Ahmadinejad to U.S.: Change Your Attitude and We'll Talk

Beco

I'm Not Your Guru
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
57,795
Iranian president says the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday said the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran, as he hit out at Washington for imposing sanctions on Tehran, AFP reports.

His comments, in a speech marking the 34th anniversary of the Islamic revolution that ousted the U.S.-backed shah in 1979, came just days after Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's call for direct talks.

They also come at a time when Tehran and six world powers are preparing to resume stalled talks over Iran's nuclear programme in the Kazakh city of Almaty on February 26.

"The change of tone is necessary but not sufficient," Ahmadinejad said at Tehran's landmark Azadi (Freedom) Square amid chants of "Death to America," according to AFP.

"Stop pointing weapons at the Iranian nation and I will myself negotiate with you," he said, addressing the United States directly.

"Talks should be with respect, fairness and not under pressure."

"You have done everything to prevent us from becoming nuclear and you have failed. The best solution is cooperation and understanding," said the Iranian president.

Last week Biden made a "serious offer" for direct talks in the framework of negotiations between Iran and the so-called P5+1 (the United States, France, Britain, Russia, China and Germany) on Tehran's nuclear program, which world powers suspect is aimed at making atomic weapons.

Iran vehemently denies the allegation.
 
"Stop pointing weapons at the Iranian nation and I will myself negotiate with you," he said, addressing the United States directly.

"Talks should be with respect, fairness and not under pressure."

"You have done everything to prevent us from becoming nuclear and you have failed. The best solution is cooperation and understanding," said the Iranian president.

Which part of this is incorrect?

The US and Israel have attempted to jump start Iran's nuclear program by repeatedly threatening Iran.

That's not to say that Iran is a stable country, that should have nuclear weapons, but one of the very reason that they're actively pursuing it, is because the stated threats.

Bringing Iran into the fold would could have easily been done after the Iraq/Iran war, but the US chose instead to keep a destabilization agenda for the middle east.

We're now seeing the consequences of those actions.
 
Last edited:
The way Iran refuses to take any shit from the USA is to be commended.
 
simple solution, drop a couple nukes on Iran



Iranian president says the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday said the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran, as he hit out at Washington for imposing sanctions on Tehran, AFP reports.

His comments, in a speech marking the 34th anniversary of the Islamic revolution that ousted the U.S.-backed shah in 1979, came just days after Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's call for direct talks.

They also come at a time when Tehran and six world powers are preparing to resume stalled talks over Iran's nuclear programme in the Kazakh city of Almaty on February 26.

"The change of tone is necessary but not sufficient," Ahmadinejad said at Tehran's landmark Azadi (Freedom) Square amid chants of "Death to America," according to AFP.

"Stop pointing weapons at the Iranian nation and I will myself negotiate with you," he said, addressing the United States directly.

"Talks should be with respect, fairness and not under pressure."

"You have done everything to prevent us from becoming nuclear and you have failed. The best solution is cooperation and understanding," said the Iranian president.

Last week Biden made a "serious offer" for direct talks in the framework of negotiations between Iran and the so-called P5+1 (the United States, France, Britain, Russia, China and Germany) on Tehran's nuclear program, which world powers suspect is aimed at making atomic weapons.

Iran vehemently denies the allegation.
 
he tells us to change our attitude?

maybe he should change is address.. because i think we should turn that shit hole of a country into a parking lot
 
simple solution, drop a couple nukes on Iran

Newsflash for "jen": the US doesn't have the political capitol to pull something like that off.

Pulling a stunt like that would result in the entire international community turning against us, and would almost certainly result in the end of this nation as we know it.

But of course, you're too dumb to realize that.
 
Newsflash for "jen": the US doesn't have the political capitol to pull something like that off.

Pulling a stunt like that would result in the entire international community turning against us, and would almost certainly result in the end of this nation as we know it.

But of course, you're too dumb to realize that.


wow o wow....okay asshat sorry you are such a dick.

the world...lets see, Russia is getting our secrets from the obama
Spain, Greece, are broke and could give a fuck about us
France is broke and in a sorry state, but they are fighting wars in Africa
Germany....hum....

