Ariz. audit underway, officials finding signs of fraud

[icanhelp1]

I agree. You should have come back as another person instead of the much maligned vette.

Your histrionic banter is tiring. Would you please just shut the fuck up!

 

[ll74]

You couldn't possibly know the effects on outcome with outdated voter rolls and millions of unsolicited ballots flooding the country. If you believe everything was above board then you're ignorant!


In 2016 the country wasn't deluged with unsolicited mail-in ballots.

Correction * unsolicited mail-in ballots*

-- Outdated voter rolls have been an actual thing for decades. If you wish to do something about it, then you should make a federal law dictating how to standardize it....else you're just whining about bullshit. Bottom line on this point is that there's no ACTUAL EVIDENCE that shows that outdated voter rolls contributed to fraud in any capacity. (whether you believe it could happen or not)
-- in 2016, Trump won many states based on mail-in ballots. Did the signature verification system meet your requirements?
-- in 2020, Trump won Ohio after the REDWAVE of in-person voting. Do you believe this was due to fraud? At 10pm, Biden won Ohio...at 1am, Trump had a huge amount of votes roll in....no?...it's cool? of course it is....because you don't care why it happened...

You're probably focusing on rally crowds to determine whether votes are legal.....

FYI - I've never attended a single gathering for the person I voted for....I only know one person who has.

 

[ll74]

I hope someday you have such a "day in court."

Good non-sequitur - care to expand on what I should be prosecuted for?

 

[ll74]

Actually it's you who've been duped by sleepy Joe and Kamala, then again maybe not. You might have known all along they're both Marxists compromised by the CCP, and like the corporate media, obediently doing their bidding.

I'd be interested in hearing which policies they support that are

• Marxist
• compromised by the CCP

Maybe list them out for us.

 

[ll74]

LOL

The lying piece of shit has been back less then 24 hrs, and half a dozen posts later ,you nailed his whole persona.....

If it looks like a duck....

 

[ll74]

Apparently Justice Thomas felt different:


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/clarence-thomas-dissent-pennsylvania


Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a forceful dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision to refuse hearing a Republican challenge of a Pennsylvania state court decision allowing ballots that were received up to three days after Election Day to be counted in November’s election.

“One wonders what the Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent,” Thomas wrote on Monday.

“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future,” Thomas wrote. “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

Thomas was joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch in dissenting.

He wanted to make a mark on a ruling he knew was politically favorable to do so.

But the problem is that there is no federal mandate on what he's talking about. What he is saying is that he believes the Federal government should have more input in the election process.

I'm sure you also support federal laws to protect election integrity, as he seems to.

 

[Rightguide]

He wanted to make a mark on a ruling he knew was politically favorable to do so.

But the problem is that there is no federal mandate on what he's talking about. What he is saying is that he believes the Federal government should have more input in the election process.

I'm sure you also support federal laws to protect election integrity, as he seems to.

The simple fact that state officials changed election laws and procedures, instead of state legislatures, is a violation of the Constitution requiring the attention of the SCOTUS.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

The simple fact that state officials changed election laws and procedures, instead of state legislatures, is a violation of the Constitution requiring the attention of the SCOTUS.

Name the states. (There's 9)

 

[ShyBiGuy954]

https://64.media.tumblr.com/2bb13035a09e45e51706d60a531a409e/13a1e4432dbb81db-7d/s1280x1920/1a887be55a2f0f1813e51783b675b6de7104c6d1.jpg

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Look who figured out image tags lol

Nobody was threatened either, doofus.

 

[icanhelp1]

He wanted to make a mark on a ruling he knew was politically favorable to do so.

But the problem is that there is no federal mandate on what he's talking about. What he is saying is that he believes the Federal government should have more input in the election process.

I'm sure you also support federal laws to protect election integrity, as he seems to.

I disagree, he was attempting to protect states rights, that state legislators are responsible for voting laws not bureaucrats and that Covid was not an authority for state bureaucrats or judges to change how voting is conducted in their states.

