Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

[adrina]

One thing about Garland he's setting quite a few new precedents, and not very good ones. Not relevant.

And democrats are falling all over themselves competing for who can put the biggest hickey on Biden's ass. False

Because border agents suffered at the hands of Biden's incompetent border policy. They were overwhelmed for 3 years with no relief. Frustrated they believed any bill was better than what they were exposed to for the last three years. Biden got border patrol to cry uncle. False. They didn't support HR2. Why not? They support the bipartisan senate bill. Why?

You're delusional. Trump's wait in Mexico policy was very effective to stemming the flow. There is a reason why border control garners the highest numbers. Delusional? You're the dumbshit that thinks Trump won in 2020.

It was easier to copy and paste, I agree with everything senator Lee pointed out. Yes we know you have no original thoughts or analysis. That's what being a mouthpiece for propaganda is.

City mayors are being overrun by migrants who don't belong here. Budgets are being blown out of the water. Biden is an incompetent fool and is going to lose the election primarily over his border policy if he doesn't get us involved in WWIII More bullshit essentially

Look traitor, I'll ask one more time: why did border patrol support the bipartisan senate legislation and not HR2?

Do you think you can answer that? I don't think you can.

 

[SmokingFap]

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. Defamation carries consequences.

Being a public figure means that in addition to the defamation (which is per se in this case) he also has to prove malice on your part. Not too hard to do given your posting history and content.

Enjoy hanging on to the end of that thin branch all by yourself.

The funny thing about defamation is that it doesn't apply when the claims are true. Mine are. But for it to ever even be an issue, Ol' Diaper Donnie would have to prove, or at least, allege damages. Good luck with that one. And Ol' Babydoll Hands is the only one who would have standing in such a case. Meaning servile little ball-garglers like you can't touch me. Choke on that.

By the way, what did you hear back when you "reported" me, douchenozzle? Crickets, apparently. Maybe the good folks at Lit think you deserve a good ass-kicking, too.

I'm happily perched on a very sturdy limb. So keep it coming, you sheep-fucking failed abortion.

 

[icanhelp1]

Look traitor, I'll ask one more time: why did border patrol support the bipartisan senate legislation and not HR2?

Do you think you can answer that? I don't think you can.

I told YOU!!! it was better than nothing.

 

[adrina]

I told YOU!!! it was better than nothing.

No you didn't.

They could have endorsed HR2. Why didn't they?

Why did they specifically endorse the bipartisan senate bill?

My bet is that you will regurgitate the same bullshit as always traitor. Care to choose a different path?

 

[icanhelp1]

No you didn't.

They could have endorsed HR2. Why didn't they?

Why did they specifically endorse the bipartisan senate bill?

My bet is that you will regurgitate the same bullshit as always traitor. Care to choose a different path?

I haven't seen any opinions one way or the other on HR-2 and border patrol.

 

[adrina]

I haven't seen any opinions one way or the other on HR-2 and border patrol.

So, again, the border patrol union went out of their way to specifically endorse the senate bill. HR2 was out and going concurrently. The border patrol did not endorse HR2.

Why do you think the experts, the people who deal with immigration every single day, the people who are in charge of border security essentially, endorsed the bipartisan senate bill but not HR2?

They could have. They didn't. They specifically endorsed one but not the other.

Why do you think you know more than them? Why did they endorse one but not the other?

 

[SmokingFap]

So, again, the border patrol union went out of their way to specifically endorse the senate bill. HR2 was out and going concurrently. The border patrol did not endorse HR2.

Why do you think the experts, the people who deal with immigration every single day, the people who are in charge of border security essentially, endorsed the bipartisan senate bill but not HR2?

They could have. They didn't. They specifically endorsed one but not the other.

Why do you think you know more than them? Why did they endorse one but not the other?

You're tilting at windmills, Adrina. None of these MAGA tards will ever concede a point. The only purpose for their pathetic existences is to try to own the libs. Sad.

 

[adrina]

You're tilting at windmills, Adrina. None of these MAGA tards will ever concede a point. The only purpose for their pathetic existences is to try to own the libs. Sad.

Agreed. However sometimes I feel like sharpening my nails.

 

[Bn2f]

All the democrats can do is yell anti Trump rhetoric, they have absolutely nothing to actually offer themselves to the American people.

They've demonstrated their failed vision to the nation these last three and a half years. They have nothing but continued failure to offer.

Haha!
There’s a whole thread dedicated to Biden and democratic accomplishments. I suggest yall educate yallselves, fools.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/thanks-biden.1556933/

 

[Bn2f]

Agreed. However sometimes I feel like sharpening my nails.

Warms my heart that you’ve repeatedly been calling him a traitor in your posts and the traitor, like the disgrace of a traitor he is, just accepts and carries on.

IMO the whole lot of House Republicans are seditious traitors for crapping on their oath of office and turning their backs on legislation all because a private citizen influenced them. That’s basically what happened and the hurtful truth none of the derps here will acknowledge.

