LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Andrew Sullivan Asks...

No, just go ahead with the usual counter-question so that you can attack the answer to ignore the topic...



maroon...
 
mercury14 said:
AJ referencing a Pajamas article that's referencing a Thinker article - cross-posted on on multiple threads. Gump_Alt and his giddy hard-on for incestuous op-ed pieces is always fun to watch.
Click to expand...

Very good, MercDownSouth. Attack the poster and ignore the article. The truth hurts. We understand.
 
Questions!



Just answer the fucking questions! That way I can avoid having my opinion out there.

People just make fun of me when I offer it, so I turned bitter and angry that they do not recognize my genius...

:mad:
 
Wat_Tyler said:
It's . . . medicinal.


Fizz for the jizz.
Click to expand...

miles said:
Very good, MercDownSouth. Attack the poster and ignore the article. The truth hurts. We understand.
Click to expand...

It's like his "expertise" in what happened at the debate after he admitted that he turned it off after ten minutes, but yet he "knew" what was in it thanks to his blogs...

;) ;)

It's just that he will not cite his sources. How can he after he has decided to attack everyone else's?
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
It's like his "expertise" in what happened at the debate after he admitted that he turned it off after ten minutes, but yet he "knew" what was in it thanks to his blogs...

;) ;)

It's just that he will not cite his sources. How can he after he has decided to attack everyone else's?
Click to expand...

I've hardly ever (never) cited a LW blog and I read virtually none of them. When I back my arguments I use source data just about every time and link you to it verbatim.

"But mercury must be gettin' his facts from blogs!"

Just because you're a dimwit who avoids objective facts like the plague doesn't mean other people are.
 
mercury14 said:
I've hardly ever (never) cited a LW blog and I read virtually none of them. When I back my arguments I use source data just about every time and link you to it verbatim.

"But mercury must be gettin' his facts from blogs!"

Just because you're a dimwit who avoids objective facts like the plague doesn't mean other people are.
Click to expand...

Mercury? Facts?

Bwahahahaha.

Fucking liar.
 
miles said:
Mercury? Facts?

Bwahahahaha.

Fucking liar.
Click to expand...

Yeah, facts. If I don't back my arguments with them then please point it out.

Go respond to my proof that Romney lied in eight ways during the debate. No? Not going to do that? Wonder why?
 
Phony-in-Chief
Thomas Sowell, NRO
October 9, 2012

When President Barack Obama and others on the left are not busy admonishing the rest of us to be “civil” in our discussions of political issues, they are busy letting loose insults, accusations, and smears against those who dare to disagree with them.

Like so many people who have been beaten in a verbal encounter, and who can think of clever things to say the next day after it is all over, President Obama, after his clear loss in his debate with Mitt Romney, called Governor Romney a “phony.”

Innumerable facts, however, show that it is our commander-in-chief who is phony-in-chief. A classic example was his speech to a predominantly black audience at Hampton University on June 5, 2007. That date is important, as we shall see.

In his speech — delivered in a ghetto-style accent that Obama doesn’t use anywhere except when he is addressing a black audience — he charged the federal government with not showing the same concern for the people of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit as it had shown for the people of New York after the 9/11 attacks, or the people of Florida after Hurricane Andrew hit.

Departing from his prepared remarks, he mentioned the Stafford Act, which requires communities receiving federal disaster relief to contribute 10 percent as much as the federal government does.

Senator Obama, as he was then, pointed out that this requirement was waived in the case of New York and Florida because the people there were considered “part of the American family.” But the people in New Orleans — predominantly black — “they don’t care about as much,” according to Barack Obama.

If you want to know what community organizers do, this is it — rub people’s emotions raw to hype their resentments. And this was Barack Obama in his old community-organizer role, a role that should have warned those who thought that he was someone who would bring us together, when he was all too well practiced in the arts of polarizing us.

Why is the date of this speech important? Because less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80–14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.

Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Barack Obama cannot claim that he wasn’t present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn’t there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.

Unlike Jeremiah Wright’s church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 senators who voted against — repeat, against – the legislation which included the waiver.

When he gave that demagogic speech, in a feigned accent and style, it was world-class chutzpah and a rhetorical triumph. He truly deserves the title phony-in-chief.

If you know any true believers in Obama, show them the transcript of his June 5, 2007, speech at Hampton University (available from the Federal News Service) and then show them page S6823 of the Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, which lists how Senators voted on the waiver of the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans.

Some people in the media have tried to dismiss this and other revelations of Barack Obama’s real character that have belatedly come to light as “old news.” But the truth is one thing that never wears out. The Pythagorean Theorem is 2,000 years old, but it can still tell you the distance from home plate to second base (127 ft.) without measuring it. And what happened five years ago can tell a lot about Barack Obama’s character — or lack of character.

