Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

The funny thing about defamation is that it doesn't apply when the claims are true. Mine are. But for it to ever even be an issue, Ol' Diaper Donnie would have to prove, or at least, allege damages. Good luck with that one. And Ol' Babydoll Hands is the only one who would have standing in such a case. Meaning servile little ball-garglers like you can't touch me. Choke on that.

By the way, what did you hear back when you "reported" me, douchenozzle? Crickets, apparently. Maybe the good folks at Lit think you deserve a good ass-kicking, too.

I'm happily perched on a very sturdy limb. So keep it coming, you sheep-fucking failed abortion.


Good luck with that you little chicken shit bitch.
 
I don't even know why he would want to suspend or terminate the Constitution. Trump claimed that it empowered him to do anything he wanted to as president.


His lawyers even now, in front of the Supreme Court, are asserting that a president has the right to assassinate political adversaries. Of course, I'm sure he doesn't feel the same way now with Biden as president.

But maybe Dark Brandon should have had the FBI take Trump out as part of the classified documents raids. Presidential immunity and all that.
 
Patton also thought he was descended from the gods. A bit 'far out there' as a military commander very much like a current wannabe 'dictator for a day' candidate.

Like Trump, Patton belittled the medically wounded. He was reprimanded for striking soldiers in a field hospital, calling them cowards for not returning to battle. Despite his bravado, he was not revered as a 'general's general' but rather seen as a thug with stars on his shoulders. He demanded respect rather than earning it. The similarities in their approaches are striking, prompting one to question why you chose Patton in your response.

His life was cut short in an automobile accident, of all things. He died, but not a heroic death to which he aspired. There is no doubt that he made significant efforts toward the war's success; that much I'll credit him. Everyone has a few shining moments in time.

Honor thy dead, honor thy heroes long gone, recent, and those living still. Honor them all. Many served well; many gave all, and those deserve the highest honors.

[Edit: And now I see there is a post fact-checking his quote, and it doesn't hold carbon water for anyone!]
 
Last edited:
Try being objective, are you better off now than 4 years ago. When celebrating memorial day just remember your boy sent sincere condolences to a mass murderer, a vile individual who is responsible for murdering hundreds of our finest, bravest soldiers.
Better off? Yes, my net worth continues to increase. I'm not lacking for anything. Sure I complain about taxes going up, but everything goes up. I'm fortunate enough that my retirement incomes exceed inflation. So, yeah, I am at least one person who is better today than four years ago. By and large, our nation has gained, though not everyone has a positive benefit from the improvements Biden creates as a leader. He reaches across the aisle for partnerships. Not so ... the other guy.

Sending condolences as a national leader doesn't imply that the President acknowledges a person's vile deeds as good things. It is a way of trying to build bridges where none exist. Perhaps a word of condolence might soften an attitude that someday saves lives. Don't go pissing in the wind attacking Biden on this one. You look stupid for writing that.

Nixon sent condolences to Egypt for Nasser's passing and acknowledged his role as a significant leader in the Arab world. This gesture eased tensions in the Middle East and Nasser's successor, Anwar Sadat, eventually shifted Egypt's policy towards a more pro-Western and pro-American stance. The outcome of Nixon's condolence was positively significant.

So there is that thought as support for what I've cited for you to consider, again, not pissing upwind.
 
Why because she's making Smith follow the law, because she exposed the FBI plan to use deadly force against Donald Trump and his USS security detail, or because she exposed the fact that Jack Smith had himself mishandled and tampered with classified documents and evidence?
The FBI followed standard operating procedures; that's all. No one threatened Trump or even drew a weapon on site. Trump wasn't even there that day.

Just s-m-o-k-e blowing up someone's ass here to rile up the MAGA base looking for some more dollars.

Just BS per normal right-wing shit on this forum.
 
The FBI followed standard operating procedures; that's all. No one threatened Trump or even drew a weapon on site. Trump wasn't even there that day.

Just s-m-o-k-e blowing up someone's ass here to rile up the MAGA base looking for some more dollars.

Just BS per normal right-wing shit on this forum.
Standard operating procedures. You really need medical attention there Pinocchio!

