Why Biden Will Win

[TrailerHitch]

 

[TrailerHitch]

 

[HisArpy]

Now you’re caught in another of your spun lies. I have never factually claimed Trump is a rapist. I haven’t seen or heard proof of that myself and I don’t say that he is a “rapist”.

It is a fact legal fact that Trump’s businesses have committed crimes while he was the primary decision maker. The fact that they happened too far in the past to prosecute him no doesn’t change those facts.

So tell me, when two skilled attorneys represent different sides of a legal argument, is one representing actual fact while the other is lying? Or are they arguing legal positions based on the what is most likely to bring a judgment in their favor?

Ever lost a case, counselor? Are you a proven liar?

You keep moaning along on the same note trying to find anything you can use as a hook to somehow think you're "winning" when you really aren't.

Businesses commit business crimes every day. That doesn't mean the CEO personally did, only that the business did something that's against the law. Instead of acknowledging that fact you conflate Trump personally with his business, which is a strawman argument.

You also engage in the same type of rhetoric as others of your same ilk and beliefs when it comes to statements about Trump, law, and facts. While you may not have PERSONALLY said he was a rapist, you stand quietly by while others say it and do nothing to correct them though you know they lie. This is called tacit agreement and it makes you just as guilty as they. You may choose to deny it, but when someone is in lockstep with 9 out of 10 beliefs by another person but doesn't correct that other person on the 10th belief even though you know it's false, well, let's just say slime rubs off and you're coated with it.

Finally, you keep trying to raise my profession as if it's some kind of talisman you can use to shield your BS from the light of analysis. It doesn't work because you're not a lawyer and trying to compare your BS arguments to those an actual lawyer would use isn't possible. You're not a lawyer, you don't argue like a lawyer, you fail to include opposing viewpoints which are on point against your position, and you attempt to spin half truths into fact while ignoring actual facts which disprove your theories. In short, you even suck at this too.

Have a great day.

 

[AlexBailey]

You keep moaning along on the same note trying to find anything you can use as a hook to somehow think you're "winning" when you really aren't.

Businesses commit business crimes every day. That doesn't mean the CEO personally did, only that the business did something that's against the law. Instead of acknowledging that fact you conflate Trump personally with his business, which is a strawman argument.

You also engage in the same type of rhetoric as others of your same ilk and beliefs when it comes to statements about Trump, law, and facts. While you may not have PERSONALLY said he was a rapist, you stand quietly by while others say it and do nothing to correct them though you know they lie. This is called tacit agreement and it makes you just as guilty as they. You may choose to deny it, but when someone is in lockstep with 9 out of 10 beliefs by another person but doesn't correct that other person on the 10th belief even though you know it's false, well, let's just say slime rubs off and you're coated with it.

Finally, you keep trying to raise my profession as if it's some kind of talisman you can use to shield your BS from the light of analysis. It doesn't work because you're not a lawyer and trying to compare your BS arguments to those an actual lawyer would use isn't possible. You're not a lawyer, you don't argue like a lawyer, you fail to include opposing viewpoints which are on point against your position, and you attempt to spin half truths into fact while ignoring actual facts which disprove your theories. In short, you even suck at this too.

Have a great day.

So according to your logic you must be a tacit groper and assaulter of women, a business cheat, and an election denier.


Fuck off, weasel. You’re proving my point about your spin cycles every time you post.

 

[Lazaran]

L

Yup. Just like how the court said that abortion is a States Rights issue. Or that transgenderism is a mental illness.

What I don't get is how you don't EVER understand what my position is. I stand for the law. If the law says something is a fact, then I'm in agreement with that.

OTOH, if the law says something isn't a fact, then I'm not going to go all fucking hairbrained stupid trying to tell everyone the court is wrong.

You know, like you do.

"The Law" supported all sorts of heinous and indefensible acts and practices, once upon a time, and Derpy would have defended "The Law" without question back THEN - just like Derpy defends "The Law" supporting heinous and indefensible acts and practices without question NOW.



Derpy

 

[jomar]

Why Biden Will Not Win.

He is not running. That is a partial victory for the U.S. but not a full victory.

