Weird Harold
Opinionated Old Fart
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2000
- Posts
- 23,768
I don't check my snail mail box very often, because I don't get much snail mail except bills and account statements and I pretty know when each of them is going to arrive.
Today, I checked the mail for the first time since last Saturday -- six days of mail delivery -- and for some reason decided to drag the entire contents of the box back to the apartment instead of trashing the junk as I pass by the dumpster on the way back and then decided to weigh the contents: 1 pound 7 ounces paper was in my mailbox.
It was a pretty much a normal week's mail, one statement from the Credit Union, a new Avon brochure from my-daughter-the-Avon-Lady, and four "special offers" from the cable company -- a total of about eight ounces of mail actually addressed to me.
The rest of it, was ads and other junk-mail address to "occupant" and "current resident" for just under a pound of pure junk -- add in the special offers from the cable company and it comes to almost exactly one pound of dead trees that the Post Office delivers but seldom make it further than the nearest trash can (if they make it that far, which is a different rant.)
I know that bulk mailings are what really is keeping the Post Office in business in competition with overnight express companies and electronic mail, but it it really worth having the Post Office stay in business when two-thirds (by weight) of what they deliver is just trees killed for no real purpose?
In this apartment complex alone, they delivered 240 pounds of paper this week -- that's over six tons of junk mail a year just in one apartment complex!/b] -- How many trees are being wasted nationwide just to keep the US Post Office and biulk mailers in business?
Wouldn't it be better for eeryone -- except bulk mailers and the post office -- if those trees were left standing so they could reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide? Can we use Global Warming as an excuse to finally kill one of the biggest annoyances in the USA?
[/rant]
Today, I checked the mail for the first time since last Saturday -- six days of mail delivery -- and for some reason decided to drag the entire contents of the box back to the apartment instead of trashing the junk as I pass by the dumpster on the way back and then decided to weigh the contents: 1 pound 7 ounces paper was in my mailbox.
It was a pretty much a normal week's mail, one statement from the Credit Union, a new Avon brochure from my-daughter-the-Avon-Lady, and four "special offers" from the cable company -- a total of about eight ounces of mail actually addressed to me.
The rest of it, was ads and other junk-mail address to "occupant" and "current resident" for just under a pound of pure junk -- add in the special offers from the cable company and it comes to almost exactly one pound of dead trees that the Post Office delivers but seldom make it further than the nearest trash can (if they make it that far, which is a different rant.)
I know that bulk mailings are what really is keeping the Post Office in business in competition with overnight express companies and electronic mail, but it it really worth having the Post Office stay in business when two-thirds (by weight) of what they deliver is just trees killed for no real purpose?
In this apartment complex alone, they delivered 240 pounds of paper this week -- that's over six tons of junk mail a year just in one apartment complex!/b] -- How many trees are being wasted nationwide just to keep the US Post Office and biulk mailers in business?
Wouldn't it be better for eeryone -- except bulk mailers and the post office -- if those trees were left standing so they could reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide? Can we use Global Warming as an excuse to finally kill one of the biggest annoyances in the USA?
[/rant]