A submissive's handbook for behavioral and cognative development

I wasn't going to respond again because I wouldn't be able to say anything constructive on the topic outlined by the thread starter, but after reading this thing again, I believe that a little of my history in this entire submission thing might be conducive to understanding a bit about my position, which is not a blanket condescension against the submissive/dominant lifestyle.

I was in a sub/dom relationship for a good portion of my life where I was the submissive and he was the dominant. If you like to see exactly how I felt about this, I have some things on Svedish Chef's poetry thread. I won't repost it.

He believe he owned me, that I was his personal property to do with as he wished. I was subjected to whatever whim struck his fancy and I had no choice but to follow it or I would be punished for it. I had no control over my body, my life, or even my own thoughts. They were constantly consumed with ways to please him so he would leave me alone. Consequently I have become extremely self absorbed, self contained, and self controlled. Our relationship was never violent, he only spanked me once in my entire life and never otherwise struck me. He preferred psychological means. I, on the other hand, discovered violence. I discovered that if you hit and hurt other people, they would hurt and not me. After so many years of belonging to him and believing that I had no power, it was quite a rush to dominate people around me. It was a few more years before I managed to turn it to the person who deserved it, not to innocent bystanders. Eventually I turned on him and did the most unspeakably horrible thing that I imagine anyone could do to another person. My ignorance about certain things prevented the consequences of my actions, but in my mind I will always have to live with the fact that I not only decided to do the deed, but I did it. Even worse is the fact that I still feel no remorse for it. Still self consumed as always, I worry about my lack of conscience over that act. But I digress.

The point of this is that I was forced to be submissive, to surrender control of all of me to someone else without my consent one way or the other.

In the traditional sub/dom relationship the control of the sub is surrender to the dom, it's an act of giving. The power in this relationship rests entirely with the sub, they are the ones who decide what their limits of surrender are, how far the dom can take it. An intelligent dom, a true Master, as it were, recognizes this fact and treats the gift of the sub's surrender with the respect it deserves. Training, punishment, reward, all of those things that enter into the relationship are merely trappings of the true sub/dom union.

Being a master/mistress isn't about having a submissive there to do what you want, it isn't about training them, punishing them, rewarding them, or controlling them at all. It's all about giving. A submissive gives their control of themselves to the dominant and a dominant returns that gift by giving the submissive what they want in return, having someone else take the responsibility of their actions.

I don't know how clear that was, but it's what I've discovered in my little study that I did on this subject.
 
silverfox_66 said:
Rediscovering and nurturing the submissive nature is not at all a forceful process. It is quite obvious that you do understand that it is by a mutual agreement to live a highly charged, emotionally and sexually stimulating relationship that this type of lifestyle even exists. It is a beautiful thing for the submissive as well as her Master. The roles become more intense not because they are abusive, forceful, or degrading. It is because the relationship has evolved into a dynamic one, where emotional and sexual needs are being met ! Relationships break down when communication breaks down. I don't blame some views for promoting the feminist cause. I applaud the anger. Although it may misdirected here, it is good to see people are willing to speak out against violence, abuse, and gender degradation.

But, as you said, it is society's tendency to judge what is good or bad for couples' "healthy" relationships which convoludes the benefits derived from a submissive's handbook. This is not a 'green book' calling for a religious conversion here. If the sentiment of those who, seriously, get ticked by this discussion is that the female is being lured, or enslaved against her free will, please join the twenty first century. (and take a peek at my previous posts in this thread, my role in encouraging submissiveness is not harmful or threatening in any way).
Coming from a submissive female, I must say that I understand this more than most. My husband is in the Army, and we catch a lot of flak because even in our day-to-day lives we still have this role, and the Army sees it as my husband being controlling and manipulative, and domineering. But what they don't understand is that A) I trust my husband with my life and he does the same with me, B) I am no good at the running of financial matters, car matters, or other really huge descisions. Mainly because I am to impulsive and I like instant gratification as opposed to long term gratification.
In fact, my doctor even suggested that I see a mental health care worker to help me with my "unhealthy" attitude about myself that my husband was supposedly supreesing upon me. Why can't people even try to understand, I am not abused in any way shape or form, and I am happier now than I have ever been in my entire life. Heck, even my family has noticed how happy I am. My family understands my need for complete guidance, and they totally support mine and my husband's decisions to live this way. They even think that it has been helping our children.
As for guidleines?? I think that a submissive must first completely know and implicitly trust her master/mistress. If this isn't there, then something can and will go wrong. She must also be sure that this is something she wants and it's not something that is being forced upon her in any way<i.e. a controlling spouse>. About others?? Well, unless someone else is in a similar situtation, they really won't understand any kind of explanation and will see it as abuse. Some people are simply narrow minded like that.
 
Silverfox--I agree with you that there perhaps *ought* to be somewhere for curious potential subs to turn for guidance, and possibly guidelines. However, I also agree with Hecate and others who have suggested that the attempt to put together a handbook runs the risk of all relationship manuals--speaking in generalities tends to get away from what *specific* people/couples want and need.