 

[ll74]

I think one of the funniest parts of the whole scenario is that those who seem to care about fraud the most are the people who have no clue how to make a claim of fraud nor do they understand how those claims are investigated

 

[ll74]

The simple fact that state officials changed election laws and procedures, instead of state legislatures, is a violation of the Constitution requiring the attention of the SCOTUS.

And how much of that led to actual change of votes?

Answer: very little.

No actual process is happening currently to address your grievances

 

[Rightguide]

And how much of that led to actual change of votes?

Answer: very little.

No actual process is happening currently to address your grievances

How many votes were changed isn't the point of an illegal act, no more than the amount of money taken in a bank robbery mitigates the fact that a bank robbery took place.

Presently state legislatures are in fact addressing irregularities and fraud in their voting processes. Arizona is in the middle of investigating and revamping their voting laws as we speak.

 

[ll74]

How many votes were changed isn't the point of an illegal act, no more than the amount of money taken in a bank robbery mitigates the fact that a bank robbery took place.

Presently state legislatures are in fact addressing irregularities and fraud in their voting processes. Arizona is in the middle of investigating and revamping their voting laws as we speak.

Who performed the illegal act? Oh wait....just Democrats...no person you're going after....because you don't fucking care

You have a bunch of accusations without any evidence of any of those accusations yet somehow you wa t to solve those problems...


Fucking moron

 

[ll74]

How many votes were changed isn't the point of an illegal act, no more than the amount of money taken in a bank robbery mitigates the fact that a bank robbery took place.

Presently state legislatures are in fact addressing irregularities and fraud in their voting processes. Arizona is in the middle of investigating and revamping their voting laws as we speak.

Can you tell me which irregularities (with evidence) they are addressing? I'll wait....

 

[Rightguide]

Name the states. (There's 9)

I know of five. Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

 

[Rightguide]

Who performed the illegal act? Oh wait....just Democrats...no person you're going after....because you don't fucking care

You have a bunch of accusations without any evidence of any of those accusations yet somehow you wa t to solve those problems...


Fucking moron

Projection such as yours indicates moronic thinking more than anything I've said. I don't hold Republicans blameless either, notwithstanding your moronic projection to the contrary.

 

[ll74]

Projection such as yours indicates moronic thinking more than anything I've said. I don't hold Republicans blameless either, notwithstanding your moronic projection to the contrary.

Projection of what? I voted legally in every election. I've reported every incident of fraud I've encountered (number: 0).

I seek information. But also knowledge. Having data means shit if you don't understand the process.

For example:
To claim fraud you see, you need to file a claim.
That claim is investigated and verified by the state election board.
Valid claims then go to the state AG to investigate and prosecute if warranted.

Which part am I projecting?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

If it looks like a duck....

Most ducks are smarter than wrongway feldon ...

 

[ll74]

Most ducks are smarter than wrongway feldon ...

I think you give ducks too much credit...they're kinda dumb

 

[ll74]

I just saw four people bring in ballots. I'm going to create an affdavit and submit it to Giuliani for research

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I disagree, he was attempting to protect states rights, that state legislators are responsible for voting laws not bureaucrats and that Covid was not an authority for state bureaucrats or judges to change how voting is conducted in their states.

Funny how SCOTUS disagreed, even Clarence Thomas, except he thought the Court should take up the case, and have it dismissed after accepting it. Perhaps hindsight being perfect, SCOTUS should have done, exactly that. It would have shut up the idiots, such as yourself.

"One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent." Clarence Thomas


https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_2c83.pdf

 

[Rightguide]

Projection of what? I voted legally in every election. I've reported every incident of fraud I've encountered (number: 0).

I seek information. But also knowledge. Having data means shit if you don't understand the process.

For example:
To claim fraud you see, you need to file a claim.
That claim is investigated and verified by the state election board.
Valid claims then go to the state AG to investigate and prosecute if warranted.

Which part am I projecting?

Your projection I blame only Democrats, that nothing illegal happened, and that no evidence of it exists.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I think you give ducks too much credit...they're kinda dumb

Daffy is going to be disappointed to hear that, and of course, Bugs will never let him live it down.