███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[jomar]

same here... but just how many times does hillary, or biden&son need to be investigated and pronounced as not culpable will be enough for those who believe this stuff. what was it, 15 separate investigations into biden&son all coming up with zilch, zero, nada, nuthin'?

I know. Hypocrisy abounds.

 

[Conager]

same here... but just how many times does hillary, or biden&son need to be investigated and pronounced as not culpable will be enough for those who believe this stuff. what was it, 15 separate investigations into biden&son all coming up with zilch, zero, nada, nuthin'?

When did that happen?

 

[Rightguide]

So you’re saying Republicans like obstruction of justice and withholding congress approved funds in order to pressure another country for a political favor?

Get a clue, we have the transcript, there is no quid pro quo. Read it yourself. There was zero evidence of obstruction of justice. You are ignorant of both the law and reality. The impeachment effort has failed. All that follows is a show.

 

[Rightguide]

When did that happen?

It didn't.

 

[KeithD]

Get a clue, we have the transcript,

You think that if you say this lie enough, it will be the truth? How many times do you have to be informed that it wasn't a full transcript before your iddy bitty brain can absorb it? Just today's congressional testimony filled in some of the ellipses omissions and they were substantive on Biden and a quid pro quo. And it doesn't matter that it wasn't a complete transcript--the quid pro quo was right there in the fragmented document that was released. You're being as stupid about this as Trump was in thinking he'd released something benign.

Who do you think you're fooling this this particular lie? You can lie all you want, Trump is pinned down three ways from Sunday on the quid pro quo and no matter how you lie on a porn discussion board, that's not going to change. You can lie about this until you're red in the face--reality is marching on.

 

[Curmudgeonly]

Sounds like you have him now. This time will be different!

https://i.makeagif.com/media/12-23-2015/g-9Csw.gif

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Get a clue, we have the transcript, there is no quid pro quo. Read it yourself. There was zero evidence of obstruction of justice. You are ignorant of both the law and reality. The impeachment effort has failed. All that follows is a show.

Still waiting on that cite to this transcript.

 

[jaF0]

A transcript is 'transcribed' as it happens by a court stenographer or equivalent, or from an audio recording. It is not cobbled together days later from recollections. It is complete and doesn't leave bits out:

Top national security aide said White House transcript does not include mention of Burisma and other details from Trump call
Business Insider | Wed Oct 30, 2019 05:27 UTC

Alexander Vindman said mentions of Burisma and former Vice President Joe Biden discussing Ukraine corruption did not appear in the transcript.

 

[Conager]

It was.. There's a guy from the CIA tasked with doing just that and he did so contemporaneously.

Where is your source it was "cobbled together" other than the idiots that think they can do a dramatic reading and time this and not take into account pauses, translations and behind-the-scenes discussions on either end of the phone call.

I don't remember you having a problem with sending Mike Flynn to jail with fraudulent, Cobble together long after the fact, FBI 302 forms which represented as the transcribed recollections of conversations.

Actual court reporter transcriptions aren't delivered in real time and same day. The actual work product is delivered quite a bit later. After its checked for accuracy and routine errors. It's always been done that way even long before there was the ability to record audio on any sort of device.

 

[beezzz]

Don’t Have The Votes? House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer Won’t Commit To A Floor Vote Thursday


✔
@cam_joseph
.@LeaderHoyer says he hasn't read impeachment inquiry rule, won't fully commit to a floor vote Thursday. "We're going to have to consider whether or not it's ready to go on Thursday. I hope that's the case."



Dems not ready to take a vote on their new resolution.


New Poll Poses Serious Questions About Democratic Impeachment Drive

 

[Curmudgeonly]

https://youtu.be/f1ab6uxg908

 

[beezzz]

https://youtu.be/f1ab6uxg908

WAPO had a story on IMPEACHEMENT on Inauguration Day

 

[Kantarii]

WAPO had a story on IMPEACHEMENT on Inauguration Day

The epic fail of main stream media is they are all basically copying each other using basically the same words and dialogue message. They can’t differentiate themselves from the next network.

 

[cowslinger64]

A turd sandwich for the gop.. They're not gonna like this any better,

Democrats release impeachment resolution that calls for open hearings
Alexander Narzayan and Jon Ward
Alexander Narzayan and Jon Ward
Yahoo NewsOctober 29, 2019, 5:02 PM EDT
WASHINGTON — House Democrats have released a resolution that calls for “open and investigative proceedings” in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump for his alleged political interference in foreign aid to Ukraine.

Republicans have criticized the impeachment proceedings thus far as overly reliant on secrecy. The resolution published today by the House Rules Committee, which customarily gives legislation the final imprimatur before it heads to a floor vote, is intended to address those charges.

A vote on the impeachment resolution will take place on Thursday, and is expected to pass, since the House is controlled by Democrats.

[T]he next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings where the American people will learn firsthand about the President’s misconduct,” several leading Democrats said in a statement.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrat...n-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html

 

[someoneyouknow]

Cross posting

The fake "transcript" the con artist presented was incomplete, according to Lt. Col Vindman.

