Lootequiette: Pmann's Totally Original/Unaffiliated Thread

Good evening. Lit has seen some pretty good action over the last few days. There were more than a couple of heated exchanges about various topics, with boobs seeming to be the only thing that could unify the opposing parties.

A lot of the talk centered around the culture of Lit. Are there cliques? Is it inclusive? If people feel left out, why? That merged into discussions about the subcultures of different threads in Lit.

So today's topic extends just a little further on that discussion.

What do you like about Lit's culture? What do you dislike? Do you feel like an insider or an outsider? What would you change? Do you feel that you behave in a manner consistent with how you wish Lit would be?

Bonus points if you list the specific names of people you would ban.
Of course there are cliques and others feel left out, why is depending on the person and specific group. I just don't understand wanting to feel accepted by the majority, I enjoy being the outcast. Lit culture will always be the same, I returned and saw different people on lit, but the same behavoirs as the litsters before them. Different people same shit.
 
I choose to stick to the positives so I’m going to cheat and only answer one question
What do you like about Lit's culture?
That I was able to connect with women who fluently spoke gay or those who identify as bi/queer. Laughing with them, sharing stories and experiences. Some real talk, although I would like to be friends with some gay men here but I guess they don’t find me interesting enough to engage and that is totally fair.

As for comparing nips, I really don’t know what to say 🤔
 
I actually wanted to respond to this, but I got distracted by other things, so here it is now...

I think there are some really quality people of both sexes on here. Absolutely.

I think proportionally, the women here have a much better interest rating than the men. I think, in general, women are more cultured and well-written than men. That is a generalization, but we are talking about large pools of people here.
Are you talking about Lit or the population in general?

Lit, I'd agree. I can talk to a random woman on the Playground and have a 90%+ chance of having an interesting conversation. If I talk to a random man, its like maybe 10%. But, you're still wrong that the top men here are a luxury, because there are so many more men on Lit. There is still enough really great men for all the women to talk to. What is actually difficult is weeding out all the mediocre men that women feel too guilty to not respond to. So maybe then, the hot and nice women have a more difficult time.

In the general population, I think the difference is much less obvious. Maybe because more men are not currently holding their dicks while they talk to you.

I think men care about looks first. I know... so many men talk about wanting smart/funny/talented/etc. women and all that. It's not untrue. But a few years of biology definitely supports my theory that men and women look for different things when it comes to partners. I think what you're saying about being online versus offline has merit. I think it skews the data some. But it's my perception that the theory upholds in Lit land.

There are some objectively attractive people here. I think a simple observation of their interactions versus a similar interaction with someone less attractive would show a variance.
I think we make a lot of assumptions based on looks in offline life. As soon as we see someone, we already have an idea of if they are attractive. Our interactions may change how much we find them attractive later, but that initial appearance based opinion is the baseline that has to be overcome.

Online, unless you're just hanging out only looking at pictures in AmPics, we make our first impressions based on words rather than appearance. That is the baseline that then gets swayed by a voice or a picture. And the appearance influence is much lower online since you're mostly interacting with words rather than appearance.

Im really interested in examples of who you think has different interactions, because I don't really see the different or variance. I'm also not convinced that all men find the same subjectively hot person the most physically appealing/ attractive. Maybe this is the difference between men and women, but I can appreciate a fit muscular guy with a six pack, but I also don't think it is the most sexually appealing body type. Kind of like... I can appreciate how objectively good younger men look, but that's not the look that gets my vag wet.
 
I chose to stick to the positives so I’m going to cheat and only answer one question

You're also cheating in that you didn't post the promised boobs.

I remember it clearly. I have a perfect memory. You, @morelikeasong, @Wand3rlust, @LadyLascivious1, @OrdinaryPerson and some other women were all saying that they would post their tits in this very interesting thread if I'd just post both my moobs. That's how that happened.
 
Of course there are cliques and others feel left out, why is depending on the person and specific group. I just don't understand wanting to feel accepted by the majority, I enjoy being the outcast. Lit culture will always be the same, I returned and saw different people on lit, but the same behavoirs as the litsters before them. Different people same shit.
Feeling accepted is a basic human need. I think there's enough different flavored places on Lit that almost anyone who isn't an obvious creep can find a home.

I do think no one has an obligation to interact with anyone else. If not actively including everyone just for the sake of including them is exclusion then I guess Lit is (and should be) exclusionary.
 
I've been giving this a lot of thought and I'm gonna be way more honest than i expected;

I think one of the primary reasons why I don't e-bone here is because I don't want to navigate that scenario where I find out what someone looks like and it changes my whole perception of a person. I have a hair trigger when it comes to turn offs. Looks aren't everything but they do play a part in my attraction.
 
Feeling accepted is a basic human need. I think there's enough different flavored places on Lit that almost anyone who isn't an obvious creep can find a home.

I do think no one has an obligation to interact with anyone else. If not actively including everyone just for the sake of including them is exclusion then I guess Lit is (and should be) exclusionary.
Don't agree that being accepted is a need, I believe it is a want.

You are 100% that no one has an obligation to talk to you. With few exceptions, I don't think groups are being purposely ecluding, just getting lost in their conversations with their friends.
 
I've been giving this a lot of thought and I'm gonna be way more honest than i expected;

I think one of the primary reasons why I don't e-bone here is because I don't want to navigate that scenario where I find out what someone looks like and it changes my whole perception of a person. I have a hair trigger when it comes to turn offs. Looks aren't everything but they do play a part in my attraction.
😥 I guess we dodged a bullet here lol
 
Back
Top