Ampix Reviews

bg23

motherfuckin'sparklepony
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Posts
48,191
So I've decided to take one for the team and do a public service by reviewing some of the Lit Grrl Ampix over at That Other Board. Since I know that if it weren't for the risk of projectile vomiting, a lot more of y'all would be pervin' , I figure it's my duty to provide a clear and reasonably objective Guide on the Opens and Do Not Opens -- thread titles alone, after all, so very rarely tell you anything.

So if you have a pic thread and would like me to review it, simply have a thread you want to read but are too afraid of the possibilities...let me know. I'll make the sacrifice.

My First Review

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=457798

Poster: KKKmelon.

I started out with this thread because a) the first post was empty, which i thought was intriguing -- usually people introduce themselves one way or another before throwing nakedness at us -- and b) i found the poster's name fascinating. KKKMelon? This being Lit, I assumed that melon meant boob -- and KKK? A boob in the kukluxklan? You can see why I felt the need to click that thread.

Reading the thread, I was at first under the impression that the poster had to be some sort of bot -- the replies were short, unsubstantial, indeed often stilted. Moreover, while the pics were of a good quality, there was something of a pornish aspect to it that made me wary. I wondered if the thread was an elaborate ploy to eventually hit viewers with a website address and demands that we pay 19.95 a month for more pix.

Anyway, as the thread progressed KKKboob seemed to warm up to us in so far as she actually made a post containing more than three words. The pics, however, got progressively MUCH better. They start out clothed, and progress to very nearly naked, or naked enough for the purposes of the thread anyway. The photographic quality is high, the pictures are large, clear and in colour, well above the general Lit Standard. The subject is also highly attractive, bountiful cleavage, a nice smile and adequate ass.

I give the thread a 7.2. Points were lost due to a deficiency in entertainment value and interesting posts besides boobie ones. I grade harshly though. Thread conclusion: Open.

Here are two sample pix:

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=671117

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=671399
 
bg23 said:
So I've decided to take one for the team and do a public service by reviewing some of the Lit Grrl Ampix over at That Other Board. Since I know that if it weren't for the risk of projectile vomiting, a lot more of y'all would be pervin' , I figure it's my duty to provide a clear and reasonably objective Guide on the Opens and Do Not Opens -- thread titles alone, after all, so very rarely tell you anything.

So if you have a pic thread and would like me to review it, simply have a thread you want to read but are too afraid of the possibilities...let me know. I'll make the sacrifice.

My First Review

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=457798

Poster: KKKmelon.

I started out with this thread because a) the first post was empty, which i thought was intriguing -- usually people introduce themselves one way or another before throwing nakedness at us -- and b) i found the poster's name fascinating. KKKMelon? This being Lit, I assumed that melon meant boob -- and KKK? A boob in the kukluxklan? You can see why I felt the need to click that thread.

Reading the thread, I was at first under the impression that the poster had to be some sort of bot -- the replies were short, unsubstantial, indeed often stilted. Moreover, while the pics were of a good quality, there was something of a pornish aspect to it that made me wary. I wondered if the thread was an elaborate ploy to eventually hit viewers with a website address and demands that we pay 19.95 a month for more pix.

Anyway, as the thread progressed KKKboob seemed to warm up to us in so far as she actually made a post containing more than three words. The pics, however, got progressively MUCH better. They start out clothed, and progress to very nearly naked, or naked enough for the purposes of the thread anyway. The photographic quality is high, the pictures are large, clear and in colour, well above the general Lit Standard. The subject is also highly attractive, bountiful cleavage, a nice smile and adequate ass.

I give the thread a 7.2. Points were lost due to a deficiency in entertainment value and interesting posts besides boobie ones. I grade harshly though. Thread conclusion: Open.

Here are two sample pix:

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=671117

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=671399

She's slim and trim .... amazing looking. I am jealous.
 
1hotfuck said:
Do me next :D

Alright, and while this doesn't really apply to you I will post a

DISCLAIMER

I WILL be harsh about threads i consider to be rubbish, and if your thread is rubbish and i review it, i will say so no matter how much I might actually like you, the person. Journalistic Duty and all that. Of course that is just my opinion, others may disagree, at the end of the day, it is all just my opinion, but I -will- be posting bad reviews as well as good ones.

Also, if you wish me to do you, you will need to provide links, I can't wad through posts looking for them.
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
She's slim and trim .... amazing looking. I am jealous.

i'm still not entirely sure it's a real person, but for the moment i am satisfied with the pix so i won't prod.

she -does- have a lovely body, yes.
 
bg23 said:
Alright, and while this doesn't really apply to you I will post a

DISCLAIMER

I WILL be harsh about threads i consider to be rubbish, and if your thread is rubbish and i review it, i will say so no matter how much I might actually like you, the person. Journalistic Duty and all that. Of course that is just my opinion, others may disagree, at the end of the day, it is all just my opinion, but I -will- be posting bad reviews as well as good ones.

Also, if you wish me to do you, you will need to provide links, I can't wad through posts looking for them.
*nods and braces myself*

k I think I'm ready...
 
bg23 said:
i'm still not entirely sure it's a real person, but for the moment i am satisfied with the pix so i won't prod.

she -does- have a lovely body, yes.

If you think me not real, does that make me but a ghost?
 
