Kamala’s 2024 Presidential Run

[Bn2f]

But then how could you defend your support of Trump?
…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan…tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan

 

[SevMax2]

View attachment 2405218

Interesting. One source is saying 4%. Another is saying as high as 7% defected to Hillary. I would have been among them if I hadn't re-registered as a Democrat by that point.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Haha!
Here’s your stable genius speaking on crypto.

More please! LOLZ!

Trump actually said, “I would not allow other countries to get off the dollar.”

I guess he’d lash out at them like a petulant toddler if they dare try to exercise their sovereignty over their own nation.

What a weird moron.

 

[Lazaran]

Actually I’m quite happy with the way she answered the question in the clip. She should repeat that answer again and again.

BabyBoobs only shows up when there is a really favorable poll for DonOld or if the Democrats are having a really good moment.

There haven’t been any really favorable polls for DonOld lately, so…

The Democrats are having a really good moment.

Kamala has been killing it in various interviews (as has been mentioned), and Tim Walz was on Kimmel last night and he was awesome:

BabyBoobs

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

And apparently you can't as you can only deflect. But then how could you defend your support of Trump?

Economy crippling tariffs and tax cuts for the rich as an economic plan, Project 2025 dartboard - what will they fuck up, and of course the fact he's lost his damn marbles and rambles on like a dementia patient.

You support grandpa Simpson but are criticizing someone of Lisa Simpson's caliber.

Can't make this shit up.

The thread is about Kamala. You are deflecting from the topic at hand. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

 

[Bn2f]

Yes, which doesn’t address the topic at hand but I’m happy you and I get to keep our tax cuts.

• Extend the TCJA tax cuts
• Repeal the EV subsidies and EV tax credits
• Resume appointments of originalist/textualist federal judges
• Double the capital gains exclusion on the sale of primary residence and index for inflation
• Require congressional approval of any new administrative rule with a projected economic impact exceeding $100 million
• Border controls: tighten credible fear criteria, expand the wall and tech-based obstacles, severely penalize crossings between ports of entry, expand merit-based legal immigration
• Discontinue expansion of student loan forgiveness orders
• Clarify muddled, erratic US Ukraine policy.
• Full support for rapid Israel eradication of Hamas
• Cut federal funding for CA bullet train to nowhere

The good news is the Trump tax cuts for individuals will be extended next year for at least 99% of us American taxpayers with bipartisan support.

Babyboo applauds this because the trump tax cuts, skewed to his rich benefactors, had a sunset clause that applied to the tax cuts given to the middle class but is permanent for corporations.

 

[adrina]

The thread is about Kamala. You are deflecting from the topic at hand. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Then get out of the kitchen cuz you can't take the heat.

Repeating yourself is not only lame it shows that you have no defense. All you can do is attack Kamala because you're so afraid of democrats. A coward voting for a criminal who only has concepts of a plan.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Babyboo applauds this because the trump tax cuts, skewed to his rich benefactors, had a sunset clause that applied to the tax cuts given to the middle class but is permanent for corporations.

Relax. Your Trump tax cut (TCJA) will be extended no matter who wins the election.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Relax. Your Trump tax cut (TCJA) will be extended no matter who wins the election.

Why on earth would Republicans vote to extend the Trump tax cuts?

 

[Bn2f]

Relax. Your Trump tax cut (TCJA) will be extended no matter who wins the election.

Look. I’m sorry I stuck my nose in this.
Do me a favor, this one time please - ignore me. Reply only to Adrina because she’s whuppin your ass right now.

 

[Bn2f]

Why on earth would Republicans vote to extend the Trump tax cuts?

lol. They won’t and they are counting on their dumb constituents to not hold them accountable. But I think we are getting ahead of ourselves. What has Speaker Johnson accomplished on anything especially on crafting a budget? He’s just continually kicked the can down the road relying on the good will of democrats on extending funding while pissing off MGT and the far right loons.

Dems should be making the argument against the Johnson speakership as well as a next trump presidency.

