Airplane bathroom sex blamed for terror alert

Perhaps if it appeared to be heading into a rather important building, say, the White House, it might shoot it down, innocent passengers or no?

What a dumb thing to do on the tenth anniversary of 9/11. Especially flying out of NY. :rolleyes:

I flew yesterday. For some reason a bunch of white, middle-aged, Midwesterners flying from one Midwestern city to another looked rather suspicious, so we got to be scanned in the normal way, then right before boarding, randomly searched again.
 
I don't even know how to characterize this one?:confused:

What's a F-16 going to do to a passenger jet. I mean, really?

DH is right; they're there to shoot it down, if ordered to do so.

You can find a similar situation here, along with confirmation from NORAD.

I believe it can be characterized as evidence that our parents were right when they said, "see here, young lady; sex has consequences!";)
 
DH is right; they're there to shoot it down, if ordered to do so.

You can find a similar situation here, along with confirmation from NORAD.

I believe it can be characterized as evidence that our parents were right when they said, "see here, young lady; sex has consequences!";)

I believe it often does; even where there are few aeroplanes. . . .
 
Well, you know that old saying, "if the Pentagon doesn't scramble fighter jets, then you just aren't doing it right."
 
Well, you know that old saying, "if the Pentagon doesn't scramble fighter jets, then you just aren't doing it right."

That's a new one on me!

It looks like it's time for me to go back to Old Sayings School for a refresher. It seems to be a bit more of a party school than it used to be. :D
 
Back
Top