Asians Penalized 50 Points On SAT, Blacks Given 230 ‘Bonus’ Points…

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Asians Penalized 50 Points On SAT, Blacks Given 230 ‘Bonus’ Points…


Bonus-SAT-Points

MLK’s dream has turned into a nightmare, judged based on the color of their skin. In the future, will a black person running for POTUS get ‘bonus’ electoral college votes?

Via LA Times


In a windowless classroom at an Arcadia tutoring center, parents crammed into child-sized desks and dug through their pockets and purses for pens as Ann Lee launches a PowerPoint presentation.

Her primer on college admissions begins with the basics: application deadlines, the relative virtues of the SAT versus the ACT and how many Advanced Placement tests to take.

Then she eases into a potentially incendiary topic — one that many counselors like her have learned they cannot avoid.

“Let’s talk about Asians,” she says.

Lee’s next slide shows three columns of numbers from a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant’s race is worth. She points to the first column.

African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says.

She points to the second column.

“Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps.

Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,” Lee says.

“Zenme keyi,” one mother hisses in Chinese. How can this be possible?[…]

Lee is the co-founder of HS2 Academy, a college prep business that assumes that racial bias is a fact of college admissions and counsels students accordingly. At 10 centers across the state, the academy’s counselors teach countermeasures to Asian American applicants. The goal, Lee says, is to help prospective college students avoid coming off like another “cookie-cutter Asian.”

“Everyone is in orchestra and plays piano,” Lee says. “Everyone plays tennis. Everyone wants to be a doctor, and write about immigrating to America. You can’t get in with these cliche applications.”[…]

Complaints about bias in college admissions have persisted since at least the 1920s, when a Harvard University president tried to cap the number of Jewish students. In November, a group called Students for Fair Admissions filed a suit against Harvard University for admissions policies that allegedly discriminate against Asian Americans. The group cited the 2004 Princeton study and other sources that offer statistics about Asian Americans’ test performance.
 
“Zenme keyi,” one mother hisses in Chinese. How can this be possible?

A good question. In a country ostensibly devoted to political equality, inequality is the order of the day from the Left, which seeks to bolster its favored “victim” groups at the expense of everybody else. (That anyone would willingly embrace “victim” status is another matter.) To their eternal disgrace, the courts — including the Supreme Court — have upheld the bogus issue of “diversity” as a factor in college admissions. And so we have a system that has satisfied nobody, penalizes some of the best intellectual talent in the country and hinders American competitiveness just… because.

The moral posturing of the unholy Left, which has no morals except situational morality, is bad enough, but the impact these wretched people have had on nearly everybody is sickening. On the proven theory that every single word out of the mouth of a Leftist is a lie, we have to ask ourselves: why are they doing this?

Certainly not to “help” blacks and Hispanics. If you view the basic “progressive” in his native habitat of Manhattan, West Los Angeles and rural New England, you will quickly notice that he has a positive phobia of blacks and Hispanics, lives as far away from them as possible, and is inclined to call the cops should he happen to encounter one in his neighborhood. Further, if there is any evidence that “diversity” (as the Left defines it, which is exclusively racially) has any intrinsic, positive good, I have yet to see it. For the Left, “diversity” is purely about racial nose-counting and spoils delivering, nothing more. Which is why, of course, they’re Democrats — scions of the Tammany Party.


Read more: http://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/201...se-theyre-smart-and-successful/#ixzz3T88nWyES
 
It's called affirmative action. You got a problem with affirmative action?
 
I got a problem with ADDING points to some

and

DEDUCTING points for others

yes
 
March Madness

Earlier today on Sirius XM Urban View, an African-American talk station, the guest was Daryl Scott, president of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History. The conversation turned to STEM — science, technology, engineering, and math — education, and the origins of the ongoing push to encourage institutions and students to focus on those subjects.

Can you guess what happened?

