butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Posts
- 84,771
so mouthy, unhinged lindell famously offered $5M to anyone who could prove his figures about voting claims wrong. An expert took him up on that and did so... lindell had refused to pay out so it went to arbitration.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=2d7dec11efb34cc2ef28aa980d6ea51a&ei=18
In its decision, the panel said: “The data Lindell LLC provided, and represented reflected information from the November 2020 election, unequivocally did not reflect November 2020 election data.”
Based on its analysis, the panel said, “Mr Zeidman performed under the contract … Failure to pay Mr Zeidman the $5m prized was a breach of the contract, entitling him to recover.”
*smirk*Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, Virginia, told the Guardian: “The contest rules provided in the arbitration stated that disputes were to be ‘resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration’ and observed that arbitration ‘is subject to very limited review by courts’. Thus, Lindell cannot directly appeal the arbitration panel ruling to a court.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=2d7dec11efb34cc2ef28aa980d6ea51a&ei=18