I'm not your garden variety anything - yes, I been fully supportive of Trump yet I can all but guarantee nobody understands my position on Trump, the right v the left or even Biden. But as much as I would love to feel some sense of relief I don't and I as tempting as it would be to lay out my position, I cannot because it would be an exercise in frustration. I'll say this; anyone who knows me at all (and nobody knows me well, but if there were anyone who did, they'd agree with the few people who know anything about me) would say that my position on humanity is quite pessimistic and I 100% understand that response, but it is incorrect. I've actually been quite optimistic, which is actually tragic, because what that means is all the negative adjectives I use to describe humanity are not only valid, they actually paint a picture so much happier than reality it's frightening. As fundamentally stupid as I have considered most people to be, humans prove me wrong over and over by showing they are, in fact, of greater stupidity than anything I predicted. Not even I considered myself an optimist but actually I very much have been, and that is sad.

I will say this - the reason I feel little in the way of relief is that everything I have seen in terms of evidence has told me that anyone who sees the issues in the U.S. to be issues of right v left are completely missing the true enemy. Yes, wokism, liberalism, progressivism, etc. are all enemies not just of this country but of humanity in that they are all wholly irrational in every sense. Worse, the purveyors of these ideologies, just as with feminism, tout the ideals knowing full well they are false and damaging, ironically most severely to the very groups they claim to help. It baffles and saddens me how widely these are accepted. To show fairness, equally baffling to me is the acceptance of a fundamental ideology of the right, which is christianity. That is as false as any woke idea and while currently not as damaging at least in certain ways, religion in the course of human history has been quite damaging. My point isn't tallying the damage but the fact that the right and leftt are basically fraternal twins who hate each other yet have the same parents, Mr. & Mrs. Irrational. Just as intelligence is not wisdom, so evil is not stupidity and Lenin understood one thing very well when he called religion the "opiate of the masses".

With regards to the U.S. (and not just the U.S.) the true enemy is not even contained within our borders. And while so far I have to bet my chips on Trump and yes I support Trump which is not a position I always held. A fact I'd be more than happy to politely debate: Trump had a very successful Presidency. I thought in 2015 the guy was a clown! But I'm an empiricist and he proved me very wrong. That is the basis of my current support. Could the dems come up with a candidate that I would be reasonably ok with? Yes, but they won't. Putting some money where my mouth is (ewwww, money is dirty, you know how many hands have touched...?) I wager the dems will announce Michael Obama (otherwise known as "Michelle" and no, that's not a jab, that's biology) as the candidate. That would be unacceptable as would be Harris, Newsom or pretty much anyone else. Tulsi Gabbard would be not horrible but she isn't even a democrat anymore. I don't know enough on RFK.

But I find little relief because of two things, one is, to me, fact and the other wild opinion. Fact: Fundamental things must occur in the U.S. to even get it back to a Constitutional Republic (which it has not been since about the 1930's) and those things did not happen under Trump nor will they if he wins. #2 is my 2024 Official Wild Speculative Statement and guess what, it's fun because it's testable! This is 51/49, reflecting almost maximum uncertainty but I think the dems may win again in 2024 the same way they did in 2020 - by completely usurping the voters and rigging the entire thing and I have FANTASTIC evidence that happened in 2020, but who cares? Obviously me, but only because I find the evidence very fascinating and I never heard one person speak to it, ever.

The enemy forces that keep the Deep State alive are global and because people need a target and I don't care, here's ammo to give you all reasons to point at me and laugh. COVID was not a lab leak. COVID was a well orchestrated release that occured at many points on the globe. Second, the push for EVs has the ultimate goal of ushering in the implantation of tracking chips in every citizen of the U.S. Third, the political bodies that ultimately will strip U.S. citizens of all Constitutional rights will not be from within the U.S., rather they will be the U.N., W.H.O. and possibly NATO. Bonus Point-At-The-Crackpot Belief: Maui was accomplished via a directed energy weapon, wholly manmade, not anything "natural". And it was NOT a success, far too many survived versus the goal.

The world is complicated. One thing is not; everything happening is motivated by one goal: Power. Money is a more direct motive, yes, but nobody who has money cares about money, they care about what money can do - money is a tool. And I know what all of you are thinking right now which is, "I think I'm reading the insane ramblings of a MAJOR tool!"....amirite? I am and that's ok and no I have zero martyr complex - martyrs believe in things despite taking great losses for those beliefs. I have nothing to lose because I came in with nothing. That doesn't make me tough or badass or brave...but it does make me dangerous and if that statement is puzzling I would refer you to a famous poem, The Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone, which should be mandatory reading especially for one very stupid person who sadly may learn a great lesson but I truly hope not because as one lady said once, "ain't nobody got time for that!"

