T found guilty on all accounts

[KeithD]

All of this goes to prove that we need to build a wall on the northern border of Florida to cut off migration from the south. Those people down there are bringing in organized crime. They're bringing in Adderall. They're trying to overturn our elections. They're costing taxpayers enormous amounts of money to pay for damages caused by their damned tropical storms. Their crimes are filling our courts with new cases. They're rapists.

Yes, a few of them are good people, but, you know, NEED WALL!

Can the wall be extended over the northern border of Texas as well?

 

[KeithD]

My goodness, if the Trumpers here get so apoplectic over Trump being caught on trying to cover up his sleazy episode with a porn actress, what will they do when he is convicted of staging a coup attempt against the United States?

 

[icanhelp1]

It met the NY burden for the charge and the jury convicted unanimously.

No it didn’t. The trial process was severely flawed. Many reversible errors though-out the trial. Blaring due process violations. The judge steered the jury to the only conclusion the jury could understand. The judge was anything but a neutral arbiter of justice. Any judge worthwhile of the black robe would have supported and even encouraged the defense to provide witness testimony, especially a witness who could demonstrate the correct application of the law and rebuke flawed allegations by the prosecution concerning campaign finance abuses.

 

[ll74]

No it didn’t. The trial process was severely flawed. Many reversible errors though-out the trial. Blaring due process violations. The judge steered the jury to the only conclusion the jury could understand. The judge was anything but a neutral arbiter of justice. Any judge worthwhile of the black robe would have supported and even encouraged the defense to provide witness testimony, especially a witness who could demonstrate the correct application of the law and rebuke flawed allegations by the prosecution concerning campaign finance abuses.

Due process is more about the law that was violated and likely not to matter on appeal. The law doesn't require a conviction or indictment for the law furthered by the falsification.

I've already mentioned this will be appealed. It's not a slam dunk for reversal nor affirmation of the conviction.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop.

If Hunter’s laptop was allowed to testify, Trump would not have been convicted! The laptop’s testimony was suppressed! It’s all becoming clear.

The laptop is being held captive in the basement of a pizza place in DC. Hillary’s emails are the brains behind this vast conspiracy!

 

[Aglaopheme]

bB's head gonna 'splode

I may stick around just to watch that.

We are barely hanging on to our democracy thanks solely to black women.

 

[LLCox]

If trump gets probation he should also be made to pick up trash in Times Square.

 

[RoryN]

 

[Aglaopheme]

View attachment 2352360View attachment 2352361

I’ve always had a deep appreciation for Edel,s work.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

What a lovely day today is.

 

[jaF0]

I’ve always had a deep appreciation for Edel,s work.

Where did you come from after a year?

 

[coati]

Can the wall be extended over the northern border of Texas as well?

Yes. And, Texas will become the new site for Israel to exist in peace.

 

[adrina]

Read the book “ Culture of Corruption “ then get back to me.

Yeah see that's your problem. You read right wing propaganda and then try to apply it to reality - where sane people live.

You support a felon, traitor.

 

[coati]

The Manhattan appeals court.
View attachment 2352335

I am grateful that we have these intelligent judges and Alvin Bragg to handle organized crime in New York.

 

[Bn2f]

Read the book “ Culture of Corruption “ then get back to me.

Goddammit! Because you RW's I just went and bought 'Rules for Radicals' by Saul Alinsky and NOW you're giving me even more things to read? Is there an 'Understanding Conservatives For Dummies' you can recommend instead?

 

[adrina]

Goddammit! Because you RW's I just went and bought 'Rules for Radicals' by Saul Alinsky and NOW you're giving me even more things to read? Is there an 'Understanding Conservatives For Dummies' you can recommend instead?

Don't need a book for that. Just go with ol' Mitch. If they say yes, we say no. If they say no, we say yes.

After that it's: protect their rich friends and steer money their way.

 

[Bn2f]

Don't need a book for that. Just go with ol' Mitch. If they say yes, we say no. If they say no, we say yes.

