Lootequiette: Pmann's Totally Original/Unaffiliated Thread

[Photog1rl]

Hi!
I'm an older man.
Don't let my avatar fool you

I bet you really know how to take care of a younger woman too.

Oh wait, that was a other bot posting in search of older men.

 

[Endless_Night]

I do agree there are more men on Lit, but you have inferior dick for days. That boutique dick is a commodity. I would say if you throw out the bottom half of the bell curve, you have a significant number of women versus men (as a percentage of population). When you get to the farther end of the bell curve (like the outliers), I believe they are mostly made up of men. I think they are more of a commodity. I think a man who has the qualities it takes to stand out on the playground is less common than a woman who has those same qualities. Therefore, they are more in demand.

I agree with this to an extent - biological imperative. Basic.

But we're not living hunter gatherer style. Society has changed and we've had the chance to flower individually. Things aren't so basic anymore.

Sex is easy to come by for women. It just is. (Seriously, they should offer an elective in high school on how to navigate that war zone. ) I don't feel the need to compete. Why should I? If a guy doesn't see my value - meh. No matter how attractive initially.

Attention from random males on the board holds zero appeal. Messages get little mileage, either gender, unless I've seen you on the boards and liked what I see. That said, I still manage to spend more time in PMs than I do posting.

From my perspective "boutique" - male or female and however you want to define it - finds it's way to my inbox on it's own. Without the *Hot Girl* accoutrements like pics and a wide flirt net.

Do I still want a guy that makes my pulse pound? You betcha.

Biology in action. But it's not the only thing the informs my Lit experience.

Your experience. My experience. Both valid. Both different. There are numerous other experiences in between.

As a whole, I think we incline to focus on our individual perspective when evaluating situations. It's natural. But one outlook, or even several, don't equal a whole, making it difficult to make generalizations. Too small a pool.

My two cents.

 

[Endless_Night]

Alts and trolls with hateful intentions. The same anonymity that allows wonderful things can also breed unnecessary rudeness and disrespect. And pile ons. Even when deserving of being called out on terrible behavior, they almost always devolve into behavior on par or worse than the original bad behavior.

This^

I would like to address something from the other night. Before I say it, I want to be clear it isn't an attack. You were not particularly snarky to me or anything, so this is just a discussion. >

Not quoting the whole thing, but I find it curious how the whole premise of this post was largely ignored.

Cock Talk rolled into a complete derailment.

Attacks on an individual, out-thread disagreements aired, pages and pages of junk posts by non-thread participants. Complete disregard for the thread's culture and purpose.

Are any of the regular posters even still posting? Until ten minutes ago I haven't bothered to open the thread for days. *shrug*

Attempts at discussion have brought some minimal acknowledgement, but the primary response has been a continued diatribe of verbal diarrhea on how this original dude deserved to be attacked. Too, thread derails and highjacks are against the Playground rules (at least last time I checked).

It's beyond me how the group is justifying all the behavior that's been indulged for some poster they could have just not responded to or put on ignore.


I’m taking my own advice.

I just put the majority of the last five pages on ignore.

This is called curating your Lit experience.


I haven’t used the ignore button in over seven years.

It. Is. Odd.

 

[Endless_Night]

Now, I’m taking couple days off, because, damn, this place can be overstimulating!

I’ll read any responses when I get back.

You know, the ones I can see.

 

[Lord Pmann]

Do I still want a guy that makes my pulse pound?

What makes Enny’s pulse pound? Nevermind. That’s tomorrow’s question.

 

[deefalttwunnyfor]

There was still chatter this morning

It's started to slow down

I'm ready for Hotwords horny questions again

For real, I can’t masturbate to hardly any of this

 

[Wand3rlust]

There was still chatter this morning

It's started to slow down

I'm ready for Hotwords horny questions again

I blame ouzo.

 

[Photog1rl]

For real, I can’t masturbate to hardly any of this

Petty fights don’t do it for you?

Well, this seems like a good topic…
What do you prefer to masturbate to?

 

[deefalttwunnyfor]

Petty fights don’t do it for you?

Well, this seems like a good topic…
What do you prefer to masturbate to?

Finally, some hard-hitting questions
Honestly whatever tickles my fancy at that moment. Might be porn, might be a literotic story, might be a vacuum, might be a conversation or shared content with someone. Sometimes it’s a memory or a fantasized version of a memory

 

[aussiegeekygal]

Petty fights don’t do it for you?

Well, this seems like a good topic…
What do you prefer to masturbate to?

His welcome boobies

 

[Photog1rl]

Finally, some hard-hitting questions
Honestly whatever tickles my fancy at that moment. Might be porn, might be a literotic story, might be a vacuum, might be a conversation or shared content with someone. Sometimes it’s a memory or a fantasized version of a memory

A vacuum? Really? I thought that was a Pmann special but I guess it has its appeal

Do you have a favorite or go to category for porn? How about the Lit stories? Is there any strategy in what you choose?

