production unit. The EWTs will provide us with more data on the characteristics of the reservoirs, thus helping to ensure the best means of developing production.

We entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and a General Technological Cooperation Agreement with the Chinese companies, Sinochem Corporation and Sinopec, respectively. These strategic alliances will ensure cooperation between the companies’ activities in Brazil and abroad in areas of common interest in the oil and gas industry...



http://petrobras.com.br/en/energy-and-technology/technology-and-research/operations-in-the-pre-salt/

http://petrobras.com.br/en/about-us/profile/activities/oil-and-gas-exploration-and-production/

http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/tupi/tupi1.html

http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/tupi/

 
Last edited:
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=au5ylIStCApc


Brazil Cuts Estimate for ‘Gigantic’ Oil Field After Drilling
By Peter Millard

May 26 (Bloomberg) -- Brazil’s oil regulator reduced its estimate for the Libra field after conducting a drilling program at the site, director Magda Chambriard said.

The agency, known as the ANP, said the field likely holds 5 billion barrels and may contain as few as 4.5 billion barrels, Chambriard said today at the Latin Oil Week conference in Rio de Janeiro. That’s down from a previous estimate of as many as 15 billion barrels.

The agency said in October that the field may hold “gigantic” reserves almost twice as large as those of Tupi, which has since been renamed Lula and was the biggest discovery in the Americas in the past three decades. Brazil is counting on large discoveries in the so-called pre-salt region offshore to fund social programs aimed at reducing poverty in South America’s largest economy.

“Libra, before drilling a well, was statistically calculated as an opportunity of 3.7 to 15 billion barrels,” Chambriard told reporters. “We drilled, we reduced uncertainty, and now the most probable volume is 5 billion barrels. It could be 4.5 billion, it could be 6 billion.”

The regulator is waiting for lawmakers to approve new legislation on oil royalties before auctioning Libra and other exploration areas in the pre-salt region in deep waters of the Atlantic Ocean, Chambriard said. The government’s first auction will include the Libra field, she said.

Biggest Share Sale
State-controlled Petroleo Brasileiro SA will operate all new concessions in the pre-salt under new regulations. The company raised about $70 billion in September in the world’s biggest share sale ever as it seeks cash to fund exploration.

Brazil plans to auction 174 oil exploration areas on land and off the coast of northern and northeastern Brazil in the third quarter of this year.

“We’re expecting all the large companies,” Chambriard said about possible bidders for the blocks. “We’re including larger exploration blocks at the request of the companies.”

The exploration licenses to be awarded in so-called Round 11 will be bigger than in previous auctions because there hasn’t been much exploration in the region, she said.



http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=au5ylIStCApc
 

That's 868 Tcf, folks— second only to Qatar's North Field with an estimated 900-1,000 Tcf of gas.



_______________________

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busin...-policy-a-challenge-for-investors/437813.html


[ my highlight ]
Turkmen Gas Policy a Challenge for Investors
31 May 2011
The Associated Press
AVAZA, Turkmenistan — When news emerged five years ago that Turkmenistan had discovered one of the world's largest natural gas fields, international investors sniffed an opportunity.

But despite exhaustive efforts and flattery heaped on the former Soviet nation's authoritarian leader, global energy companies look no closer to getting a piece of it.

Representatives from all energy majors flocked to a gas conference ending Saturday at this half-completed resort town on the Caspian Sea to pay compliments to top officials and remind the government that they remain as eager as ever to invest.

Turkmenistan, a thinly populated nation of 5 million people, estimates that it is sitting on top of 24.6 trillion cubic meters of gas — enough to supply the European Union for half a century at current consumption levels.

The biggest jewel is the South Yolotan field, which the energy auditing company Gaffney, Cline & Associates told the conference appears to be the second-biggest on the planet. The auditors didn't give figures, but previous estimates have placed South Yolotan's gas at about 14 trillion cubic meters — about 7 percent of the known reserves worldwide.

Turkmen President Gurbanguli Berdymukhammedov says his country can go it alone on South Yolotan and other onshore sites, and has instead invited investors to consider exploring for oil and gas in less profitable sites beneath the Caspian Sea. But foreign businessmen say this policy is short-sighted.

Berdymukhammedov, whose address to the conference was delivered in his stead by a senior gas official, limited himself to a vague appeal for "major amounts of investment from international companies."

Peter Holding, a senior manager at the auditors Gaffney, Cline & Associates, suggested that South Yolotan is so vast it could provide rich pickings for multiple companies.

"The South Yolotan field is so big that it can sustain several developments in parallel," he said.

So far, substantial financing for the field has been provided by $8.1 billion in loans from China, which last year began receiving gas from Turkmenistan. The pipeline is expected to reach full capacity of 40 billion cubic meters a year in 2015.

State-owned China National Petroleum is the only foreign company to have been able to take a stake in the onshore gas exploration market after winning the right in 2007 to develop the Bagtyyarlyk deposit, where reserves are estimated at about 1.3 trillion cubic meters.

If Turkmenistan appears relatively complacent about the need for foreign engagement in development, it is acting with more urgency when it comes pushing for the addition of new pipelines.

A more tantalizing destination for Turkmen gas is Europe, an option that would require a pipeline to be built across the Caspian seabed to Azerbaijan. This route, which has been actively obstructed by fellow Caspian nation Russia, would serve to partly fill up the European Union-backed Nabucco pipeline that would run from Turkey through Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and end in Austria.

Berdymukhammedov has expressed his ambition for Turkmenistan to one day provide up to 40 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Europe. In the short term, even the more modest and realistic figure of 10 billion cubic meters could still prove lucrative and generate $3 billion in revenue annually for Turkmenistan, said Wolfgang Peters, a top official in the Nabucco partner RWE's supply division.

But for any of that to happen, industry insiders say all the countries along the possible export path will need to take bold steps before the clock runs down on Europe's access to Turkmenistan's energy bonanza.

"The window of opportunity for Turkmen gas has never been as open as now, but we need commitments and decisions soon," said Michael-Dieter Ulbrich, head of the pipeline projects department at OMV, which also has a stake in the planned Nabucco route.
 
Last edited:
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=aisnJEICKYGo


Russia, Qatar Face Pressure to Scrap Gas-to-Oil Price Link
By Ben Farey

June 1 (Bloomberg) -- Russia and Qatar are under growing pressure from Europe’s biggest utilities to scrap a 40-year-old system that links natural-gas prices to oil after Brent crude’s 23 percent surge this year.

As delegates from countries that hold two-thirds of the world’s reserves gather in Cairo tomorrow for a one-day meeting of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum, customers from France’s GDF Suez SA to EON AG of Germany are urging producers to link prices to spot markets instead of insisting on long-term contracts that shadow the fluctuations of oil. Contract prices will rise about 15 percent in the next quarter alone, according to Wood Mackenzie Ltd., an Edinburgh-based energy consultant.

“The European contract price of gas is going up,” said Thierry Bros, a senior analyst at Societe Generale SA in Paris. “Utilities won’t sign new oil-linked contracts.”

Europe’s dependency on gas is rising as the region seeks to minimize carbon emissions and nations such as Germany turn away from nuclear power after Japan’s radiation crisis. About two- thirds of continental Europe’s gas is priced under long-term contracts that lag movements in Brent by about six months, making it more expensive than spot markets, where prices more closely reflect supply and demand.

Spot Prices
The average price for contract gas from Russia and Norway, the region’s biggest suppliers, will rise to $12.60 a million British thermal units next quarter and $13.15 in the fourth, from $10.95 currently, according to Wood Mackenzie. Spot prices of U.K. gas for third-quarter delivery on London’s ICE Futures Europe exchange were 59.40 pence a therm, or $9.76 a million Btu today. Gas for delivery next month is trading at 58.45 pence on ICE, down 4.3 percent this year.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition announced plans on May 30 for the country to exit atomic energy by 2022, after the March 11 earthquake in Japan sparked the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. Gas produces about half the carbon dioxide of coal in power generation, making it a more attractive option to replace the lost capacity as the region seeks to curb emissions.

Europe “cannot afford” a system with two prices for gas and suppliers must design a framework that suits the European gas industry for the next decade or more, said Jean-Francois Cirelli, vice chairman of GDF Suez, the world’s biggest utility.

“Either they merge or something should happen, because it is not possible to be supplied with expensive gas and cheap gas in the long term,” he told reporters in Berlin on May 19.

Renegotiating Contracts
EON, Germany’s biggest utility, said its global gas unit’s adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization fell 83 percent in the first quarter and cited “considerable margin pressure” in its wholesale business.

The Dusseldorf-based company has already revised about a quarter of its long-term gas purchases and “renegotiations of the other contracts are moving in the right direction,” EON Chief Financial Officer Marcus Schenck told analysts on a conference call on May 11. RWE AG, Germany’s second-largest utility, said in April it expects results in 2012 or 2013 from arbitration over gas contracts.

The Gas Forum, which brings together some of the world’s biggest exporters in the same way OPEC groups oil producers, can’t control global production or prices for the next five or 10 years because most supply contracts are long-term, Secretary- General Leonid Bokhanovsky said in December.

‘Splinter Group’
The forum’s 11 members are Algeria, Bolivia, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Russia, Trinidad & Tobago and Venezuela. Kazakhstan, the Netherlands and Norway have observer status. Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei may join as members, and the group may talk with Australia, Turkmenistan and Canada about becoming observers, Bokhanovsky said.

If the traditional practice of selling gas under long-term contracts linked to oil collapses, it’s “entirely possible” that some GECF members may seek to coordinate their production to maximize prices, or concentrate on sales to Asia rather than Europe, said Jonathan Stern, director of gas research for the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

“A splinter group of Russia, Qatar and Algeria, possibly joined by Egypt and Nigeria, could emerge,” he said in a telephone interview last week.

