Any man can be convicted of "rape" for consensual sex with his wife

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html

I suppose if one's married to a nine-year-old....
 
'Cuz being choked while brutally fucked against your will is ok. You know, as long as you're married. Other than that it is so uncool.
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html

If a man forces his wife to have sex when she doesn't want to then it's rape. Being married to someone doesn't mean they have to have sex with you every time you want it.
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html

Spousal rape is rarely reported and almost never prosecuted precisely because of people's attitudes of marriage giving "implied consent". The woman in the story was repeatedly assaulted by her husband, and the last time he attacked her, it included rape. If she hadn't caught the assault on tape, nothing may have been done in her case either.

Your comment about written consent is ridiculous.
 
If a man forces his wife to have sex when she doesn't want to then it's rape. Being married to someone doesn't mean they have to have sex with you every time you want it.

In other words men now have no reason whatsoever to get married.
 
In other words men now have no reason whatsoever to get married.

If a man wants to get married to just to have sex with a certain women then no he shouldn't get married. Marriage is not just about sex. It's about loving and sharing your life with someone else. It's about compromise and sacrifice. If a man thinks that his wife is your own personal sex toy and is suppose have sex with him when he wants then he is a sad excuse for a man.
 
If a man wants to get married to just to have sex with a certain women then no he shouldn't get married. Marriage is not just about sex. It's about loving and sharing your life with someone else. It's about compromise and sacrifice. If a man thinks that his wife is your own personal sex toy and is suppose have sex with him when he wants then he is a sad excuse for a man.

Shut up, you stupid slut.
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html

Sounds like the start of an Ish thread.
 
If it was consensual, there wouldn't be an issue. But the fact is, when a man forces a woman to have sex with her (whether it's his girlfriend, wife, classmate or a stranger), it is rape. Doesn't matter what their prior relationship is. Any man who truly loved a woman would understand she's not in the mood.

What next, you're going to question the validity of date rape? Because a guy coughed up $20 for dinner, a woman owes her body?
 
Wait, in the old days? I thought that still was legal grounds....:confused:

It was called "withholding the marital privilege" Most states now are "no fault" divorce states, which means you don't even need to give a reason to divorce. Those that do require a reason allow "irreconcilable differences" which pretty much covers everything, including not getting any.
 
If it was consensual, there wouldn't be an issue. But the fact is, when a man forces a woman to have sex with her (whether it's his girlfriend, wife, classmate or a stranger), it is rape. Doesn't matter what their prior relationship is. Any man who truly loved a woman would understand she's not in the mood.

What next, you're going to question the validity of date rape? Because a guy coughed up $20 for dinner, a woman owes her body?

Who the hell spends only $20 on a dinner with a date? Where the fuck do you go, Red Lobster?
 
It was called "withholding the marital privilege" Most states now are "no fault" divorce states, which means you don't even need to give a reason to divorce. Those that do require a reason allow "irreconcilable differences" which pretty much covers everything, including not getting any.

Um...I know.

Twice.
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

Funny when I got married I remember saying things like love and cherish. Force myself sexually on you when ever I want wasn't part of my vows.
I think your getting your contracts mixed up. This may be more you what you had in mind.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/wife-forced-sex-slave-agreement
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html


Is this a fucking joke?

You assume that because you marry a woman you can force sex on her whenever you want?

Go back a few centuries and die of the plague, please.
 
If a man forces his wife to have sex when she doesn't want to then it's rape. Being married to someone doesn't mean they have to have sex with you every time you want it.

It depends on the prenuptial agreement. Sex on demand is the first line.
 
That the real motivation behind the "spousal rape" absurdity. If a "marriage" is not implicit consent to make love to one's spouse, then what possibly is it? Just an economic agreement to share expenses? The government can have it, then, as far as I'm concerned.

Why should a man have to get written consent prior to EVERY time he makes love to his legal spouse? Is that what these loons want?

http://www.10news.com/news/24707743/detail.html


Renard, if you have a wife I feel horribly bad for her.
 
Who would sign a prenup that states that?

So far, all of my wives.

It's really simple to understand. No lawyer needed.

1. Sex on demand.
2. All her money.
3. A pitcher of ice tea in the refrigerator at all times.

What's the problem?
 
Back
Top