Are lesbians more sexual women in general than hetero women ?

lucky-E-leven said:
That is NO way to flatter one's Y characteristic, The Earl. Honestly. :eek:
OK, THAT'S the funniest thing I've seen all day. :D
 
lucky-E-leven said:
That is NO way to flatter one's Y characteristic, The Earl. Honestly. :eek:

Oh, sorry, I missed out the measurements, didn't I. 14" long and as thick as a coke can. I would look in the mirror and look 10 years younger as well, but I think that's against the laws of Lit.

The Earl
 
TheEarl said:
Oh, sorry, I missed out the measurements, didn't I. 14" long and as thick as a coke can. I would look in the mirror and look 10 years younger as well, but I think that's against the laws of Lit.

The Earl

Yeah, yeah. [all together now] "Like a babies arm holding an apple..." :rolleyes:
 
Dranoel said:
Yeah, yeah. [all together now] "Like a babies arm holding an apple..." :rolleyes:

Anyone ever stop and think just how disturbing that simile is? Who looks at a baby holding an apple and thinks - "Wow, that's just the same shape as my cock!"

The Earl
 
TheEarl said:
Anyone ever stop and think just how disturbing that simile is? Who looks at a baby holding an apple and thinks - "Wow, that's just the same shape as my cock!"

The Earl
I've never heard it before, but it's certainly disturbing.
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
Are lesbians more sexual women in general than hetero women ? I think probably yes but I dont really know for sure. Maybe lesbians are just kinkier - just another reason to love lesbians.
Hell if I know. But I'd imagine there's less concern about getting knocked up.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
I'm hopping on board the lesbian with the wrong chromosone train. Now that that's settled...I'm hopping on Carson, because as stated, bi's get to have all the fun. :cool:

Now if you'll excuse me...I'm going to lather Carson up in a melted chocolate sauce and enjoy some dessert. After that I'm going to get the whipped cream, tie a fine fem down, (any volunteers?), and enjoy a nice sundae. Perhaps I bring the male gender closer to the female as far as great oral. And if I fail, I still get dessert. :D Not matter what, I win. See, bi's do have all the fun. Or maybe it's just me...
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
Are lesbians more sexual women in general than hetero women ? I think probably yes but I dont really know for sure. Maybe lesbians are just kinkier - just another reason to love lesbians.

The phenomenon you mention isn't a lesbian characteristic but rather an attitude of being comfortable about sex and sexual topics. It may seem to crop up more often among lesbians because women or men who are fully comfortable about their sexuality and went through the nerve rally of "coming out" may find a shorter jump to being open about sex topics in general.

Similarily, out gays are less likely than the "straight" camp to hold views of sex (in general) as immoral since gay sex is considered an immoral form of sex. This also leads to a skewing of your observations, especially if you live in a community that drives you to ask the question (no offense to your community, just observing it may be less sexually open than say San Francisco)
 
TheEarl said:
Oh, sorry, I missed out the measurements, didn't I. 14" long and as thick as a coke can. I would look in the mirror and look 10 years younger as well, but I think that's against the laws of Lit.

The Earl

Ever hear a horse cackle madly? ;)
 
To ask such a general question is probably a mistake in the first place, Mike. Every person differs, no matter what sexual orientation they are. I know straight women who are very open about their sex lives, and straight men that aren't. Not every man is lewd, and not every woman is conservative.

I believe the term for women you were inquiring about is "nympos".. I'd like to meet a nympo bi-sexual chick *nods knowingly*
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
I dont have any quantitative data on why I think lesbians are most sexual than heteros but I do have three lesbian friends and they talk about sex in ways I have never heard hetero woman discuss. They are as open and uninhibited as men or so it seems. Heck, maybe they just feel comfortable around me talking openly about these matters.

Maybe it has something to do that they've already rejected societies definition of what they *should* be, so therefore they don't feel (or cave to) the pressure to be 'good girls' and whisper about 'naughty things.'

--Not saying 'all lesbians'- just your friends. Everybody is different, and that's probably what everybody else on this thread said too.:)
 
Lucifer_Carroll said:
The phenomenon you mention isn't a lesbian characteristic but rather an attitude of being comfortable about sex and sexual topics. It may seem to crop up more often among lesbians because women or men who are fully comfortable about their sexuality and went through the nerve rally of "coming out" may find a shorter jump to being open about sex topics in general.