Japan and South Korea are the world’s two biggest buyers of LNG, mostly under long-term contracts tied to crude. China has imported LNG since 2006 and operates three liquefied-gas terminals, with an additional 16 planned or under construction.

Gazprom Says Never
Spot markets don’t have enough trading to ensure adequate supply, Alexander Medvedev, deputy chief executive officer of Russia’s OAO Gazprom, the world’s biggest producer, said May 13.

“There has never been any transition to spot-priced market structure, and never will be, because spot market liquidity is insufficient,” Medvedev said in Slovakia’s capital, Bratislava. As soon as economies began to recover from the financial crisis, “it became clear that the market will work as before.”

Qatar’s Energy Minister Mohammed Saleh al Sada struck a more conciliatory tone, saying that the gap between spot prices and long-term contracts is narrowing.

“That difference is closing down gradually except in the U.S., which is kind of a captive market, well below the world average,” al Sada said in an interview in Doha late yesterday.

Russia, Qatar and Iran hold a combined 53 percent of global gas reserves, according to data from BP Plc. The three nations plan to work together to develop deposits in Iran, according to Morten Frisch, an independent liquefied-natural-gas consultant in East Horsley, England. While Iran exports the fuel by pipeline, international sanctions have prevented it from becoming an exporter of LNG.

Khelil’s Gambit
Chakib Khelil, Algeria’s former energy minister, tried unsuccessfully last year to get GECF members to consider a coordinated output reduction to halt a decline in spot prices triggered by a supply glut. Algeria is Africa’s largest gas exporter and the third-largest supplier of the fuel to Europe.

Rising production of shale gas in North America has changed the supply outlook by curtailing the power of national oil companies and state monopolies, said Alan Riley, a law professor at City University in London.

As an organization, the GECF has yet to find its role, Stern said. That differs from OPEC, which has a policy of setting production quotas.

Cartel or Research Body
“They are completely uninterested in the suggestion they may be a cartel of any sort,” Stern said. The forum sees itself as a research body while politicians and the media are more interested in its potential to control global gas supplies, as OPEC does with crude, he said.

Such a move might have benefits for gas markets because OPEC was able to boost production during emergencies including the current crisis in Libya, said Karen Sund, the founder of Sund Energy AS, a consulting company based in Oslo.

“It’s been useful to have OPEC,” she said. “If people want steady gas prices and at the same time volatile consumption, someone needs to be the elastic band.”

Delegates from GECF member states, including Libya, Iran and Russia, are arriving in Cairo ahead of the meeting. A press conference will be held after the conclusion of the talks tomorrow at about 2 p.m. Cairo time.
 
Last edited:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-well-at-3-1-billion-barrel-franco-field.html


Petrobras Starts Drilling at $42.5 Billion Offshore Fields
By Peter Millard - May 23, 2011 1:57 PM ET


Petroleo Brasileiro SA (PETR4), the world’s largest oil producer in waters deeper than 1,000 feet, started drilling a well at its Franco field as it begins developing reserves it bought from Brazil’s government for $42.5 billion.

Petrobras, as Brazil’s state-run producer is known, is drilling in 1,863 meters (6,112 feet) of water at Franco, which may hold 3.1 billion barrels of crude, the national oil regulator said on its website. The company is using a rig hired from Oslo-based Sevan Marine ASA (SEVAN) to drill the well.

Petrobras aims to more than double proven reserves to as many as 35 billion barrels in the next four years as it develops deepwater discoveries including Franco and the nearby Lula field, which may have 6.5 billion barrels of oil. Franco and Lula are located in Brazil’s Santos Basin, home to the Americas’ biggest discoveries in the more than three decades.

Petrobras is adjusting its five-year investment plan to include Franco and six other fields where it bought the rights to produce 5 billion barrels last September as part of a $70 billion share sale, the largest in history. Petrobras plans to invest $8 billion to $10 billion in the next five years to explore and develop the areas, Chief Financial Officer Almir Barbassa said in a Jan. 14 interview.
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-08/exxon-mobil-reports-3-discoveries-in-gulf-of-mexico.html


Exxon Finds 700 Million-Barrel Oil Field in Deep-Water Gulf
By Joe Carroll - Jun 8, 2011 11:31 AM ET

Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) announced it found the equivalent of 700 million barrels of oil beneath the Gulf of Mexico, the biggest discovery in the region in 12 years.

The estimated size of the Hadrian field may increase as drilling continues, Exxon said in a statement today. The discovery is about 250 miles (400 kilometers) southwest of New Orleans in water about 7,000 feet (2,000 meters) deep, Irving, Texas-based Exxon said.

Exploratory drilling began in 2009 at the prospect and was halted last year after a record oil spill from BP Plc’s Macondo well prompted a U.S. moratorium on deep-water exploration. Drilling resumed on March 26 after the government implemented new safety rules. This was the company’s first deep-water Gulf exploration well since the moratorium was lifted, Exxon said.

Exxon’s Hadrian discovery is the biggest in the Gulf since Thunder Horse in 1999, Mohammad Rahman, a senior analyst at Wood Mackenzie Ltd. in Houston, said today in a telephone interview. Thunder Horse has been estimated to hold 1 billion barrels.

“This is a very, very significant find,” Rahman said. “When a supermajor like Exxon Mobil throws a number like 700 million at you, it indicates they are very confident in what they’ve got here.”

The Gulf accounted for 29 percent of U.S. crude production in 2009, according to the Energy Information Administration...

...Exxon Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson in March announced plans to spend $100 million a day for the next half decade to expand the search for oil and natural-gas in geologic formations previously regarded as impenetrable. The company’s exploration prospects extend from Greenland to Madagascar to Vietnam.

The field is about 85 percent oil, based on data from three wells, the company said. Eni SpA (ENI) and Petroleo Brasileiro SA (PETR4) also hold stakes in the prospect, according to the release.

Exxon is leasing A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S’s Maersk Developer rig to drill into Hadrian. The 2-year-old vessel is equipped to drill as deep as 40,000 feet beneath the sea surface, according to RigZone, a research firm that tracks the offshore drilling industry.


Hadrian
 
Last edited:

Note:
GTL=(Natural) Gas-To-Liquid (Fuel)
LNG=Liquified Natural Gas
CNG=Compressed Natural Gas



By Dale R. McIntyre, Ph.D.

I spent four years of my life working on a gas-to-liquids project. It was fascinating work, techically, and it taught me the promise and the problems of this intriguing technology.

Diesel fuel from a gas-to-liquids (GTL) process is much cleaner than conventional diesel fuel derived from crude oil. When you run it through a diesel engine, the exhaust smells like candle wax. Lovely.

There are a two or three problems with diesel from GTL which need to be acknowledged.

Firstly, it has a relatively high pour point compared to conventional diesel fuel. Therefore it is not well suited as a stand-alone motor fuel since it tends to wax up and clog fuel lines and injectors at low temperatures. For this reason, it is not a true substitute for conventional diesel fuel. Rather, GTL diesel is better suited as a "blend stock", for mixing with diesel fuel derived from petroleum. As such it could extend the world's supplies of diesel,bringing down prices, which would certainly be no bad thing.

Secondly, the plants to make GTL diesel are quite expensive compared to a conventional crude oil refinery. The Pearl GTL plant in Qatar is a case in point. That plant turned out to be way behind schedule and way over budget by the time it was finally built and operational. Andy, did you by any chance ask your contacts at Shell how much the Pearl GTL plant cost compared to a bog-standard oil refinery, in terms of capital cost per barrel of oil equivalent capacity? My sources tell me that Pearl cost $20 billion dollars, which is about ten times what an ordinary oil refinery of that capacity would cost to build.

Thirdly, for those who care about such things, diesel from GTL is quite a CO2-intensive process, far more so than the production of conventional diesel fuel from crude oil. I myself have stated many times, on Dot Earth, that I think the CO2 issue has been grossly exaggerated. But if anyone believes that CO2 is indeed the evil actor that the IPCC makes it out to be, then diesel from GTL is not going to look good.

The great competitor for GTL is LNG. Translated from the acronym, that is liquified natural gas.

Liquifiing natural gas is a much cheaper way to commercialize stranded natural gas (gas produced far from a market) than GTL since the LNG plants are mature technology which are much cheaper to build. Expect to see more and more LNG in the near to medium term future.

LNG is already practical as an alternative to diesel fuel for long-haul trucks.

On an energy equivalent basis, LNG costs about $1.40 per gallon of gasoline equivalent compared to abour $4 per gallon of gasoline equivalent for diesel fuel.

Sadly, a lack of fueling stations is holding back this promising clean fuel from fulfilling its potential as an alternative transportation fuel to gasoline and diesel derived from crude oil...

http://community.nytimes.com/commen...-gas-with-planet-in-mind/?permid=28#comment28

...Firstly, you ask how can the 10X expense of a GTL plant be justified? In the case of the Pearl GTL plant in Qatar, according to my industry informants, the original estimated price was about $10 Billion. However, delays in construction, congestion in the Ras Laffan industrial district of Qatar, and labor cost inflation steadily inflated the price. Then a protracted plant commissioning sequence, when was not (so I hear) at all straight-forward, increased the price further towards the $20 billion mark.

Given the present spread in price between their natural gas feedstock (very cheap) and their synthetic diesel fuel product (very pricey), the Pearl GTL plant may very well turn a handsome profit for its corporate owner, Shell Oil, once its capital costs are defrayed.

My point was that if you want to play in the GTL game, you need to be able to ante up tens of billions of dollars. This limits the playing field to the four or five very largest international oil companies, or to the monopolistic national oil companies (NOC's) such as the Saudi's or Qataris.

You ask what is the cost per gallon over the lifetime of the plant. GTL plants (and conventional oil refineries) are normally not rated in that fashion. Rather, their processes are compared based on the cost per barrel of rated daily capacity. A $20 billion plant making 120,000 barrels per day, for example, would be rated as a $167,000 per barrel plant. This is a very high sticker price for a hydrocarbon production plant.