There is absolutely nothing routine about raiding an ex-president's resident, it's never happened before. Garland authorizing the raid is one of the most irresponsible actions that a fucking AG could do. Garland like you is mentally unstable, suffer from extreme TDS to the point that you both should be medically evaluated for psychosis. Sending armed FBI agents against armed SS agents protecting the an x-president where the potential of loss of life due to a gun battle between law enforcement officials.

It's standard operating procedures when dealing with the potential for violence like drug dealers or violent criminals. You've lost all your marbles. Your hatred for Trump put's you in the mentally disturbed category along with smokingfap, Adrina, BnF2. I'm glad you're not in the military today, you're seriously detached from reality and should never again be in possession of a firearm.
 
Better off? Yes, my net worth continues to increase. I'm not lacking for anything. Sure I complain about taxes going up, but everything goes up. I'm fortunate enough that my retirement incomes exceed inflation. So, yeah, I am at least one person who is better today than four years ago. By and large, our nation has gained, though not everyone has a positive benefit from the improvements Biden creates as a leader. He reaches across the aisle for partnerships. Not so ... the other guy.

Sending condolences as a national leader doesn't imply that the President acknowledges a person's vile deeds as good things.
It is a way of trying to build bridges where none exist. Perhaps a word of condolence might soften an attitude that someday saves lives. Don't go pissing in the wind attacking Biden on this one. You look stupid for writing that.
Yes it does!!!! I don't know about you but I had friends wounded by IEDs and crippled for life because of that fucking murderer.

Building bridges with terrorist??? Are you fucking kidding me???? Do you have any idea what message that sends to the rest of the world. It's more vacillation and lack of courage by Biden to stand up to these fucking murderers, either that or the Biden administration is in bed with this terrorist organization. I wonder how Israel feels about Biden sending condolences to the terrorist that was planning the destruction of Israel.
Nixon sent condolences to Egypt for Nasser's passing and acknowledged his role as a significant leader in the Arab world. This gesture eased tensions in the Middle East and Nasser's successor, Anwar Sadat, eventually shifted Egypt's policy towards a more pro-Western and pro-American stance. The outcome of Nixon's condolence was positively significant.
Richard Nixon had established a friendship with Nasser right from the moment Nixon won the presidency. So, are you trying to say Biden had a warm relationship with Ebrahim Raisi? a scumbag who murdered hundreds of US soldiers. You need to stop justifying all of Biden's fuckups. He is the most incompetent foreign policy designer in history.
So there is that thought as support for what I've cited for you to consider, again, not pissing upwind.
 
Standard operating procedures. You really need medical attention there Pinocchio!
Yes the raid followed the SOP's of the FBI.
There is absolutely nothing routine about raiding an ex-president's resident,
True, the FBI hasn't really had to do that before.Then again no President before has failed to hand over documents that should not be in their posession before.
it's never happened before. Garland authorizing the raid is one of the most irresponsible actions that a fucking AG could do. Garland like you is mentally unstable, suffer from extreme TDS to the point that you both should be medically evaluated for psychosis.
Who's the loose cannon here? Garland or you....damn I wish the poll feature still existed.
Sending armed FBI agents against armed SS agents protecting the an x-president where the potential of loss of life due to a gun battle between law enforcement officials.
SOP...and they also co-ordinated the raid with the SS,imagine that.
It's standard operating procedures when dealing with the potential for violence like drug dealers or violent criminals.
Oh so you're saying the FBI goes around unarmed while on duty? I'd think their Union might say something about that.
You've lost all your marbles. Your hatred for Trump put's you in the mentally disturbed category along with smokingfap, Adrina, BnF2.
Yes, everyone who disagrees with you by pointing out reality, has a hatred of Trump....nice to see you follow emotions instead of facts.
I'm glad you're not in the military today, you're seriously detached from reality and should never again be in possession of a firearm.
I'm glad you're not in the military either, there is no way you'd be an effective soldier....imagine you serving with Biden as Commander in Chief...TFF
 
Yes the raid followed the SOP's of the FBI.

True, the FBI hasn't really had to do that before.Then again no President before has failed to hand over documents that should not be in their posession before.

Who's the loose cannon here? Garland or you....damn I wish the poll feature still existed.

SOP...and they also co-ordinated the raid with the SS,imagine that.

