1 in 5 young adults has personality disorder - yahoo.news

AllardChardon

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Posts
4,797
1 in 5 young adults has personality disorder
By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer

CHICAGO – Almost one in five young American adults has a personality disorder that interferes with everyday life, and even more abuse alcohol or drugs, researchers reported Monday in the most extensive study of its kind.

The disorders include problems such as obsessive or compulsive tendencies and anti-social behavior that can sometimes lead to violence. The study also found that fewer than 25 percent of college-aged Americans with mental problems get treatment.

One expert said personality disorders may be overdiagnosed. But others said the results were not surprising since previous, less rigorous evidence has suggested mental problems are common on college campuses and elsewhere.

Experts praised the study's scope — face-to-face interviews about numerous disorders with more than 5,000 young people ages 19 to 25 — and said it spotlights a problem college administrators need to address.

Study co-author Dr. Mark Olfson of Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute called the widespread lack of treatment particularly worrisome. He said it should alert not only "students and parents, but also deans and people who run college mental health services about the need to extend access to treatment."

Counting substance abuse, the study found that nearly half of young people surveyed have some sort of psychiatric condition, including students and non-students.

Personality disorders were the second most common problem behind drug or alcohol abuse as a single category. The disorders include obsessive, anti-social and paranoid behaviors that are not mere quirks but actually interfere with ordinary functioning.

The study authors noted that recent tragedies such as fatal shootings at Northern Illinois University and Virginia Tech have raised awareness about the prevalence of mental illness on college campuses.

They also suggest that this age group might be particularly vulnerable.

"For many, young adulthood is characterized by the pursuit of greater educational opportunities and employment prospects, development of personal relationships, and for some, parenthood," the authors said. These circumstances, they said, can result in stress that triggers the start or recurrence of psychiatric problems.

The study was released Monday in Archives of General Psychiatry. It was based on interviews with 5,092 young adults in 2001 and 2002.

Olfson said it took time to analzye the data, including weighting the results to extrapolate national numbers. But the authors said the results would probably hold true today.

The study was funded with grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and the New York Psychiatric Institute.

Dr. Sharon Hirsch, a University of Chicago psychiatrist not involved in the study, praised it for raising awareness about the problem and the high numbers of affected people who don't get help.

Imagine if more than 75 percent of diabetic college students didn't get treatment, Hirsch said. "Just think about what would be happening on our college campuses."

The results highlight the need for mental health services to be housed with other medical services on college campuses, to erase the stigma and make it more likely that people will seek help, she said.

In the study, trained interviewers, but not psychiatrists, questioned participants about symptoms. They used an assessment tool similar to criteria doctors use to diagnose mental illness.

Dr. Jerald Kay, a psychiatry professor at Wright State University and chairman of the American Psychiatric Association's college mental health committee, said the assessment tool is considered valid and more rigorous than self-reports of mental illness. He was not involved in the study.

Personality disorders showed up in similar numbers among both students and non-students, including the most common one, obsessive compulsive personality disorder. About 8 percent of young adults in both groups had this illness, which can include an extreme preoccupation with details, rules, orderliness and perfectionism.

Kay said the prevalence of personality disorders was higher than he would expect and questioned whether the condition might be overdiagnosed.

All good students have a touch of "obsessional" personality that helps them work hard to achieve. But that's different from an obsessional disorder that makes people inflexible and controlling and interferes with their lives, he explained.

Obsessive compulsive personality disorder differs from the better known OCD, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, which features repetitive actions such as hand-washing to avoid germs.

OCD is thought to affect about 2 percent of the general population. The study didn't examine OCD separately but grouped it with all anxiety disorders, seen in about 12 percent of college-aged people in the survey.

The overall rate of other disorders was also pretty similar among college students and non-students.

Substance abuse, including drug addiction, alcoholism and other drinking that interferes with school or work, affected nearly one-third of those in both groups.

Slightly more college students than non-students were problem drinkers — 20 percent versus 17 percent. And slightly more non-students had drug problems — nearly 7 percent versus 5 percent.

In both groups, about 8 percent had phobias and 7 percent had depression.

Bipolar disorder was slightly more common in non-students, affecting almost 5 percent versus about 3 percent of students.

***In praise of raising awareness about this subject.
 
I dont believe it for a moment. Over the course of my career I assessed 1000s of people. Very few have severe mental illness or personality disorders. Much of what passes for mental illness is adjustment problems caused by severe stress or common 'shit happens' stress.

Pile your plate with a divorce, loss of job, parents death, and maybe cancer, and you'll act pretty strange for a while, but there's a big difference between pathology and a big shit sandwich. Pathology rears its head when everything else in your life is dandy. If a new love or new job or found money puts a smile back on your face, you aint crazy.