China? well, they would be happy to get more oil from Iran and lets face it we owe them so much money that who cares if they are pissed off.......thank the obama

eye for an eye, pussy challenged boy....the only good islamic nut job is a dead islamic nut job
 
wow o wow....okay asshat sorry you are such a dick.

the world...lets see, Russia is getting our secrets from the obama
Spain, Greece, are broke and could give a fuck about us
France is broke and in a sorry state, but they are fighting wars in Africa
Germany....hum....

China? well, they would be happy to get more oil from Iran and lets face it we owe them so much money that who cares if they are pissed off.......thank the obama

eye for an eye, pussy challenged boy....the only good islamic nut job is a dead islamic nut job

Busybodification is a sad thing to watch.
 
Bringing Iran into the fold would could have easily been done after the Iraq/Iran war, but the US chose instead to keep a destabilization agenda for the middle east.

What could the U.S. have done nine years after the shah getting overthrown?
 
It's always a treat reading Islamic Republic of Iran supporters on this Board...

...tell us all about the Twelvers, boys.
 
It's political posturing, nothing more.
Iran will engage in the proposed talks as they're running short of friends/supporters in the region.
 
Do we give a shit?:D

Not really. I'm just sitting here in a house with a legally registered unloaded shotgun hidden in the attic. Hoping my fellow US citizens won't crucify me for defending us in case we're attacked. My only backup is a phone call to some neighbors who feel the same way.
 
Iranian president says the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday said the United States must change its attitude if it wants to hold direct nuclear talks with Iran, as he hit out at Washington for imposing sanctions on Tehran, AFP reports.

His comments, in a speech marking the 34th anniversary of the Islamic revolution that ousted the U.S.-backed shah in 1979, came just days after Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's call for direct talks.

They also come at a time when Tehran and six world powers are preparing to resume stalled talks over Iran's nuclear programme in the Kazakh city of Almaty on February 26.

"The change of tone is necessary but not sufficient," Ahmadinejad said at Tehran's landmark Azadi (Freedom) Square amid chants of "Death to America," according to AFP.

"Stop pointing weapons at the Iranian nation and I will myself negotiate with you," he said, addressing the United States directly.

"Talks should be with respect, fairness and not under pressure."

"You have done everything to prevent us from becoming nuclear and you have failed. The best solution is cooperation and understanding," said the Iranian president.

Last week Biden made a "serious offer" for direct talks in the framework of negotiations between Iran and the so-called P5+1 (the United States, France, Britain, Russia, China and Germany) on Tehran's nuclear program, which world powers suspect is aimed at making atomic weapons.

Iran vehemently denies the allegation.
You can't appease savage islamists. We should take hiom out since the Mulklahs and him are terrorists and not legititmate rulers of Iran
 
You can't appease savage islamists. We should take hiom out since the Mulklahs and him are terrorists and not legititmate rulers of Iran

Yeah let's install our own legitimate ruler there. It worked so well in 1953....

Derp.
 
Yeah let's install our own legitimate ruler there. It worked so well in 1953....

Derp.
Iranian people were far better under the shah.

women had rights and were not ttreated as cattle.

the world was safer too, they had normalized relations with Israel.

Just as people in Egypt are not worse under the islamic thug Morsi
 
Newsflash for "jen": the US doesn't have the political capitol to pull something like that off.

Pulling a stunt like that would result in the entire international community turning against us, and would almost certainly result in the end of this nation as we know it.

But of course, you're too dumb to realize that.
What could the international comunity do.

nothing.

I say we should take all the mullahs andevery islamic terrorist out. The world would than k us.
 
Newsflash for "jen": the US doesn't have the political capitol to pull something like that off.

Pulling a stunt like that would result in the entire international community turning against us, and would almost certainly result in the end of this nation as we know it.

But of course, you're too dumb to realize that.

Not to mention, you know, the massive and senseless loss of life and the deaths of millions of innocents in the name of ..... ?
 
Back
Top