Are women more sensitive?

Dude. The last time I tried a line like this one, she laughed in my face, just saying. :D

What? She didn't like your tits? Tits are toys, she doesn't like playing with toys? I thought women loved toys, billions spent every year on them and batteries.

Always wanted to see a commercial with the Duracell bunny ramming a vibe up a woman's pussy and get cum all over him
 
Could someone save all this for a Letters & Transcripts story? :p

Slyc, this is exactly where I get my story ideas from. Reading the threads on this site. It's a wealth of plot lines. Like cuckold Sr getting fucked with a strapon by lesbian Safe-Bet. Lots of things here make great story lines.
 
Slyc, this is exactly where I get my story ideas from. Reading the threads on this site. It's a wealth of plot lines. Like cuckold Sr getting fucked with a strapon by lesbian Safe-Bet. Lots of things here make great story lines.

Well, that might work for the Erotic Horror cat . . . .

Ya think? ;)

Maybe not the way you're thinking, but someone like BFW could never go away. Parasites are a constant. ;)
 
Slyc, this is exactly where I get my story ideas from. Reading the threads on this site. It's a wealth of plot lines. Like cuckold Sr getting fucked with a strapon by lesbian Safe-Bet. Lots of things here make great story lines.

All I am going to say on that subject is: EWWWWWWWW!


Now you've done it, Lance! SR and I prolly have finally agreed on something! You realize that that is one of the signs of the End Times don't you? :eek:
 
All I am going to say on that subject is: EWWWWWWWW!


Now you've done it, Lance! SR and I prolly have finally agreed on something! You realize that that is one of the signs of the End Times don't you? :eek:

( Safe-Bet prances around the stage, weilding an 8" strap-on, challenging Sr to put up or shut up. The spot light follows the wobbling life-like member attached to her hips. A naked young woman is brought on stage and has her hands bound to her ankles. Her ass is high in the air and the camera zooms in for a close up of her wet sex. Safe-Bet looms close and smiles to the audience and raises her hand to urge a cheer from the crowd.....)
 
you're an insensitive asshole, lance. It's now very clear.

What a shame, too, you started out funny.
 
you're an insensitive asshole, lance. It's now very clear.

What a shame, too, you started out funny.

*Tapping foot petulantly...she's killing my build up! Watching to see if Bets makes any rejectory motions. Substitutes have been known to make their names with the stuffiness of union strikes."
 
*Tapping foot petulantly...she's killing my build up! Watching to see if Bets makes any rejectory motions. Substitutes have been known to make their names with the stuffiness of union strikes."

Why are you taking offence Stella? Isn't this all just fun and games? I haven't said anything to you that was off-colour. I see the name calling and the attitudes flying about and I just had some fun with it diffusing it to a safer level for everyone to deal with. Don't you like having fun and playing outside your normal arena? Can't have it your way all the time. I've made mistakes and apologized for them. If I've made one now, tell me what it is.
 
Safe-Bet is a real person. She is married, and monogamous. Furthermore, she may have-- you do not know-- suffered rape in her past. Writing her 'raping' a girl is an ugly presumption. She is a very private person. Writing her raping a girl in front of an audience is ugly.

When you start describing what a real person is "doing," without any consideration for her actual preferences, morals, past history, it's abusive.

This has been considered a form of virtual rape since the very first days of usenet-- I remember there was a 'rape' in words, of a woman, and the real-life person who 'perpetrated' it suffered a great deal of real life ostracism as a result.

Of course no one can do anything to you here no matter what you write, but I would ask you please, to be compassionate and remember you're talking to and about real human beings. Speak for yourself, not for other people, okay?
 
Why are you taking offence Stella? Isn't this all just fun and games? I haven't said anything to you that was off-colour. I see the name calling and the attitudes flying about and I just had some fun with it diffusing it to a safer level for everyone to deal with. Don't you like having fun and playing outside your normal arena? Can't have it your way all the time. I've made mistakes and apologized for them. If I've made one now, tell me what it is.

Well, for me, you trivialized a disagreement that isn't at all shallow and you completely misjudged Stella (but probably not safe_bet) in the (can't find a better word, so will just repeat it) shallowness of your innuendo and banter. I think you completely misjudged the persona of Stella--and misjudged safe_bet's party line, although you got the level of her intellect pretty faithfully.

You're trying much, much too hard, I think--and firing on all of the wrong forum pistons.

But that's just for me. You have the right to exhibit as you wish here. Certainly is on the same cartoonish, sterotyped level as safe-bet.
 
Last edited:
See, this is what usually happens; the quarrelers all turn on the one guy as a common enemy! :D
 
Safe-Bet is a real person. She is married, and monogamous. Furthermore, she may have-- you do not know-- suffered rape in her past. Writing her 'raping' a girl is an ugly presumption. She is a very private person. Writing her raping a girl in front of an audience is ugly.