You ask, is GTL diesel more CO2 intensive than regular diesel from crude oil? The answer is yes.

The GTL process consists of three very energy-intensive processes; 1) steam methane reforming to make synthesis gas ("syn-gas"), 2) Fischer-Tropsch conversion of the syn-gas to a waxy intermediate, and 3) hydrogenation of the waxy intermediate with hot high pressure hydrogen to generate synthetic diesel fuel. All of three of these processes are are very energy-intensive compared to conventional distillation to separate the diesel fuel fraction from the mixture of hydrocarbons which is crude oil.

Because of its energy intensity, the estimates I have seen suggest that making GTL diesel results in approximately twice the CO2 emissions as the distillation of conventional diesel from crude oil.

Combustion of GTL diesel in a diesel engine is, I believe, very slightly more efficient than that of conventional diesel because of the high cetane number of the GTL diesel. However, the net result is still that GTL diesel is significantly more CO2 intensive than conventional diesel.

Which, I believe, is totally irrelevant. However, I am well aware that others are of a different opinion on this matter.

You ask if, once converted to LNG, a diesel truck would not burn any other fuel. I understand that conversion of a diesel vehicle to LNG requires specialized tuning and the installation of a sizable pressurized fuel tank, rated to hold the liquifaction pressure of natural gas and insulated to maintain cryogenic temperatures. There are also, I believe, modifications required to the lubrication system since LNG does not have the lubricity of diesel fuel. These modifications are complex enough and specialized enough that I do not believe it would be practical to have another, separate fuel storage system on board for conventional diesel fuel. So I am under the impression that the answer to your question is yes; once converted, an LNG diesel vehicle would probably need to run exclusively on LNG unless re-converted.

Your final question is, how does this compare to CNG? CNG is simpler in that a super-insulated cryogenic fuel tank is not required, and the heat exchangers necessary to re-gasify LNG before injection are also not necessary. However, the energy density of CNG is very poor unless the pressures of the CNG tank are extremely high. The higher the pressure, the higher the risk of rupture in the event of a collision. By contrast, LNG is 661 times more dense than its parent natural gas at standard temperature and pressure.

The density of LNG is good enough to make it practical as a vehicle transportation fuel. However, it should be remembered that LNG has only 2/3rds of the volumetric energy density of conventional diesel fuel. Therefore the LNG tanks (and their insulation) will occupy a significantly larger volume in the vehicle than comparable diesel fuel tanks if range is not to be sacrificed.


http://community.nytimes.com/commen...-gas-with-planet-in-mind/?permid=41#comment41
 
Last edited:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...gas-pact-may-be-clouded-by-price-quarrel.html


Price Quarrel May Cloud Russia-China Gas Pact
By Lyubov Pronina and Henry Meyer - Jun 15, 2011

A Russian-Chinese natural-gas accord set to be signed by Dmitry Medvedev and Hu Jintao may be clouded by negotiations over how much China needs to pay the world’s largest energy exporter for the fuel.

China will probably sign a gas-supply agreement with Russia during a four-day visit by Hu, who will participate in the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum after meetings in Moscow today, Assistant Foreign Minister Cheng Guoping said.

Russia is targeting foreign gas sales beyond its existing European markets and China is looking to diversify its providers. During price negotiations, Russia may be counting on Japan’s nuclear disaster boosting demand for fossil fuels, while China may use supply options across central Asia as leverage.

“It’s inevitable that Russia will become the most important supplier of natural resources into China,” Roland Nash, chief investment strategist at Verno Capital, a Moscow hedge fund that manages about $140 million, said by e-mail. “The problem is both countries believe they hold the better bargaining position.”

Hu will join executives including Deutsche Bank AG Chief Executive Officer Josef Ackerman, Citigroup Inc. CEO Vikram Pandit and BP Plc CEO Robert Dudley at the St. Petersburg forum.

Russia is pursuing energy sales to Asian countries, including Japan. The government in Moscow pledged to supply China with all the natural gas it needs, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said during President Dmitry Medvedev’s visit to Beijing in September.

China, Russia’s biggest trading partner with total volume jumping 50 percent to $59 billion last year, wants to triple its gas consumption by 2020 to keep pace with its economy, which expanded an annual 9.7 percent in the first quarter.

‘No-Brainer’
“This seems like a no-brainer,” Peter Zeihan, an analyst from Austin, Texas-based intelligence-consulting group Stratfor, said in a June 9 research note. “Russia is the largest exporter of raw commodities in the world. China is the largest importer.”

Differences over pricing between OAO Gazprom and China National Petroleum Corp., the parent of PetroChina Co., have delayed plans to build the pipelines for more than a decade.

As countries such as Germany cool toward nuclear power after the Fukushima plant disaster, Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller has sought prices equivalent to those his company receives in Europe, where it accounts for a quarter of supplies.

China has pushed for lower rates similar to those charged on its domestic energy market after obtaining piped supplies from Turkmenistan and imports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, from countries including Yemen and Australia. It’s also planning to develop its own shale gas.

‘Less Incentive’
“Gazprom is looking at potentially higher demand from Germany and Japan,” Alex Brideau, an analyst at political consultancy Eurasia Group, said in an e-mailed note June 15. “From the Chinese viewpoint, increased domestic production, piped gas from Central Asian producers and more LNG availability give CNPC more options and less incentive to agree.”

Gazprom plans to provide Siberian gas through two pipelines from as early as 2015, with total annual deliveries to reach 68 billion cubic meters, more than 60 percent of China’s 2010 consumption, according to BP Plc’s Statistical Review of World Energy.

The gas deal would follow Russia’s 2009 agreement to supply China with crude oil for 20 years in return for $25 billion of loans to state energy companies.

“I don’t think we will manage to finally agree on the price,” said Sergei Sanakoyev, head of the Russian-Chinese Center of Trade and Economic Cooperation in Moscow. “Price aside, we can sign a political agreement that a pipe will be constructed.”

Industry Cooperation
In addition to energy cooperation, Chinese companies from the construction, machine-building and railways industries will join Hu in St. Petersburg after an April visit by Medvedev to China yielded “dozens” of cross-border deals, Sanakoyev said.

Russia wants to use the St. Petersburg forum to attract foreign investment and boost growth closer to the pace of India and China. Foreign direct investment totaled $3.9 billion in the first quarter, compared with $60 billion-$70 billion before the global economic crisis, while gross domestic product expanded 4.1 percent.

Russia, which remains hopeful of joining the World Trade Organization this year wants to lure foreign capital with a $10 billion fund to co-finance international investment and has targeted innovative industries to wean the economy off its dependence on energy exports.

Medvedev and Hu will discuss joint investment and cooperation in industries including aerospace and defense, the Russian president’s chief foreign policy aide Sergei Prikhodko told reporters in Moscow last week.

Russia’s ‘Silicon Valley’
Russia is also keen to lure Chinese partners to Skolkovo, the Moscow suburb Medvedev has championed as the country’s “Silicon Valley” for developing new technologies.

Hu’s speech tomorrow will likely be the highlight in St. Petersburg, underlining the growing influence of the BRIC nations at an event that will once again feature the heads of international energy companies including BP, Total SA and Statoil ASA.

“Interest toward China is on the rise and the forum is becoming a more authoritative platform,” Prikhodko said.
 

...the crack spread, a measure of the difference between the cost of crude oil and the price of products derived from it, exceeded $35 a barrel, the widest in at least 25 years...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ing-marketing-arm-as-mulva-set-to-retire.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/chart?h=200&w=280&range=1y&type=gp_line&cfg=BQuoteComp_10.xml&ticks=CRK321M1%3AIND&img=png

Code:
$101.46	Nymex Crude Future ($/bbl.)					
$2.42	Nymex Crude Future ($/gal.)        = $3.65 @ Retail ($/gal.)	
$3.17	Nymex Heating Oil ($/gal.)					
$133.07	Nymex Heating Oil ($/bbl.)					
$3.00	Nymex RBOB Gasoline Future ($/gal.) = $3.63 @ Retail ($/gal.)	
$125.92	Nymex RBOB Gasoline Future ($/bbl.)					
						
    [B][COLOR="Blue"][SIZE="3"] Thus, 3-2-1 Crack Spread:						
	$26.84[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]


Crack spreads are calculated as follows, Example: based on a 321 CL:HU:HO crack spread: (((XBA*2*.42)+(HOA*1*.42))-(CLA*3)))/3

Please note that all contracts follow the crude contract, so if the front month for CLA is October, the other components of the calulation should be based on October contracts as well. The HU contacts are being replaced with XB contracts starting from Feb 07. All calculations from Feb 07 on contain XB contract not HU. On CRKS page 2, the 12-month 3:2:1 crack strips are an arithmetic average of twelve cracks divided by 12. And, the other crack strips are averages of their respective 12-month strip ratios.

Note: these are Bloomberg calculated spreads which are to be used for price indication purposes only.


http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=CRK321M1:IND
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=CRK321M1:IND


Crack Spread
Crack Spreads
CrackSpread
CrackSpreads
 
Last edited:
http://blogs.forbes.com/afontevecch...ery-day-ipads-every-2-years/?partner=yahootix


Petrobras CFO On Becoming Bigger Than Exxon And Apple
By AGUSTINO FONTEVECCHIA


Despite having made the most important oil field discoveries in the last ten years, Petrobras’ stock price has languished. The company recently released their five year business plan where they pledge to divest low-growth assets and double up on exploration and production (E&P) investments, particularly in deepwater projects, Petrobras CFO Almir Barbassa told Forbes. Asked whether Petrobras could outstrip Exxon Mobil and beat Apple to become the world’s largest company, Barbassa said “I buy oil every day; iPads, you buy every couple of years.”