With that caveat, however, I do think that there are some safe generalizations:
**A sub should implicitly trust the dom--this requires time and committment. These relationships do not develop overnight, and there is no quick-fix way to find the right person or the right frame for exploring your submissive side.
**There are levels of committment to this way of life--some people prefer to think of D/S as a roleplay which begins and ends in the bedroom; others make it their everyday reality, and there is everything in between. There is no *one* way to do this.
**SAFE WORDS--there is just no way to emphasize this too much. Everyone needs to know that there is an "out" if they become uncomfortable, or need a chance to process what they've done/seen/thought/felt/etc. This also goes a long way toward reducing beginner's anxiety, and general fears about exploring this part of your sexuality & personality.
**A good dom will give as much as they take--this is not about you giving yourself to another person, only to have that gift go unappreciated, or worse. Your dom should be ready, willing and eager to explore *your* specific needs and desires--every bit as much as you are fulfilling their desires and needs.
**Titles help to remind everyone of their roles and responsibilities--many people like using titles because it helps to "set the scene", and it also liberates people from their everyday realities a bit by allowing them an expressive opportunity to recognize that this is a *choice*, and that it can be reversed.

Those are just a few to get started--I'm keeping company waiting.

I still have reservations about attempting to unify all D/S relationships for the purposes of a "handbook". But, I am ready and willing to come back to this conversation if it will be helpful, or will generate an interesting conversation. Let me know what you think.
 
Wow..

KillerMuffin said:
I believe that a little of my history in this entire submission thing might be conducive to understanding...

An intelligent dom, a true Master, as it were, ... treats the gift of the sub's surrender with the respect it deserves.

Being a master/mistress isn't about having a submissive there to do what you want, it isn't about training them, punishing them, rewarding them, or controlling them at all. It's all about giving. A submissive gives their control of themselves to the dominant and a dominant returns that gift by giving the submissive what they want in return...

I don't know how clear that was, but it's what I've discovered in my little study that I did on this subject.

Oh, KillerMuffin, that was very clear. Thank you for rejoining this discussion, because your words actually reflect the theme of my purpose here. And they come straight from your heart, too.

RisiaSkye and Hecate. Your well adjusted dominant personalities offer invaluable insight into the compassion that must underlie any relationship, if it is going to be healthy and survive. Hecate, your comment that disclosing your feelings as a Domme will ruin your reputation absolutely floors me, because it underscores the true nature of the D/s roleplay. It is possible only if the relationship has a foundation of love and respect. Period.

April and Cheyenne. You join KillerMuffin in truly making a difference by protecting what is sacred. Actually, I think any one of you would fight to the death to shelter the most vulnerable person who enters into the inherently dangerous D/s lifestyle absent love and respect. They can only stem from a healthy communicative exchange between partners. I believe that all of you know that the sub in this lifestyle is sought out by the antisocial element. And he/she are extremely skillful at identifying their prey. There is one problem to the "abuser", however. When people start to give a damn about this abuse and make it their business to learn how to identify these skilled bastards... Then the abuser cannot keep their "thinking errors" from being exposed. Hmmm, if only their were predictable "rules" governing this delightful D/s roleplay that can help identify the "grooming" characteristics of an abuser...

Sammyjo. I think you enjoy acting the part of the submissive. But I have a feeling your Domme really doesn't adapt to his perceived "cold" role of Master. It sounds like he loves you enough to try on occasion, though. Has he the true essentials of promoting a trusting, unselfish and respectful bond with you? Sounds like potential Master material to Me. Get him some acting lessons and enjoy!

And, Dancinvixen. You clearly express the opinion of the well adjusted submissive in a healthy relationship. The Army is playing abuse watchdog for you. Although they are acting in your best interest, it sounds like this micro-society may be infringing on your D/s roleplay out of concern, or because it does not see your marriage conforming to the norms which they deem appropriate. The ultimate fact is that you don't see your D/s relationship as problematic. You are happy. So to hell with them. (Just don't give them the finger... the Army might take it out on your husband).

Wow. Thank you all for your honest reactions, and sharing of personal experiences. I enjoy getting to know each and every one of you.

silverfox_66
 
submissive's guidelines

There is a "handbook" of the ilk that you describe!

I've seen it floating around the internet somewhere...

I believe it is entitled the "Slut-Wife Course"!

It is designed and laid out like a training manual for both the slave and the master.

I could probably find the link if I scoured... and I believe I remember where I had seen it... if you are interested, I can look it up, or you could probably do a search on it yourself! Try it and let me know... or let me know and I'll see if I can locate it again!
 
Re: Re: Point and counterpoint

Hecate said:
...Hope you don't mind me "using" you like that Cheyenne :)

Nope, not a problem!

Here is the biggest difference. I believe you train animals, not people.

I admit that "train" was maybe a bad choice of words here *s* give me advantage of second language ok?

Got it. Your English is so flawless that I forget sometimes it is your second language.

Give me an equal partner, or give me nothing at all.

If you were in love and found out your SO had submissive tendencies ... would you deny him/her to explore that desire??

Good question. I'm not sure. I think I might have to say that I couldn't be the one to help him.
 
I may have posted this before...to anyone who is interested in learning more about BDSM and the like, go to...

http://www.castlerealm.com

It is the best site I have found on this topic, and have recommended it to many people.
 
Back
Top