 

[adrina]

Warms my heart that you’ve repeatedly been calling him a traitor in your posts and the traitor, like the disgrace of a traitor he is, just accepts and carries on.

IMO the whole lot of House Republicans are seditious traitors for crapping on their oath of office and turning their backs on legislation all because a private citizen influenced them. That’s basically what happened and the hurtful truth none of the derps here will acknowledge.

Supporting Trump is being a traitor.

He supports suspending the constitution. He openly puts US policy for sale to the highest bidder. He actively sows division with his lies about the election and his open hatred of democrats.

And that's just a partial list.

A person can be a patriot. A person can be a trumper. But they can't be both.

 

[icanhelp1]

So, again, the border patrol union went out of their way to specifically endorse the senate bill. HR2 was out and going concurrently. The border patrol did not endorse HR2.

Why do you think the experts, the people who deal with immigration every single day, the people who are in charge of border security essentially, endorsed the bipartisan senate bill but not HR2?

They could have. They didn't. They specifically endorsed one but not the other.

Why do you think you know more than them? Why did they endorse one but not the other?

Not exactly a full throated support for the bill. If you read between the lines the caveat to Judd's support for the bill is this senate bill preps the landscape for what he believes will happen if Trump wins the election. Like I wrote earlier, the bill was better than nothing at all.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/newsnation-now/national-border-patrol-council-immigration-bill/

“This border security bill doesn’t end everything,” Judd said. “But if Trump came into office, he could then give us the rest of what we need, and that’s the reason why we support him because we know that he is going to do what’s necessary to absolutely secure the border (and) protect the American people.”

"The package would streamline the adjudication of asylum claims and allow the president to shut down the border if daily crossings average more than 4,000, NewsNation partner The Hill reported. The package calls for 100 additional immigration judges, 4,300 new asylum officers and added border staff."

The bill, however, doesn’t appear likely to move forward.

 

[Bn2f]

Supporting Trump is being a traitor.

He supports suspending the constitution. He openly puts US policy for sale to the highest bidder. He actively sows division with his lies about the election and his open hatred of democrats.

And that's just a partial list.

A person can be a patriot. A person can be a trumper. But they can't be both.

May I add true Christian as well. Can’t be that and be a trumper too.

 

[adrina]

Not exactly a full throated support for the bill. If you read between the lines the caveat to Judd's support for the bill is this senate bill preps the landscape for what he believes will happen if Trump wins the election. Like I wrote earlier, the bill was better than nothing at all.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/newsnation

Not exactly a full throated support for the bill. If you read between the lines the caveat to Judd's support for the bill is this senate bill preps the landscape for what he believes will happen if Trump wins the election. Like I wrote earlier, the bill was better than nothing at all.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/newsnation-now/national-border-patrol-council-immigration-bill/

“This border security bill doesn’t end everything,” Judd said. “But if Trump came into office, he could then give us the rest of what we need, and that’s the reason why we support him because we know that he is going to do what’s necessary to absolutely secure the border (and) protect the American people.”

"The package would streamline the adjudication of asylum claims and allow the president to shut down the border if daily crossings average more than 4,000, NewsNation partner The Hill reported. The package calls for 100 additional immigration judges, 4,300 new asylum officers and added border staff."

The bill, however, doesn’t appear likely to move forward.

-now/national-border-patrol-council-immigration-bill/

“This border security bill doesn’t end everything,” Judd said. “But if Trump came into office, he could then give us the rest of what we need, and that’s the reason why we support him because we know that he is going to do what’s necessary to absolutely secure the border (and) protect the American people.”

"The package would streamline the adjudication of asylum claims and allow the president to shut down the border if daily crossings average more than 4,000, NewsNation partner The Hill reported. The package calls for 100 additional immigration judges, 4,300 new asylum officers and added border staff."

The bill, however, doesn’t appear likely to move forward.

Yet, again, no endorsement of HR2. Full-throated, semi-throated or even watered down.

They had ample opportunity to endorse HR2. They chose the bipartisan senate bill.

Again traitor, why do you think you know better than border patrol?

 

[icanhelp1]

Supporting Trump is being a traitor.

He supports suspending the constitution. He openly puts US policy for sale to the highest bidder.

That's exactly what Biden is doing. Typical leftist projection. He doesn't support suspending the constitution.

He actively sows division with his lies about the election and his open hatred of democrats.

And yet Biden rails against 80 million Americans daily.

And that's just a partial list.

You're list is a conglomeration of nothingness. Quite comical. I enjoy your post, they're entertaining.

A person can be a patriot. A person can be a trumper. But they can't be both.

Yes they can. It appears Trumpers are smarter then the looney left.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yet, again, no endorsement of HR2. Full-throated, semi-throated or even watered down.

They had ample opportunity to endorse HR2. They chose the bipartisan senate bill.

