Cock Talk

[Ricardus]

I have masturbated in front of my partner or vice versa without the other person also masturbating.

That is quite a thought. I'd rather like to hear how those stories continue!

However, I was going to say ... each of you masturbating for one another (as you originally mentioned, and as opposed to this, where one person shares just for the other to watch) is certainly one meaning of mutual masturbation.

However, it can also mean each of you masturbating the other at the same time. I thought this question probably referred to that, because it also had separate questions both about masturbating with your partner, and watching/being watched.

 

[awired50]

That is quite a thought. I'd rather like to hear how those stories continue!

However, I was going to say ... each of you masturbating for one another (as you originally mentioned, and as opposed to this, where one person shares just for the other to watch) is certainly one meaning of mutual masturbation.

However, it can also mean each of you masturbating the other at the same time. I thought this question probably referred to that, because it also had separate questions both about masturbating with your partner, and watching/being watched.

It could also be a combo of solo or each other. The reason there are 2 questions is because you may be masturbating mutually with someone who is not your partner Many folks have partners that would never do mutual. Fortunately, I do not have a partner like that

 

[Ricardus]

It could also be a combo of solo or each other. The reason there are 2 questions is because you may be masturbating mutually with someone who is not your partner Many folks have partners that would never do mutual. Fortunately, I do not have a partner like that

Oh, I see. That possibility didn't occur to me! I just took your partner to be the relevant person that you were sharing with.

 

[awired50]

Oh, I see. That possibility didn't occur to me! I just took your partner to be the relevant person that you were sharing with.

You never know these days.

 

[awired50]

https://happyundies.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/dancing-animated-dick-1.gifhttps://happyundies.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/animated-dick-gif.gif

 

[Apisto42]

I am dying to know your number

I read that as phone number…

I don't even know! I looked a few days back. Turns out I have no idea where to find my ignore list.

Cause this one

I hope she's kneeling

Would probably follow this one’s directions…

(I might be put on ignore for this).

 

[Endless_Night]

(I might be put on ignore for this).

What is this general fascination with my ignore list?

The one whose residence is a mystery to me.


I am studiously ignoring the rest of your post.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

https://forum.literotica.com/account/ignored

 

[Endless_Night]

https://forum.literotica.com/account/ignored

Thank you!

Oh! Oh, goodness.

That was quite the flurry of button pushing.

Fifteen.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

Thank you!

Oh! Oh, goodness.

That was quite the flurry of button pushing.

Fifteen.

Dwight, you ignorant slut

 

[Ricardus]

Dwight, you ignorant slut

Or Dwigt?

 

[Photog1rl]

https://forum.literotica.com/account/ignored

Um…I was like-ooh we twin but honestly I wonder how many other folks have some of the same people on their ignore list.

Edited to add that I am a total ding dong
That link took me to my ignore list it didn’t share yours

 

[hotwords229_A]

Edited to add that I am a total ding dong
That link took me to my ignore list it didn’t share yours

I am too! I thought that was Aussie’s list. Apparently I have two people I’ve never heard of before on ignore. They might have been PM “women” who aren’t real.

 

[Apisto42]

I am too! I thought that was Aussie’s list. Apparently I have two people I’ve never heard of before on ignore. They might have been PM “women” who aren’t real.

Same. I didn’t recognize any of them.

 

[Endless_Night]

Edited to add that I am a total ding dong
That link took me to my ignore list it didn’t share yours

I am too! I thought that was Aussie’s list.

Me three!!

Which was confusing, because it seemed unlikely Aussie had people on ignore. At least, not fifteen.

 

[hotwords229_A]

Dude, are those dudes?
https://64.media.tumblr.com/9e399aade9c956f30a287e6947891d38/2f8d564698669dee-33/s500x750/540226edb5d05914b447790f86f62fe5210f2aba.gif
https://64.media.tumblr.com/48864fe9509ea7718d07e0703f8129f6/515bb03277d889ee-44/s500x750/cc25387c4a341deda50617d40dae2398daa7c47f.gif


I spend some time on tumblr and I come across these two pics often.
They seem to be reblogged a lot, like, tens of thousands of times.
I’ve become a little obsessed with seeing them because I clearly see 2 guys in both pics.
However, reading the comments on the pics, it is clear that the vast majority of people seem to think that is a guy and a girl in both pics.
This boggles my mind.