In 1983, the guest explained, a commission empaneled by the secretary of education issued a report titled “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform.” In a memorable phrase, it warned of “a rising tide of mediocrity” in the nation’s public schools. That phrase, he said, was a “euphemism.” A euphemism for what? “For us — for African Americans.”

Trigonometry is Racist!, Kevin D. Williamson
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/414585/print
 
March Madness

Earlier today on Sirius XM Urban View, an African-American talk station, the guest was Daryl Scott, president of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History. The conversation turned to STEM — science, technology, engineering, and math — education, and the origins of the ongoing push to encourage institutions and students to focus on those subjects.

Can you guess what happened?

In 1983, the guest explained, a commission empaneled by the secretary of education issued a report titled “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform.” In a memorable phrase, it warned of “a rising tide of mediocrity” in the nation’s public schools. That phrase, he said, was a “euphemism.” A euphemism for what? “For us — for African Americans.”

Trigonometry is Racist!, Kevin D. Williamson
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/414585/print

Good article.

Didn't we just end Black History month? At least I think it was Black History month based on what I saw of the PBS programming. I get a laugh (in the peculiar way, not in the funny way) over this whole "Black History" month bullshit. The history of black Americans is inextricably woven into the fabric of the nations history, right along with the Italians, Irish, Germans, Dutch, etc. that make up the melange that is America. The way so many of the blacks act you'd think that 'Black America' is/was some foreign nation to be studied separately like, oh, say, China. The other observation about the PBS programming is that it was all (maybe not all, but most certainly the programs I surveyed) about whining, crying, sob sister bull shit. Not one forward looking, uplifting, program in the lot. Victim reinforcement programming at it's best. (Or alternatively an attempt to heap guilt on all other races.)

Getting back to the theme of the thread, I know that Dr. Williams has written on the subject consistently over the years and I know that you and I have posted those articles and discussed same. The nut of it is is that these "bonus" points being awarded blacks and Hispanics could be best categorized as "guaranteed to fail" points. Blacks and Hispanics have monstrously high drop out rates in the first two years of Univ. Especially true at the higher rated Univ. They are unable to keep up with the curriculum so are forced to drop out, often with the stigma of 'failure' hung about their necks along with a student loan they have no hope of repaying anytime soon. But the liberals get to count those heads as part of their 'diversity' venue. Who gives a fuck whether those 'minorities' have a snowballs chance in hell of ever graduating, "Our numbers look great!!!"

So the bonus kids have been set up to fail and the openings that might have gone to a young adult that had a reasonable chance of getting their degree went to a failure.

This insanity is called "compassion" and "diversity." And even more amazing is that the victims of this "bonus scheme" (meaning the ones that got the bonus then failed) are complaining that the courses are too hard and "racist." (See the article AJ linked.) Are the Univ. now to 'dumb' down the course to accommodate those that should have NEVER been admitted to the Univ. to begin with? A worthless degree from Harvard is no different than a worthless degree from Podunk A&M, just one hell of a lot more expensive.

Ishmael
 
It was so hard for the Cherokee that she had to plagiarize and publish FAUX data...

:cool:

... but they kept on promoting her anyway in the name of diversity.
 
This

Black

White

Divide

Is outta Hand

But Dumz need the vote. ..so the chains remain

But to lower scores is vile
 
For the record, I think giving favorable or unfavorable treatment to anyone, no matter how it's done, in college admissions on the basis of race or ethnicity is wrong and should be outlawed. Totally.
 
If Asians take a 50 point hit, we deserve at least 75. :D

*chuckle*

This

Black

White

Divide

Is outta Hand

But Dumz need the vote. ..so the chains remain

But to lower scores is vile

There is a coming black-brown divide when blacks discover en masse that all of their perks, goodies and jobs are going to the Mexicans...

;)

Like Juan Williams sons, they will begin rediscovering their "conservative" roots and reject the dreams of their "fathers."
 
The military the fire, sanit ,etc

Provide

Loonz
FAGZ
Cunts

Extra credit
 
Back
Top