Atheist!

You can't see it but it is a fact that a person who says they are a Christian but lives by and accepts a philosophy of the anti Christian faith, is not really a Christian. I don't know anyone who is stupid enough to say that he is a Christian and then deny the philosophy of Jesus Christ, unless it be you.

I don't know. You're doing a pretty good job of denying his philosophy. I seem to recall "judge not lest you be judged" as a pretty core teaching. Could it be that you're a Christian atheist? Or are you just stupid enough to say that you're a Christian and then deny his teachings?
 
I don't know. You're doing a pretty good job of denying his philosophy. I seem to recall "judge not lest you be judged" as a pretty core teaching. Could it be that you're a Christian atheist? Or are you just stupid enough to say that you're a Christian and then deny his teachings?

Neither, I think. It's just Amicus (or similiar) taking a run at us with an alt. Doesn't believe anything, really, other than the fun of cheap manipulation.
 
Neither, I think. It's just Amicus (or similiar) taking a run at us with an alt. Doesn't believe anything, really, other than the fun of cheap manipulation.

I have her pegged as a true believer who decided that this forum would provide an audience in need of evangelizing. The more we resist, the more she gets to suffer for her faith. I certainly think that her faith requires a lot of suffering. She could be an alt, but I'm especially bad at identifying those. :eek: Of course, I stopped reading her screeds several pages ago, so I'm sure I've missed some clues.
 
Neither, I think. It's just Amicus (or similiar) taking a run at us with an alt. Doesn't believe anything, really, other than the fun of cheap manipulation.

I had that notion before briefly too, but then again I think one can easily chafe at amicus' debating style and ideas - but I would never ever question his personal integrity or belief in being right in what he says and does, or, let's phrase it more highbrow, his moral certitude - and employing these kinds of tactics would probably be way way below him. I was more thinking in the direction of other alt-loving regulars you are crossing blades with on numerous occasions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Past Perfect, this person might be bi-polar, or schizophrenic, or loose in some other screw-- but talking to them is like talking to a bowl of goldfish for all the good it will do you...
Your illness had to wait until psychology came up with the term necessary to explain your symptoms and illness. Bi-polar and schizophrenic do not explain your behavior but try RABD. That seems to be your illness. You can be cured but it will take time. Work on it as the cure is self-evident.
 
Well, there was one useful bit of information in all that for our sleuthing - if her father died in 1944 she is probably not exactly a young girl anymore.
That I was a young girl was your spin to insult me. This is a symptom of RABD, a title which you have earned.
 
No, I have no hate of Christians at all. That's called "paranoia" on your part. I have a very simple bit of evidence that the Founding Fathers would never have allowed this statement on money: THEY NEVER DID. Every last one of them was long dead by the time this statement was added to the money we use today.

You mistake the idea of "divine revelation" for "self evident truth". A Self Evident Truth is called an Axiom, and what it means is that the concept is evident in and of itself, without outside additional evidence necessary. The statement "Existence Exists" is an Axiom, a "self evident truth". The statement "God created the world" is NOT an Axiom, it is NOT self evident (or evident at all, for that matter).

My logic is accurate and my view of history is exactly correct, informed, and educated. The Founding Fathers, even the Christian ones, were adamant that the Church and the State must be separate. Jefferson and Madison were well known to be Deists; Adams (John) was a Christian who nevertheless supported separation. They knew this to be necessary in order for the country to maintain a purpose higher and nobler than their respective beliefs--Liberty, which is the state of nature in which Individuals are free to choose and maintain their own beliefs independent of anyone else's and their right to do so is protected by law.

It's unfortunate, but an ignorant zealot such as yourself will likely never understand the depth of the Founders' brilliance or the uniqueness of what they achieved in history. Your own rabid desire to enforce your views on others is indicative of only one thing: Your own inability to rest comfortably with your beliefs. You are a doubter, and you hate yourself for it.

Boy!! Somebody really were hit with that rock. Nobody cares enough about you to force their ideas down your throat. We all support separation of Church and State. The original idea of the concept was to keep the State from disallowing people to worship God as they so pleased. Liberals pervert this to mean that those who practice democracy can not practice religion in government at all. Grow up and throw off the symptoms of RABD.
 
I certainly hope that Bush and Cheney believe that and take a European vacation, as there are a few countries there that have them under indictment as war criminals. :)
Yes, all liberals they be and all suffering from RABD.
 
I have her pegged as a true believer who decided that this forum would provide an audience in need of evangelizing. The more we resist, the more she gets to suffer for her faith. I certainly think that her faith requires a lot of suffering. She could be an alt, but I'm especially bad at identifying those. :eek: Of course, I stopped reading her screeds several pages ago, so I'm sure I've missed some clues.
Unless you can cite one example of where she has tried to evangelize you or anybody else, admit it, you suffer from RABD.
 
BentSecrets, your post 849 is wonderful/amazing/marvelous, take your pick or choose another superlative.

Thank you!

Amicus...
 
This nutcase makes Ami seem positively sane.
By the way Stella-Omega, what you think about my trolls trap on Holier Than Thou Kink? For those interested in this pissing contest of ours, check out SO on this thread and also check out the thread To Troll Alert! Red Ass Bitch Dogs on the members regular discussion board where the trolls on this thread are hung out to dry before the 1,000,000 + members of this forum. You fellows are becoming very popular. I hope you enjoy your new status.

Don't you just love it when a plan comes together like this?
 
By the way Stella-Omega, what you think about my trolls trap on Holier Than Thou Kink? For those interested in this pissing contest of ours, check out SO on this thread and also check out the thread To Troll Alert! Red Ass Bitch Dogs on the members regular discussion board where the trolls on this thread are hung out to dry before the 1,000,000 + members of this forum. You fellows are becoming very popular. I hope you enjoy your new status.

Don't you just love it when a plan comes together like this?
This nutcase makes both Ami and Scouries seem sane!
 
but I would never ever question his personal integrity or belief in being right in what he says and does

Well, there we disagree. I think he is just an agent provocateur, lying through his teeth as it suits him, and/or dumb as a post.
 
True. This board has seen much better, more sophisticated and professional agent provocateurs. wmrs2 is coming across as a real amateur.
I am amateur but all these trolls talk like it was I who started this pissing contest and that simply is false. I baited these jerks to my thread to prove they were trolls trying to ridicule and embarrass anyone that differed with them. If you can not take ridicule don't dish it out and then call foul. That is a characteristic of a RABD. Your admirers have not as yet challenged one of my intellectual positions with any tempered reasoning. How can they be anything but a troll?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top