Why Biden Will Win

[HisArpy]

You’re conflating the issues and denying one of them. I understand that in your book, lack of conviction equals innocence but would you be okay with your daughter dating a rapist who was let off on a technicality? Yes? Bullshit.

You spin your legal arguments to match your politics just a defense counsel will spin legality for their client.

You’re a legal weasel.

You pull strawmen out of your ass in order to justify your bias.

Under the law, a failure to convict means "NOT GUILTY." Technicality or not, that's what it means and you don't get to say otherwise without consequences.

 

[adrina]

It can be, I get that. We'll see where we end up.

We better end up with a democratic president. For multiple reasons. White men better especially hope that because if they deliver another Trump presidency then it will be right to essentially ignore white men. Especially by women.

 

[DaddysSissySlut24]

Why Biden Will Not Win.

He is not running. That is a partial victory for the U.S. but not a full victory.

I'm not your garden variety anything - yes, I been fully supportive of Trump yet I can all but guarantee nobody understands my position on Trump, the right v the left or even Biden. But as much as I would love to feel some sense of relief I don't and I as tempting as it would be to lay out my position, I cannot because it would be an exercise in frustration. I'll say this; anyone who knows me at all (and nobody knows me well, but if there were anyone who did, they'd agree with the few people who know anything about me) would say that my position on humanity is quite pessimistic and I 100% understand that response, but it is incorrect. I've actually been quite optimistic, which is actually tragic, because what that means is all the negative adjectives I use to describe humanity are not only valid, they actually paint a picture so much happier than reality it's frightening. As fundamentally stupid as I have considered most people to be, humans prove me wrong over and over by showing they are, in fact, of greater stupidity than anything I predicted. Not even I considered myself an optimist but actually I very much have been, and that is sad.

I will say this - the reason I feel little in the way of relief is that everything I have seen in terms of evidence has told me that anyone who sees the issues in the U.S. to be issues of right v left are completely missing the true enemy. Yes, wokism, liberalism, progressivism, etc. are all enemies not just of this country but of humanity in that they are all wholly irrational in every sense. Worse, the purveyors of these ideologies, just as with feminism, tout the ideals knowing full well they are false and damaging, ironically most severely to the very groups they claim to help. It baffles and saddens me how widely these are accepted. To show fairness, equally baffling to me is the acceptance of a fundamental ideology of the right, which is christianity. That is as false as any woke idea and while currently not as damaging at least in certain ways, religion in the course of human history has been quite damaging. My point isn't tallying the damage but the fact that the right and leftt are basically fraternal twins who hate each other yet have the same parents, Mr. & Mrs. Irrational. Just as intelligence is not wisdom, so evil is not stupidity and Lenin understood one thing very well when he called religion the "opiate of the masses".

With regards to the U.S. (and not just the U.S.) the true enemy is not even contained within our borders. And while so far I have to bet my chips on Trump and yes I support Trump which is not a position I always held. A fact I'd be more than happy to politely debate: Trump had a very successful Presidency. I thought in 2015 the guy was a clown! But I'm an empiricist and he proved me very wrong. That is the basis of my current support. Could the dems come up with a candidate that I would be reasonably ok with? Yes, but they won't. Putting some money where my mouth is (ewwww, money is dirty, you know how many hands have touched...?) I wager the dems will announce Michael Obama (otherwise known as "Michelle" and no, that's not a jab, that's biology) as the candidate. That would be unacceptable as would be Harris, Newsom or pretty much anyone else. Tulsi Gabbard would be not horrible but she isn't even a democrat anymore. I don't know enough on RFK.

But I find little relief because of two things, one is, to me, fact and the other wild opinion. Fact: Fundamental things must occur in the U.S. to even get it back to a Constitutional Republic (which it has not been since about the 1930's) and those things did not happen under Trump nor will they if he wins. #2 is my 2024 Official Wild Speculative Statement and guess what, it's fun because it's testable! This is 51/49, reflecting almost maximum uncertainty but I think the dems may win again in 2024 the same way they did in 2020 - by completely usurping the voters and rigging the entire thing and I have FANTASTIC evidence that happened in 2020, but who cares? Obviously me, but only because I find the evidence very fascinating and I never heard one person speak to it, ever.