 

[Photog1rl]

His welcome boobies

Why don't we have a reaction? The smile/laugh does it for me. Mischievous and filled with a promise of fun. It’s contagious joy.

 

[Donotrustanybody]

Hi!
I'm an older man.
Don't let my avatar fool you

I thought of this, after your posts

 

[deefalttwunnyfor]

A vacuum? Really? I thought that was a Pmann special but I guess it has its appeal

Do you have a favorite or go to category for porn? How about the Lit stories? Is there any strategy in what you choose?

A few nights ago I was watching lesbian vids called women seeking women and it really rung my bell. Otherwise I’ll go to threesome or orgy
For stories I search “first time”, or I’ll go find stories tagged ‘reluctance’ those are generally home runs for me

 

[Photog1rl]

A few nights ago I was watching lesbian vids called women seeking women and it really rung my bell.

Is there anything in particular? I don't watch much porn but there are some super hot light BDSM lesbian videos that I LOVE.

Otherwise I’ll go to threesome or orgy

Group sex is an often read lit category for me.

For stories I search “first time”, or I’ll go find stories tagged ‘reluctance’ those are generally home runs for me

Do you have a strategy for choosing a story? Does the rating system come into play? Do you look at any reviews or comments? Do you read the whole thing even if its bad or do stop at some point?

 

[OrdinaryPerson]

I think sometimes people can get caught up in having fun with their friends that we forget our manners. And it takes a lot to figure it out. Like talking too loudly and having a party at a quiet coffee shop, maybe the first few gentle shushs don't register, especially when it's coming from people who are also talking, and the the criticisms pile on until it feels like an attack. Then people really don't respond well to perceived attacks.

I'm sorry for being part of the cock thread derail. Like yesterday when I thought about it, I stopped posting in there cause yes that's not what that thread is and people who enjoy that head should get it back. I thought of Endless and how she might not like it. I felt really bad reading her post because that just confirmed that yes it was shitty. So I'm sorry for posters like Endless or Rosie that feel overwhelmed. I don't want to invade your spaces like that and I'm sorry for any time that I have done (and I'm sure it wasn't just this time.)

As for what I love about Lit, for me it's a space to be open and silly and not have filters. I appreciate people who are who they are and that can be people I disagree with. There are many of you that I will never be good friends with because we are too different but I appreciate you being around and being you.

 

[deefalttwunnyfor]

Is there anything in particular? I don't watch much porn but there are some super hot light BDSM lesbian videos that I LOVE.

I can’t think of the specific one. There’s like 200 movies of this series and they’re almost all incredible. Good point about the light bdsm, that hits home for me too

Group sex is an often read lit category for me.

I venture in there from time to time, but I haven’t had the experience so it gets tough to lose myself in it I think

Do you have a strategy for choosing a story? Does the rating system come into play?

Yep, views or ratings. A few thousand people can’t all be wrong can they? Wait, how many votes did trump get?

Do you look at any reviews or comments?

If I LOVED the story I’ll read the comments but otherwise I’m too busy starting cleanup

Do you read the whole thing even if its bad or do stop at some point?

Oh I stop immediately if I’m not entranced at the end of paragraph 2 or 3

 

[LadyLascivious1]

As a whole, I think we incline to focus on our individual perspective when evaluating situations. It's natural. But one outlook, or even several, don't equal a whole, making it difficult to make generalizations. Too small a pool.

My two cents.

"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.”

Being exposed to a much wider pool of experiences and perspectives is one of my favorite things about Lit. Even if I have to occasionally and vocally remind myself that my experience and perspective is not everyone else’s.

What makes Enny’s pulse pound? Nevermind. That’s tomorrow’s question.

Tentacle and monster porn, but NOT monster sex toys

I think sometimes people can get caught up in having fun with their friends that we forget our manners….Like talking too loudly

There are times I forget how loud my inherited Italian laugh and talking can be if I’m really enjoying myself*

I like to think I balance it out by not being rude when called on it. And genuinely wanting to listen more than talk. I also might be deluding myself on these two points

*I meant socializing while in public places, but it applies to sex too

 

[Lord Pmann]

I can think of just as many "boutique dick" as there are interesting women on the PG. You might just be discounting too many men that we women find attractive or too blinded by the sea of mediocre dick.

You may be correct. It could be the Baader–Meinhof phenomenon. Like, I only ever saw my exquisite dick. Then I saw all this mediocre dick here at Lit and it's all I can see.

Perhaps I do discount some of the men you (not you specifically) find attractive. Some of them appear bland as fuck to me. But I'm sure I seem obnoxious as fuck to others and attraction really is so objective.

I think most men have sent me pictures before I sent them mine. The boutique dick here lets you know that a picture would be welcomed but would never pressure you for one. By contrast, as a woman, it is much more accepted for me to ask for a picture. My guess is that more women have asked you for pictures than men have asked me. Im pretty sure I asked you for a picture before you asked me, if you ever did.

You did ask for my picture first. I felt violated and unsafe. I'm kidding.