Again traitor, why do you think you know better than border patrol?

Cite where Brandon Judd didn't support HR-2.

 

[adrina]

That's exactly what Biden is doing. Typical leftist projection. He doesn't support suspending the constitution.

And yet Biden rails against 80 million Americans daily.

You're list is a conglomeration of nothingness. Quite comical. I enjoy your post, they're entertaining.

Yes they can. It appears Trumpers are smarter then the looney left.

No he's not.

No he doesn't.

No it isn't.

No they can't and no they aren't.

Feel free to list your examples.

 

[adrina]

Cite where Brandon Judd didn't support HR-2.

It's hard to find something that doesn't exist.

Have you found the golden throated bobble wobble? I hear their red feathers have purple tips this time of year. Prove it doesn't exist.

Again traitor, why didn't border patrol support HR2 and why do you think you know more than border patrol?

 

[icanhelp1]

No he's not.

No he doesn't.

No it isn't.

No they can't and no they aren't.

Feel free to list your examples.

Yes he is!

Yes he does!

Yes it is!

Yes they can and yes they're more patriotic than you and your weasel leftist.

 

[adrina]

Yes he is!

Yes he does!

Yes it is!

Yes they can and yes they're more patriotic than you and your weasel leftist.

Again, feel free to show examples traitor.

I thought the Trumpers wearing "better Russian than democrat" Ts were pretty patriotic. How about you traitor?

You simply denying it without substance is less valuable than Trump's copious flatulence.

 

[icanhelp1]

It's hard to find something that doesn't exist.

Have you found the golden throated bobble wobble? I hear their red feathers have purple tips this time of year. Prove it doesn't exist.

Again traitor, why didn't border patrol support HR2 and why do you think you know more than border patrol?

Perhaps you should view this video or read the narrative. He blast Biden for his border policy. He supports my argument in that the senate bill is better than nothing at all. As far as behind the scenes I have no evidence that Judd did or didn't support HR-2. HR-2 being a more comprehensive bill I find it hard to believe he wouldn't support that bill also.

https://www.mediamatters.org/immigr...-judd-fox-republicans-are-against-border-bill

 

[adrina]

Perhaps you should view this video or read the narrative. He blast Biden for his border policy. He supports my argument in that the senate bill is better than nothing at all. As far as behind the scenes I have no evidence that Judd did or didn't support HR-2. HR-2 being a more comprehensive bill I find it hard to believe he wouldn't support that bill also.

https://www.mediamatters.org/immigr...-judd-fox-republicans-are-against-border-bill

Well that's pretty simple then. Find Judd endorsing the bill.

In fact I'll even help: Google Fu

In the meantime, why do you think you know better than the border patrol traitor? They openly put their endorsement out there for the bipartisan senate bill. Yet trying to find one for HR2 doesn't seem to be successful.

So, traitor, why did the border patrol openly endorsed one but not the other?

 

[Bn2f]

Google Fu.

 

[adrina]

 

[adrina]

Perhaps you should view this video or read the narrative. He blast Biden for his border policy. He supports my argument in that the senate bill is better than nothing at all. As far as behind the scenes I have no evidence that Judd did or didn't support HR-2. HR-2 being a more comprehensive bill I find it hard to believe he wouldn't support that bill also.

https://www.mediamatters.org/immigr...-judd-fox-republicans-are-against-border-bill

Here, traitor:

Failed border bill would have stopped migrants from ‘gaming the system,’ Border Patrol union president says​

https://www.deseret.com/2024/2/8/24065231/border-patrol-union-president-brandon-judd-mitt-romney/

Why did the Border Patrol endorse the Senate’s immigration deal?​

The Senate bill would have gotten to the root of one of the core problems behind the system’s dysfunction, Judd said, by eliminating the ability of, and incentive for, anyone crossing the border to claim asylum and stay in the country with the expectation of getting lost in judicial backlog while awaiting a distant court date.

The bill would only allow asylum claims at official ports of entry and would grant Border Patrol agents new authority to conduct “credible fear” interviews at the border to determine whether someone qualifies for further legal steps. The bar for passing such interviews, and being granted entrance into the United States, would also be “raised exponentially” to levels Trump attempted to implement with his policies, according to Judd.

“So this law increases the threshold for credible fear to what President Trump wanted; that is a huge deal because that stops the gaming of this system,” Judd said. “And that’s the reason why we’re in this problem in the first place is because so many people can game the system.”

The bill would end the Biden administration’s use of prosecutorial discretion in deciding whether to apply Title 8 deportation proceedings to all those who fail to meet asylum criteria, Judd said, and would also include funding for more deportation flights.

^^ it's a straight copy and paste job so you should be able to understand it.

He actually addresses many of your criticisms (pardon, Mike Lee's criticisms) below what I pasted. Doubt you'll read it traitor. It proves just about everything you said wrong.