Anathema

[bellisarius]

Considering these laws are already in place I don't think it's that uncharted just because it's digital.

Trump forcing them to stop playing fuck fuck games and decide what they are and thus which regulations they have to follow is him simply doing his job...enforcing the law.

The fact that all the pro-regulation, net neutrality supporters of leftist who want regulations for all the things are suddenly libertarian when THEY are no longer getting to regulate/enforce just shows their lack of conviction in their belief system.

True enough. Although "net neutrality" had little to do with free speech.

 

[BotanyBoy]

True enough. Although "net neutrality" had little to do with free speech.

No it didn't, but it had EVERYTHING to do with free exchange/association/commerce..... and (D)'s just couldn't have that because freedom is BAD!!!

If the left can shit on that I don't see why the right can't make them play by their own rules when it comes to other areas of control.

I hope Trump bends the silicon valley elitist left over and gore fucks them with their own sword, I just wish in this case it was a much bigger, serrated, dull sword.

Here's hoping he finds some more "regulations" to shove up silicon valleys ass.

https://media0.giphy.com/media/6oB3X3W6MYM3C/giphy.gif

 

[HisArpy]

This is what happens when the Left's chickens come home to roost.

And, of course, the only proper thing to do is blame Trump for it even though they aren't his chickens.

 

[Rightguide]

No shit.

The left wing sites and bloggers are going ape shit telling their readers what the "leaked" draft (allegedly in CNN's possession) will do. But nowhere can I find a copy of the draft. Why is that?

Cuz, it's CNN.

 

[RocketLauncher]

don't forget he said he'd make canada pay for the wall - guess that came after realising mexico wasn't about to and he had to spout SOMETHING.

and there's that little thing his fans probably find adorable... he seems unable to pronounce 'origins' and repeatedly says 'oranges'. makes me wonder what he has on his mind, bless.

Wot?! How come we have to pay for your wall?!
A tall hedge, a row of poison oak maybe....

 

[butters]

Wot?! How come we have to pay for your wall?!
A tall hedge, a row of poison oak maybe....

ask trump

seems canadian borders are less obvious but well-serviced and extremely functional. because the money's been put into the technology and manpower, not stupid big walls that trump only wants to build because he would see it as emphasising HIM, his name in history... HIM making a big big mark on the world. probably imagined himself stood atop it like some potentate atop the great wall of china. after all, it can be seen from space. in otherwords, it's about him and his ego.

 

[heathergives]

Google is already censoring the Internet.

As has Facebook, Amazon, You Tube, Twitter, Instagram and many other social media sites.

All in the name of censoring conservative opinions, as has the MSM.

 

[butters]

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Google is already censoring the Internet.

As has Facebook, Amazon, You Tube, Twitter, Instagram and many other social media sites.

All in the name of censoring conservative opinions, as has the MSM.

So your answer to censorship you do not agree with, is censorship you do agree with.

You do understand that is pretty much the most un-American sentiment there is?

Also, you do understand the incredibly massive difference between U.S. v. Schenck, Debs v. U.S. and Frohwerk v. U.S and how they align with my OP on this administration's trial balloon of an EO, and a private company allowing/disallowing content to be posted on its own site, right?

 

[heathergives]

So your answer to censorship you do not agree with, is censorship you do agree with.

You do understand that is pretty much the most un-American sentiment there is?

Also, you do understand the incredibly massive difference between U.S. v. Schenck, Debs v. U.S. and Frohwerk v. U.S and how they align with my OP on this administration's trial balloon of an EO, and a private company allowing/disallowing content to be posted on its own site, right?

Liberal media manipulation of the facts is not censorship, it is propaganda pure and simple.

The NYT, WAPO, CNN and MSNBC provide "facts" only if they are appropriate to their particular (liberal) agenda.

One can fill pages of newsprint (and Internet websites) with what said "news organizations" do not print.

 

[adrina]

"la la la fake news"

https://dakiniland.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ostrich-head-in-sand.jpg?w=520

 

[heathergives]

"la la la fake news"

https://dakiniland.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/ostrich-head-in-sand.jpg?w=520

Is that a spotted owl?

It certainly isn't a snail darter.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Liberal media manipulation of the facts is not censorship, it is propaganda pure and simple.

The NYT, WAPO, CNN and MSNBC provide "facts" only if they are appropriate to their particular (liberal) agenda.

One can fill pages of newsprint (and Internet websites) with what said "news organizations" do not print.

OK. So you want un-American, overt, government censorship in order to combat what you perceive to be the propaganda of the mainstream media.

Is that correct?

 

[adrina]

I'm sure you thought that was a clever retort when you typed it.

 

[heathergives]

OK. So you want un-American, overt, government censorship in order to combat what you perceive to be the propaganda of the mainstream media.

Is that correct?

You are a product of the liberal media that you choose to adore.


Walter Cronkite and Edward Murrow are turning over in their graves.

 

[heathergives]

I'm sure you thought that was a clever retort when you typed it.

Yes, but it got your attention, didn't it?

 

[Hal9000_]

Talk about bullshit propaganda.

Net neutrality was killed by the democrats?

"With the onset of the Presidency of Donald Trump in 2017, and the appointment of Ajit Pai, an opponent of net neutrality, to the chairman of the FCC, the FCC has reversed many previous net neutrality rulings, and reclassified Internet services as Title I information services.[62] The FCC's decisions have been a matter of several ongoing legal challenges by both states supporting net neutrality, and ISPs challenging it. The United States Congress has attempted to pass legislation supporting net neutrality but have failed to gain sufficient support. In 2018, a bill cleared the U.S. Senate, with Republicans Lisa Murkowski, John Kennedy and Susan Collins joining all 49 Democrats but the House majority denied the bill a hearing.[63] Individual states have been trying to pass legislation overriding the FCC's decision to make net neutrality a requirement within their state. California has successfully passed its own net neutrality act, which the United States Department of Justice is challenging on a legal basis.[64]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality#United_States

I mean, really? You expect people to just lap up the tripe you post?

 

[heathergives]

This message is hidden because Hal9000_ is on your ignore list.

 

[adrina]

Yes, but it got your attention, didn't it?

Not really. Just highlighted what an idiot you are. Shrugs. Your decision, obviously.

 

[heathergives]

Not really. Just highlighted what an idiot you are. Shrugs. Your decision, obviously.

Following a lie with an ad hominem attack - how typical.

 

[Hal9000_]

**this message bought and paid for by the Kock foundation***

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Never understood the logic of telling someone you have on ignore that you have them on ignore.

 

[heathergives]

View PostUnread Today, 10:12 PM
Remove user from ignore listHal9000_
This message is hidden because Hal9000_ is on your ignore list.

 

[Hal9000_]

Never understood the logic of telling someone you have on ignore that you have them on ignore.

This is the same logic stating that democrats killed NN.

It's more than illogical. It's blatant lies.

 

[adrina]

Following a lie with an ad hominem attack - how typical.

A statement of fact is a simple statement of fact.

Claiming a victory because you "got my attention" in a topic I posted in already is ridiculous. Which hasn't stopped you I realize.

I don't care if you don't like me calling you an idiot or if you want to classify it as an attack. We already know you are a victim. Bless your heart.