Petrobras released its new five year business plan, with $225 billion in new investments, 57% of which have been earmarked for E&P. While the company defends its integrated model, as others like ConocoPhillips move to spin-off their lower margin downstream businesses, CFO Barbassa notes “this is the new frontier, where the growth opportunities are.” (Read ConocoPhillips Beats Estimates And Reiterates Intention To Spin-Off Donwstream Operation).

Barbassa uses as an example a well in the Lula field, formerly known as the Tupi pre-salt field. “Petrobras’ most productive well, it produces about 36,000 barrels per day,” he said, noting that it’s one of the first to begin production, along with another thirty which have been drilled, surveyed, and will be prepared in coming years.

Latin America’s largest company, Petrobras plans to take its production from 2.77 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed) to 4 million in 2015 (Exxon Mobil’s current production rate) and then to 6.4 by 2020. Previously, Barbassa had said that they expected to be the largest oil company in the world by 2020, now, he ups the ante. “Our results will speak for themselves, the opportunities we have are massive,” he said, adding that he thinks they can beat Steve Jobs’ Apple to the top spot on the market cap list in coming years. (Read Petrobras CFO: We’ll Be Bigger Than Exxon By 2020).

To grow, though, Petrobras must balance many priorities. A state-backed company (the Brazilian government is their largest shareholder), Petrobras is focused on supplying the local market, but also helping the economy grow and add jobs. That is why Petrobras insists on the integrated model.

“Brazil is very far from its trading partners, Europe, China, even from the U.S.; exporting crude oil results in a net loss of $28 per barrel,” explained Barbassa. “Our market is here, demand is growing, the economy is growing,” he said, noting that lower transportation costs and running their own operations make the economics much more attractive. (Read A Soft Landing For Brazil As Output Slows And Growth Centers On Middle Class).

The company is also shedding low-margin assets to concentrate on the big stuff, deepwater. Petrobras is looking to generate $13.6 billion from divestitures in the next two years. Assets in Ecuador and Bolivia have become less profitable given “resource nationalism” in those countries, while Petrobras’ Argentina operation has seen its margins squeezed by price controls, making them viable candidates, Reuters speculates. “We are freeing up capital to allocate it more efficiently,” Barbassa said.

Growth has been elusive in capital markets, though, where shares in Petrobras have been in limbo ever since it placed $67 billion-worth of shares in the private market, diluting the stock and taking the government’s participation rate to 48%. Barbassa recognizes that dilution played a role, but notes that it helped naturally correct the company’s exorbitant stock price after it grew on average “530% to 540% in dollar terms from ’05 to ’08.” While he thinks investors’ growth projections are too low (“they estimate sub-10% growth”), Barbassa expects results to speak for themselves, and reassures markets, “there won’t be any more share offerings, we are done.” (Read Brazilian Equity Market Correction Is ‘Healthy,’ IPO Expert Says).

Petrobras hit an all-time high above $70 back in May 2008, only to fall along with the rest of the world. At the time of writing, the stock traded at $33.95, having broken to the upside past its 50-day moving average as it worked its way toward the 200-day moving average. Bullish, Barbassa tells investors to bet on Brazil and on Petrobras, to look long term. Even though their stock has lagged, Barbassa is confident, “just remember, we have made the largest oil discoveries in ten years, and those reserves will become assets in Petrobras’ balance sheet,” he said


more...

http://blogs.forbes.com/afontevecch...ery-day-ipads-every-2-years/?partner=yahootix
 
http://en.rian.ru/business/20110801/165497114.html


Gazprom Neft takes 30 pct in Cuban shelf oil project

11:28 01/08/2011
HAVANA, August 1 (RIA Novosti)

Gazprom Neft, the oil arm of energy giant Gazprom, has bought a 30 percent stake in a project to develop four blocks on the Cuban shelf of the Gulf of Mexico, the company said on Monday.

Gazprom Neft, Cuba's national oil company Cubapetroleo and Malaysia's oil and gas company Petronas signed a production sharing agreement for the project on July 29. Petronas owns 70 percent in the project, Gazprom Neft said in a statement.

The project will be financed by the participants in proportion to their stakes.

Manuel Marrero, a member of the Cuba Commission for the Exclusive Economic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico, said he hoped Gazprom Neft would increase its participation in the project after the discovery of the first oil, which may be drilled at the beginning of 2012.

Gazprom Neft plans to produce about 10 percent of its overall hydrocarbon output abroad by 2020.
 
Crack spreads are exciting, aren't they?


If you want to be an educated, interesting and informed person, the answer is "yes." The continuing explanatory accuracy of Moore's Law and the human therapeutic implications that a complete understanding of single nucleotide polymorphisms would have are similarly exciting.



 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...to-liquids-plant-to-start-output-in-2013.html


Chevron Nigeria’s Natural Gas-to-Liquids Plant to Start Producing in 2013
By Elisha Bala-Gbogbo - Aug 3, 2011


Chevron Corp. (CVX), the world’s fourth- largest energy company, said its Nigerian Escravos gas-to- liquids plant is more than 70 percent complete and on course to start production in 2013.

The facility, which will refine natural gas to produce 33,000 barrels a day of fuels including diesel, is set “to be completed at the end of 2012,” Andrew Fawthrop, chief executive officer of the company’s Nigerian unit, said in an interview yesterday in Abuja, the capital.

Chevron holds a 75 percent interest and will operate the estimated $8.4 billion project [ thus, cost/barrel of capacity is $8.4B/33,000 or $254,545/bbl. This compares with Royal Dutch Shell's Pearl GTL facility which cost $20 billion with an output of 120,000 BPD or $166,667/bbl. See: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=37807550&postcount=133 ] jointly developed with the state- owned Nigeria National Petroleum Corp., he said.

Nigeria, holder of Africa’s largest gas reserves of about 187 trillion cubic feet, burns off, or flares, most of the fuel it produces along with oil because it lacks the infrastructure to process it. At least $3 billion in revenue is lost annually due to flaring, according to the Petroleum Ministry. The country flared 15.2 billion cubic meters last year, according to the World Bank’s Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership.

Chevron’s daily production in Nigeria averaged 524,000 barrels of crude, 206 million cubic feet (5.8 million cubic meters) of natural gas and 5,000 barrels of liquefied petroleum gas in 2010 as security improved in the oil-rich Niger River delta, according to the company.

The company holds interests in 10 deepwater oil blocks in Nigeria, including its 250,000 barrels per day Agbami field located 70 miles (113 kilometers) off the country’s coast. A 10- well development program within the next three years is expected to boost output to offset declining production in the field.

“We’re continuing the development of the Agbami field and we’re looking for new opportunities in deepwater continuously,” Fawthrop said.
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-rules-on-drilling-before-arctic-freezes.html


Shell Gambles U.S. Rules on Drilling Before Arctic Freeze
By Katarzyna Klimasinska
Aug 3, 2011


Long winter nights and ice that clogs Arctic seas from November through June haunt Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSA)’s ambitions to explore for oil off Alaska.

Shell, Europe’s largest oil company, says it must decide by October whether to assume that U.S. regulators will issue all 35 permits it would need to explore under the Beaufort and Chukchi seas next year during the four mildest months, from July to October.

Shell may win approval within days from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement of an exploration plan for drilling as many as two wells a year in the Beaufort Sea in 2012 and 2013. The company says that after investing more than $3.5 billion in the Arctic, it still awaits permits from the drilling regulator, the Coast Guard and the Environmental Protection Agency. Some are unlikely to come before its October deadline to make plans for next year.

It’s a “frustrating and disappointing” slog through a regulatory maze, Marvin Odum, the president of Shell’s American operations, said in a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington on July 28. The company must make its decision for next year by October because Shell faces “investment decisions that can’t be deferred,” according to spokeswoman Kelly op de Weegh.

“The blueprints need to be put in place several months in advance to ensure our program is safe and that the assets and personnel are available to commence drilling in July 2012,” op de Weegh said in an e-mailed statement.

Second-Largest Reservoir
Alaska’s waters may hold as much as 26.6 billion barrels of oil, according to a federal report, making it the second-largest domestic oil reservoir after the Gulf of Mexico. Shell, based in The Hague, has been seeking permission to drill since 2007, and some of its permits expire in four years.

Shell was ready to begin exploration in 2010, until Interior Secretary Ken Salazar pledged a review of the Alaska plans after BP Plc (BP/)’s well exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, causing the largest U.S. offshore oil spill.

Shell has said a spill in the Beaufort Sea may release as much as 9,468 barrels a day if ruptured, compared with as much as 62,000 barrels a day that spewed from BP’s ruptured well.

The company has pledged to have skimming vessels, booms, tankers, icebreakers, barges and helicopters available in case of a spill from one of its Alaska wells.

Shell may spend as much as $100 million on equipment such as a containment dome that would be lowered onto a well in a spill, Pete Slaiby, the vice president of Shell Alaska, said in a May interview.

‘No Certainty’
“It’s really quite impressive when you look to what they have built up specifically for the Arctic with, at this point, no certainty that they will be able to begin the exploration,” Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said in a July 29 interview at Bloomberg’s Washington office. “I don’t know how much longer they can make the commitment without being able to do anything.”

Continued delays make it harder to persuade Shell’s top management to keep investing in the U.S., Odum said during his appearance in Washington last month.

“When I get questions about the regulatory system in the U.S., and how much risk is there around investing in the U.S. -- that is becoming a very difficult conversation,” Odum said.

While Statoil ASA (STL), Norway’s largest oil and gas company, and Houston-based ConocoPhillips (COP) also hold leases in Alaska, their preparations for drilling are less advanced than Shell’s, Murkowski said.

‘Guinea Pig’
“Shell right now is the guinea pig,” Murkowski said. “If Shell can’t make this happen, you’re going to have other companies who had hoped to be able to move in, that are going to look at this and say, `You know, if a company with resources and reserves of Shell can’t make it, why would we put our assets on line?’”

