a bill too far?

[BotanyBoy]

A challenge involves taking you seriously. I can't do that.

You keep that tail tucked sister

 

[Luk]

A challenge involves taking you seriously. I can't do that.

No one does.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Luk keeps his tail tucked too....

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

No one does.

Adrina seems like your type: insecure and not too smart. You might just have a chance with her.

 

[Luk]

LOL @ Luk's trolls.

 

[Rightguide]

Adrina seems like your type: insecure and not too smart. You might just have a chance with her.

I think when I first came here somebody exposed a personal ad she posted about liking to be handled roughly, dominated, and slapped round, during sex, something like that. So maybe she'll let Luk beat up her tits.

 

[Luk]

I think when I first came here somebody exposed a personal ad she posted about liking to be handled roughly, dominated, and slapped round, during sex, something like that. So maybe she'll let Luk beat up her tits.

"You" weren't around for the bruised titty pics, vettebirther. If you're gonna pretend to not be you, do a better job of it, tubby bitch.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

LOL @ Luk's trolls.

Do you acknowledge me?

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

"You" weren't around for the bruised titty pics, vettebirther. If you're gonna pretend to not be you, do a better job of it, tubby bitch.

Everyone here knows that you get your jollies from abusing low self esteem women. I think it's a stickie.

 

[colddiesel]

A bloke at work told me last week he'd always voted DUP but wouldn't be this time because they were running a gay candidate for one of the council seats.

I called him a cunt.

But at least he gave you the opportunity to call him what he is. Personally I tend to the view that it is better for even cunts to express their views in order that everybody may see who they are. I have a young gay friend who would not have reacted as you did; he would have smacked the cunt in the gob.

I like Butters and often agree with her, but she is far to quick to regulate or legislate when old fashioned public humiliation, (or a smack in the gob) will do the job.

 

[Luk]

Everyone here knows that you get your jollies from abusing low self esteem women. I think it's a stickie.

So you're saying Luk can only get ugly women with low self-esteem who like to be abused and may or may not be real.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Texas then


https://www.africanglobe.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Texas-Whites-Only-Neighborhood.jpg

https://www.latinousa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Mexicans-250x250.png

http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-L-2Q2a8ZRyQ/VkUbVj5tJ3I/AAAAAAAAM9M/GcKNxtyFNGI/s640/blogger-image--965688147.jpg


and now

http://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Whites-sticker-750x612.jpg

 

[Aglaopheme]

But at least he gave you the opportunity to call him what he is. Personally I tend to the view that it is better for even cunts to express their views in order that everybody may see who they are. I have a young gay friend who would not have reacted as you did; he would have smacked the cunt in the gob.

I like Butters and often agree with her, but she is far to quick to regulate or legislate when old fashioned public humiliation, (or a smack in the gob) will do the job.

You do realize that it is Texas that wants to legislate discrimination and not butters, right?

 

[Rightguide]

Everyone here knows that you get your jollies from abusing low self esteem women. I think it's a stickie.

One of our female posters brought this up not too long ago and conversation ensued. It's been talked about a few times in the last couple of years.

 

[Luk]

One of our female posters brought this up not too long ago and conversation ensued. It's been talked about a few times in the last couple of years.

LAWLZ.

Luk has your broken brain swimming, vettebirther.

 

[Que]

Everyone here knows that you get your jollies from abusing low self esteem women. I think it's a stickie.

So you're saying Luk can only get ugly women with low self-esteem who like to be abused and may or may not be real.

Where did you get "ugly" pr imaginary from that statement? Sounds like you are projecting your own ugliness.

 

[Rightguide]

Where did you get "ugly" pr imaginary from that statement? Sounds like you are projecting your own ugliness.

There was at least one woman here who didn't even want her name associated with his, didn't even want to be in the same post with him, let alone life in general.

 

[Luk]

There was at least one woman here who didn't even want her name associated with his, didn't even want to be in the same post with him, let alone life in general.

Shaddup, vettebirther.

ETA: How the fuck can someone be in the same post as me, dummy?

 

[von_Bismarck]

Adrina seems like your type: insecure and not too smart. You might just have a chance with her.

mAnn calling anyone not too smart is unintentionally hilarious.

 

[Luk]

mAnn calling anyone not too smart is unintentionally hilarious.

His pist was a great source of irony - Liam

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

So you're saying Luk can only get ugly women with low self-esteem who like to be abused and may or may not be real.

You might be able to con them into a fuck or two but from past observations, they don't seem to stick around once the real you shines thru. Amirite or amirite?

Kthxbi.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You do realize that it is Texas that wants to legislate discrimination and not butters, right?

Texas isn’t legislating discrimination, Texas is legislating freedom of association for the individual in the marketplace.

The two are not the same and you only make yourself look dishonest by trying to conflate them.

