5 questions for the Dom Guys

[WriterDom]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?


1. Yes, if I liked her

2. Rarely

3. eating pussy

4. Yes, if she gave good blow jobs and was enthusiastic about sucking I could live without the swallowing.

5. I'd expect a good faith effort to enjoy it. After that, I could probably live without it. But I've never had anyone who was really into anal. Mainly virgins.

 

[fallon2]

Reply

1) No
2) Absolutely not
Women know if you are serious and if you are not you are wasting both your time and effort.

3) Definitely eating pussy.

4) Yes, but I have never met any woman who refused me.

5) Yes, but see above answer. I would also add anal is something that I don't have to live without having on a regular basis.
Anal, for me and others, is a last 'taboo" and therefore makes the pleasure doubled.

 

[cellis]

*watches this thread with great interest*

 

[WriterDom]

*watches this thread with great interest*

can you cum up with 5 questions for the subs?

 

[NCShin]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Yes.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Yes

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

This is a tough question. I think it depends...

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

Think I agree with you, as long as she still gave good head and at least seemed to enjoy it, but didn't want to swallow. I could deal.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

Yes, anal is not a big thing for me.

 

[navarre]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?
Yes.
2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?
Yes.
3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?
Eating pussy. Don't know why. It just seems more personal to me.
4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?
I would have to agree with WD.
5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?
Nope.

 

[cellis]

can you cum up with 5 questions for the subs?

Let me put on my thinking cap!

 

[rosco rathbone]

No across the board.

Pussy.

 

[ShyGuy68]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?
If I like her as a person, yes I'm sure I could.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?
If I'm having intercourse with her, I would do it, as long as her pussy isn't to hairy.

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?
I find them both equal

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?
Yes!

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?
If I really like her for everything else, yes I think so, even though anal is my kink

 

[Betticus]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

No

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

No

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

Eating pussy

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

Yes if I like her enough. I don't mind her not swallowing but I would prefer it. She at least has to not mind tasting it.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

Yes if you are talking just about penile penetration.

 

[MissTaken]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

1. No

2. No

3. Eating pussy in the physical context. Intercourse in the emotional context.

4. Yes.

5. Probably.

I know, I know, I am not a member of the targetted all male club denoted in the thread title, but I just know it was a small oversight!

 

[MastrJ]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

1. Nope

2. Nope

3. Oral Sex

4. Probably not. If she were really enthusiastic about the blowjob, maybe but I have never run into a woman that could be into giving a blowjob without also swallowing.

5. Yes, but I would want a good faith attempt at it. If she's willing to make an attempt and is still not interested, then that's perfectly fine. Even if she's my sub I still expect both of us to enjoy the sex act so it wouldn't do anything for me if I was forcing her to endure something she just didn't like.

 

[Justina123]

Sir's answers:

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

No. But have played, and still play, with women to whom I am not physically attracted.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

No. Don't do this at all, attraction or not.

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

Eating pussy

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

Yes.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

Yes. I am.

 

[Joe Wordsworth]

1. As we're talking about possibilities, yes it is possible that I would.

2. Also, this is merely possible, so yes.

3. Personal? Actual intercourse.

4. Sure, its possible.

5. Also possible.

 

[FungiUg]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

I have done so, mostly as an exercise in being "open minded". For example, one lady I chatted to on the 'net for ages, and we got along famously. But in person, there just wasn't the "zing factor". I figured I should at least be open minded enough to discount the physical.

I've since learned (from trying it) that physical attraction is an important part of sex, and that sex is both mental and physical for me. I need the physical attraction.

So having done so in the past, no, I require attraction for sex now.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Done it (same woman). Wouldn't do so again.

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

Eating pussy. And the thing is with oral sex, there's an additional factor -- she needs to taste good! I've had partners who I found physically attractive, but who didn't taste good. Not surprisingly, they were the ones I found hardest to lick.

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

I was married 8 years to a woman who didn't. So yes, I could imagine having a submissive who didn't swallow. It would certainly detract from the pleasure, and whether the "long-term" would work might be more difficult. But then, "long-term" is already difficult with me because I already have a partner. So let's just say I don't really know.

Keep in mind that for any long term prospect, a submissive would have to belong to both my partner and I. And so swallowing cum becomes more of a requirement, but included would be licking cum out of pussy, off face or tits and so on.

So I have to say that this would likely be more of an issue than the anal question.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

Yes. Anal sex is a fantasy, sure. But there are heaps of other things I like to do too, so it's not a massive restriction. My current partner isn't a huge anal fan (when we met, it was strictly off limits, but some careful play has extended the limits somewhat.)

 

[MasterTamer]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

--------------------------

1. No, it's disrespectful, even if she is a sub

2. No

3. Definetely tongue pleasure with the pussy

4. Yes, because I enjoy making my pets hold still while I cum on them. I want to see the end result of the work, though I will permit a swallowing sub to do so as a treat if she has been good for me.

5. I would expect her to try it at least twice with me, as there are plenty of men who don't know how to attempt it properly. If she still has no desire for it and it ruins the mood then I it becomes one of the things I wont force my pet to endure.

 

[Learn Humility]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?
Only with great difficulty

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?
With greater difficulty

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?
Definitely eating pussy. Every one tastes different to me

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?
Sure. There is no one thing other than complete disobedience that would disqualify a sub from a long term relationship. I would also consider what happens in lieu of the swallowing. I often prefer to see my cum on a sub's face.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?
Again, there is no one thing....And between anal, oral, and, um "regular", anal is my last choice.

 

[Sir_Winston54]

Re: Re: 5 questions for the Dom Guys

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Have; won't again.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Have; won't again.

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

Cunnilingus.

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

Have; won't again.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

Have. Since control and the D/s-S/M portion of the relationship are more important to me than the precise physical sexual acts, if those aspects (control and D/s-S/M) are what I want, specific sexual acts are less important. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy it - I do - but since I have only one penis, having only two openings to enjoy instead of three won't make a lot of difference.

 

[Arles]

1. No, if I weren't attracted to her in some way--which need not be physical--I couldn't fuck her.
2. No, same as above.
3. It depends. Both can be intimate and personal--or not. But I'd say intercourse, simply b/c I'd probably go down on a woman before I'd fuck her.
4. No. She's gotta be a total cumslut.
5. No. ... and a buttslut, too.
   [/list=1]

 

[Rugor]

1. Would you have intercourse with a woman you were NOT attracted to?

No, she may or may not be physically attractive, but unless she attracts Me somehow it's not going to happen.

2. Would you perform oral sex on a woman you were NOT attracted to?

Same as above.

3. Which do you find more "personal" -- eating pussy or having intercourse?

Cunnilingus without a doubt.

4. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not "swallow" cum?

No, and as stated I think the question is meaningless, or at least an oxymoron. A sub submits. she is submissive. If she is setting the limits such as not swallowing My cum then she is not submitting. If she isn't submitting she's not a sub.

Now, she may dislike it, and for other reasons I may choose to pamper her and not require it as a matter of course (very unlikely for Me as I believe cum belongs in her stomach), but it is My choice not hers. Even then she would be expected to swallow when required, she would just be required to swallow less often.

5. Could you be with a femsub "long-term" who did not accept "anal" sex?

No. It may not be something I would require regularly, but see above. When required she would have to accept it. she is the sub, not the Dom. It is My choice, not hers.

This is completely ignoring the fact that I consider that the "Owner's hole" and tend to exercise it regularly.