Alaska’s rough winter and the short drilling season off its north coast are cited by environmentalists opposed to Shell’s drilling plans.

Shell’s spill-response plan was based on a hypothetical accident in August, when weather conditions are better than at the end of drilling season, according to Leah Donahey, Western Arctic and Oceans Program Director for the Alaska Wilderness League, a Washington-based non-profit organization.

‘Just One Piece’
“We would like them to have a worst-case scenario in October, if they’re planning to drill through October,” she said in an interview. “Shell’s Beaufort exploration plan is just one piece of several permits that Shell will need to get and the Interior Department will be reviewing, so we will continue to submit comments throughout the process and urge the administration not to approve risky oil drilling in the Arctic.”

The Natural Resources Defense Council, which challenged air permits the company obtained last year, said “we do not know how to clean up oil in broken ice.”

“Proceeding with oil and gas drilling at this time is simple and plain lunacy,” Chuck Clusen, director of Alaska projects for the New York-based group, said in an interview. “America’s Arctic is our last frontier, and this magnificent ecosystem supports a vast array of marine mammals: whales, polar bears, walrus, ice seals.”

Coming to Rescue
Shell’s draft exploration plans assume the company will drill in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas the same year. That way, a rig from the Beaufort could come to the rescue if there were an accident in the Chukchi Sea, and vice versa, according to Slaiby, the Shell vice president.

Approval for the Chukchi Sea exploration plan may not come until November because the offshore regulator can’t approve it until a legal dispute over the underlying lease sale is resolved, he said.

The 2008 oil lease sale on the Chukchi Sea, in which Shell purchased $2.1 billion of leases, was challenged by a coalition of environmental groups and Alaska natives, and a U.S. District Court judge ordered the Interior Department to revise the environmental impact statement.

After the amended statement is submitted, the court will determine whether the information provided is sufficient, and then the Interior secretary has until Oct. 3 to decide whether to approve the sale.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-rules-on-drilling-before-arctic-freezes.html
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-sea-finds-linked-in-giant-oil-discovery.html



Statoil Says Two North Sea Finds Are Probably Part of ‘Giant’ Discovery
By Marianne Stigset and Stephen Treloar
Aug 16, 2011


Statoil ASA (STL) said two North Sea finds are probably part of a single field that could be the country’s largest oil discovery since the 1980s, helping to prolong the nation’s output that has declined for 10 consecutive years.

The Aldous and Avaldsnes oil discoveries located on the Utsira High may hold 500 million to 1.2 billion barrels of recoverable oil, the Stavanger-based company said in an e-mailed statement today.

“It’s probably the largest offshore oil discovery anywhere in the world this year,” Tim Dodson, Statoil’s executive vice president for exploration, said in an Oslo interview. “Norway has not seen a similar oil discovery since the mid-eighties.”

The find could reverse Norways’s dwindling output due to maturing fields in the North Sea and smaller new discoveries. Production peaked in 2000 and is forecast to drop 6 percent this year to about 1.7 million barrels a day, according to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Statoil, which operates 80 percent of Norway’s oil and gas production, missed its 2010 output target and may produce less this year than last.

“To discover an elephant in Norway is in our view remarkable, especially given that it’s in the North Sea,” said Trond Omdal, an Arctic Securities ASA analyst. “Production could be 250,000 to 300,000 barrels a day, and given that Norway’s production last year was 2.1 million and this year has been below 2 million, that shows the impact of it.”

Shares Rise
Statoil rose as much as 1.2 percent to 124.1 kroner and was little changed at 123.3 kroner as of 1:11 p.m. in Oslo. Partner Det Norske Oljeselskap ASA (DETNOR) soared as much as 30 percent to 41.3 kroner, the highest in intraday trading since October 2008. Lundin, also a partner, climbed as much as 9 percent in Stockholm to 87 kronor.

Statoil on Aug. 8 said its 16/2-8 well made a “high- impact” oil find at the Aldous Major South prospect, estimated at 200 million to 400 million barrels of oil equivalent, with “additional upside” potential both north and south of the find. The license is located west of Lundin Petroleum AB (LUPE)’s Avaldsnes find.

The well also established common oil and water contact between the Aldous and Avaldsnes structures, Statoil said today. Between 200 million and 400 million barrels of resources have been discovered at the Aldous Major South Well, with strong indications from well data of another 200 to 400 million barrels of recoverable oil equivalent in the same structure. A resource base of 100 million to 400 million barrels is estimated in the Avaldsnes structure.

‘One-in-Two Chance’
Statoil will start drilling next week with the Transocean Leader rig at the Aldous Major North prospect, which the company estimates may hold as much as 300 million barrels of oil equivalent, Dodson said. The company estimates it has a “one- in-two chance” of striking oil there, Dodson said.

“We think it’s probably the same oil-water contact there, but we won’t know for sure until we’ve drilled the well,” Dodson said in the interview.

The Aldous-Avaldsnes discovery will add at least 4 to 5 kroner to the value of each Statoil share, Magnus Smistad, an analyst Fondsfinans ASA, said by telephone today. “We’re talking unrisked valuation of probably something around $2.7 billion to $2.8 billion,” he said, based on capital expenditure of $5 billion. The discovery “is a huge one.”

High Recovery Rate
Statoil expects to start assessing development solutions for the field toward the end of the year, Dodson said. A stand- alone installation is most likely, he said. Production will probably start within six to eight years, he said.

The company estimates the field to have a rate of recovery of at least 50 percent, Dodson said. The country’s average recovery rate is 46 percent, according to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.

This is Statoil’s third so-called high-impact find, defined as a discovery that holds more than 250 million barrels of oil equivalent, this year.

The company expects its production to grow by about 3 percent a year during the next decade to exceed 2.5 million barrels a day in 2020, it said in June. By that date, the state- controlled producer expects to get 44 percent of oil and gas output from outside Norway. The company won’t alter its production forecasts based on today’s announcement.

Statoil’s partners in license 265 include Petoro AS with 30 percent, Det Norske with 20 percent and Lundin with 10 percent. Avaldsnes is located in license 501 and is operated by Lundin, which holds a 40 percent stake, while Statoil has 40 percent and Maersk Oil has 20 percent.


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-sea-finds-linked-in-giant-oil-discovery.html


Statoil
Recent North Sea discovery even larger than expected
Aug 16, 2011


STAVANGER, NORWAY -- (Marketwire) -- 08/16/11 -- Communication between the Aldous and Avaldsnes oil discoveries on the Utsira High in the North Sea has now been confirmed. In combination these discoveries may represent an oil structure of between 500 million and 1.2 billion barrels of recoverable oil equivalent.

If the upper part of the interval strikes pay dirt, the discovery will be one of the ten largest oil finds ever on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). Statoil (OSE: STL, NYSE: STO) has a 40% stake both in licence PL 265, where Aldous was discovered, and in PL 501, where the Avaldsnes discovery was made.

"Aldous/Avaldsnes is a giant oil discovery, and according to our estimates the combined discovery may make the top 10 list of NCS oil discoveries. Norway has not seen a similar oil discovery since the mid-eighties" says Tim Dodson, Statoil's executive vice president for Exploration.

This is the third "high-impact discovery" (*) for Statoil as an operator in 2011. In April of this year the 250 million barrel Skrugard oil discovery was made in the Barents Sea, and the 150-300 million barrel Peregrino South oil field was discovered offshore Brazil.

"The discoveries are a result of Statoil's exploration strategy of prioritising high-impact opportunities, while focusing on our established core areas," says Dodson.

As the company announced on 8 August, a minimum 65-metre oil column has been confirmed in Aldous Major South well 16/2-8 in the North Sea. The discovery was made in Jurassic sandstone in a very good quality reservoir consisting of coarse-grained, unconsolidated sand.

The well has also established common oil/water contact between the Aldous and Avaldsnes structures, and according to preliminary estimates the combined discovery in the two licences (PL 265 and PL 501) totals between 500 million and 1.2 billion barrels of recoverable oil equivalent. Between 200 and 400 million barrels of these resources have been discovered in well 16/2-8, with strong indications from well data of another 200 to 400 million barrels of recoverable oil equivalent in the same structure, whereas a resource base of 100 to 400 barrels previously has been estimated in the Avaldsnes structure (PL 501).

The well was drilled by the Transocean Leader drilling rig, which soon will spud Aldous Major North well 16/2-9 (PL265) to clarify the further potential and any communication with Aldous/Avaldsnes. In addition the partners plan further appraisal drilling in licence PL 265 next year to clarify the full volume potential for a future development solution.

"As we said at the Capital Market Day event in New York in June, the NCS is a world-class petroleum province. The Aldous/Avaldsnes discoveries are evidence that the NCS is still attractive. Making a discovery of this size in a mature area shows that exploration is all about perseverance, creativity and obtaining new knowledge," says Dodson.

Aldous Major South is located in licence 265. Statoil is the operator and has a 40% interest. The other partners are Petoro (30%), Det norske oljeselskap (20%) and Lundin (10%).

Avaldsnes is located in licence 501. Lundin is the operator and has a 40% interest, whereas partners Statoil and Maersk have 40% and 20% interests, respectively.

(*) "High-impact discovery" = a total of more than 250 million barrels of oil equivalent, or 100 million net barrels of oil equivalent to Statoil.
 
Last edited:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ig-expansion-on-hold-as-build-costs-soar.html



Maersk Drilling Puts Oil Rig Fleet Expansion on Hold as Build Costs Soar
By Marianne Stigset
Aug 19, 2011


Maersk Drilling, the oil rig unit of Denmark’s largest company, may put its expansion on hold because the cost of building platforms is rising and takeovers are too expensive.