 

[Lazaran]

lol. They won’t and they are counting on their dumb constituents to not hold them accountable. But I think we are getting ahead of ourselves. What has Speaker Johnson accomplished on anything especially on crafting a budget? He’s just continually kicked the can down the road relying on the good will of democrats on extending funding while pissing off MGT and the far right loons.

Dems should be making the argument against the Johnson speakership as well as a next trump presidency.

I’m living for the moment when Hakeem Jeffries secures the gavel from MAGAt Mike and Nancy Pelosi smiles approvingly.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Why on earth would Republicans vote to extend the Trump tax cuts?

Same reason Biden said he’d extend the individual rates for all but the top bracket. Same reason Kamala will extend them if she is elected. You have nothing to worry about. Your Trump tax cut is safe no matter who wins.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Look. I’m sorry I stuck my nose in this.
Do me a favor, this one time please - ignore me. Reply only to Adrina because she’s whuppin your ass right now.

I simply responded to comments each of you directed at me. I shared a video clip of Kamala in a thread about Kamala. Same advice I gave to Adrina applies to you. If you can’t stand the heat, get the fuck out of kitchen.

 

[Rotadom]

I simply responded to comments each of you directed at me. I shared a video clip of Kamala in a thread about Kamala. Same advice I gave to Adrina applies to you. If you can’t stand the heat, get the fuck out of kitchen.

OoOoOo angry drunk BB is drunk and angry.

 

[Lazaran]

I simply responded to comments each of you directed at me. I shared a video clip of Kamala in a thread about Kamala. Same advice I gave to Adrina applies to you. If you can’t stand the heat, get the fuck out of kitchen.

BabyBoobs should really stick to posting cherry picked polls instead of posturing like a drunk "former contender".



BabyBoobs

 

[adrina]

BabyBoobs should really stick to posting cherry picked polls instead of posturing like a drunk "former contender".



BabyBoobs

He can't stand the heat so he's lashing out at anyone who is pointing out his massive hypocrisy.

 

[Lazaran]

He can't stand the heat so he's lashing out at anyone who is pointing out his massive hypocrisy.

The POS won’t / refuses to accept that calling out their hypocrisy about the free pass they CONSTANTLY give DonOld (Kamala’s main opponent) and the double standard they (and the corporate media) CONSTANTLY employ IS related to Kamala and DOES belong in this thread.

There’s an element of gaslighting in BabyBoobs’ attempt to control the narrative / conversation in this instance.

Fuck that ^.



BabyBoobs

 

[butters]

new Evangelicals for Harris $1M ad prompts threats of litigation

(RNS) — The ad begins with a clip of renowned evangelist the Rev. Billy Graham, wearing glasses, a gray suit and tie, leaning in toward a pulpit.

“But you must realize that in the last days, the times will be full of danger,” Graham declares. “Men will become utterly self-centered and greedy for money.”

Suddenly, a clip of former President Donald Trump is spliced in. Standing before a row of American flags at a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa, Trump says: “My whole life I’ve been greedy, greedy, greedy. I’ve grabbed all the money I could get. I’m so greedy.”

For the next few seconds, the ad, which has racked up over 30 million views, flips between Graham’s 1988 sermon, contrasting his points with shots of Trump using violent language, claiming to be “the chosen one” and talking about kissing women without their consent.

The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association is NOT happy, and has sent multiple letters, including a cease and desist, claiming copyright infringement.

In response to the threatened lawsuit, Evangelicals for Harris released a statement saying Franklin Graham is taking a page from Trump’s playbook by trying to silence the group through legal action.

“Franklin is scared of our ads because we do not tell people what to do or think. We merely hold Trump’s own words up to the light of Scripture, the necessity of repentance, and Biblical warnings against leaders exactly like Trump,” they wrote in a post on X.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=96c862a627824b2db2d42750cd796fb4&ei=61

 

[deckardB26354]

“Franklin is scared of our ads because we do not tell people what to do or think. We merely hold Trump’s own words up to the light of Scripture, the necessity of repentance, and Biblical warnings against leaders exactly like Trump,” they wrote in a post on X.

Actually…Satanic Frankie is scared because of all the skeletons rattling around in his closet that Duh-duh wouldn’t be too happy about hearing down in hell.