The enemy forces that keep the Deep State alive are global and because people need a target and I don't care, here's ammo to give you all reasons to point at me and laugh. COVID was not a lab leak. COVID was a well orchestrated release that occured at many points on the globe. Second, the push for EVs has the ultimate goal of ushering in the implantation of tracking chips in every citizen of the U.S. Third, the political bodies that ultimately will strip U.S. citizens of all Constitutional rights will not be from within the U.S., rather they will be the U.N., W.H.O. and possibly NATO. Bonus Point-At-The-Crackpot Belief: Maui was accomplished via a directed energy weapon, wholly manmade, not anything "natural". And it was NOT a success, far too many survived versus the goal.

The world is complicated. One thing is not; everything happening is motivated by one goal: Power. Money is a more direct motive, yes, but nobody who has money cares about money, they care about what money can do - money is a tool. And I know what all of you are thinking right now which is, "I think I'm reading the insane ramblings of a MAJOR tool!"....amirite? I am and that's ok and no I have zero martyr complex - martyrs believe in things despite taking great losses for those beliefs. I have nothing to lose because I came in with nothing. That doesn't make me tough or badass or brave...but it does make me dangerous and if that statement is puzzling I would refer you to a famous poem, The Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone, which should be mandatory reading especially for one very stupid person who sadly may learn a great lesson but I truly hope not because as one lady said once, "ain't nobody got time for that!"

 

[AlexBailey]

You pull strawmen out of your ass in order to justify your bias.

Under the law, a failure to convict means "NOT GUILTY." Technicality or not, that's what it means and you don't get to say otherwise without

Unindicted co-conspirator number one is innocent.

Yep.

 

[CliimaxForYou]

Why Biden Will Not Win.

He is not running. That is a partial victory for the U.S. but not a full victory.

I'm not your garden variety anything - yes, I been fully supportive of Trump yet I can all but guarantee nobody understands my position on Trump, the right v the left or even Biden. But as much as I would love to feel some sense of relief I don't and I as tempting as it would be to lay out my position, I cannot because it would be an exercise in frustration. I'll say this; anyone who knows me at all (and nobody knows me well, but if there were anyone who did, they'd agree with the few people who know anything about me) would say that my position on humanity is quite pessimistic and I 100% understand that response, but it is incorrect. I've actually been quite optimistic, which is actually tragic, because what that means is all the negative adjectives I use to describe humanity are not only valid, they actually paint a picture so much happier than reality it's frightening. As fundamentally stupid as I have considered most people to be, humans prove me wrong over and over by showing they are, in fact, of greater stupidity than anything I predicted. Not even I considered myself an optimist but actually I very much have been, and that is sad.

I will say this - the reason I feel little in the way of relief is that everything I have seen in terms of evidence has told me that anyone who sees the issues in the U.S. to be issues of right v left are completely missing the true enemy. Yes, wokism, liberalism, progressivism, etc. are all enemies not just of this country but of humanity in that they are all wholly irrational in every sense. Worse, the purveyors of these ideologies, just as with feminism, tout the ideals knowing full well they are false and damaging, ironically most severely to the very groups they claim to help. It baffles and saddens me how widely these are accepted. To show fairness, equally baffling to me is the acceptance of a fundamental ideology of the right, which is christianity. That is as false as any woke idea and while currently not as damaging at least in certain ways, religion in the course of human history has been quite damaging. My point isn't tallying the damage but the fact that the right and leftt are basically fraternal twins who hate each other yet have the same parents, Mr. & Mrs. Irrational. Just as intelligence is not wisdom, so evil is not stupidity and Lenin understood one thing very well when he called religion the "opiate of the masses".

With regards to the U.S. (and not just the U.S.) the true enemy is not even contained within our borders. And while so far I have to bet my chips on Trump and yes I support Trump which is not a position I always held. A fact I'd be more than happy to politely debate: Trump had a very successful Presidency. I thought in 2015 the guy was a clown! But I'm an empiricist and he proved me very wrong. That is the basis of my current support. Could the dems come up with a candidate that I would be reasonably ok with? Yes, but they won't. Putting some money where my mouth is (ewwww, money is dirty, you know how many hands have touched...?) I wager the dems will announce Michael Obama (otherwise known as "Michelle" and no, that's not a jab, that's biology) as the candidate. That would be unacceptable as would be Harris, Newsom or pretty much anyone else. Tulsi Gabbard would be not horrible but she isn't even a democrat anymore. I don't know enough on RFK.

