99.5 % covid deaths are the unvaccinated...6,000 in June!

[Dribble]

Lowe's hardware chain just instituted an interesting vaccination policy:

• If you are vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be paid sick leave
• If you are not vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be terminated for cause.

Can't wait until insurance companies refuse to pay. Or at minimum...charge the retards double.

 

[butters]

Lowe's hardware chain just instituted an interesting vaccination policy:

• If you are vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be paid sick leave
• If you are not vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be terminated for cause.

United Airlines has a different policy

• If you present proof of vaccination by Sept 20th, employees will receive one extra day of paid time off
• If you fail to present proof of vaccination by Sept 20th, you will be terminated for cause

as more and more get vaccinated, there'll be a proportionate growth of anti anti-vaxxer ness...why should the majority risk their kids' health or their own if they have comorbidities/enhanced risks because a mouthy minority won't help protect the society they live in?

 

[butters]

cnn stands by its policy of 'Vaccination is mandatory for anyone reporting in the field, working with any other employees or going into an office' and fires 3 who took the piss and came into the office anyway

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-c...eadline]-[news]-[bizdev]-[isapi]&xtor=ES-213-[BBC%20News%20Newsletter]-2021August6-[top+news+stories]

CNN chief Jeff Zucker mentioned the dismissal in a company memo sent on Thursday and seen by several US media outlets.

Vaccination is mandatory for anyone reporting in the field, working with any other employees or going into an office, he is quoted as saying in the memo."Let me be clear - we have a zero-tolerance policy on this," Mr Zucker, chairman of news and sports for WarnerMedia, is quoted as saying.

 

[Rightguide]

Lowe's hardware chain just instituted an interesting vaccination policy:

• If you are vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be paid sick leave
• If you are not vaccinated and contract any form of Covid, you will be terminated for cause.

United Airlines has a different policy

• If you present proof of vaccination by Sept 20th, employees will receive one extra day of paid time off
• If you fail to present proof of vaccination by Sept 20th, you will be terminated for cause

These examples could be violations of law.

 

[Adre]

These examples could be violations of law.

Oh yeah? What law?

 

[innocntplay]

These examples could be violations of law.

I agree it is against the law. Vaccine passport, WTF? Who is the gestapo?
The government seems to be imposing a rule for anyone to interpret/apply/enforce any way they want.
If it comes down to a legal battle regarding income loss, health, travel, fuel, access to food….
Where are the courts? The judicial system? Is this still a free country?
In history all of these impositions, extended curfews, limited access to fuels, propagandised data, government imposed food shortages to drive up price and papers required to move about evolved around war.
What is the motive of the current admin? Again I haven't been able to find any place to discuss this. It always comes down to libs doing name calling, shaming…. bullying, repeating non-factual BS as fact and arbitrary or incorrect unsupported opinion.

Imagine anyone still believing any of this is about a virus.

 

[innocntplay]

Oh yeah? What law?

It is called the Constitution of the United States.

You should read it sometime.

 

[butters]

Oh yeah? What law?

only the dopes think that

from the article i linked:

It is legal in the US for firms to require employees to be vaccinated.

In May the US government said it was legal for employers to require staff attending the workplace in person to be vaccinated against Covid-19.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It is called the Constitution of the United States.

You should read it sometime.

What line specifically since you are obviously well versed on the document.

 

[innocntplay]

Then one quotes the liberal media

Another reveals if he did read the Constitution, he did not understand it.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Then one quotes the liberal media

Another reveals if he did read the Constitution, he did not understand it.

Please cite what part of the Constitution is concerned with the subject at hand.

 

[Rightguide]

Oh yeah? What law?

Read this article and note this conclusion. Generally it is illegal to force anyone to take an experimental drug, all of the Covid vaccines are under an emergency use authorizations EUA and are classified as experimental:


Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA
By Aaron Siri Feb. 23, 2021

"This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization.

State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated.

Organizations are free to encourage vaccinations through internal communications, through educational events, and through other measures to urge employees to be vaccinated. They can take these measures so long as: (1) they are not viewed as coercive, (2) the organization makes clear the decision regarding whether to receive the vaccine is voluntary, and (3) the measures comply with the requirements in the EUAs and the related regulations for these products.

People across the world have had their lives upended during the last year. The urgency to return to normalcy is felt deeply by many. As decision-makers at organizations decide on their Covid-19 vaccination policy, they should be careful to not let this passion lead the organization to run afoul of the law.