When you start describing what a real person is "doing," without any consideration for her actual preferences, morals, past history, it's abusive.

This has been considered a form of virtual rape since the very first days of usenet-- I remember there was a 'rape' in words, of a woman, and the real-life person who 'perpetrated' it suffered a great deal of real life ostracism as a result.

Of course no one can do anything to you here no matter what you write, but I would ask you please, to be compassionate and remember you're talking to and about real human beings. Speak for yourself, not for other people, okay?

I do apologize to you Stella if i offended you with my banter. Nothing was ever directed personally as a slight to your character.
I humbly apologize to Safe-Bet for any inference to my fictional account of on-stage antics. I wrote it with no intention of making it rape-related in any way. I was merely making it a lesbian related sideshow and I again apologize if the tying of her hands to her ankles made it a rape scene. It was not my intention for it to be construed that way. The fact that many seem to know her past, as I don't, I can see why you feel it would offend her in that way.
To Safe-Bet, my sincerest apologies to you. I in no way want you to think i would attack your personal life or your lifestyle choice with any fore thought of knowing about it. In knowing about the terrible event in your past, I'm saddened that things like that have happened to you and only wish you the peace of knowing you are cared for in this room and by the people, including myself, who come here.
I will discontinue posting anymore about the imaginary fight between you and Sr, as it has become an issue for both of you.
I hope you will all allow me to continue posting in my same humourous way, but warn me personally if I have struck a nerve. I am new here to this room and don't know the pasts of all the people, like you all do. i hope this makes amends to all I have mentioned. Lance
 
Now I am absolutely impressed! :rose:

But one thing-- I do NOT know if Safe_bet was ever a victim of rape. Neither do you.

And whether or not she was, is immaterial. It's an assumption you might always want to be very careful about, whenever you talk about women and, in more cases than you'd expect, men as well. There are so incredibly many social and personal ramifications that can last a lifetime, yanno? for friends and family, too.
 
Now I am absolutely impressed! :rose:

But one thing-- I do NOT know if Safe_bet was ever a victim of rape. Neither do you.

And whether or not she was, is immaterial. It's an assumption you might always want to be very careful about, whenever you talk about women and, in more cases than you'd expect, men as well. There are so incredibly many social and personal ramifications that can last a lifetime, yanno? for friends and family, too.

I mis-read your comment. I thought you said she was. Regardless, the point is taken and noted. Am I allowed to come back and play?
 
I mis-read your comment. I thought you said she was. Regardless, the point is taken and noted. Am I allowed to come back and play?

sure, and you can have milk and cookies with the other kids before naptime!

really, it's so damn rare to see an apology that is specific to the instance, and doesn't try to excuse or explain away the problem. I can't do that very often, even though I know how and why; yours is a model for me to remember!:rose:

There's a couple of researchers who showed up to research a mostly female community a couple weeks ago. it became very obvious that these guys had their theory already, and only wanted data that proved it, and were willing to ignore or rewrite anything to the contrary. The community began point out the problems in the assumptions their questions were based on-- a lot of the women are also academics, some of them are researchers and all of them are defensive about their identities and the community, and not willing to let outsiders have instant access.

Eventually, the dudes retreated, leaving behind a note that read;
"We wish to apologize for any offense caused by our survey, ..."

when they could (should) have said;

We wish to apologise for the offense caused by our survey...

Because that slimy little qualifier "any" says; "it's all in your mind, bitches!"

and makes it no apology at all.

a nice little object lesson for the rest of us!
 
sure, and you can have milk and cookies with the other kids before naptime!

really, it's so damn rare to see an apology that is specific to the instance, and doesn't try to excuse or explain away the problem. I can't do that very often, even though I know how and why; yours is a model for me to remember!:rose:

There's a couple of researchers who showed up to research a mostly female community a couple weeks ago. it became very obvious that these guys had their theory already, and only wanted data that proved it, and were willing to ignore or rewrite anything to the contrary. The community began point out the problems in the assumptions their questions were based on-- a lot of the women are also academics, some of them are researchers and all of them are defensive about their identities and the community, and not willing to let outsiders have instant access.

Eventually, the dudes retreated, leaving behind a note that read;
"We wish to apologize for any offense caused by our survey, ..."

when they could (should) have said;

We wish to apologise for the offense caused by our survey...

Because that slimy little qualifier "any" says; "it's all in your mind, bitches!"

and makes it no apology at all.

a nice little object lesson for the rest of us!

Thank you, I'd like choclate chip cookies and mother's milk
 
Back
Top