Vindman reportedly said two of the omissions were Trump talking about his belief that there were recordings of Joe Biden discussing Ukraine corruption, and a reference by Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to Burisma Holdings, the energy company that Hunter Biden was on the board of and that Trump wanted investigated. Vindman did not offer a motive as to why his corrections to the transcript were not heeded, the Times said.​

Apparently the con artist didn't learn a thing from Nixon except how to be even more corrupt.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/vindman-said-white-house-transcript-of-ukraine-call-omitted-key-material-report-2019-10-29?mod=home-page

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/us/politics/alexander-vindman-trump-ukraine.html?action=click&module=Top**0Stories&pgtype=Homepage

 

[Adre]

Get a clue, we have the transcript, there is no quid pro quo. Read it yourself. There was zero evidence of obstruction of justice. You are ignorant of both the law and reality. The impeachment effort has failed. All that follows is a show.

Tell us that when the words “national security” appear in an article of impeachment.

 

[jomar]

Get a clue, we have the transcript, there is no quid pro quo. Read it yourself. There was zero evidence of obstruction of justice. You are ignorant of both the law and reality. The impeachment effort has failed. All that follows is a show.

I think you need to get a thorough physical including comprehensive bloodwork.

You think that if you say this lie enough, it will be the truth? How many times do you have to be informed that it wasn't a full transcript before your iddy bitty brain can absorb it? Just today's congressional testimony filled in some of the ellipses omissions and they were substantive on Biden and a quid pro quo. And it doesn't matter that it wasn't a complete transcript--the quid pro quo was right there in the fragmented document that was released. You're being as stupid about this as Trump was in thinking he'd released something benign.

Who do you think you're fooling this this particular lie? You can lie all you want, Trump is pinned down three ways from Sunday on the quid pro quo and no matter how you lie on a porn discussion board, that's not going to change. You can lie about this until you're red in the face--reality is marching on.

This shorts their synapses.

It was.. There's a guy from the CIA tasked with doing just that and he did so contemporaneously.

Where is your source it was "cobbled together" other than the idiots that think they can do a dramatic reading and time this and not take into account pauses, translations and behind-the-scenes discussions on either end of the phone call.

...

Actual court reporter transcriptions aren't delivered in real time and same day. The actual work product is delivered quite a bit later. After its checked for accuracy and routine errors. It's always been done that way even long before there was the ability to record audio on any sort of device.

So release the actual transcript and remove all doubt.

Cross posting

The fake "transcript" the con artist presented was incomplete, according to Lt. Col Vindman.

Vindman reportedly said two of the omissions were Trump talking about his belief that there were recordings of Joe Biden discussing Ukraine corruption, and a reference by Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to Burisma Holdings, the energy company that Hunter Biden was on the board of and that Trump wanted investigated. Vindman did not offer a motive as to why his corrections to the transcript were not heeded, the Times said.​

Apparently the con artist didn't learn a thing from Nixon except how to be even more corrupt.

Oops, that’s why.

 

[jaF0]

It would really be a serious mistake to hitch the wagon to this one event when there are so many others that should be included. His whole tenure has been riddled with offenses.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

You think that if you say this lie enough, it will be the truth? How many times do you have to be informed that it wasn't a full transcript before your iddy bitty brain can absorb it? Just today's congressional testimony filled in some of the ellipses omissions and they were substantive on Biden and a quid pro quo. And it doesn't matter that it wasn't a complete transcript--the quid pro quo was right there in the fragmented document that was released. You're being as stupid about this as Trump was in thinking he'd released something benign.

Who do you think you're fooling this this particular lie? You can lie all you want, Trump is pinned down three ways from Sunday on the quid pro quo and no matter how you lie on a porn discussion board, that's not going to change. You can lie about this until you're red in the face--reality is marching on.

well said

 

[Rightguide]

Tell us that when the words “national security” appear in an article of impeachment.

There isn't going to be a credible article of impeachment.

 

[beezzz]

A day after Nancy Pelosi announces her fake impeachment resolution to great fanfare, Democrats are backing away from voting this week.

She doesn’t have the votes!

 

[jaF0]

"Tim Morrison, the top Russia official on President Trump's National Security Council, who is scheduled to testify in the impeachment inquiry on Thursday, is expected to leave his White House post imminently, three sources familiar with the plan told NPR."


"An attorney for Morrison said Morrison planned to appear before House investigators on Thursday if subpoenaed.

It was not clear whether Morrison had been asked to leave his job or was departing voluntarily, and NPR could not immediately confirm the exact timing of his departure. His attorney, Barbara Van Gelder, would not discuss Morrison's job status or plans."

https://www.npr.org/2019/10/30/7748...ional-security-council-amid-impeachment-inqui

 

[beezzz]

If Democrats had the goods on Trump, Democrats would have the votes for impeachment.

If Democrats had the votes, theyd hold the vote.

And now that we know the fake whistleblower is a Deep State hack...

What a glorious clown show. And the media are the biggest bozos.

 

[Curmudgeonly]

So, no vote tommorow after all?

 

[someoneyouknow]

[Spamming, bumping multiple threads in order to flood the forum, posting same content to multiple locations, or screen-stretching to disrupt the forum is prohibited per our forum guidelines.] - Last Warning Already Given