1HF's av....

Only on Lit would a stance of being against the physical abuse of women be considered aberrant.

You calling safe, sane and consensual play "physical abuse" does not make it so. Words mean actual things. Substituting a word because it supports your particular revulsion does not alter the actual facts.

Your equating rough sex with actual domestic violence does not honor the actual victims of such, nor does it appropriately condemn actual abuse. What it does is play into the idea that some women like it rough, so slapping a woman around that doesn't like it is somehow permissible.

Send in your hat for dry-cleaning. It is not nearly as white as you think it is.
 
Only on Lit would a stance of being against the physical abuse of women be considered aberrant.

Oh I won't disagree. When I saw her av I texted her "WHO BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU" and she once again, very patiently, explained why she likes what she likes. The thing is, it's not abuse if she wants it, sort of like you can't rape the willing. I might not understand why she likes it but I don't have to.
 
Oh I won't disagree. When I saw her av I texted her "WHO BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU" and she once again, very patiently, explained why she likes what she likes. The thing is, it's not abuse if she wants it, sort of like you can't rape the willing. I might not understand why she likes it but I don't have to.

Nothing is worse than a game of rape with willing participants.
 
I would never EVER speak for all women; we are all individual and have our own thoughts and opinions.

As I'm entitled to mine. Regardless of anyone's feelings, this is mine. In a consenting, healthy relationship, if one partner asks the other for pain to help them feel better where is the harm?

If you are genuinely concerned for my well being, then thank you. I truly appreciate it. If you are just looking for a platform, then be my guest. Justifying my position is getting no where and I won't waste my breath nor should you.
 
You calling safe, sane and consensual play "physical abuse" does not make it so. Words mean actual things. Substituting a word because it supports your particular revulsion does not alter the actual facts.

Your equating rough sex with actual domestic violence does not honor the actual victims of such, nor does it appropriately condemn actual abuse. What it does is play into the idea that some women like it rough, so slapping a woman around that doesn't like it is somehow permissible.

Send in your hat for dry-cleaning. It is not nearly as white as you think it is.

I firmly stand behind everyone's right to be an idiot.
 
I would never EVER speak for all women; we are all individual and have our own thoughts and opinions.

As I'm entitled to mine. Regardless of anyone's feelings, this is mine. In a consenting, healthy relationship, if one partner asks the other for pain to help them feel better where is the harm?

If you are genuinely concerned for my well being, then thank you. I truly appreciate it. If you are just looking for a platform, then be my guest. Justifying my position is getting no where and I won't waste my breath nor should you.

Since when dick became not enough??????????????????????????????????????????????????
 
http://i.imgur.com/RxqLq.jpg

It's fucking hilarious how women's sexual autonomy and self-agency gets some so-called men on the planet shook like The Scarecrow in The Wizard of Booze.

Keep going for yours, 1HF. It's all good.

Fuck these daily impotent, eternal mommy-issues having, stay masturbating to June Cleaver image magazine tearout schnooks! :D
 
I would hope for your sake, and that of your lady friends, that your sexuality comes from more than your dick.

Kissing, touching,licking and shit like that is only the appetizer. The dick is the main course. Who goes to a restaurant just for the appetizers? So I ask again, since when was dick not enough?
 
Back
Top