That's how I sort it out, anyway.
 
Yeah, that do seem a bit high for personality disorders. But as for alcohol abuse on campus...
 
It sounds like a study to "prove" that more psychiatrists are needed - written by people who train psychiatrists.

As one "lady" once observed "He would say that, wouldn't he?"

Og
 
It sounds like a study to "prove" that more psychiatrists are needed - written by people who train psychiatrists.

As one "lady" once observed "He would say that, wouldn't he?"

Og

So once we got to og, we started over again, right?

Allard, DZ, DP, JBJ, and jomar . . .

this is too hard. I'm thinking 2 or 3 out of 5 easy.
 
So once we got to og, we started over again, right?

Allard, DZ, DP, JBJ, and jomar . . .

this is too hard. I'm thinking 2 or 3 out of 5 easy.

I think that any study of the AH would conclude that we have more than our fair proportion of people with personality disorders.

Perhaps having a personality disorder is a requirement for being an author. We have to believe that we can write stories that other people will want to read.

We're deluded...deluded, I say...deluded...

Rushes off for a quick snort of single malt whisky.

Og
 
I think that any study of the AH would conclude that we have more than our fair proportion of people with personality disorders.

Perhaps having a personality disorder is a requirement for being an author. We have to believe that we can write stories that other people will want to read.

We're deluded...deluded, I say...deluded...

Rushes off for a quick snort of single malt whisky.

Og

Which would make you diluted as well. Diluted, I say. :D
 
I second that, deluded and diluted. A study of the AHers would reveal some strange bedfellows.
 
I think that any study of the AH would conclude that we have more than our fair proportion of people with personality disorders.

Perhaps having a personality disorder is a requirement for being an author. We have to believe that we can write stories that other people will want to read.

We're deluded...deluded, I say...deluded...

Rushes off for a quick snort of single malt whisky.

Og

Which would make you diluted as well. Diluted, I say. :D

And possibly dissolute.
 
It sounds like a study to "prove" that more psychiatrists are needed - written by people who train psychiatrists.

As one "lady" once observed "He would say that, wouldn't he?"

Og


Actually, it's more like a study to "prove" that more drugs must be developed post haste for these horribly debilitating "disorders" of children - practically children! - by big pharmaceutical companies for psychiatrists to prescribe so they feel they haven't wasted their time in med school........

:cattail:
 
VM

Officially, anyways, a minor cannot be diagnosed with a personality disorder. I dont think its a safe bet between 18-25, either. People under 30 really havent been tested by life, to determine their innate mental resources. That is, from 18-25 most of us are thrown into the water with school, relationships, work, finances, children etc., and a good portion of these experiences are failures until we learn which way is up. By 30 we usually know. By 30 we dont surprise ourselves or others too much.
 
SELENA

We need to sprout some balls and take control of our lives away from the so-called "experts." There really is such a thing as the TYRANNY OF EXPERTS, especially when it comes to drugs.

Example: My grandson is a prince in most ways. His parents enrolled him at an exclusive private school because the public school he attended was undisciplined and out of control. He's biracial and caught a lot of grief for being half-white.

So he goes to the private school and has a crush on a white girl. He's 11. Her mother strokes out because he's half-black. The school demands that he be sedated, etc. He held the girls hand is the crime. No shit. But the school wants him on Ritalin.

I tell my daughter NO FUCKING WAY!

So she enrolls him in a public school with a good mix of blacks, whites, hispanics, and biracial kids. He made straight A's on his report card, and everyone thinks he's a prince.
 
I agree with you both, Selena and JBJ. I have read too many articles on the increase in pharamceuticals being prescribed to youngsters for their behavior problems to feel this is right. I wonder if it is the older parents who do not have the time and patience to raise their children (due to being old enough to be their grandparents and ready for some peace and quiet in their lives) that are driving the drug market for kids as well as the experts. Not all older parents, but I have met a few who want their kids on drugs to quiet them down.
 
AC

I suspect the answer is ALL OF THE ABOVE. The drug makers want the profits from drug sales, the MDs want the extra income, the teacher doesnt have time to cope with a rambunctious boy, and the parents dont want to be bothered with one more problem to deal with. So the answer is SEDATE HIM TILL HE'S 18. Everyone wins but the kid.
 
Actually, it's more like a study to "prove" that more drugs must be developed post haste for these horribly debilitating "disorders" of children - practically children! - by big pharmaceutical companies for psychiatrists to prescribe so they feel they haven't wasted their time in med school........