“We see newbuilding orders being at a fairly high price and we will certainly not go out and order something tomorrow or in the near future,” Chief Executive Officer Claus V. Hemmingsen said yesterday in a telephone interview. “We would have to watch the market, they’re very expensive currently.”

Maersk Drilling, which has about 3 percent of the offshore market, has a five-year target to become the world’s fifth- largest owner of rigs able to drill the deepest offshore wells. It’s spending $3.8 billion to build four deepwater drillships and two so-called ultra-harsh jack-up rigs, and plans to order at least eight rigs by 2016, Hemmingsen said. Maersk has also kept an eye out for acquisition opportunities.

“I would say that while valuations may have been low, the end purchase prices are not particularly low,” the executive said. “We have been following the markets and we have not found that it was the right thing for us to pursue” corporate acquisitions at this time, he said.

Rising oil prices have increased exploration budgets and added demand for rigs able to operate in harsh and deepwater environments such as the Arctic and Brazil. Stricter rules after the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and sank in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have also increased demand for more modern rigs, boosting costs for new rigs and fueling merger and acquisitions.

Transocean Deal
Transocean Ltd. (RIG) this week agreed to buy Aker Drilling ASA for almost twice its market value at $1.46 billion, to expand its ultra-deepwater rig fleet. That followed Ensco Plc’s bid in February for Pride International Inc., which was valued at $8.47 billion including debt, a 24 percent premium.

“We are very firm, that as we do look at candidates or even assets, it would have to be something that fits our high- end sophisticated fleet,” Hemmingsen said. “It’s not important for us to gain size, it’s important to get the right equipment. Our primary view is that we will grow organically.”

Maersk Drilling, a unit of Copenhagen-based A.P. Moeller- Maersk A/S, has brought the average age of its fleet down to eight years, the world’s second-lowest after Seadrill Ltd. (SDRL) That compares to an industry average of 22 years, Hemmingsen said.

Four Drillships
The company ordered the four drillships from Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. and two ultra-harsh environment jack-ups from Keppel FELS Ltd. and has the option to order two more drillships with Samsung at the same price as the first four, Hemmingsen said. Maersk expects to order its next eight rigs in the ultra-deepwater, semi-submersible and drillship segments once the market conditions permit, Hemmingsen said.

Prices to build new rigs “have been fairly stable over the last four years, but with a tendency to rise over the last six months,” Hemmingsen said. “They’ve probably risen 10 to 12 percent in the last six months.”

The unit’s second-quarter profit surged to $223 million from $175 million a year earlier helped by an 18 percent gain in sales as high oil prices spurred demand for modern rigs, Maersk said on Aug. 17.

Financing future newbuild rigs will be done from “general corporate financing sources available to A.P. Moeller-Maersk Group and/or operational cash flow,” spokeswoman Birgitte Gam said in an e-mailed response to questions yesterday.

Maersk Drilling’s 26 rigs include 6 ultra-harsh environment jack-ups, 6 further jack-ups, 4 semi-submersibles and 10 drilling barge rigs. Jack-up rigs have extendable legs while semi-subs are rigs that float and are partly filled with water for stability.

‘Full Coverage’
The company has “almost full contract coverage” for the remainder of the year, according to its second-quarter statement, and has over 70 percent of its available capacity covered for 2012, Hemmingsen said.

Demand for rigs remain high and is expected to be boosted in Norway, where Maersk is the biggest operator of jack-ups, by Statoil ASA (STL)’s announcement this week that the Aldous Major South and Avaldsnes discoveries in the North Sea are linked, creating the biggest offshore oil find this year. The “giant” discovery may help prolong Norway’s oil output, which has declined for 10 consecutive years.

“It’s great news for the industry,” Hemmingsen said. “We do expect that it will lead to increased activity and also increased activity in the segment that we are targeting, which is the jack-up segment up to 150 meters of water depth.”

Demand from regions such as Norway, Brazil, West Africa and the Gulf of Mexico are supporting day rates, both for ultra- deepwater and for jack-up rigs.

For ultra-deepwater rigs, “we’ve had an average of about $450,000 for a while, and we wouldn’t expect it to go below that,” Hemmingsen said. “We’re not so optimistic that we see a rapid increase, a dramatic increase either, but probably a stable level of $450,000 to $550,000 would be expected going forward in the short-term.”


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ig-expansion-on-hold-as-build-costs-soar.html
 


LUKoil

Dividend per share
(Rubles)

Code:
     RUR  205     + 5.1% (Current indicated rate)
2017 RUR  195     +10.2
2016 RUR  177     +14.9
2015 RUR  154     +40.0
2014 RUR  110     +22.2
2013 RUR  90      +20.0
2012 RUR  75      +27.1
2011 RUR  59      +13.5
2010 RUR  52       +4.0
2009 RUR  50      +19.0
2008 RUR  42      +10.5
2007 RUR  38      +15.2
2006 RUR  33      +17.9
2005 RUR  28      +16.7
2004 RUR  24      +23.1
2003 RUR  19,5    +30.0
2002 RUR  15      +87.5
2001 RUR   8     +166.7
2000 RUR   3     
1999 RUR   0,25
5-year AACGR: 17.9%
10-year AACGR: 17.2%

Cost: $18.79/share
Acquisition date: 9 July, 2003
Holding period: 14.4 years
Holding period AACGR: 8.0% (excluding dividends)
Current yield on cost: 18.4%
(as of 11/12/17)






lukoildividend
lukoildividends




OAO Tatneft

Dividend per share
(Rubles)

Code:
2012 RUR 8.60      +21.5%
2011 RUR 7.08      +41.0
2010 RUR 5.02      -23.5
2009 RUR 6.56      +48.4
2008 RUR 4.42      -21.8
2007 RUR 5.65      +22.8
2006 RUR 4.60     +360.0
2005 RUR 1.00
5-year AACGR: 9.0%

Cost: $9.64/share
Acquisition date: 16 February, 2005
Holding period: 7.2 years
Holding period AACGR: 20.1%
Current yield on cost: 14.8%







Tatneftdividend
Tatneftdividends





OAO Gazprom

Dividend per share
(Rubles)

Code:
2013 RUR 7.20     +20.2%
2012 RUR 5.99     - 33.2 
2011 RUR 8.97     +133.0
2010 RUR 3.85      +61.1
2009 RUR 2.39     +563.9
2008 RUR 0.36      -86.5
2007 RUR 2.66      + 4.7
2006 RUR 2.54      +69.3
2005 RUR 1.50      +26.1
2004 RUR 1.19      +72.5
2003 RUR 0.69      +72.5
2002 RUR 0.40       -9.1
2001 RUR 0.44      +46.7
2000 RUR 0.30     +200.0
1999 RUR 0.10       NMF
1998 RUR  -       -100.0
1997 RUR 0.03     + 50.0
1996 RUR 0.02        0.0
1995 RUR 0.02        0.0
1994 RUR 0.02

5-year AACGR: 24.7%
10-year AACGR: 19.7%

Cost: $/share $6.71
Acquisition date: 28 April, 2005
Holding period: 7.0 years
Holding period AACGR: 7.0% (without dividend)
Current yield on cost: 8.9%






GazpromDividend
GazpromDividends
 
Last edited:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...32794.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection


Exxon, U.S. Government Duel Over Huge Oil Find
By RUSSELL GOLD
August 18, 2011

Exxon Mobil Corp. is fighting with the U.S. government to keep control of one of its biggest oil discoveries ever, in a showdown where billions of dollars hang in the balance for both sides.

The massive Gulf of Mexico discovery contains an estimated one billion barrels of recoverable oil, the company says. The Interior Department, which regulates offshore drilling, says Exxon's leases have expired and the company hasn't met the requirements for an extension. Exxon has sued to retain the leases.

The court battle is playing out at a time in which the Obama administration has made an issue of unused leases, which deprive the Treasury of valuable taxes. It also comes as regulators are being careful not to be seen as lax in their dealings with large energy companies in the wake of last year's BP PLC spill.

The stakes are high: Under federal law, the leases—and all the oil underneath—could revert to the government if Exxon doesn't win in court.

The loss of the leases would be an enormous black eye for Exxon. The company hadn't previously disclosed the size of the discovery in what is called the Julia field until it was mentioned in the suit Exxon filed against the Interior Department last week in federal court in Lake Charles, La.


The Texas behemoth faces the sobering prospect that it may have made the largest discovery ever in the Gulf of Mexico only to lose it. Tens of billions of dollars of oil could slip through its hands because it failed to follow federal rules for getting a lease extension while it moved forward with plans to get the oil out of the ground.

Exxon spokesman Patrick McGinn said the company expected to get the extension, which he said was traditionally granted as a matter of course. "You state your case and you got it. [This] was unexpected."

This high-stakes standoff is likely to spark a political, as well as legal, showdown between the federal government and the nation's largest oil company. It has also roped in Norway's Statoil ASA, which owns 50% of the Julia find. Statoil said it filed its own suit Monday in the same Louisiana federal court against the Interior Department to preserve the leases. Exxon is the field's operator and lease holder.

A spokeswoman for the Interior Department said, "Our priority remains the safe development of the nation's offshore energy resources, which is why we continue to approve extensions that meet regulatory standards."

The Interior Department, which oversees offshore oil development and collects royalties, has been trying to show that it has become a tougher, but still fair, regulator of the Gulf of Mexico's oil riches. Its reputation was battered during the massive Deepwater Horizon well blowout and oil spill last year, when BP sought—and the government approved—last-minute changes to the well design, which some investigators say contributed to a chaotic environment aboard the drilling rig. The government was roundly criticized for weak oversight of safety rules.

Now the department must decide whether to fight Exxon in court or settle and allow it to develop the oil. Turning the leases over to another company would mean further delays to the tax royalties that would go to government coffers. At current prices, potential royalties paid to the government over the lifetime of a one billion-barrel field would be about $10.95 billion.