After that it's: protect their rich friends and steer money their way.

Ok, but what if he just stares at me glitching all scary and turtle-like? Is that a yes or no?

 

[adrina]

Ok, but what if he just stares at me glitching all scary and turtle-like? Is that a yes or no?

"Does not compute"

 

[HisArpy]

These supposed officers of the court who took an oath to uphold the constitution, who took an oath to protect an serve, who took an oath to apply the law equally, to apply the law with fairness and to provide equal protection under the law chose partisan majority tyranny and set our justice system back to pre- signing of our *DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE* Many New Yorkers woke up this morning riding in the front seat of their new mobile to nowhere with a grand view of what justice is like in Venezuela or Moscow. In the mean time crime in the streets remains unchecked, cashless bail will still release violent recidivist criminals back to the streets. Homelessness, illegal migrants over burdening New Yorkers hospitals, schools, parks and hotels while New York politicians fail to prioritize their allegiance to the taxpayer wasting millions of dollars on a sham trial. Sad.

The saddest part is that, if you look at it in another light, the jurors fucked up bigly.

As it stands they get their 3 second media soundbite to say they're the ones who found Trump guilty. Maybe a couple of the more photogenic/articulate jurors will get a talk show appearance once or twice. Then they disappear. Yay - big leagues...

On the other hand, had they "deliberated" for 1 more day then found him not guilty they could have had a multiple million dollar book deal for all of them which would have made each of them stinking rich. A ghost writer and a title of Persecuted! could have had them living the high life in an immediate retirement.


They chose the stupid plan of being democrats.

 

[Aglaopheme]

 

[ll74]

The saddest part is that, if you look at it in another light, the jurors fucked up bigly.

As it stands they get their 3 second media soundbite to say they're the ones who found Trump guilty. Maybe a couple of the more photogenic/articulate jurors will get a talk show appearance once or twice. Then they disappear. Yay - big leagues...

On the other hand, had they "deliberated" for 1 more day then found him not guilty they could have had a multiple million dollar book deal for all of them which would have made each of them stinking rich. A ghost writer and a title of Persecuted! could have had them living the high life in an immediate retirement.


They chose the stupid plan of being democrats.

Yes, obviously the jurors should have been focusing on their book deals in their deliberations.

Good thinking Mr loiyer!

 

[Aglaopheme]

Yes, obviously the jurors should have been focusing on their book deals in their deliberations.

Good thinking Mr loiyer!

I do believe that was in Judge Merchan’s instructions, yes.

 

[HisArpy]

Let me stop you right there.... No you don't.

Because if you stood for the law, you would be cheering for Trump's conviction- because he broke the law. Multiple times, on multiple occasions. The fact that you think he should somehow be above the law and immune from prosecution, shows how little respect you have for the law.

If you truely are a lawyer, which I doubt, I would have you disbarred based on some of the content you have posted on here.

Lol, more of your fantasy bullshit where you think you're in charge of something.

I've said it before and I'll say it as often as necessary, I stand for the law. This is something most people do not do. They scoff at the law when they roll stop signs, take illegal drugs, con everyone as much as they can get away with, and, worst of all, lie about all of the above.

Right and wrong are the only 2 aspects the law. The most basic principle of the law is to promote what is right while correcting wrongs.

This verdict is a travesty. Eventually it will be set right. And you will cry and make more meaningless statements of self aggrandizing false superiority which will only prove that you're a nothing masquerading as a piece of shit and thinking you've come up in the world.

 

[Aglaopheme]

I've said it before and I'll say it as often as necessary, I stand for the law. This is something Trump does not do. He scoffs at the law when he roll stop signs, takes illegal drugs, cons everyone as much as he can get away with, and, worst of all, lies about all of the above.

I wholeheartedly agree.

 

[HisArpy]

I wholeheartedly agree.

When you falsely edit the words of others, you forge lies about yourself.