ms_ann_thrope
Resurrected
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Posts
- 25,731
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a form of job creation.I like their 'UFO's were really just experimental planes', while almost half the released papers are blacked out!
The conspiracy-theory, tinfoil-hat brigade is going to go nuts!
I like their 'UFO's were really just experimental planes', while almost half the released papers are blacked out!
The conspiracy-theory, tinfoil-hat brigade is going to go nuts!
I don't care how much of any UFO documents have been redacted, any aliens who may have visited earth could not be described as "life as we know it," because life as we know it appears to be constrained by general relativity physics which posits the speed of light as a most emphatic "terminal velocity" (if I may take license with the phrase).
Any alien civilization smart enough to transcend the relativity constraint (which they would certainly have had to have done since there are no planet bearing stars in our immediate galactic neighborhood) would have certainly been advanced enough not to have "crashed" here and left their crumpled vehicles and deceased passengers and crew littering the Mojave Desert.
Area 51 is now as it has always been -- a secluded military base for testing advanced, but wholly earth-born aircraft.
I don't care how much of any UFO documents have been redacted, any aliens who may have visited earth could not be described as "life as we know it," because life as we know it appears to be constrained by general relativity physics which posits the speed of light as a most emphatic "terminal velocity" (if I may take license with the phrase).
Any alien civilization smart enough to transcend the relativity constraint (which they would certainly have had to have done since there are no planet bearing stars in our immediate galactic neighborhood) would have certainly been advanced enough not to have "crashed" here and left their crumpled vehicles and deceased passengers and crew littering the Mojave Desert.
Area 51 is now as it has always been -- a secluded military base for testing advanced, but wholly earth-born aircraft.
I don't care how much of any UFO documents have been redacted, any aliens who may have visited earth could not be described as "life as we know it," because life as we know it appears to be constrained by general relativity physics which posits the speed of light as a most emphatic "terminal velocity" (if I may take license with the phrase).
Any alien civilization smart enough to transcend the relativity constraint (which they would certainly have had to have done since there are no planet bearing stars in our immediate galactic neighborhood) would have certainly been advanced enough not to have "crashed" here and left their crumpled vehicles and deceased passengers and crew littering the Mojave Desert.
Area 51 is now as it has always been -- a secluded military base for testing advanced, but wholly earth-born aircraft.
Considering the staggering mathematical improbability of evolution occurring somewhere else I find the idea of other sentient beings improbable but not impossible.
I believe that Area 51 is doing reverse engineering on technology left behind by earth time travelers. This is farfetched but has the same likelihood of aliens.
How is time travel somehow more efficient than space travel?
If I knew this I would be employed at NASA instead of waiting tables and getting leered at by fat truckers.
Transporters won't work because of the data crunching and error margin.
Heisenberg's principle means you can't know where all particles are, their trajectory, their mass, their velocity.
If we don't know where everything in a living body is going. Bad news. You don't mind if you're not alive on the other side, do you?
Most likely we'd encounter mechanical or biochanical probes that travel long distances. Not whoever made them, they probably gots stuff to do in the intervening billion years.
I just made up the word biochanical by the way.
The technology boggles the mind but I don't believe anything is impossible as crazy as some things seem. Many things considered impossible at one time is everyday household technology today.
Transporters won't work because of the data crunching and error margin.
Heisenberg's principle means you can't know where all particles are, their trajectory, their mass, their velocity.
If we don't know where everything in a living body is going. Bad news. You don't mind if you're not alive on the other side, do you?
Most likely we'd encounter mechanical or biochanical probes that travel long distances. Not whoever made them, they probably gots stuff to do in the intervening billion years.
I just made up the word biochanical by the way.
Chekov can do 'zat'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LambIJjkamg
I didn't say impossible. Just improbable with any of the methods suggested so far.
I'm sure someone will come up with something, but I doubt after that fact, they'll show up on Earth and say "Look what we made! Oh. Right. You guys still poop."
I do think time travel would be more destructive than productive. The meddlesome humans would wish to stop tragic events such as the Holocaust, maybe even the crucifiction of Christ. But changing these events could have unforeseen backlash that could be catastrophic. While I hope we invent teleportation I hope time travel will stay impossible. I would be even happier if they first cured cancer. AIDS, war, famine, birth defects and
men with small penises.
In J. J. Abrams universe, sense and science do not exist.
Of course he can do zat, he doesn't have to think about how. He just reads the script.
Robert Heinlein did a good job portraying some time travel with success. Since you had infinite time and infinite chances (his characters were also essentially immortal at this point) they had the motto of "A Paradox can be Paradoctored."
You're just determined to offend people, aren't you?
You're no fun this morning.
I hate J. J. Abrams. I think it would be a public service to remove him from breathing status.
I'm a Star Trek fan and the reboot is insulting and unwatchable.
Jon Stewart said it best. J.J. Abrams said that Star Trek was "too intellectual" and he didn't understand it as a kid. Jon's response was "I stopped listening, but your lips were still moving, so I assumed you were apologizing."
Hate that guy. *spit*
It's just fiction. Too many people take it too serious sometimes. I fancy myself a Trek fan too, but welcome the new blood. It's as close to TOS as this generation is going to get to keep the franchise rolling.