LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

SCOTUS Decisions

At this point putting out decisions about horses and nonprofits is much higher priority than presidential immunity.

Fuck this court.
 
These aren't rulings as such. Just deciding which cases to take for next term.
 
The court rules in Snyder v. United States, that federal bribery law does not make ti a crime for state and local officials to accept gratuities that may be given as a token of appreciation after the official act. Federal law, the court writes, “leaves it to state and local governments to regulate gratuities to state and local officials.”

https://www.scotusblog.com/
 
jaF0 said:
The court rules in Snyder v. United States, that federal bribery law does not make ti a crime for state and local officials to accept gratuities that may be given as a token of appreciation after the official act. Federal law, the court writes, “leaves it to state and local governments to regulate gratuities to state and local officials.”

https://www.scotusblog.com/
Click to expand...

The US supreme court just basically legalized bribery

I am shocked, SHOCKED, that “conservative” Supreme Court justices ruled that bribing public officials is fine.

To celebrate the decision, Harlan Crow gave each of the “conservative” justices a new house.
 
jaF0 said:
The court rules in Snyder v. United States, that federal bribery law does not make ti a crime for state and local officials to accept gratuities that may be given as a token of appreciation after the official act. Federal law, the court writes, “leaves it to state and local governments to regulate gratuities to state and local officials.”

https://www.scotusblog.com/
Click to expand...

If only those Egyptian business men that bribed sen. Menendez knew the proper "legal" way to bribe someone in Washington as ok'ed by SCOTUS here.
 
  • The court grants a group of states’ request to put the EPA’s “good neighbor plan” on hold in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency. The rule was issued to reduce air pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities based on the EPA’s interpretation of a provision of the Clean Air Act, which requires “upwind” states to reduce emissions that affect the air quality in “downwind” states.
  • The court rules in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. that the bankruptcy code does not authorize a multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy plan for Purdue Pharma, the maker of the highly addictive opioid painkiller OxyContin, that would release members of the Sackler family, which owned the company but did not declare bankruptcy, from any future liability for claims against them.
  • In SEC v. Jarkesy, the court rules that when the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial.
  • The court dismisses Moyle v. United States, allowing doctors in Idaho to continue providing abortions in emergency medical situations.
https://www.scotusblog.com/


So, they rule in favor of air pollution, against BigPhamra, in favor of jury trials and against Iowa.
 
Laws need to be changed so that rulings must be issued no later than 60 days after hearings. This practice of last minute stuff needs to end.
 
HisArpy said:
Gang tattoos indicate support for illegal acts and behavior. They indicate a refusal to obey the law and be a peaceful/productive citizen.

Thus they are a statement of ill intent. An application for citizenship can be denied on that basis of that statement. Not because of that the applicant "might do" but because of what they have already done.
Click to expand...
So the Biden administration should be able to deny the application for any applicant who wears a red MAGA hat a lot, right? That is tacit support for an insurrectionist, rapist, and 34 times convicted felon.
 
jaF0 said:
  • The court grants a group of states’ request to put the EPA’s “good neighbor plan” on hold in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency. The rule was issued to reduce air pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities based on the EPA’s interpretation of a provision of the Clean Air Act, which requires “upwind” states to reduce emissions that affect the air quality in “downwind” states.
  • The court rules in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. that the bankruptcy code does not authorize a multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy plan for Purdue Pharma, the maker of the highly addictive opioid painkiller OxyContin, that would release members of the Sackler family, which owned the company but did not declare bankruptcy, from any future liability for claims against them.
  • In SEC v. Jarkesy, the court rules that when the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial.
  • The court dismisses Moyle v. United States, allowing doctors in Idaho to continue providing abortions in emergency medical situations.
https://www.scotusblog.com/


So, they rule in favor of air pollution, against BigPhamra, in favor of jury trials and against Iowa.
Click to expand...
Without knowing all the details of every case, it sure seems like the Supreme Court has been all over the place this past year.
 
jaF0 said:
Laws need to be changed so that rulings must be issued no later than 60 days after hearings. This practice of last minute stuff needs to end.
Click to expand...
And the Supreme Court would instantly rule those laws unconstitutional. Why? Because they can.
 
Maybe it's time to defund the Supreme Court. Most of them make millions in bribes, anyway.
 
SmokingFap said:
Without knowing all the details of every case, it sure seems like the Supreme Court has been all over the place this past year.
Click to expand...
Their inconsistent and sometimes absurd ability to narrowly or broadly rule on cases is frustrating. Cases that don't require additional scope are getting it while others that should have it are not getting it.
 
ll74 said:
Their inconsistent and sometimes absurd ability to narrowly or broadly rule on cases is frustrating. Cases that don't require additional scope are getting it while others that should have it are not getting it.
Click to expand...
That seems like a perfect summation of the situation.
 
jaF0 said:
It's the Duggars, Arkansas Royalty.
Click to expand...
I totally blame his hypocritical, holier-than-thou asshole parents. But whichever network carried their show deserves some blame too. No one should ever have even heard of this disgusting family.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Bodington
Federal Judges Whine That SCOTUS Is Overturning Their Rulings
2
Replies
42
Views
328
Rightguide
Rightguide
Saint_Ann
Talking strictly about politics is too limiting
Replies
10
Views
144
HisArpy
HisArpy
ll74
The Dispatch Acquires SCOTUSBlog
Replies
0
Views
61
ll74
ll74
Rightguide
SCOTUS Upholds Ban On Medicare Funds For Planned Butcherhood
2 3
Replies
56
Views
939
Lazaran
L
Rightguide
The SCOTUS Thumps The Tranny Movement
2
Replies
25
Views
546
Chernosoth
Chernosoth
Back
Top