 

[Rightguide]

No matter how she tries to escape the policies of Joe Biden he tells us how it really was:

‘She helped me pass every law, she was part of every decision.’

 

[Pad_Foot]

I take it you're advocating for a new PM in Israel that might lead to Iran and their proxies wiping Israel off the map? Right now I don't see any suitable replacement waiting in the wings. Maybe with your unriveled insight into Israeli politics, you do.

You do know that Israel has nukes
What the fuck is wrong with you ?
Now? If Israel could remove all of Iran’s nuclear capability, I would not be upset. They have the right.

Starving people in Gaza? Nope!!

 

[butters]

Because one of the most personally malignant and politically dangerous candidates in American history was on the ballot, The Atlantic endorsed Trump’s previous Democratic opponents—only the third and fourth endorsements since the magazine’s founding, in 1857. We endorsed Abraham Lincoln for president in 1860 (though not, for reasons lost to history, in 1864). One hundred and four years later, we endorsed Lyndon B. Johnson for president.

In 2016, we endorsed Hillary Clinton for more or less the same reason Johnson won this magazine’s endorsement in 1964. Clinton was a credible candidate who would have made a competent president, but we endorsed her because she was running against a manifestly unstable and incompetent Republican nominee. The editors of this magazine in 1964 feared Barry Goldwater less for his positions than for his zealotry and seeming lack of self-restraint.

Of all Trump’s insults, cruelties, abuses of power, corrupt dealings, and crimes, the event that proved the essential rightness of the endorsements of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden took place on January 6, 2021, when Trump became the first American president to try to overturn an election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/11/kamala-harris-atlantic-endorsement/679944/

The Atlantic would like you to know that, for only “the fifth time in its 167-year history,” it has decided to endorse a presidential candidate. The magazine has thrown its weight behind Democrat Kamala Harris in the impending election, less because of who she is and more because of who she isn’t.

The editorial largely defines Harris in opposition to Donald Trump, noting that in his 2024 iteration, the former president is “even more vicious and erratic than in the past,” not to mention more extreme in his policies. Harris, by contrast, is “untainted by corruption, let alone a felony record or a history of sexual assault,” the editors argue. “She doesn’t embarrass her compatriots with her language and behavior, or pit them against one another. She doesn’t curry favor with dictators. She won’t abuse the power of the highest office in order to keep it. She believes in democracy.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=cf41a7c041f740cbc8e3cf3dee1e8417&ei=174

 

[butters]

trump's incensed at editing CBS made to their 60-minutes interview with Kamala Harris... first showing one half of her response to a question, then in another airing showing the second half. CBS says it's not unusual and is about time restraints.

• trump raved they'd edited ' to make her look Presidential'—guess he didn't like how lucid or PRESIDENTIAL she sounded to viewers
• that she was otherwise incoherent and babbling—remember, every accusation is an admission and he fails to mention how heavily edited and sane-washed his own screen-time is
• that CBS should be dragged off air and its license sold to the highest bidder. Not content with that, ALL tv news channels should suffer the same fate!

Trump, who backed out of his “60 Minutes” interview at the last minute, claimed in a follow-up post that CBS is “A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.” (He faces that same accusation, which is at the center of two of his criminal indictments.)

It’s conceivable that Trump, who has long had a fraught relationship with the press, could act on this threat if he wins back the White House next month. Experts have noted there’s an obscure provision in the 1934 Communications Act allowing presidents to shut down broadcasters in the interests of “national emergency” or “national security.”

he'd likely do it on DAY 1 as an act of his dictatorship: seize control of the news available to the public, replace it with State TV *ugh*

yet another reason not one single news agency, not even fox, should be voting for him or carrying his water.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=8b891cc72dd3473383acb7753a67a840&ei=428

 

[Justplainjeff]

You do know that Israel has nukes
What the fuck is wrong with you ?
Now? If Israel could remove all of Iran’s nuclear capability, I would not be upset. They have the right.

Starving people in Gaza? Nope!!

Too bad you're not aware that of 90% of all the food donated to the people of Gaza was stolen by Hamas?