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?
Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?
How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?
Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?

 

[aussiegeekygal]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?
Nah. It may be availability bias. Those are definitely sexually ambiguous asses. Very androgynous.
I can easily picture me when I look at those asses, and in the same thought could picture that both of those being @deefalttwunnyfor

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?
Guys

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?
Could be. Always.

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?
I find them equally sexy. That first one solicites a completely different reaction within me based on whether it's a guy or a girl there... Both are delightful thought experiments

 

[hotwords229_A]

I can easily picture me when I look at those asses, and in the same thought could picture that both of those being @deefalttwunnyfor

So wait, he’s squeezing his own ass?

 

[LadyLascivious1]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?

I think that’s sort of the default for most people a lot of the time.

In this case I think both images are androgynous, which makes it easier to assume it’s what you find most compelling.

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?

Immediate glance, all four guys, but that was based on your first sentence about dudes. When I took a minute to look with more attention, they still read as guys to me. Thinking about the reasons, in the first the torso musculature looks male to me and in the second the chest/nipple looks male.

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?

Oh, what it could be! It’s like starter fuel for my imagination.

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?

Both are sexy, but I think all guys in these two specific pictures are sexiest. Probably because not only do I not come across guy on guy erotica as often, the scenario in person would be much more elusive. I could pretty easily arrange a male and female butt or two female butts. It would be much more challenging for me to witness two male butts. So that ends up being the more compelling scenario and my brain sees two men

 

[Endless_Night]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?
I agree with the view those posteriors are somewhat androgynous. I'm not sure about Aussie's posterior, but I can totally see that top pic as default. Also agree the androgyny allows for prejudice bias.

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?
Two guys.

The definition of the obliques in the first picture and the visible veins in the forearm of the second.

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?
That's a toughie. More often what it is, but there are occasions where could be enters the picture.

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?
I appreciate visual beauty in many forms: line, composition, mood evoked. That said, photos are more likely to appeal as beauty, rather than sexual. I'm not strongly visual, at least not when it comes to depictions of sex.

Too, I'm pretty far along the scale on hetero. Two guys isn't really my jam.

 

[Bry1313]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?

Yeah, our brains are constantly constructing reality for us and when information isn’t fully provided, it fills in what it wants. In most cases, that’s hetero eroticism

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?

Looking at the one person’s back, that looks like a dude getting caressed

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?

Because there is no objective reality, the mind fills in what it wants

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?

The same

 

[awired50]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?
Puzzler for sure.

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?
2 guys

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?
What it is.

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?
Seems sensual

 

[hotoldrguy]

Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?
I think our minds always tend to fill in the blanks and question marks
Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?
2 guys
How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is? I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?
more for what it could be
Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?
I find it very sensual. Not my jam though.

 

[deefalttwunnyfor]

So wait, he’s squeezing his own ass?

New fantasy unlocked

 

[Wriggle]

Dude, are those dudes?


Is this a simple case of seeing what you want rather than what is?

Before I read the question I did assume it was male on female so I was definitely seeing what I wanted to see.

Is that 2 guys or a guy and a girl in your eyes?

Now you have suggested it is two males the 1st looks like man bum more than the 2nd.

How able are you to imagine a pic being better than it actually is?

No - I think there is only the picture. No better: no worse.

I guess what I mean is, do you take a picture for what it could be, or only for what it is?

What it is in this case. There's no any nuance or abstraction here.

Knowing that those pics are 100% 2 guys (I’m absolutely sure), do you find it sexier, less sexy, or a cumblasting good time?

Less sexy, and the more I look at it and make my mind awe men I find it less appealing - but it's obviously sexy to someone.