███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

Whiteguide is still clinging onto hope with his fingernails that the House will ignore the preponderance of evidence, and will instead only consider evidence that he presents on the porn board.
 
Hey asshole, there isn't a sliver of evidence linking the Republicans or Trump to the Russians. It's always been the Democrats who've protected them and who've embraced communism. Go find the CPUSA's 1966 party platform and compare it to the Democrat Party's platform. Come back and explain how they differ.

toilet mouth!
 
Whiteguide is still clinging onto hope with his fingernails that the House will ignore the preponderance of evidence, and will instead only consider evidence that he presents on the porn board.

Evidence of what, exactly?
 
Evidence of what, exactly?

^^^Another Deplorable who acts like the decision will be made on the basis of debates on the porn board.

If you can't discern the problem with a President holding up Congressionally appropriated military aid to try to extract favors for his own pollical purposes, nothing I say is going to change that.

But Trump will be impeached for it.

It falls on the Deplorable Senators to back him up after he is impeached, which they may well do.
 
Hey asshole, there isn't a sliver of evidence linking the Republicans or Trump to the Russians. It's always been the Democrats who've protected them and who've embraced communism. Go find the CPUSA's 1966 party platform and compare it to the Democrat Party's platform. Come back and explain how they differ.

You should go work for Dipshit Donald. You're as clumsy at diversion as he
 
Funny that you guys still try to beat libtards with the commie stick while you carry pictures of Vlad the Impaler. Russia is the same corrupt thugs like Colonel Putin who were the Soviet Union, the gang just changed their colors.

You think you or the (D)'s are liberal?? LOL

Why do all the liberty loathing leftist who regularly conflate liberalism with fascism think this???
 
Last edited:
Whiteguide is still clinging onto hope with his fingernails that the House will ignore the preponderance of evidence, and will instead only consider evidence that he presents on the porn board.



PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE? If this was a tort case. You do understand that this is an impeachment process looking to prove high crimes and misdemeanor.
 
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE? If this was a tort case. You do understand that this is an impeachment process looking to prove high crimes and misdemeanor.

Of course I do, which is why impeachment is a judgment call by the members of the House. They will look at all the evidence, including that of witnesses who may hold the opinion that what Trump did was not a crime.

However, the decision is not going to be made by the witnesses, most of whom either worked or are now working in the Trump administration. If the preponderance of evidence points toward holding up Congressionally appropriated military aid to try to extract political favors from a foreign country, it will probably be judged impeachable by the majority of House members.

You are just hung up on my use of the word preponderance, as distinguished from proof beyond a shadow of a doubt or some other burden of proof. Sorry to disappoint, but I am not impressed that you watched TV shows about lawyers.

This is not a court case, it is an impeachment process. The trial does not even happen until it goes to the Senate.

So, sit tight and watch a little more TV for a while. You may get an education about how impeachment actually works.
 
Of course I do, which is why impeachment is a judgment call by the members of the House. They will look at all the evidence, including that of witnesses who may hold the opinion that what Trump did was not a crime.

However, the decision is not going to be made by the witnesses, most of whom either worked or are now working in the Trump administration. If the preponderance of evidence points toward holding up Congressionally appropriated military aid to try to extract political favors from a foreign country, it will probably be judged impeachable by the majority of House members.

You are just hung up on my use of the word preponderance, as distinguished from proof beyond a shadow of a doubt or some other burden of proof. Sorry to disappoint, but I am not impressed that you watched TV shows about lawyers.

This is not a court case, it is an impeachment process. The trial does not even happen until it goes to the Senate.

So, sit tight and watch a little more TV for a while. You may get an education about how impeachment actually works.



I think I have a good understanding of the impeachment process as well as the Senate trial phase. Without further ado, I have to get back to my Perry Mason show.
 
Back
Top