Ariz. audit underway, officials finding signs of fraud

Funny, how nobody ever brings up the possibility of fraud in the states Trump won?? Why is it only in those five he lost by close margins?
.

The assholery is even more obvious than that. Campaigns won by Republicans aren't brought up in the charge that only the Democrats who won in the same electoral process in targeted states illegally won. Those no limit to how flagrant the Republicans can get in this circus.
 
Actually it's been interesting to read your approach to our wee lil chuckleheads. I wish they'd actually hear what is being told to them. It would save a lot of frustration. Sadly they won't. That's the way they work - their brains have been thoroughly washed.

I wish you luck. And in the absence of luck, fortitude and a thick skin. :D

This isn't my first rodeo. ;)
 
Funny, how nobody ever brings up the possibility of fraud in the states Trump won?? Why is it only in those five he lost by close margins?

The assholery is even more obvious than that. Campaigns won by Republicans aren't brought up in the charge that only the Democrats who won in the same electoral process in targeted states illegally won. Those no limit to how flagrant the Republicans can get in this circus.


I've been noticing that for a while.

'There must be fraud, there has to be fraud. They say our guy didn't get as many votes as the other guy, so there MUST be fraud, otherwise they'd say our guy won. Where they say our guy won, we agree, no fraud because they say our guy won.'
 
So that's 250K+ votes for Trump?

From what i see, it says 254,722 possible fraud Ballots. It doesn't say A: they are fraudulent, nor B does it tally any of the votes for any specific candidate?

These are ballots,so they would have votes on them for a range of Candidates such as House, Senate, Presidential...whatever else you Americans choose to throw on at Election time.

Which means they could all be fraudulent votes for Trump, resulting in 250K or so "less" votes for Trump. They could also change the tally for Senate, and House too.

To bad there is no independent observers, or Democrats, or even members of the media. After all the state recounts had them.
 
From what i see, it says 254,722 possible fraud Ballots. It doesn't say A: they are fraudulent, nor B does it tally any of the votes for any specific candidate?

These are ballots,so they would have votes on them for a range of Candidates such as House, Senate, Presidential...whatever else you Americans choose to throw on at Election time.

Which means they could all be fraudulent votes for Trump, resulting in 250K or so "less" votes for Trump. They could also change the tally for Senate, and House too.

To bad there is no independent observers, or Democrats, or even members of the media. After all the state recounts had them.

I haven't yet seen where this even came from.
 
I haven't yet seen where this even came from.

Me either, but it is never too early to give a shout out to those who think the data set points one way, when it can be in fact, pointing to the other.

is it?
 
Me either, but it is never too early to give a shout out to those who think the data set points one way, when it can be in fact, pointing to the other.

is it?

Without a source, it's just someone making up shit...lol
 
I'd agree with you on accountability had the courts done their job and held evidentiary hearings followed up by investigations and holding so-called public officials accountable. Dems spouting *Nothing to see here* doesn't make it so.
The courts did do their jobs ..Trump lost over 60 court cases
60 ..lossses .. and atill thats not enough

And i listened to the audio of a few ..
Rudy Giuliani out right said .. no your honor we are not aledging fraud ..

In Anothercase i heard.. some crack pot lady lawyer was insisting that all of the Arizona voter registration be made available to the public including names address social security numbers and daye of birth ..
 
The courts did do their jobs ..Trump lost over 60 court cases
60 ..lossses .. and atill thats not enough

And i listened to the audio of a few ..
Rudy Giuliani out right said .. no your honor we are not aledging fraud ..

In Anothercase i heard.. some crack pot lady lawyer was insisting that all of the Arizona voter registration be made available to the public including names address social security numbers and daye of birth ..

Speaking of Giuliani Feds search Giuliani apartment in Ukraine investigation: report
 
I haven't yet seen where this even came from.

So it seems it is coming from here...
Peter Navarro, Trump’s trade adviser, appeared on the April 24 episode of the podcast. He walked Bannon through the information in the graphic, which he described as the results of his own investigation — not the audit underway in Arizona.

"I did a deep dive on this and identified six different types of election irregularities across the six battleground states," he said. "The possible illegal votes, my investigation uncovered, was 254,722. So that’s 24 times the alleged Biden victory margin so there’s a lot of possible slack in that system and that’s what these forensic folks are gonna be looking for as they count the ballots in Maricopa County."


https://www.politifact.com/factchec...rter-million-fraudulent-votes-werent-uncover/
 
So it seems it is coming from here...
Peter Navarro, Trump’s trade adviser, appeared on the April 24 episode of the podcast. He walked Bannon through the information in the graphic, which he described as the results of his own investigation — not the audit underway in Arizona.

"I did a deep dive on this and identified six different types of election irregularities across the six battleground states," he said. "The possible illegal votes, my investigation uncovered, was 254,722. So that’s 24 times the alleged Biden victory margin so there’s a lot of possible slack in that system and that’s what these forensic folks are gonna be looking for as they count the ballots in Maricopa County."


https://www.politifact.com/factchec...rter-million-fraudulent-votes-werent-uncover/

Thanks for the link - tracked it down to page 75 of the Navarro Report
 
Actually, it's Bill Hader. But I don't have a gif of me laughing, so you'll have to do with him.

He does look like a clueless dummy, so you've properly projected that personal characteristic successfully. :D
 
He does look like a clueless dummy, so you've properly projected that personal characteristic successfully. :D

I appreciate that you really try to be a witty one. It takes a lot to put yourself out there like that.
 
Back
Top