You all know Harris is no more a Marxist than Trump is

Politruk

Loves Spam
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
18,471
Yet some of you keep repeating that preposterous dishonest meme as an established fact.
 
Trump and many other people agree with Marx. Specifically the part that says capitalism will chase profits and power to the exclusion of any other social or individual interests.

The only difference is they think this part of capitalism is a good thing while Marx thought it was bad.
 
Yet some of you keep repeating that preposterous dishonest meme as an established fact.
Donald was raised by millionaires.
Kamala was raised by Marxists.

Avowed in both cases.

How far from the fucking oak do you think the acorn rolls?
Are you going to point to a walnut husk now?
 
Trump matriculated in business.
Kamala matriculated in the system.

When do puppies become kittens in real life?
You don't really expect a serious answer from a contingent that can't/won't tell male from female do you?
 
The more I think about it, how can she not be more Marxist than him?

She's not to the hard right of him.

No room at the in

and out

Therefore, it is at least a valid statement.
 
The OP has set up quite a little quandary for itself. It has basically eliminated Trump as a Marxist. However in another thread it has postulated that Trump is a Fascist. So wouldn't a better comparison be as to whether Harris is more a Fascist than Trump? Given that she's co-opting Trumps policies as fast as she can it would appear that she's at least as good a Fascist as he is.

So it would appear that the OP is implying that this election is one between the better of two Fascists and that Harris is the better. :cool:
 
Very good.

I think that she could be his equal in regard to the marriage of State and Industry.

She would, I think that this should pass without mention, even manage the ceremonies much more smartly.



She puts the pant in pantsuit.

Hillary only slipped her cankles in...
 
The John Birchers were convinced Eisenhower was a Communist.

This is no less ridiculous.
 
Marx was the theorist of economic growth par excellence. He concieved of the capitalist economy as an inherently expansionary system having an inner logic of its own. It was his purpose to discover the abstract and general principles underlying the operation of this form of society and the contradictions it entailed, so as to account for its process of change and supersession. Out of this scientific endeavor, Marx developed an integrated system of analysis with a distinctive method and quite specific formulation of the laws of motion of the capitalist economy. Others, after Marx, have attempted to elaborate upon and develop further this system of analysis, recognizing the changing conditions of capitalism as it develops. Specific elements of Marx's own formulation as concerns, for instance, the law of the falling tendency of the rate of profit and a tendency of the organic composition of capital to rise, are subject to an ongoing debate within the Marxian tradition. The system of analysis is also incomplete in some of its essentials. Nevertheless, the Marxian system remains today as a powerful basis upon which to construct a theory of growth of the capitalist economy appropriate to modern conditions. Accordingly, an attempt is made below (see Chapters 3 and 10) to develop some elements of the Marxian theoretical system that are relevant to this purpose.

Guess who...
 
Back
Top