amicus
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 14,812
Sad news for me personally, as I found Japanese girls in Honolulu, to be horny little honey bunnies...but...sighs...that was long ago:
TOKYO (AFP) –
~~~
Well, phooey, I have a long dormant story of three Japanese school girls on a tour of the US and a friendly desk clerk at a Beach Hotel...sighs...
I am going to pose a 'general' question I have spoken of before, the apparently natural relationship between modern industrial societies and the birth rate of women in those societies. To set the table, to maintain stable population numbers, discounting immigration, an indigenous society needs to have each woman produce two children, just to maintain the population.
This is a subject that sociologists have been tinkering with and will continue to do so, as it appears modern societies are doomed to fail, internally, from the failure to reproduce.
I am purposely going to attempt to 'guide' this conversation, if there is one, along serious philosophical lines and not the shallow political interpretations that usually occur. To wit:
The objective, natural existence of human life is motivated by the innate drives to procreate and nurture. Read that again and think about it; the purpose and meaning of life arises from the innate psychological and physical imperatives to reproduce and nurture offspring.
As recent ago as the 90's when I last did talk radio and posed the question to my mostly female listeners, almost 80% of those who responded, stated they would be 'stay at home moms', if economic conditions permitted it.
There are hundreds of other observations, some scientific, some not, nome mere opinion polls or psycholgical theories and postulations with a sociological foundation, that confirm my suspicions, that given the chance, most women would choose not to be in the labor market full time.
To perhaps disuade those 'zero population growth' fanatics and the zealots who see man as an infestation of the pristine natural purity of mother earth; please don't put forth your warped fantasies, they bore me.
Amicus
TOKYO (AFP) –
Young Japanese men are losing interest in sex, according to a study commissioned by the government, in a further warning sign for a nation notorious for its low birth rate, a doctor said Friday.
The survey also found that more than 40 percent of married people said they have not had sex in the past month, said Kunio Kitamura, head of the clinic of the Japan Family Planning Association, who took part in the survey.
"This is directly linked with falling birth rate. Policy actions are necessary," Kitamura told AFP.
The data confirmed a wider social belief that younger men are becoming "herbivorous", a label attached to passive men who do not actively seek women and sex.
The latest biennial survey found that 36.1 percent of Japanese males between the ages of 16-19 said they had no interest or even despised sex, a jump from 17.5 percent in the 2008 study.
Compounding the issue was data that showed 59 percent of girls in the same age group felt the same way, up 12 percentage points from 2008.
The data is a worry for a government aiming to encourage couples to have children to reverse a falling birth rate and avert a potential economic calamity.
Japan's total fertility rate in 2009 was estimated by the government at 1.37 births per woman, one of the world's lowest, compared with 2.06 in the United States and 1.97 in France.
The trend has been largely blamed on a widespread belief, especially in rural Japan, that women who give birth should quit their jobs, amid shortages of childcare centres and other systemic factors.
Japan's population has already started to decline as younger people delay starting a family due to the perceived burden on their finances, lifestyles and careers.
~~~
Well, phooey, I have a long dormant story of three Japanese school girls on a tour of the US and a friendly desk clerk at a Beach Hotel...sighs...
I am going to pose a 'general' question I have spoken of before, the apparently natural relationship between modern industrial societies and the birth rate of women in those societies. To set the table, to maintain stable population numbers, discounting immigration, an indigenous society needs to have each woman produce two children, just to maintain the population.
This is a subject that sociologists have been tinkering with and will continue to do so, as it appears modern societies are doomed to fail, internally, from the failure to reproduce.
I am purposely going to attempt to 'guide' this conversation, if there is one, along serious philosophical lines and not the shallow political interpretations that usually occur. To wit:
The objective, natural existence of human life is motivated by the innate drives to procreate and nurture. Read that again and think about it; the purpose and meaning of life arises from the innate psychological and physical imperatives to reproduce and nurture offspring.
As recent ago as the 90's when I last did talk radio and posed the question to my mostly female listeners, almost 80% of those who responded, stated they would be 'stay at home moms', if economic conditions permitted it.
There are hundreds of other observations, some scientific, some not, nome mere opinion polls or psycholgical theories and postulations with a sociological foundation, that confirm my suspicions, that given the chance, most women would choose not to be in the labor market full time.
To perhaps disuade those 'zero population growth' fanatics and the zealots who see man as an infestation of the pristine natural purity of mother earth; please don't put forth your warped fantasies, they bore me.
Amicus