The oil industry, led vocally by Exxon, has said that developing oil fields in the deepest reaches of the Gulf takes time to do safely. And by threatening to take away a massive discovery, the industry says that the government is sending the message that oil companies need to be in a rush to produce.

The possibility that Exxon could lose this oil will likely send shock waves through the industry. "This is unprecedented," said Amy Myers Jaffe, associate director of the Energy Program at Rice University in Houston. "The question is: Do our offshore rules allow for flexibility? You don't want to let companies sit on a discovery…We definitely don't want to send the industry a message that you need to be in a rush or we'll take the oil away from you."

Exxon's lawsuit said the government has granted "thousands" of extensions over time. It said the government's denial of its extension relied on legal interpretations that it "had never before applied and had never before articulated." Statoil asserted in its lawsuit that no request for an extension for a deep-water development "had ever previously been denied." The Interior Department couldn't comment on this.

The Exxon discovery is believed to be the largest in the Gulf of Mexico since BP found the Thunder Horse Field in 1999, and it could be larger. The find also cements the Gulf of Mexico as a rich exploration area with large amounts of undiscovered oil that may keep oil companies active for years to come.

"This is very deep water, very complex structures and difficult-to-produce oil," said Exxon's Mr. McGinn.

The dispute over Exxon's plans for the Julia field began in October 2008—about a month before its 10-year leases expired—when it applied for a five-year "suspension of production."

Such extensions are "fairly common," said Elmer P. Danenberger III, a former federal official who oversaw U.S. offshore-drilling rules until he retired in 2009.

"I can honestly say that people who manage that program are really strict, which they need to be or it will be abused. If you don't have a commercial discovery and a plan for moving ahead at the end of the lease term…that's it."

In February 2009, the government denied Exxon's request for an extension and after a brief appeal denied it again that April. Exxon said in a letter at the time that it was "committed" to producing the oil, but the government said it didn't present a specific plan. The government contended this didn't meet legal requirements and denied the application.

More appeals followed, but Exxon lost its final appeal in May. The final decision hinged on whether Exxon had a concrete "commitment" to produce the oil in December 2008, when its lease expired. The director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals at the Interior Department ruled that it didn't.

Exxon is known in the industry for moving slowly and studying all options exhaustively before committing billions of dollars. But even if it loses this court case, all might not be lost. The Julia field consists of five leases—or square blocks in the Gulf of Mexico—and only three are being disputed. The other two aren't set to expire until 2013.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...32794.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

StatoilHydro And Exxon Announce New Deepwater Discovery
http://www.offshore-technology.com/news/news3600.html

09 January 2008

Norwegian oil and gas company StatoilHydro and US oil major ExxonMobil have announced a "promising" hydrocarbons discovery in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Julia discovery well, southwest of New Orleans, is located in 2,000m of water and was drilled to a total depth of 9,500m.

Julia is the first well drilled in deepwater Gulf of Mexico under a 2005 exploration agreement between the two companies.

Further appraisal drilling is planned in 2008 to determine the extent of the discovery.

StatoilHydro, the third largest leaseholder in deepwater Gulf of Mexico, is developing two other significant discoveries in the same area - Jack and St Malo - which are not scheduled to come onstream for another five years.

Exxon Sues U.S. Interior Department Over Canceled Gulf of Mexico Leases
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ment-over-canceled-gulf-of-mexico-leases.html
By Phil Milford and David Wethe
Aug 18, 2011


Exxon Mobil Corp. sued the U.S. Interior Department, asking a judge to set aside the agency’s decision to cancel offshore leases that may yield “billions of barrels of oil.”

The department overstepped its authority in a ruling on Gulf of Mexico leases for the so-called Julia Unit, Exxon Mobil said in a complaint filed Aug. 12 in federal court in Lake Charles, Louisiana. Statoil ASA (STL), a partner of Exxon Mobil’s in the Julia fields, filed a similar lawsuit in the same court on Aug. 15.

“The Interior decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise contrary to law,” and “deprives Exxon Mobil of property without due process of law,” the Irving, Texas-based company said in its complaint.

Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest publicly traded oil company, said federal regulations allow oil producers to suspend production in their fields, partly “to facilitate proper development of a lease.” Because of drilling complexity, Exxon Mobil said, it asked for a suspension for Julia in 2008.

The Interior Department denied the request in 2009, stating that the company “had not demonstrated a commitment to production,” according to court papers. Unsuccessful appeals followed.

The Interior Department is reviewing the Exxon Mobil complaint, Melissa Schwartz, spokeswoman for the department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, said in an e-mailed statement.

‘Safe Development’
“Our priority remains the safe development of the nation’s offshore energy resources, which is why we continue to approve extensions that meet regulatory standards,” Schwartz said. The government must respond to the Exxon suit within 60 days of receiving the Aug. 15 summons, according to a court filing.

The lawsuits were reported earlier by the Wall Street Journal.

Analysts Fadel Gheit at Oppenheimer & Co. in New York and Brian Youngberg at Edward Jones in St. Louis said they ultimately expect Exxon Mobil to reach an agreement with the government to keep the leases. Both said they hadn’t heard of the Julia discovery before the lawsuit.

“Exxon’s not just going to walk away from it,” said Gheit, who rates the shares “outperform” and owns an undisclosed number of them.

Shares Drop
Exxon Mobil fell $3.24, or 4.4 percent, to $70.92 at 2:49 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading as crude oil slumped the most in a week after Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank AG cut their forecasts for global economic expansion. Statoil’s American depositary receipts, each representing one ordinary share, declined $1.68, or 7 percent, to $22.40.

Wyn Hornbuckle, a U.S. Justice Department spokesman, declined to comment on the dispute. Jonathan A. Hunter, lead attorney on the suit for Exxon, couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

President Barack Obama stopped deep-water oil and natural- gas drilling early last year after a BP Plc (BP/) well blew out off the Louisiana coast, claiming 11 lives and causing the largest U.S. oil spill. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar lifted the ban in October.

Exxon alleges that the Interior Department terminated the Julia leases to gain new leases and make more money.

“Cancellation of the original Julia leases would give Interior the opportunity to collect millions of dollars in bonuses and royalties that it otherwise would not be entitled to collect,” Exxon said in court papers.

If the agency’s decision stands, Exxon Mobil and Statoil will “lose the enormous value of those leases and their hundreds of millions of dollars in investments,” Statoil said in its complaint.

Ola Morten Aanestad, a spokesman for Stavanger, Norway- based Statoil, had no immediate comment on the complaints.

The case is Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) v. Kenneth Salazar, 11CV1474, U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana (Lake Charles).

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ment-over-canceled-gulf-of-mexico-leases.html

_____________________


Exxon Settles Lawsuit Over Gulf of Mexico Offshore Oil Lease Against U.S.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...settlement-on-offshore-oil-lease-dispute.html
By Allen Johnson Jr. and Mark Chediak
January 7, 2012


Exxon Mobil Corp., the largest publicly traded oil company, settled its lawsuit against U.S. Interior Secretary Kenneth Salazar over the government’s decision to cancel offshore leases that may yield “billions of barrels of oil.”

The accord “will allow ExxonMobil to develop this very large, but technically challenging, resource as quickly as possible using a phased approach,” Patrick McGinn, a spokesman for Irving, Texas-based Exxon, said in an e-mail yesterday.

Exxon sued Aug. 12 over a ruling by the department that canceled Gulf of Mexico leases for the so-called Julia Unit. The company and the government entered into settlement agreement on Dec. 30, according to a filing yesterday in U.S. District Court in Lake Charles, Louisiana.

Exxon said in its complaint that it sought a suspension for its Julia leases in 2008 because of drilling complexity. It cited federal regulations that allow oil oil producers to suspend production in their fields, partly “to facilitate proper development of a lease.”

The Interior Department denied the request in 2009, stating that the company“had not demonstrated a commitment to production” according to court papers. Unsuccessful appeals followed.

Suspension of Production
As part of the settlement, the Interior Department granted a suspension of production for the leases from Dec. 13, 2008, to Oct. 31, 2013. The department will grant a second suspension until Aug. 31, 2014, if Exxon and Statoil ASA, a partner in Exxon’s Julia fields, remains in compliance with the terms of the agreement and takes certain steps toward production, according to court documents.

Exxon and Statoil agreed to pay a yearly fee on the original leases of $650 per acre until 87.5 million barrels of oil are produced from the fields. The first fee will be owed for 2011, according to court documents. The minimum royalty rate for the leases was increased to $11 per acre and the yearly rental rate increased to $16 an acre.

“The Julia project will play an important role in meeting America’s energy demand,” McGinn said in the e-mail. “The initial phase of the project is expected to produce more than 175 million barrels of oil through six production wells.”

Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for the Interior Department, said in an e-mailed statement that the proposed settlement affirms the regulatory process, “provides incentives for timely and thorough development of the leases, and secures a fair return on those resources to the U.S. Treasury.”

The case is Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Kenneth Salazar, 11- CV-1474, U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana (Lake Charles).



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...settlement-on-offshore-oil-lease-dispute.html
 
Last edited:



That's pretty amazing— during the most recent recession, U.S. petroleum consumption fell below the amount consumed 30 years ago, in 1978!


Code:
Date	U.S. Petroleum Consumption (Thousand Barrels per Day)
1973	17,308
1974	16,653
1975	16,322
1976	17,461
1977	18,431
1978	18,847
1979	18,513
1980	17,056
1981	16,058
1982	15,296
1983	15,231
1984	15,726
1985	15,726
1986	16,281
1987	16,665
1988	17,283
1989	17,325
1990	16,988
1991	16,714
1992	17,033
1993	17,237
1994	17,718
1995	17,725
1996	18,309
1997	18,620
1998	18,917
1999	19,519
2000	19,701
2001	19,649
2002	19,761
2003	20,034
2004	20,731
2005	20,802
2006	20,687
2007	20,680
2008	19,498
2009	18,771


Petroleum Consumption
Ghawar
 
Last edited:


Very interesting.


http://en.rian.ru/business/20110830/166306227.html


Rosneft, ExxonMobil sign strategic cooperation deal


19:27 30/08/2011
SOCHI, August 30
(RIA Novosti)

Russian state-controlled oil company Rosneft and U.S. energy giant ExxonMobil on Tuesday signed an agreement on strategic cooperation, including Arctic shelf operations.