:cattail:

I wouldn't say that, but this reminded me of something else. Somewhere in the drug/alcohol counseling industry, there's an idea floating around that if you've ever blacked out because you drank too much (not necessarily actually passed out, but woken up the next morning being unable to remember anything), you have a drinking problem and require help. And this is ever, as opposed to "if this has happened more than four times in the last twelve months," or something that makes more sense. When I read that I thought, "Oh, so I have a drinking problem. I get drunk MAYBE once a year AT MOST and I've only ever blacked out once in my entire life. But I have a drinking problem." :rolleyes:

I figured that idea came about to give drug and alcohol counselors more work, to create a need for more of them, and I think this is along those same lines. I'm wondering what their definition of "interfering with daily activities" and the like is. I know the DSM-IV has criteria by which each disorder is recognized and diagnosed but it stipulates that a person has to be exhibiting "x" number of the listed symptoms AND it has to be interfering with their daily lives and activities. It sounds to me like the psychiatric profession is broadening the definition of that interference rather than broadening the scope of the disorders themselves.

My OBGYN once told me that 42% of women have some type of sexual dysfunction and that number's getting higher. Then she told me that she felt enough women now are getting diagnosed with sexual dysfunction that it's probably time to redefine what is and is not normal sexual function. "Abnormal" means "not normal," so if enough people are displaying behaviors that are "abnormal," then maybe it's time to redefine what "abnormal" is.
 
"Abnormal" means "not normal," so if enough people are displaying behaviors that are "abnormal," then maybe it's time to redefine what "abnormal" is.

Logical but not capitalistic.

The more "abnormalities" we define, the more money everyone makes trying to make everyone "normal."
 
When I read that I thought, "Oh, so I have a drinking problem. I get drunk MAYBE once a year AT MOST and I've only ever blacked out once in my entire life. But I have a drinking problem." :rolleyes:
Whenever I consume large amounts of alcohol, I get dizzy, have personality changes, slurred speech, lose my ability for complex abstract thought, get abnormal cravings for salty and fatty foods, and tend to need to unrinate more than usual.

All of those things are kind of inconvenient, and could be seen as problematic. Do I have a drinking problem?
 
A scientific look at the information relayed in the first post:


Quote: "The study was released Monday in Archives of General Psychiatry. It was based on interviews with 5,092 young adults in 2001 and 2002."
quote end.

This indicates that the study includes only young adults, which gives us absolutely no comparison to other age groups. Hence, is in no way an indicator that young adults are more (or less) inclined to be eligible for a personality disorder diagnosis than the rest of the population.


quote: The disorders include problems such as obsessive or compulsive tendencies and anti-social behavior that can sometimes lead to violence. The study also found that fewer than 25 percent of college-aged Americans with mental problems get treatment.
quote end.

So they found a personality disorder in one of 5 and less than 25% of those got treatment. Assuming that only the ones who was granted a personality disorder got treatment, that tells us that one in twenty students was under treatment.

quote: "One expert said personality disorders may be overdiagnosed. But others said the results were not surprising since previous, less rigorous evidence has suggested mental problems are common on college campuses and elsewhere."
quote end.

The multitude of possible personality disorder diagnoses is a quite interesting mix. Ranging from a fairly well-defined symptomology and array of symptoms as in the case of OCD to the more obscure personality disorders defined merely by traits of character, background, and line of thought.

Most personality disorders are defined by a list of about ten more or less abstract questions, to which the patient need only give an affirmative reply to 4, 5 or 6 of those to be eligible for the diagnosis.



Quite frankly, I find it surprising that in any part of a population as few as 1 in 5 was diagnosed with a personality disorder. Looking at some personality disorder questionaires my a priori estimate was that such a number would have to be far higher for certain single personality disorders.

Is it possible that the investigation covered only a small fraction of the available personality disorder diagnoses to keep the number of afflicted individuals to a minority? It could be interesting to look it up.

Does anyone have the name of this study? Or something else that would make looking it up easier?
 
ELLYNEI

The problem is experience with the subject population. Using the criteria of the DSM 4 doesnt really quantify what the threshold is for serious pathology.

Take ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER. To many people a kid who squirms and fidgets and socializes in class has ADHD. To me, a kid with ADHD is constantly animated in purposeless activity and cannot attend to any activity more than briefly. In one minute he climbs and crawls and runs and throws objects. He cannot color or read or play a computer game or watch tv.

My diagnosis was always contingent upon whether a kid could color a picture for me or read me a story or watch a short video or solve a puzzle. You can have them tie shoelaces or follow instructions to tie a windsor knot or assemble simple/complex jigsaw puzzles. ADHD kids can do none of these activities.

If he can, then I think the problem may be pervasive developmental delay. And Ritalin wont help that.
 
Back
Top