But I find little relief because of two things, one is, to me, fact and the other wild opinion. Fact: Fundamental things must occur in the U.S. to even get it back to a Constitutional Republic (which it has not been since about the 1930's) and those things did not happen under Trump nor will they if he wins. #2 is my 2024 Official Wild Speculative Statement and guess what, it's fun because it's testable! This is 51/49, reflecting almost maximum uncertainty but I think the dems may win again in 2024 the same way they did in 2020 - by completely usurping the voters and rigging the entire thing and I have FANTASTIC evidence that happened in 2020, but who cares? Obviously me, but only because I find the evidence very fascinating and I never heard one person speak to it, ever.

The enemy forces that keep the Deep State alive are global and because people need a target and I don't care, here's ammo to give you all reasons to point at me and laugh. COVID was not a lab leak. COVID was a well orchestrated release that occured at many points on the globe. Second, the push for EVs has the ultimate goal of ushering in the implantation of tracking chips in every citizen of the U.S. Third, the political bodies that ultimately will strip U.S. citizens of all Constitutional rights will not be from within the U.S., rather they will be the U.N., W.H.O. and possibly NATO. Bonus Point-At-The-Crackpot Belief: Maui was accomplished via a directed energy weapon, wholly manmade, not anything "natural". And it was NOT a success, far too many survived versus the goal.

The world is complicated. One thing is not; everything happening is motivated by one goal: Power. Money is a more direct motive, yes, but nobody who has money cares about money, they care about what money can do - money is a tool. And I know what all of you are thinking right now which is, "I think I'm reading the insane ramblings of a MAJOR tool!"....amirite? I am and that's ok and no I have zero martyr complex - martyrs believe in things despite taking great losses for those beliefs. I have nothing to lose because I came in with nothing. That doesn't make me tough or badass or brave...but it does make me dangerous and if that statement is puzzling I would refer you to a famous poem, The Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone, which should be mandatory reading especially for one very stupid person who sadly may learn a great lesson but I truly hope not because as one lady said once, "ain't nobody got time for that!"

Ain’t nobody got time for reading that shit. Damn dude. Wtf. College said all that with 1/5th of the words.

 

[LostHorizon]

We better end up with a democratic president. For multiple reasons. White men better especially hope that because if they deliver another Trump presidency then it will be right to essentially ignore white men. Especially by women.

I’m not exactly sure how this makes any sense. This makes the assumption that ALL women support the Democrats and vote for them. That’s obviously not true.

Ignore white men? What does that even mean? That’s good news for Republican women. They get more variety to choose from.

 

[adrina]

I’m not exactly sure how this makes any sense. This makes the assumption that ALL women support the Democrats and vote for them. That’s obviously not true.

Ignore white men? What does that even mean? That’s good news for Republican women. They get more variety to choose from.

Deflecting to women. How fucking quaint. And expected.

Almost 70% of white men support Trump. You'll wear that forever if we get him back in office.

 

[HisArpy]

Unindicted co-conspirator number one is innocent.

Yep.

Has he been convicted? No? Then he is INNOCENT until proven guilty.

Sorry, but that's the way it works in real life.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Deflecting to women. How fucking quaint. And expected.

Almost 70% of white men support Trump. You'll wear that forever if we get him back in office.

Glad to see you took my advice on the drink.

 

[adrina]

Glad to see you took my advice on the drink.

How have you not advanced? Seriously. Did you get stuck in 10 to 15 years ago mode?

And the thing is you think you are being clever. But to be fair your echo chamber thinks you are being humorous. So at least you get that.

Though they haven't seemed to advance either in the same time. Put a coat of shellac on it boys and call it a day!

I actually am in the odd place of feeling sorry for you.

 

[Saint_Ann]

How have you not advanced? Seriously. Did you get stuck in 10 to 15 years ago mode?

And the thing is you think you are being clever. But to be fair your echo chamber thinks you are being humorous. So at least you get that.

