AI

[Prudence_Art]

Again, editing a photo you yourself took is not the same as altering one found on the web, or using a machine to create an image based on typed prompts. It really isn't as hard as some of you are trying to make it.

oh really ?



https://i.pinimg.com/originals/16/9f/a4/169fa4e4ff32c70d2673dd796b2b0011.jpg

 

[butters]

and the point of this thread is what, exactly?

yes, there's an adult discussion to be had, but you've already been given all the advice and information available. A new thread here, after the last was closed to further replies, is not about to get the site owner's attention either. If it were just about having that conversation, then perhaps you'd not have started out posting AI twice, in consecutive posts, in what is, quite frankly, a childish manner.

you can either accept what you've been told and wait to see what new parameters might be set or continue to rant into the wind. If your point about those other threads is 'why are THEY still there when mine got nuked?', maybe it's because they weren't reported or drawn to the attention of mods/admin by others. Making demands from a site that owes you exactly zero is a fruitless pursuit, no matter how maligned you may personally feel.

 

[jaF0]

A new thread here, after the last was closed to further replies,

Really? I stopped watching that thread.

I've seen people banned from the site for opening new threads on a topic after one was closed.

 

[Twanquavius]

In my view, no. Those would be allowable.

Was this what the AI photo thread literally was?

 

[girlsmiley]

I already said all that except better IMO.

Less wanky and to the point.

 

[girlsmiley]

Fine, I give up. Apparently seeking clarification is a sin. Have it your way.

Have it your way? Hahaha! No, I think the problem here is that you didn’t have it your way.

You weren’t happy with the response and decided to throw your toys out of the cot.

Zero to do with sins and everything to do with arrogance.

 

[girlsmiley]

I’d be deleting posts about studying law if I were you, too.

 

[jaF0]

Was this what the AI photo thread literally was?

No.

 

[peekingone]

Made me sad.

For sure enjoyed seeing your posts too

 

[Twanquavius]

No.

Really? I didn’t know about the OP’s thread , but in the “you + ai = ???” Thread that got deleted, I was under the impression that it was just us or our partners with AI filters so that we felt comfortable posting ourselves—at least that was what was intended.

If it’s gone for good, then that’s sad, but understandable I suppose. Thanks for answering my questions

 

[impresso]

but in the “you + ai = ???” Thread that got deleted, I was under the impression that it was just us or our partners with AI filters so that we felt comfortable posting ourselves—at least that was what was intended.

AI Trigger... Just like "Wife + AI" has also been deleted.
Only because someone was running around yelling, "Witch!" )

 

[FataMorgana]

Have it your way? Hahaha! No, I think the problem here is that you didn’t have it your way.

You weren’t happy with the response and decided to throw your toys out of the cot.

Zero to do with sins and everything to do with arrogance.

Don't fuck with her, she's gone bold font.

 

[girlsmiley]

Don't fuck with her, she's gone bold font.

goodbye

 

[ToPleaseHim]

AI Trigger... Just like "Wife + AI" has also been deleted.
Only because someone was running around yelling, "Witch!" )

When the AI threads were being removed by the site owners, it did make me chuckle to see that the person complaining the loudest opted to link all of the threads in one place. I’m not sure what she thought was going to happen when she did that, but it was pretty obvious to me.

 

[SilentSometimes]

Again, editing a photo you yourself took is not the same as altering one found on the web, or using a machine to create an image based on typed prompts. It really isn't as hard as some of you are trying to make it.

Sooo does that mean the “you + AI = ?” Thread can start back up again?

 

[PapaRomantic]

I'm pretty sure Bea's avatar is an AI-generated image.

 

[butters]

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/policy-on-artificially-created-images.1593507/

^^Jafo's advisement thread with link to Literotica's new, current policy regarding AI

basically, nope

 

[SalviaDivinorum]

I guess all media content on the forum should be removed. Because all of it is some kind of violation

I understand that it becomes a legal problem for Lit when copyrighted materials are uploaded on their servers, so perhaps the solution for those wanting to share their AI pictures would be to just put them on an image hosting website and just link to them in the AI picture threads?
Perhaps ask Laurel or Manu if that would work?

I think it's polite to respect the concerns of those who are legally responsible for the content on their servers.

 

[impresso]

I understand that it becomes a legal problem for Lit when copyrighted materials are uploaded on their servers, so perhaps the solution for those wanting to share their AI pictures would be to just put them on an image hosting website and just link to them in the AI picture threads?
Perhaps ask Laurel or Manu if that would work?

I think it's polite to respect the concerns of those who are legally responsible for the content on their servers.

Our pictures didn't violate anything, except the new Lit policy and the opinion of some drowsy people.
(Last year in the US AI-generated work "Théâtre D'opéra Spatial" took first place in the digital category at the Colorado State Fair.)
So there's no point in asking anything else, it's easier not to post anything that could be considered a violation of portal rules or act as a red rag on someone )

 

[SalviaDivinorum]

Our pictures didn't violate anything, except the new Lit policy and the opinion of some drowsy people.
(Last year in the US AI-generated work "Théâtre D'opéra Spatial" took first place in the digital category at the Colorado State Fair.)
So there's no point in asking anything else, it's easier not to post anything that could be considered a violation of portal rules or act as a red rag on someone )

If that's how you feel, then yeah, don't post anything on Lit.
No skin off my nose.

 

[SilentSometimes]

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/policy-on-artificially-created-images.1593507/

^^Jafo's advisement thread with link to Literotica's new, current policy regarding AI

basically, nope

Ok but reading that says if it’s my photo that I took myself with my phone and then I added it to an AI filter, without adding in any word prompting and could post it but clearly identify, “this is me with a 20% cartoon filter from the AI Mirror app”, then that should TECHNICALLY be fine because I identified both where the photo came from and the editing source.

Right?

 

[jaF0]

Let's not pick it apart like buzzards on a possum carcass.

The key is that the work is created my traditional 'human' methods. Nobody will gripe if you tweak it a bit with technology.