The deal was signed in the presence of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Rosneft President Eduard Khudainatov and ExxonMobil President Neil Duffin.

“This event will be well received by global markets as new horizons will open,” Putin said at a meeting with ExxonMobil’s top executives, referring to the company’s operations in Russia’s Arctic and on its deepwater shelf.

Direct investment could amount to 500 billion rubles, he said.

Under the deal, Rosneft will now be able to operate in ExxonMobil turf in the United States - in the Gulf of Mexico and Texas, as well as in third countries.

The agreement includes approximately US $3.2 billion to be spent funding the exploration of East Prinovozemelskiy Blocks 1, 2 and 3 in the Kara Sea and the Tuapse License Block in the Black Sea.

ExxonMobil said on its website the blocks “are among the most promising and least explored offshore areas globally, with high potential for liquids and gas.”

The companies will create an Arctic Research and Design Center for Offshore Developments in St. Petersburg, which will be staffed by Rosneft and ExxonMobil employees.

ExxonMobil Development Company President Neil Duffin said: "Today's agreement with Rosneft builds on our 15-year successful relationship in the Sakhalin-1 project. Our technology, innovation and project execution capabilities will complement Rosneft’s strengths and experience, especially in the area of understanding the future of Russian shelf development.”

Additionally Rosneft and ExxonMobil will implement a program of staff exchanges of technical and management employees which “will help strengthen the relationships between the companies and provide valuable career development opportunities for personnel of both companies,” ExxonMobil said.

In January, Rosneft and Britain's BP agreed on a $16 billion share swap and Arctic shelf development deal. This was later blocked by a court injunction following legal action by the AAR consortium, which represents BP’s partners in the TNK-BP Russian joint venture.

AAR says the deal broke TNK-BP's 2008 shareholder agreement under which all energy projects had to be offered to TNK-BP first.

AAR then went to the Stockholm tribunal, which froze the deal and ordered BP, which pinned hopes of replenishing its reserves on the Rosneft deal after the Gulf of Mexico disaster, to develop the project together with TNK-BP, but Rosneft said it did not see AAR as a partner.


http://en.rian.ru/business/20110830/166306227.html


Exxon, Rosneft tie up in Russian Arctic, U.S


SOCHI, Russia (Reuters) - U.S. oil company Exxon (NYSE:XOM - News) and Russia's Rosneft (ROSN.MM) signed a deal on Tuesday to develop oil and gas reserves in the Russian Arctic, opening up one of the last unconquered drilling frontiers to the global industry No.1.

The deal, signed in the presence of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, involves Arctic assets BP (LSE:BP.L - News) had hoped to exploit, and dashes the British company's hopes of reviving its own deal with Rosneft that was blocked in May by its billionaire partners in an existing Russian venture.

With Putin at the signing ceremony in the Black Sea resort of Sochi were Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson and Russia's top energy official, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin.

"New horizons are opening up. One of the world's leading companies, Exxon Mobil, is starting to work on Russia's strategic shelf and deepwater continental shelf," Putin said.

Under the deal, Exxon and Rosneft will invest $3.2 billion in developing East Prinovozemelsky Blocks 1, 2, and 3 in the Arctic Kara Sea and the Tuapse licensing block in the Black Sea.

Those regions "are among the most promising and least explored offshore areas globally, with high potential for liquids and gas," Exxon said in a statement.

Rosneft, meanwhile, will be offered an equity interest in a number of Exxon exploration projects in North America, including deep-water Gulf of Mexico and tight oil fields in Texas, as well as in other countries.

"The fact that after the BP-Rosneft deal collapsed a new partner was found so quickly is a very positive signal," said Denis Borisov, energy analyst at Bank of Moscow.

The deal would help Rosneft share the risks of developing the Arctic, which could run into the hundreds of billions of dollars, and contrasts with the BP-Rosneft deal in that it does not include a share swap.

"If this is essentially the BP deal it is exposure to a pretty significant resource base. There's a lot of risk that's involved in it," said Jason Gammel, energy analyst at MacQuarie Research.

"Rosneft had been pretty clear that they were still looking to get a deal done up there," Gammel added. "It's a pretty big win for them if they were able to gain access up there, clearly dependent on what type of terms they got."

Rosneft shares were up 2.1 percent in late Moscow trading, paring earlier gains of up to 3 percent on expectations of an announcement. Exxon stock opened 1.3 percent weaker.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Exxon-Rosneft-tie-up-in-rb-3237384563.html?x=0&.v=1


http://en.rian.ru/russia/20110803/165540124.html


Russian govt may sell entire Rosneft stake by 2017


17:44 03/08/2011
SOCHI, August 3
(RIA Novosti)

The Russian government may sell its entire stake in the country's largest oil company, Rosneft, by 2017, presidential economic aide Arkady Dvorkovich said on Wednesday.

The government wants to privatize 25 percent of Rosneft, in which it now owns over 75 percent, by 2011-2013 as part of its three-year $59 billion privatization program.

"The government has suggested a full withdrawal from Rosneft's capital before 2017," Dvorkovich told reporters, adding that concrete privatization terms would be set in the nearest future.

Last autumn the government approved the program, under which the state was to reduce its holding in companies to a controlling stake.

In June, President Dmitry Medvedev ordered the government to broaden the privatization program and cut state stakes in key companies to blocking, or even sell them entirely. Dvorkovich said that Medvedev approved the new plan which may be published on Wednesday.


http://en.rian.ru/russia/20110803/165540124.html
 
Last edited:



If you want to be an educated, interesting and informed person, the answer is "yes." The continuing explanatory accuracy of Moore's Law and the human therapeutic implications that a complete understanding of single nucleotide polymorphisms would have are similarly exciting.




How's that not having any friends thing working out for you?
 


Damn— they sure got this thing built quickly.





Gazprom Starts Filling Nord Stream Gas Pipeline
By Anna Shiryaevskaya and Kateryna Choursina
Sep 5, 2011


OAO Gazprom will today start pumping natural gas into a $10 billion subsea pipeline from Russia to Germany, bypassing Ukraine, where disputes halted supplies to European customers twice since 2006.

The Nord Stream pipeline runs under the Baltic Sea and will be able to carry enough gas to supply 26 million European homes when it's fully up and running next year. It’s the first direct link between western Europe and Russia, which supplies about 25 percent of the European Union's gas.

Clashes between Ukraine and Russia over gas prices and debts disrupted shipments to Europe and led Gazprom to seek alternative routes. Nord Stream may weaken Ukraine’s hand in negotiating gas supply deals with Russia. Ukraine, which carries 80 percent of Russian gas to the EU through Soviet-era pipes, is seeking to revise its long-term contract for fuel imports.

Nord Stream “will be especially important” if existing agreements between Russia and Ukraine “break down this winter over the pricing issue, thus leading to a new dispute,” said Katja Yafimava, a research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

Gazprom and its partners, BASF SE’s Wintershall AG unit, E.ON Ruhrgas AG, Nederlandse Gasunie NV and GDF Suez SA, are building the pipeline in stages. The first line will have a capacity of 27.5 billion cubic meters a year, doubling to 55 billion cubic meters when the second is ready in 2012.

Transit States
“We are slowly and surely turning away from the dictate of transit states,” Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said yesterday as he announced that Russia’s gas-export monopoly would start filling the Nord Stream link with gas. The pipeline will begin commercial operations next month.

European winter gas prices, led by the U.K.’s National Balancing Point, the continent’s largest single market for the fuel, advanced to near three-year highs this year amid heightened concerns about supply security and rising import dependency as North Sea production dwindles.

Gas for delivery in Britain during the six-month heating season from October reached a high of 78.25 pence a therm on Aug. 31, the highest since October 2008. It closed at 73.60 pence at yesterday up 17 percent this year. That’s equal to $11.86 a million British thermal units.

Diverted Supplies
Gazprom may divert as much as 20 billion cubic meters that is currently shipped through Ukraine through Nord Stream, Chief Executive Officer Alexei Miller said in May, according to state television Rossiya 24. Sergei Kupriyanov, a spokesman for Gazprom, declined to comment on expected volumes yesterday.

Ukraine’s state-run energy company NAK Naftogaz Ukrainy, which pumps about 100 billion cubic meters of gas a year to Europe, has an annual transit capacity of 142 billion cubic meters.

“Reduction in transit volumes will cause Ukraine to lose about $550 million in revenues from transit next year,” said Denis Sakva, an energy analyst at Dragon Capital, a Kiev-based investment bank.

Nord Stream is nearing completion as Ukraine, the biggest buyer of Russian gas, seeks lower gas purchases from Gazprom and revisions to a pricing formula. Gazprom’s Chief Executive Officer Alexei Miller had offered to revise the contract if Naftogaz agreed to merge with his company. That proposal was rejected by Ukraine.

The eastern European country may have to turn to an international court “as a last resort” in order to revise gas supply contracts, President Viktor Yanukovych said on Sept. 3, according to his website.

From Germany, Nord Stream’s first line will be connected to the OPAL system that connects the Czech Republic. The second line will connect to the NEL onshore pipeline and carry gas to western Germany and other European countries.

Gazprom has contracted about 22 billion cubic meters to supply customers including EON AG and GDF Suez (GSZ) via Nord Stream in the coming years.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ter-shortage-threat-as-baltic-pipe-opens.html
 
Back
Top