Obama’s true believers may not want to know the truth. But there are millions of other people who have simply projected their desires for a post-racial America onto Barack Obama. These are the ones who need to be confronted with the truth, before they repeat the mistake they made when they voted four years ago.
Click to expand...

And Mitt Romney is the liar.

;) ;)

Perhaps if he had not have left ten minutes into the speech, he would have heard Mitt list four losers that went under before he tried to post the "fact" from a blog that only 3 of 28 went under...

:eek:
 
mercury14 said:
AJ posts something completely off-topic as usual and I need to make a counter argument, eh?
Click to expand...

Then why did you feel the need to indict the source?

If his article had no bearing on anything, why couldn't you let the article fail to speak for itself?
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Phony-in-Chief
Thomas Sowell, NRO
October 9, 2012



And Mitt Romney is the liar.

;) ;)

Perhaps if he had not have left ten minutes into the speech, he would have heard Mitt list four losers that went under before he tried to post the "fact" from a blog that only 3 of 28 went under...

:eek:
Click to expand...


You seriously cross-posted this spam?
 
Everyone knows that Sowell is an Uncle Tom, almost as bad as that Williams guy.
 
Dr. Sowell is just an Uncle Tom to you?

Just another "conservative" liar???

Why is the date of this speech important? Because less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80–14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.

Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Barack Obama cannot claim that he wasn’t present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn’t there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.

Unlike Jeremiah Wright’s church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 senators who voted against — repeat, against – the legislation which included the waiver.

When he gave that demagogic speech, in a feigned accent and style, it was world-class chutzpah and a rhetorical triumph. He truly deserves the title phony-in-chief.

If you know any true believers in Obama, show them the transcript of his June 5, 2007, speech at Hampton University (available from the Federal News Service) and then show them page S6823 of the Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, which lists how Senators voted on the waiver of the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans.
Click to expand...


Why are you ONLY concerned with what your blogs consider to be Romney lies???

The professor of the $5 trillion report is saying that Obama is lying about his work!

The AARP told him to cease and desist too!!!

He told us IT WAS A VIDEO when he knew it was TERRORISM!
 
Wat_Tyler said:
Everyone knows that Sowell is an Uncle Tom, almost as bad as that Williams guy.
Click to expand...

:cool:

Everyone that Jenn14 knows "knows" it...

If he is reporting that Obama openly and brazenly lied, well, then sir, that is a damned dirty LIE!!!
 
kbate said:
Then why did you feel the need to indict the source?

If his article had no bearing on anything, why couldn't you let the article fail to speak for itself?
Click to expand...

He absolutely reads nothing other than his POV.

He "knows" what is in it and like the debate he did not watch, "knows" that it is all lies...
 
Another Cairo-based foreign policy triumph!

TEL AVIV — Israel’s military as well as other intelligence agencies have concluded that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps sent hundreds of operatives to Sinai as well as the neighboring Gaza Strip. They said IRGC was directing arms smuggling as well as training Palestinian and Bedouin insurgents to conduct separate and joint operations.
Click to expand...
http://www.worldtribune.com/2012/10/08/iran-commandos-coordinating-influx-of-fighters-arms-to-sinai/
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Quit diminishing such a great man.

That Chief should be at least four point!

That is CHIEF to you droog o'mine!
Click to expand...


Did the horned toad say to say that?


He's really much better on directions.


Like a 19th-century Googlemaps.
 
I listen too much to that rabid right-wingnut...


Naturally, most conservatives never bought into this myth. What with, among other things, his declaration he had visited "57 states with one to go," his reference to the "Austrian language" not to mention his inability to discern the Maldives from the Malvinas. As Bret Stephens wrote in the Wall Street Journal in August 2011, "I just think the president isn't very bright." Stephens concluded, "But it takes actual smarts to understand that glibness and self-belief are not sufficient proof of genuine intelligence. Stupid is as stupid does, said the great philosopher Forrest Gump. The presidency of Barack Obama is a case study in stupid does."

Yet the liberal media would not be deterred: President Obama is the smartest man in the room, if not the entire world. And if that wasn't enough, President Obama apparently believed his own publicity. As noted in Stephens' article, Obama reportedly claimed he was a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, a better policy director than his policy director and a better political director than his political director.
Click to expand...

;) ;)

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/10/09/the-great-pretender
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MaturemanAJ
Getting hit on
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
cadman7777
C
B
Help! Looking for a story
Replies
0
Views
196
burntmuffins
B
I
Forgotten Title!! Plssss help it's a really goog story!!
Replies
0
Views
180
idkidcidgaf
I
J
Wife's Christmas night out
Replies
5
Views
1K
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
A
Looking for a story
Replies
2
Views
447
again321
A
Back
Top