Also to be fair Butters supports the authoritarian model over the liberal one Texas is legislating....and like most anti-American lefties usually does support authoritarian policy over the liberal one.

Makes me wonder....

Freedom of speech, association, religion and the right to be armed and secure in ones privacy and property without unjust search and seizure are all core ideals the USA was formed around and the left is totally antithetical to all of it. Absolutely loathing of these concepts......yet they choose to come/stay here.

What the actual fuck?

I just don’t understand....

 

[RobDownSouth]

Luk keeps his tail tucked too....

Perhaps he fears your Irish temper, which you inherited from your red-haired green eyed daddy.

Texas isn’t legislating discrimination, Texas is legislating freedom of association for the individual in the marketplace.

The two are not the same and you only make yourself look dishonest by trying to conflate them.

"Freedom of association for the individual in the marketplace" is a rather tortortuous interpretation of the word "commerce"....but you can't say that because you know it'll make the rest of your rant look foolish.

The government can and does regulate commerce (see also: the Trump tariffs you adore). You CAN legally put "No shoes, no shirt, no service" on your store's front door, "action" is not a "protected class". Race, religion, national origin, sex ARE "protected classes", which is why you cannot put "No Negroes or NannerBoys" signs on your front door.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Perhaps he fears your Irish temper, which you inherited from your red-haired green eyed daddy.

Be kinda hard considering I'm 0% Irish.

Dad doesn't have green eyes or red hair.....he grew out of it like most Mongolians
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/files/2014/05/amazons_horsegirl.jpg

Chinese....
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/files/2010/11/uyghurboy.png

And Koreans born with those features.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/2a/15/2d/2a152d8733efa13c96c9394d1363fb49.jpg

But don't let the facts burst your racist bubble white boy.

"Freedom of association for the individual in the marketplace" is a rather tortortuous interpretation of the word "commerce"....but you can't say that because you know it'll make the rest of your rant look foolish.

Not foolish at all.

Freedom of commerce then....doesn't change the message.

The government can and does regulate commerce (see also: the Trump tariffs you adore). You CAN legally put "No shoes, no shirt, no service" on your store's front door, "action" is not a "protected class". Race, religion, national origin, sex ARE "protected classes", which is why you cannot put "No Negroes or NannerBoys" signs on your front door.

Obviously, there are some valid regulations out there.

However forcing everyone to be PC about it is not a federal issue nor is it very valid, and why I ignore that "protected class" commie bullshit.

I don't hang a sign, I just discriminate discretely.

Especially with my employees, not so much my customers...only thing I give a fuck about there is money.

 

[butters]

If we leave people to be free about who they want to do business with then everyone knows who the assholes are. When you force people into hiding then it becomes a bigger problem. Keep them out in the open so the world knows.

in big cities, it may not prove a real problem - doesn't make it right. in smaller towns, however, those bible-belters... would it be okay in your books for the couple of docs and nurses there to refuse medical aid to a person (with insurance, even!) on the grounds of them being lgbt? it's no damned different than refusing someone service because of the colour of their skin, or serving men only because, yanno, wimmens are 'bad luck/bleeders>unclean/crazy/more likely to shoplift than men etc..., etc..., etc....

i happen to agree with you that it's better to know who the bigots are, out in the open; trouble is, with the past 2 presidents we've seen how they come out of the woodwork because of their 'beliefs' and how it has divided america in a way not seen for maybe 50 years. sometimes society needs to tuck their dirty laundry out of sight for people to be able to work together and make for a productive experience. most of us have had to work alongside people whose beliefs we didn't agree with or accept, and people whose personal behaviour we didn't approve of - we worked with them because we had a job to do. it didn't mean we had to like the person, or kiss arse, just be polite and get on with stuff.

https://pics.me.me/thumb_arguing-withidiotsis-like-playing-chess-with-a-pigeon-no-matter-20851210.png

I'll have to remember that the US constitution is now being classified as "mandated equality".

And that others are more concerned with the rights of a plumber to be a bigot than for someone to be treated for a life threatening condition.

But ya know... details. For pigeons.

yup

and it's the bigots shouting the loudest about the right to discriminate

But at least he gave you the opportunity to call him what he is. Personally I tend to the view that it is better for even cunts to express their views in order that everybody may see who they are. I have a young gay friend who would not have reacted as you did; he would have smacked the cunt in the gob.

I like Butters and often agree with her, but she is far to quick to regulate or legislate when old fashioned public humiliation, (or a smack in the gob) will do the job.

yeah, smacking the person in the mouth might be the most personally satisfying, but it isn't gonna change the bigot's p.o.v or how they stick to not wanting to serve lgbt customers. i'm not advocating for more legislation; quite the opposite. i'd like to see them having to serve everybody EQUALLY as they're already supposed to, and not use some bullshit religious beliefs to hide their bigotry behind.

You do realize that it is Texas that wants to legislate discrimination and not butters, right?

i'd hope so....