I don't dispute that females get more attention. The men want to talk to women and there are not that many women on Lit. However, the "attractiveness" difference really baffles me. I don't see what you're talking about on S&S, and honestly cannot even guess who you think is "objectively attractive". I've interacted with the men and women on there mostly before I saw anyone's face there and I dont think knowing what they looked like has ever altered my interactions with them.

I don't imagine it would alter your interactions with them. I think, for the most part, it is a particularly male characteristic (though I mentioned where it is evident in female circles)

I do believe you don't see it. But from the responses here, I feel like some of you from the SnS group have blinders on to how they perceive interactions. I don't say that rudely. You've always been very nice to me, so my comment isn't said pointedly. Hell, I stuck my dick in a vacuum for you to see.

It's just that some of you don't seem to see other points of view on this subject.

Heck, @Mr_bogey does just find without showing what he looks like.

It's not every day you get to e-bone a mummy.

You will never get the same responses because there are so many men on Lit that just want to talk to girls. That doesn't mean an "objectively attractive" girl gets more responses than any other girl

You may be right. I feel like I have a pretty good eye on things in terms of patterns and such. But I could be off here.

Once again, thank you for interacting politely and with genuinely good comments.

 

[Xerxes82]

I would like to address something from the other night. Before I say it, I want to be clear it isn't an attack. You were not particularly snarky to me or anything, so this is just a discussion.

I think the other night is a good example of what could be considered as cliquish. Here is my reasoning.

I didn't see whatever is being talked about here, so I can't comment on that. But since they were mentioned as part of the discussion I'd like to talk about S+S. Not to pick on them or judge or accuse, but just because they represent a visible example that I think most PGers are familiar with.

I've had several bad interactions with people from SnS. I won't go in there, and that won't change because of whatever else may or may not have happened elsewhere.

I'm also not the biggest fan of the way they'll sometimes slide into other threads and just completely steamroll them for days at a time, but it's easy enough to just shrug and move on. It's clear it is not malicious, even when I personally find it annoying, and I'm not going to tell anybody how to Lit when any frustration I may feel is so easily avoided just by giving then all a wide berth.

And sure, sometimes they act like a clique. But doesn't any friend group to some extent? Isn't it natural to rally around your friends and have their backs when they feel wronged or creeped out? It can go to far, sometimes it does with the piling on and the white knighting, but it has never struck me as being first and foremost exclusionary. Individuals, perhaps. Such is the nature of any group.

But as a whole they just seem like a rambunctious group of friends who sometimes forget how loud a group can get in a public space. No meaningful harm meant. Every now and then those of us on the outside may have to roll our eyes and exercise a modicum of patience, but I suspect Lit gets more positives from groups of the sort than it does negatives.

I don't imagine anyone really cared about my two cents, but I suppose I've offered it anyhow.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

I didn't see whatever is being talked about here, so I can't comment on that. But since they were mentioned as part of the discussion I'd like to talk about S+S. Not to pick on them or judge or accuse, but just because they represent a visible example that I think most PGers are familiar with.

I've had several bad interactions with people from SnS. I won't go in there, and that won't change because of whatever else may or may not have happened elsewhere.

I'm also not the biggest fan of the way they'll sometimes slide into other threads and just completely steamroll them for days at a time, but it's easy enough to just shrug and move on. It's clear it is not malicious, even when I personally find it annoying, and I'm not going to tell anybody how to Lit when any frustration I may feel is so easily avoided just by giving then all a wide berth.

And sure, sometimes they act like a clique. But doesn't any friend group to some extent? Isn't it natural to rally around your friends and have their backs when they feel wronged or creeped out? It can go to far, sometimes it does with the piling on and the white knighting, but it has never struck me as being first and foremost exclusionary. Individuals, perhaps. Such is the nature of any group.

But as a whole they just seem like a rambunctious group of friends who sometimes forget how loud a group can get in a public space. No meaningful harm meant. Every now and then those of us on the outside may have to roll our eyes and exercise a modicum of patience, but I suspect Lit gets more positives from groups of the sort than it does negatives.

I don't imagine anyone really cared about my two cents, but I suppose I've offered it anyhow.

You summed up my position perfectly.

The only thing that's different is that I haven't had any bad interactions with people here. I'm like Switzerland

 

[Lord Pmann]

I don't imagine anyone really cared about my two cents, but I suppose I've offered it anyhow

Whether someone agrees or disagrees with me, I welcome their comments. So I appreciate it.

 

[Bry1313]

You summed up my position perfectly.

The only thing that's different is that I haven't had any bad interactions with people here. I'm like Switzerland

I’ll try to do better.

 

[Bry1313]

I've had several bad interactions with people from SnS. I won't go in there, and that won't change because of whatever else may or may not have happened elsewhere.

This genuinely makes me feel bad, I’m sorry that’s happened to you.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

I’ll try to do better.

You know when two sets of titties don't calm the crowd that you've got to just let it run its course.

And I was part of it, too.
But yeah, it definitely got more than a little out of control there