AOC, the 'Genius,' wants to Abolish Our Prison System

S

score_keeper

Guest
AOC says she wants 'to abolish our carceral system'

"I want to abolish our carceral system that's designed to trap Black and Brown men," the democratic socialist told a rally of Turner supporters in Cleveland. "I want justice. I want peace, and I want prosperity. That’s what I want."

That's what she wants?

She doesn't want to stop black and brown men from becoming criminals?

She doesn't want to provide them with more opportunities to succeed in life? Safer neighborhoods? Better education?

She doesn't want to provide them with a crime-free lifestyle that gives people hope for a better tomorrow by working hard today?

This is why I hope AOC stays in office forever: She panders to a small demographic of radicals and no one but a radical likes a radical, which is why she is among the least effective members of congress.
 
We have a larger percentage of our population incarcerated than any other country including China, and I'm sure we don't have a more criminally inclined population than any other. That is not OK. Something is wrong with the system.
 
We have a larger percentage of our population incarcerated than any other country including China, and I'm sure we don't have a more criminally inclined population than any other. That is not OK. Something is wrong with the system.

What's wrong is blaming the policing system instead of going into the low-income neighborhoods and fixing the root cause of all this crime: The people.
 
What's wrong is blaming the policing system instead of going into the low-income neighborhoods and fixing the root cause of all this crime: The people.

They're no more criminal than other countries' people. Something is wrong with the system.
 
They're no more criminal than other countries' people. Something is wrong with the system.

Nothing is wrong with the system.

Certainly not because some folks can't follow the laws.

That's as silly as thinking you were wronged somehow because someone else made more money than you.
 
Nothing is wrong with the system.

Certainly not because some folks can't follow the laws.

That's as silly as thinking you were wronged somehow because someone else made more money than you.

Completely different matter. If we have that many people in prison it means the system is doing something wrong, regardless of what the inmates did.
 
Completely different matter.

But your totally irrational assumptions are just as detached from reality in both cases.

If we have that many people in prison it means the system is doing something wrong, regardless of what the inmates did.

No.

While I agree we arrest/prosecute people for shit we shouldn't some things should be and stay absolutely zero tolerance and enforced by and to the fullest extent of the law.

IDGAF how many murderers, rapist, elderly/child/animal abuse, arsonist and robbers get busted and locked away.....because murder, rape, arson, abuse of the innocent and robbery are BAD. Catch ALL of them and make it all but a sure thing that anyone who engages in those activities gets caught.

Build a penal colony in the Mojave. Convicted scum bags go in so the rest of us who CAN follow the rules can get on with our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
 
Last edited:
Devil's Island never made anybody think well of the French.

IDGAF...society is better off when you lock the violent animals in a cage.

Petty/victimless crimes....lots of room for policy change and discussion there. I obviously take a far more liberal approach here, don't think victimless crime should be a thing and petty crime should be punished with an appropriate array of community service type restitution and or fines.

But society is objectively better with the violent/harmful ones behind bars....hunt them down and lock them up.
 
Last edited:
We have a larger percentage of our population incarcerated than any other country including China

1. Ask the Uighurs whether they agree perhaps.

2. After that consider the possibility that the prison population in China is regularly depleted by their World leadership in executions.

3. Think first. :)
 
1. Ask the Uighurs whether they agree perhaps.

2. After that consider the possibility that the prison population in China is regularly depleted by their World leadership in executions.

3. Think first. :)

He said percentage not overall numbers.

Think first.
 
AOC says she wants 'to abolish our carceral system'

"I want to abolish our carceral system that's designed to trap Black and Brown men," the democratic socialist told a rally of Turner supporters in Cleveland. "I want justice. I want peace, and I want prosperity. That’s what I want."

That's what she wants?

She doesn't want to stop black and brown men from becoming criminals?

She doesn't want to provide them with more opportunities to succeed in life? Safer neighborhoods? Better education?

She doesn't want to provide them with a crime-free lifestyle that gives people hope for a better tomorrow by working hard today?

This is why I hope AOC stays in office forever: She panders to a small demographic of radicals and no one but a radical likes a radical, which is why she is among the least effective members of congress.

She definitely knows the right Trumpy buttons to push, that's.for sure.

Good luck...hope she doesn't make you pee your pants
 
He said percentage not overall numbers.

Think first.

Thank you for pointing that out. China only has some 4 million people imprisoned, but in addition, the entire population is confined to a significant extent through the implementation of the Hojou (internal passport) system.

Some 150 million+ have lost access to basic services like education and medical aid. Since technological improvements in moitoring the population, local CCP officials have acquired great power over whether to grant or deny freedom of movement and place of residence to individuals. :)
 
I said...
This is why I hope AOC stays in office forever: She panders to a small demographic of radicals and no one but a radical likes a radical, which is why she is among the least effective members of congress.

and you said...

She definitely knows the right Trumpy buttons to push, that's.for sure.

Good luck...hope she doesn't make you pee your pants

So, you either have a comprehension problem or a selective perception problem. You should fix it, because it makes you look foolish and immature, just like a Flat Earther who denies reality.
 
I said...


and you said...



So, you either have a comprehension problem or a selective perception problem. You should fix it, because it makes you look foolish and immature, just like a Flat Earther who denies reality.

Right, because I was responding to what you said in this post rather than your knee jerk post whenever AOC says anything in the public sphere.

I think you're secretly hot for her.
 
Right, because I was responding to what you said in this post rather than your knee jerk post whenever AOC says anything in the public sphere.

I think you're secretly hot for her.


So, question? Is AOC an asset or liability to her party?
 
Right, because I was responding to what you said in this post rather than your knee jerk post whenever AOC says anything in the public sphere.

I think you're secretly hot for her.

She's doable, but what were you hoping to accomplish by bringing that up?
 
Just trying to decipher why you have to post every time AOC opens her mouth, which was my original comment.

AOC makes herself an easy target for ridicule, and given your constant lack of legitimate responses whenever she's brought up, you realize that defending her is like saying gas vapors don't burn.

I do question your maturity after your 'hot for her' comment, though. It's a little too 'playground' don't you think? It reminds me of my thread Immaturity, Lack of Dignity, and the Democrats, but that's a D-bag for you.

Just so you know, I don't blush.
 
AOC makes herself an easy target for ridicule, and given your constant lack of legitimate responses whenever she's brought up, you realize that defending her is like saying gas vapors don't burn.

I do question your maturity after your 'hot for her' comment, though. It's a little too 'playground' don't you think? It reminds me of my thread Immaturity, Lack of Dignity, and the Democrats, but that's a D-bag for you.

Just so you know, I don't blush.

You have an obsession with her......it definitely is not based on any reality of policy decisions, so I figured it had to be personal.

I have no desire to defend her comments....she doesn't represent me or the party in any meaningful way....the only thing I can say is that she whips up votes for the party....which is great
 
You have an obsession with her......it definitely is not based on any reality of policy decisions, so I figured it had to be personal.

I have no desire to defend her comments....she doesn't represent me or the party in any meaningful way....the only thing I can say is that she whips up votes for the party....which is great

AOC is running the Democrats. She's ineffective as a legislator, but she's very effective as a campaigner, and the Donks are terrified of being primaried by a Squad clone. Just ask Lacey Clay.
 
AOC is running the Democrats. She's ineffective as a legislator, but she's very effective as a campaigner, and the Donks are terrified of being primaried by a Squad clone. Just ask Lacey Clay.

lmao, she's running laps in Trumpies' heads.
 
Back
Top