Oh so you're saying the FBI goes around unarmed while on duty? I'd think their Union might say something about that.

Yes, everyone who disagrees with you by pointing out reality, has a hatred of Trump....nice to see you follow emotions instead of facts.

I'm glad you're not in the military either, there is no way you'd be an effective soldier....imagine you serving with Biden as Commander in Chief...TFF
Their narrative will be destroyed when they see that force was authorized for the Biden and Pence raids as well.

Oh wait....they cooperated.
 
Standard operating procedures. You really need medical attention there Pinocchio!

There is absolutely nothing routine about raiding an ex-president's resident, it's never happened before. Garland authorizing the raid is one of the most irresponsible actions that a fucking AG could do. Garland like you is mentally unstable, suffer from extreme TDS to the point that you both should be medically evaluated for psychosis. Sending armed FBI agents against armed SS agents protecting the an x-president where the potential of loss of life due to a gun battle between law enforcement officials.

It's standard operating procedures when dealing with the potential for violence like drug dealers or violent criminals. You've lost all your marbles. Your hatred for Trump put's you in the mentally disturbed category along with smokingfap, Adrina, BnF2. I'm glad you're not in the military today, you're seriously detached from reality and should never again be in possession of a firearm.
Garland verified that the exact same guidelines and restrictions were in place when the FBI searched Biden's house, as well. So go fuck yourself, douchebag.
 
Their narrative will be destroyed when they see that force was authorized for the Biden and Pence raids as well.

Oh wait....they cooperated.
Actually, the same, standard MO was used in those searches, as well, even though those two rational, responsible adults cooperated and complied.

So Biden was obviously trying to have Mike Pence and himself assassinated, as well.
 
Their narrative will be destroyed when they see that force was authorized for the Biden and Pence raids as well.

Oh wait....they cooperated.
They didn't even draw up a warrant for the Biden search.
 
Garland verified that the exact same guidelines and restrictions were in place when the FBI searched Biden's house, as well. So go fuck yourself, douchebag.

It's the drama. They make mountains out of molehills and freak out at the least little thing.

Note: He never addressed any of the ongoing discussion from yesterday. Even though he will continue to insist on his failed narrative.
 
I'll gladly engage in any discussions, unfortunately it always breaks down into name calling, insulting family members or strings of ad-hom remarks.

Standard operating procedures. You really need medical attention there Pinocchio!

There is absolutely nothing routine about raiding an ex-president's resident, it's never happened before. Garland authorizing the raid is one of the most irresponsible actions that a fucking AG could do. Garland like you is mentally unstable, suffer from extreme TDS to the point that you both should be medically evaluated for psychosis. Sending armed FBI agents against armed SS agents protecting the an x-president where the potential of loss of life due to a gun battle between law enforcement officials.

It's standard operating procedures when dealing with the potential for violence like drug dealers or violent criminals. You've lost all your marbles. Your hatred for Trump put's you in the mentally disturbed category along with smokingfap, Adrina, BnF2. I'm glad you're not in the military today, you're seriously detached from reality and should never again be in possession of a firearm.
Shurely shome mishtake!
 
Standard operating procedures. You really need medical attention there Pinocchio!

There is absolutely nothing routine about raiding an ex-president's resident, it's never happened before.
No ex-president has ever stolen and refused to return classified documents before, tard.
...you're seriously detached from reality and should never again be in possession of a firearm.
Wouldn't that be an infringement upon his inalienable Second Amendment rights? Sheesh! You people sure are selective about who deserves rights and who doesn't.
 
  • requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;
  • prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;
  • limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;
  • S that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;
  • expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;
  • authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;
  • prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;
  • authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;
  • imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and
  • requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.
  • . H.R. 2 would limit the ability of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide parole to aliens (non-U.S. nationals), which allows them to temporarily enter the United States, in part by defining the reasons for which that parole may be granted.
I actually agree with many of the provisions of that bill, but there are some sticking points that would cause me to vote against it, or at least amend it, if I were in Congress. I also don't see anything about adding border patrol officers, or administrators to facilitate the adjudication of asylum seekers, both of which I feel would be critical to improved immigration management. Perhaps you just didn't copy and paste those bullet points?
 
Back
Top