Always Soaked

But, but, but, the 72 virgins might be male.

In any case, regardless of which sex they are, is there anything which promises that they'll be young-ish and attractive? If not...
do any of the politicians understand this? Maybe they'll start blowing themselves up.



nothing that I've heard, but you do make a frightening point.
 
So you say, and yet you have an avater, therefore the balance of probability comes down towards you having posted there quite a bit yourself, at least to start with.

Don't let the door hit your arse on the way out, and don't give up the day job. :rolleyes:

What does having an avatar have to do with posting on The Playground? :confused:
 
What does having an avatar have to do with posting on The Playground? :confused:
Adjudicator signed up under that name in January 2016 - it'd be difficult for him to have clocked up enough posts (100) to be able to use an avatar, let alone his current 672, if he only ever posted in the General Board and never in the place he calls a waste of time (the playground and its threads).

I could be wrong about this, but CBA to stalk heavily enough to check...
 
Adjudicator signed up under that name in January 2016 - it'd be difficult for him to have clocked up enough posts (100) to be able to use an avatar, let alone his current 672, if he only ever posted in the General Board and never in the place he calls a waste of time (the playground and its threads).

I could be wrong about this, but CBA to stalk heavily enough to check...

That doesn't make sense, if he's active there and posts 10 times a day, it would have only taken him 10 days of posting to get 100. And, 672 posts in 8 months is less than a 100 posts a month... what's so hard to understand that he wouldn't need the Playground to do that in? :confused:
 
Adjudicator signed up under that name in January 2016 - it'd be difficult for him to have clocked up enough posts (100) to be able to use an avatar, let alone his current 672, if he only ever posted in the General Board and never in the place he calls a waste of time (the playground and its threads).

I could be wrong about this, but CBA to stalk heavily enough to check...

Methinks you have a point. Also, it seems odd for a relative newbie, to be calling out someone that has been here for 2 yrs. Also, I thought we didn't cross the boards (sort of like not crossing the streams in Ghostbusters)? I know I don't stray from my yard....
 
I am NOT always soaked, but I have been accused of being so by people with limited experience with my soakedness levels over long periods of time. Admittedly, when they have been in a position to judge, yes, I have been soaked. That, however, does not mean that I am always soaked.
 
Adjudicator signed up under that name in January 2016 - it'd be difficult for him to have clocked up enough posts (100) to be able to use an avatar, let alone his current 672, if he only ever posted in the General Board and never in the place he calls a waste of time (the playground and its threads).

I could be wrong about this, but CBA to stalk heavily enough to check...

That doesn't make sense, if he's active there and posts 10 times a day, it would have only taken him 10 days of posting to get 100. And, 672 posts in 8 months is less than a 100 posts a month... what's so hard to understand that he wouldn't need the Playground to do that in? :confused:

The maths, they're hard.
 
Also, I thought we didn't cross the boards (sort of like not crossing the streams in Ghostbusters)? I know I don't stray from my yard....

You feeling that way doesn't stop other people from doing so.
 
Adjudicator signed up under that name in January 2016 - it'd be difficult for him to have clocked up enough posts (100) to be able to use an avatar, let alone his current 672, if he only ever posted in the General Board and never in the place he calls a waste of time (the playground and its threads).

I could be wrong about this, but CBA to stalk heavily enough to check...

Yes, you are wrong about this.

Getting to 100 posts is no great feat of endurance. And, out of curiosity, I checked. Adjudicator's first 100 posts were all in the General Board or Politics. He has six posts in The Playground, four of them in this thread.

Stalk heavily? Probably took me less time to get that information than it did for you to write your posts. But, why bother with information, right? This is just The Playground.
 
It feels like somebody left the door open to the Playground and somebody tracked a bunch of shit in. Damn, this is why we can't have nice things!
 
Do you guys really want to be thinking about "stains" on a porn message board?
 
Do you guys really want to be thinking about "stains" on a porn message board?

Well, the people being referenced are basically the shit stains in the tighty-whities of life, so......it still kind of applies.
 
Well, the people being referenced are basically the shit stains in the tighty-whities of life, so......it still kind of applies.
Don't hold back, tell me how you really feel! :D


*Wonders....are shit stains in boxer briefs more or less offensive....
 
Don't hold back, tell me how you really feel! :D

*Wonders....are shit stains in boxer briefs more or less offensive....

I'm sorry. We're all entitled to our opinions, and these are open threads so there is the implied right to post your opinion wherever you'd like. I get that and will support that, even for the GBers.

But, when your (not you specifically :)) opinion is nothing but a personal attack well outside the original thread and does nothing to advance the conversation, and serves only to bring someone else down (granted, refer to the 72 people thread).....you've kind of crossed the line of general decency, and have shown your own value as a human.

And.....the type of underwear doesn't matter, it's all about the color. Stains pop off the white blend into the black.
 
I'm sorry. We're all entitled to our opinions, and these are open threads so there is the implied right to post your opinion wherever you'd like. I get that and will support that, even for the GBers.

But, when your (not you specifically :)) opinion is nothing but a personal attack well outside the original thread and does nothing to advance the conversation, and serves only to bring someone else down (granted, refer to the 72 people thread).....you've kind of crossed the line of general decency, and have shown your own value as a human.

And.....the type of underwear doesn't matter, it's all about the color. Stains pop off the white blend into the black.
*sigh*

That was well written, and far too serious. ;)

Great, now I'm going to have to show my tits to distract everyone from the asshattery.
 
Back
Top