So legit curious question. How do you square being a cross dressing sissy cumslut with your hard right politics, particularly with the first few sentences in your second full paragraph.

Or is your profile not really who you are

 

[jomar]

Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973 and withstood many attempts to overturn it for 49 years.

49 years of decided case law does not appear to be a decision made "in haste".

Blithely overturning Roe to enact a desired political outcome strikes me as the epitome of the ends justifying the means.

I recognize that your desperate need to rationalize the Supreme Court's newfound habit of throwing out decades of Stare Decisis (precedent) to "legislate from the bench" requires tortuous legal interpretation of case law , i.e. a man found responsible for sexual abuse is technically "innocent" because he is a "responsible sexual abuser".

Seems like I recall all those SCOTUS judges confirmed during the trump admin declaring Roe v was settled law under oath

 

[HisArpy]

So according to your logic you must be a tacit groper and assaulter of women, a business cheat, and an election denier.


Fuck off, weasel. You’re proving my point about your spin cycles every time you post.

You need to give it a rest. You're not impressing anyone with your political dogma and ad hom attacks.

 

[AlexBailey]

You need to give it a rest. You're not impressing anyone with your political dogma and ad hom attacks.

Dear weasel,
I called you out for what you do. That’s not ad-hom, it’s saying you are a lawyer. Is that some kind of insult?

 

[HisArpy]

Dear weasel,
I called you out for what you do. That’s not ad-hom, it’s saying you are a lawyer. Is that some kind of insult?

It's Ad Hom and you're more than aware it is and why you're doing it. Trying to falsely redefine Ad Hom as something it isn't in order to save your ass from ridicule isn't going to work.

 

[Bn2f]

View attachment 2368431

 

[AlexBailey]

It's Ad Hom and you're more than aware it is and why you're doing it. Trying to falsely redefine Ad Hom as something it isn't in order to save your ass from ridicule isn't going to work.

You’re the one subject to ridicule for your denial.

You consider law “fact” while also admitting it is a construct. You claim to speak of “fact” while refusing to acknowledge that law does not always determine truth - of course you probably conflate all three to be the same thing.


You have said that it is the responsibility of an attorney to give their client a robust representation. I can see that you do that with your political views - you use your legal analysis to the benefit of your political position.

Do you deny this?

Is that an insult?

 

[HisArpy]

You’re the one subject to ridicule for your denial.

You consider law “fact” while also admitting it is a construct. You claim to speak of “fact” while refusing to acknowledge that law does not always determine truth - of course you probably conflate all three to be the same thing.


You have said that it is the responsibility of an attorney to give their client a robust representation. I can see that you do that with your political views - you use your legal analysis to the benefit of your political position.

Do you deny this?

Is that an insult?

Any time you attempt to inject personal real life commentary it's Ad Hom. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

It's past time for you to give this a rest. You're not going to "one up" me because you don't have the brains for it, you don't have the stamina for it, and you start with a handicap position in the next county.

You can say/do whatever you like to soothe your ego but you know the score and you're not winning this contest. Why? Because it's not about you and me, it's about everyone else who reads these posts and realizes what a fuckup you are. Every time you tug up your undies and wade forth to do battle you just prove it to them once again.

Time for you to stop being stupid and taking any of this personally.

 

[JoePepsiCo]

So much winning...

You're going to get tired of so much winning.

 

[YDB95]

So much winning...

You're going to get tired of so much winning.

That might well be the one and only time Trump was right about something. We kicked him to the curb in 2020, fair and square, and I for one did get tired of how many times we had to repeat that.

 

[AlexBailey]

Any time you attempt to inject personal real life commentary it's Ad Hom. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

It's past time for you to give this a rest. You're not going to "one up" me because you don't have the brains for it, you don't have the stamina for it, and you start with a handicap position in the next county.

You can say/do whatever you like to soothe your ego but you know the score and you're not winning this contest. Why? Because it's not about you and me, it's about everyone else who reads these posts and realizes what a fuckup you are. Every time you tug up your undies and wade forth to do battle you just prove it to them once again.