Aaron Siri is the managing partner at Siri & Glimstad LLP, a civil litigation firm with its principal office in New York City that has represented the Informed Consent Action Network, a group that campaigns against vaccine requirements. This article is not intended to provide legal advice but to offer broad and general information about the law."

https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23...-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/

Here's an article by an employment attorney:

Can employers force employees to have the COVID-19 vaccine?
ARTICLE BY: Sarah Hayes is an employment lawyer - Paris Smith solicitors | Published: 10 MAY 2021

https://www.thehrdirector.com/featu...n-employers-force-employees-covid-19-vaccine/

 

[Dribble]

Remember when the Supreme Court sided with that Fascist run company about not having to cover women's health needs? Well that SAME result gives companies today the right to demand vaccinations from their employees. Sucks doesn't it.

 

[Adre]

In the United Airlines example, the date is 20 Sept. It is expected that the vaccines will be fully FDA approved by then. So I repeat, “what law?” And to the moron who said the Constitution, where does the Constitution prevent companies from insisting on health safety in the workplace?

 

[ll74]

Yes, your employer can force you to get a vaccine

No, the Nuremberg Code cannot be used as a defense

 

[Rightguide]

In the United Airlines example, the date is 20 Sept. It is expected that the vaccines will be fully FDA approved by then. So I repeat, “what law?” And to the moron who said the Constitution, where does the Constitution prevent companies from insisting on health safety in the workplace?

As of today, current federal law.

 

[DeluxAuto]

As of today, current federal law.

Who proposed it and who passes it?

 

[Rightguide]

Who proposed it and who passes it?

What, the current law?

 

[DeluxAuto]

What, the current law?

The one you're stating exists and is applicable.

 

[Adre]

As of today, current federal law.

Show us the law, not some fucking newspaper article.

 

[innocntplay]

FDA approval of a drug is not law.
FDA approval may be considered precedent in a court of law.
FDA non-approval/denial can render billions of dollars in produced drug to never leave the loading dock and at the expense of the Pharma that produced it to destroy. The EPA would become the watchdog for where how that happens. Would be a real shame for some things to be loosed into the air or water supply....

What is happening now is a pass from politicians. Originally Trump to accelerate the production of the test vaccine and later Biden to attempt to get the masses to actually take the test vaccine. Unapproved it is a test. A trial. In any drug trial there has to be a control group, I am in that group.

As for the approval Sept 30 or any time of the current or next covid mRNA jab by the FDA.

I doubt it.

The FDA has been around a long time and has been very consistent with its standards. It remains a non-political arm of government for the purpose of safety by means of regulation.

Not to mention the numerous direct and indirect adverse actions from the current test the deaths from this debacle are nearing 12,000.
The adverse effects alone are enough data for them to continue silent. The current regime will continue to see to it they do not prohibit by [denial] disapproval the drug companies to continue to release this test vaccine. According to Moderna statements yesterday two more mRNA attempts before the end of the year. This as the virus "mutates". Technically a correct word. If this were a naturally occurring virus the term would be evolve not mutate.

Worse the US has nearly mandated the spike poison globally by offering the US mRNA varieties as long as the drug production companies are held harmless. Cannot be sued or other wise held accountable.
The distribution points for related adverse action are also being protected by the government. Know any one with Bell's Palsey?

Either way this thread continues to look like a bunch of random media quotes. Libs demanding facts because they don't believe their leadership only cater to their artificial fears and drama.
It is the same posers in here everyday demanding fact, asking for answers to nonsense statements and questions, quoting media and calling the rest of us names for paying attention to detail.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

A trial. In any drug trial there has to be a control group, I am in that group.

*chuckles*

So you got a jab of saline instead of vaccine?

If that is not the case, you are not in a trial group, just an idiot group.

 

[innocntplay]

*chuckles*

So you got a jab of saline instead of vaccine?

If that is not the case, you are not in a trial group, just an idiot group.

You *chuckles* a lot!

Is that a nervous tick or did it start after the vaccine?

Sorry to respond to fuzzy, it is the nonsense and name calling I referred to in my last post.

I am confidently sure Fauci did get a jab of saline instead of the vaccine. He knows the mRNA is a spike protein trial and the virus is a derivative of human testing without antidotal research.

 

[KeithD]

Y

I am confidently sure Fauci did get a jab of saline instead of the vaccine.

Which pretty much shows how ignorant, antisocial, and bamboozled by Trumpians you are.

 

[ll74]

Not even 10 people have died from the vaccine.

Making judgments about the vaccine when you misunderstand the VAERS report is not valid.