Similarily, out gays are less likely than the "straight" camp to hold views of sex (in general) as immoral since gay sex is considered an immoral form of sex. This also leads to a skewing of your observations, especially if you live in a community that drives you to ask the question (no offense to your community, just observing it may be less sexually open than say San Francisco)


Everyone in SF talks about sex openly, more so than in the midwest where I grew up, so your theory makes a lot of sense to me. I'm straight, but I talk more openly about sex with my gay male friends than I do with my straight guy friends or straight girl friends. Straight guys are the least open about talking about sex with me, unless they're boyfriends. I only have one lesbian friend and I she's more open than my straight girl friends, but she's a wild and crazy lady from New Orleans, so she's pretty open about everything.

Clear as mud? :D
 
BlackShanglan said:
How about seeing one stare entranced at an AV? Oh, I know - too often to count.
Tonight it was put up in a shameless attempt to get a great poem out of Fool. Worked, too. ;)
 
minsue said:
Tonight it was put up in a shameless attempt to get a great poem out of Fool. Worked, too. ;)

Perfect muse and a perfect poet. What other result could there be?
 
The_Fool said:
Thanks sweets....There was actually four, but since Dar asked to keep hers for her Sig, I didn't put it in the thread. I need to mine the "Last" thread sometime for some of the other stuff I've written.
I thought one was missing, but it's been a long day so I figured I was wrong. :D

I'm pretty sure you'd find tons of poems of yours in the AH thread graveyard.
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
Are lesbians more sexual women in general than hetero women ? I think probably yes but I dont really know for sure. Maybe lesbians are just kinkier - just another reason to love lesbians.

I don't think there's many women out there who are much more sexual and kinky than me. Seriously.

And get this:

I'm straight!!

As a couple have already said in this thread, it's not about being straight/gay/bi or whatever, it's about being comfortable with our own sexuality.

I'm so comfortable with mine, I wear it like a second skin. And I love talking about it. :D I'm a slut. ;) But, not a promiscuous slut. I'm very, very selective. Poor guy, he's gone away on a holiday now. *snicker*

As The Fool once said about me, "Don't kid us. You aren't straight. You aren't gay. You aren't bi. You are whatever it takes to get off. And whatever it takes to get your partner of the moment off. You aren't bisexual, asexual, heterosexual or homosexual. You are sexual....and sexy... Don't change..." ~The Fool

:kiss:

Having said all of that, certain women do "do it" for me. BUT, I think the big kick for me, in doing something with another woman, would be in having my man there, watching, and then joining in. In fact, I know it is.

Lou :p
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
Are lesbians more sexual women in general than hetero women ? I think probably yes but I dont really know for sure. Maybe lesbians are just kinkier - just another reason to love lesbians.


Depends on the woman.

Just a quiet corrollary, but most women are, in company they are comfortable with, more willing to talk about sex than we are given credit for. If you ever maketti to a hen party, you might find yourself shocked at how open a lot of women are with each other. That openess, in the presence of women you know are lesbians, might lead you to conclude all the sexual chatter is a form of "chatting each other up". That isn't neccessarily the case.

Lucky is a sexual dynamo. She's also a lesbian. Lou is easily as sexual, but she's straight. I've dated girls, where there weren't enough hours in the day for all the sex they wanted. I've also dated women who seem to think once a week is enough. It's a totally individual taste and I would guess it varries in about the same proportion among straight and lesbian women as well as among straight and gay men.

A lot of other things affect it too. Age, background, social climate being just a few. You are basically, lumping a large group of dissimial women into a group and then asking about a group dynamic that isn't really there.

Lesbians come in all flavors, if you'll pardon the pun. Like every other trait, they are all individuals. I highly doubt sexual appetite varries in a way that is statistically different from the population of straight women.
 
I don't know what the studies on lesbians say, but I have heard that homosexual men are more promiscuous and have sex more frequently than het men.

I also heard an explanation. Because men are bigger sluts than women (for good biological, Darwinian reasons), "men with men" is the perfect opportunity to go sex crazy.

The onset of AIDS curtailed it to a degree. Pre-AIDS western homosexuals lived at fantastic levels of promiscuity and indulgence - stories from San Francisco bath houses in the 70's had orgies and scenes of debauchery and excess far exceeding anything from the bible (even!).

Pity i am het really - sounds like a good deal.

SL61
 
Sexual preference has absolutely nothing to do with one's desire for or ability to be candid about sex. Nothing. It also has nothing to do with kinkiness versus non-kinkiness. Absolutely nothing. The idea is ludicrous. Everyone is born a sexual being to some degree and in some form. Within every spectrum of preference, you will find people on both sides of the coin. Some will be very active, involved, and open, and some will not. Some will be kinky, some will not. It has nothing to do with which preference they hold and to suggest so is akin to asking if blue-eyed people eat more ice cream than brown-eyed people. There is no connection.

My 2 Centavos,

AppleBiter
 
Back
Top