Though they haven't seemed to advance either in the same time. Put a coat of shellac on it boys and call it a day!

I actually am in the odd place of feeling sorry for you.

"If we get him back in office..."
You switching to Trump?

 

[adrina]

"If we get him back in office..."
You switching to Trump?

Nah the cognitively fucked up old man is your shtick.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Nah the cognitively fucked up old man is your shtick.

Oddly worded at best.

 

[adrina]

*** random comment I'm replying to *** - snip

So now that Harris is up for being the candidate, what do you think your kids will do? Will you push them to vote? Will you encourage them to get their friends on board? Will this excite them to vote?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Has he been convicted? No? Then he is INNOCENT until proven guilty.

Sorry, but that's the way it works in real life.

34 times, but who’s counting?

 

[AlexBailey]

Has he been convicted? No? Then he is INNOCENT until proven guilty.

Sorry, but that's the way it works in real life.

No, that’s the way it works in law.

No matter how much you want to confuse the two, law and fact are not the same thing. There are lots of examples that should be obvious even to an asshat like you in family law.

 

[AlexBailey]

So now that Harris is up for being the candidate, what do you think your kids will do? Will you push them to vote? Will you encourage them to get their friends on board? Will this excite them to vote?

One called to give me the news as soon as he heard. I spoke with two of my kids - they are way more optimistic and excited about the possible outcome.

If that’s any indication, the dems just picked up a lot of the youth who were not motivated by Biden.

 

[adrina]

One called to give me the news as soon as he heard. I spoke with two of my kids - they are way more optimistic and excited about the possible outcome.

If that’s any indication, the dems just picked up a lot of the youth who were not motivated by Biden.

That is awesome. I am very happy to hear that. Sincerely.

I really like that one called you.

Thank you for telling me. I really do appreciate it.

Now just make sure they follow up with their enthusiasm and get to the polls.

 

[LeeKee]

We better end up with a democratic president. For multiple reasons. White men better especially hope that because if they deliver another Trump presidency then it will be right to essentially ignore white men. Especially by women.

Racist.

 

[adrina]

Oh. Look. Another one who needs a new shtick. No development at all. It's like the past decade never even happened and as the years went by, no change, no expansion, no growth. Just the same ol same ol'.

T&P

 

[HisArpy]

No, that’s the way it works in law.

No matter how much you want to confuse the two, law and fact are not the same thing. There are lots of examples that should be obvious even to an asshat like you in family law.

Your personal facts are irrelevant to truth or law.

But keep on dredging up those strawmen so you can soothe your hurt feelers that Biden dropped out.

 

[HisArpy]

34 times, but who’s counting?

Yup, 34 times.

I wonder how you're going to spin it, like you're trying to spin Biden's stepping down from his campaign, if the court issues the vacatur or the appeals court reverses.

BTW, vacatur means "like it never even happened." So if the court issues one, then you won't even be able to say he was convicted. You can try, but...

 

[ShandyLeer]

Oh. Look. Another one who needs a new shtick. No development at all. It's like the past decade never even happened and as the years went by, no change, no expansion, no growth. Just the same ol same ol'.

T&P

Harris has been prepping for days for this, and neither Pelossi nor Obama fall into the ‘white men’ category but pulled their support anyway, from a white guy who you wanted to stay in the race.

So it’s not easy to see why you’re blaming white males for this, nor why you’re so keen they all be sidelined.

Probably something to do with identity politics I guess.

 

[adrina]

Harris has been prepping for days for this, and neither Pelossi nor Obama fall into the ‘white men’ category but pulled their support anyway, from a white guy who you wanted to stay in the race.

So it’s not easy to see why you’re blaming white males for this, nor why you’re so keen they all be sidelined.

Probably something to do with identity politics I guess.

Same ol' same ol'. Donor class are white males and whispering in their ears.

You're working too hard to argue against the obvious.

Give it a rest.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Yup, 34 times.

I wonder how you're going to spin it, like you're trying to spin Biden's stepping down from his campaign, if the court issues the vacatur or the appeals court reverses.

BTW, vacatur means "like it never even happened." So if the court issues one, then you won't even be able to say he was convicted. You can try, but...

That does change the fact that he is, doll, no if, ands, or buts about it.