Time for you to stop being stupid and taking any of this personally.

Never back down! Never surrender!

It’s not a question, it’s an observation. You’re a weasel assed attorney trying to claim you are arguing without being a weasel assed attorney.

 

[HisArpy]

Never back down! Never surrender!

It’s not a question, it’s an observation. You’re a weasel assed attorney trying to claim you are arguing without being a weasel assed attorney.

Give it up dudly, you've lost all your credibility now. Even ninny girl is giving you the death knell with her thumbs up.

 

[AlexBailey]

Give it up dudly, you've lost all your credibility now. Even ninny girl is giving you the death knell with her thumbs up.

So you’re just here to shine your non-partisan legal wisdom to illuminate truth and justice?


Let’s see you prove it:

* Why is it important for the perceived legitimacy and impartiality of judges to maintain good optics?

* How did Clarence Thomas damage the public trust and credibility of the SCOTUS by compromising optics when he didn’t report personal gifts from a conservative billionaire?


(What deflection technique are you going to use to evade these questions?)

 

[ChloeTzang]

There is only one poll that matters.

LOL. There is, and Biden (mostly, except for wherever he can't be taken off) won't be in it, so I guess this thread is toes up.

 

[AlexBailey]

LOL. There is, and Biden (mostly, except for wherever he can't be taken off) won't be in it, so I guess this thread is toes up.

We’re not going back.

 

[ChloeTzang]

We’re not going back.

I'd need a sight more coffee if we did. This election is a total soapbox.

I never cease to be surprised by the Democratic (sic) Party hypocrisy. I mean, dumping your candidate mid-stream because he's losing, That's one for the books. And no real selection process for a replacement. Talk about peeing on your members.

On can see very clearly that Harris is the Soros-anointed one, and everyone falls meekly into line. Bunch of sheep.

 

[HisArpy]

So you’re just here to shine your non-partisan legal wisdom to illuminate truth and justice?


Let’s see you prove it:

* Why is it important for the perceived legitimacy and impartiality of judges to maintain good optics?

* How did Clarence Thomas damage the public trust and credibility of the SCOTUS by compromising optics when he didn’t report personal gifts from a conservative billionaire?


(What deflection technique are you going to use to evade these questions?)

What does this have to do with the thread title, which is now obsolete?

Are you still trying to insert more meaningless Ad Hom into the conversation than you already have? Merely because you think some STUPID gotcha challenge is going to win you style points with the usual suspects?

Are you REALLY this fucking stupid?


Of course you are. You think you're winning by being annoying and clownish.

 

[HisArpy]

I'd need a sight more coffee if we did. This election is a total soapbox.

I never cease to be surprised by the Democratic (sic) Party hypocrisy. I mean, dumping your candidate mid-stream because he's losing, That's one for the books. And no real selection process for a replacement. Talk about peeing on your members.

On can see very clearly that Harris is the Soros-anointed one, and everyone falls meekly into line. Bunch of sheep.

More like Lemmings. Lemmings who aren't going back so they'll just keep running into the sea.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

What does this have to do with the thread title, which is now obsolete?

Are you still trying to insert more meaningless Ad Hom into the conversation than you already have? Merely because you think some STUPID gotcha challenge is going to win you style points with the usual suspects?

Are you REALLY this fucking stupid?


Of course you are. You think you're winning by being annoying and clownish.

Lichtman's model predicts which party will control the White House. Even with Biden stepping down, it still predicts a Harris win in November.

 

[AlexBailey]

What does this have to do with the thread title, which is now obsolete?

Are you still trying to insert more meaningless Ad Hom into the conversation than you already have? Merely because you think some STUPID gotcha challenge is going to win you style points with the usual suspects?

Are you REALLY this fucking stupid?


Of course you are. You think you're winning by being annoying and clownish.

I won - again. Gotcha- again.

You’re an easy mark because your bias is obvious and your integrity is nil.

This thread is far past the OP topic, did you hear? Biden withdrew.



I didn’t go to law school but I’m sure AF smarter than you. You may be able to play your game in a courtroom but you’re a loser here, time and time again.

You constantly whine about Ad-hom but you try to use against me constantly - nearly every post without any explanation, just simple accusations. I can back up what I say about you. I did here and I have before.

You’re a clown, your honor.