1hotfuck said:
*nods and braces myself*

k I think I'm ready...

I think your pic thread is 1hot thread! :kiss:

You come up with some amzaing poses that I can only be jealous of (and turned on by). :p
 
Interesting idea.

KKKmelon

Since AmPic threads are usually about as interesting as a moist towel, just slightly more entertaining than a Playground "numbers thread", the thread chat contributes nothing to the overall thread grade. Only pic content, amount and ease of finding them contribute.

KKK's is good so far. She's way more attractive than most lit chicks, and the style of photographs even seems suspiciously like stolen porn pics.

8. Full nudes or a full face shot could bring her up one or two points.
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
I think your pic thread is 1hot thread! :kiss:

You come up with some amzaing poses that I can only be jealous of (and turned on by). :p
thanks sweetie but you've totally got me beat :kiss:
 
1hotfuck said:
*nods and braces myself*

k I think I'm ready...

Review #2: 1Hotfuck

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=369029

Although I'm not sure I really need to review this thread since, being a GBer, she's quite well known to us already and we can see from her AVs that she is, indeed, a hot chick, I did promise to fulfil requests. Since I have my page settings on at 100 posts per page it's hard for me to tell where she kept her index, so I just started from the beginning.

The first thing I was struck with, with the first batch of pictures was a) the pics were tiny and b) crappy pic quality. While 1HF is clearly an attractive girl, the small size and grainy quality of the photos made this difficult to see, as did the rather bad lighting. However, as the thread progresses, the pictures get larger, and the lighting gets better.

Despite the fact that the thread disclaims any nudity there ARE some bikini pictures further on, and these are a noticeable improvement in photo quality, although by no stretch of the imagination can we say there is any particular amount of skill involved here. As we might have guessed from the initial pictures, 1HF is indeed, very pretty, with a soft, pleasing body. I have to admit I am a sucker for threads with face pix, and this one does not disappoint. I did not or don't have time to go through the entire thread, but I would rate it as a 7.5, once again reminding y'all that I am very harsh in terms of grading.

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=532517

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=533047
 
MechaBlade said:
Interesting idea.

KKKmelon

Since AmPic threads are usually about as interesting as a moist towel, just slightly more entertaining than a Playground "numbers thread", the thread chat contributes nothing to the overall thread grade. Only pic content, amount and ease of finding them contribute.

KKK's is good so far. She's way more attractive than most lit chicks, and the style of photographs even seems suspiciously like stolen porn pics.

8. Full nudes or a full face shot could bring her up one or two points.

uh, mecha?

why did you just review the thread i'd just reviewed?

FIND YOUR OWN DAMN THREAD
 
bg23 said:
Review #2: 1Hotfuck

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=369029

Although I'm not sure I really need to review this thread since, being a GBer, she's quite well known to us already and we can see from her AVs that she is, indeed, a hot chick, I did promise to fulfil requests. Since I have my page settings on at 100 posts per page it's hard for me to tell where she kept her index, so I just started from the beginning.

The first thing I was struck with, with the first batch of pictures was a) the pics were tiny and b) crappy pic quality. While 1HF is clearly an attractive girl, the small size and grainy quality of the photos made this difficult to see, as did the rather bad lighting. However, as the thread progresses, the pictures get larger, and the lighting gets better.

Despite the fact that the thread disclaims any nudity there ARE some bikini pictures further on, and these are a noticeable improvement in photo quality, although by no stretch of the imagination can we say there is any particular amount of skill involved here. As we might have guessed from the initial pictures, 1HF is indeed, very pretty, with a soft, pleasing body. I have to admit I am a sucker for threads with face pix, and this one does not disappoint. I did not or don't have time to go through the entire thread, but I would rate it as a 7.5, once again reminding y'all that I am very harsh in terms of grading.

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=532517

https://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=533047

*nods* fair enough bg23 :)

and the newest pics I've posted are way better. Bought a new webcam and the quality is much better...

http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/6268/myfacerc5.jpg

thanks again for the honesty babe :kiss:
 
bg23 said:
Since I have my page settings on at 100 posts per page it's hard for me to tell where she kept her index, so I just started from the beginning.

I was just thinking about this two seconds ago.

Why do so many people reference page numbers when it depends on your personal settings?

This isn't rocket science.
 
MechaBlade said:
I found your review inadequate.

you said the exact damn same thing i said, you just gave her .8 more of a point.
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
If you think me not real, does that make me but a ghost?

what?

i was talking about the kkkboob girl.

wtf are you talking about
 
Marquis said:
I was just thinking about this two seconds ago.

Why do so many people reference page numbers when it depends on your personal settings?

This isn't rocket science.

I forgot about that....

I'll fix it so the index is the first post.

then you can quit yer bitchin
 
bg23 said:
what?

i was talking about the kkkboob girl.

wtf are you talking about


My post was not in reference to any post you made about anybody else. What I was talking about was my belief that you think me fake, but regardless, asking you to rate me in accordance with your thread topic.

... and since when can't a girl interject with a completely random thought?
 
Marquis said:
I was just thinking about this two seconds ago.

Why do so many people reference page numbers when it depends on your personal settings?

This isn't rocket science.

i think it'd be better if people referenced post numbers

they don't change according to settings
 
Back
Top