Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

[icanhelp1]

Yes that's HR2.

In your usual fashion you did not process what was being asked of you. I asked you to take apart the Senate bill which is favored by the border agents. You continue to blather on about the partisan HR2 DOA bill.

Catch up baby tomato.

I told you I did break down the senate bill and pointed out what I disliked about it. I never wrote that the whole bill had no merit, just that the cons outweighed pros.

First Biden and democrats created the worst border crisis in our history and they own it. It's ironic that Schumer is bringing it up the failed bill for a vote again. This time there is no republican support for the bill. This is slimebag Schumer's attempt to blame republicans for the mess at the border and point the finger at republicans as not being interested in border security. Anyone with a brain could see right through that political diarrhea, so that leaves you out.

Senate republicans are right now in agreement that the senate bill is not tough enough.

The senate bill would provide a path to citizenship for illegals. poison pill. Not fair for those immigrants that did it the right way.

No border wall no bill.

Is not specific enough on parole regulations, still gives to much authority to the executive branch and DHS to abuse parole.

It funds more border patrol agents but to assist in processing illegals not patrolling in between points of entry.

Then there's this:

https://www.lee.senate.gov/2024/2/s...irty-dozen-disasters-in-so-called-border-deal.

 

[ll74]

Senate republicans are right now in agreement that the senate bill is not tough enough.

They are not in agreement about the toughness of the bill. They are in agreement that 45 doesn't want it passed and will do his bidding.

The senate bill would provide a path to citizenship for illegals. poison pill. Not fair for those immigrants that did it the right way.

There is no path to citizenship in the Senate bill.

 

[Rotadom]

 

[icanhelp1]

https://www.lee.senate.gov/2024/2/s...irty-dozen-disasters-in-so-called-border-deal.

1. CODIFIES CATCH AND RELEASE: Gives the Secretary of Homeland Security unchecked authority to release an alien into the United States under ineffective “alternatives to detention.” The illegals only have to express “credible fear” of persecution or the intent to apply for “protection determination.” (SEC. 235B)

1. ALLOWS UP TO 1.8 MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS TO ENTER BEFORE TEMPORARILY CLOSING PARTS OF THE BORDER: The Secretary of Homeland Security is only required to shut down the border if there are 5,000 average illegal crossings over a consecutive seven-day period or 8,500 in a single day. The Secretary may shut down the border if crossings are at 4,000 daily average over a consecutive seven-day period. Even during a border emergency, this bill requires the administration to process a minimum of 1,400 illegal immigrants a day. This is 400 more per day than Obama’s DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said constituted a crisis in 2019. (SEC. 244B)

1. LOOPHOLES: Does not count any unaccompanied alien children from non-contiguous countries, suspected trafficking victims, aliens who are determined “exempted” based on decisions by ICE, or aliens who meet screening criteria for asylum. Also allows the reopening of the border once encounters are at 75% of the number that caused the shut down, so if the number was 10,000 per day, it only has to be reduced to 7,500/day to reopen.

1. LIMITED DURATION: Limits the number of days each year where authority to shut down the border can be in place: 270 days in first calendar year, 225 days in the second year and 180 days in the third year. The period that this “border shutdown” is mandatory decreases – in year one, the first 90 days are mandatory; in year two, the first 75 days are mandatory; and in year three, only the first 60 days are mandatory.

1. PRESIDENTIAL DISCRETION: Allows the president to reopen the border any time it is in the “national interest to temporarily suspend the border emergency authority” for up to 45 days.

1. FUNDS SANCTUARY CITIES AND NGOs SENDING ILLEGALS AROUND THE COUNTRY: Includes $1.4 BILLION for more FEMA grants to NGOs that provide shelter, transportation, legal advice and other services to illegal aliens and $2.3 BILLION to HHS for Refugee Entrant And Assistance, a slush fund for services to unaccompanied alien children.

1. SUBSIDIZES FREE, TAXPAYER-FUNDED LEGAL COUNSEL TO ILLEGAL ALIENS: Orders the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ensure that “all unaccompanied alien children who are or have been in the custody of the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Secretary of Homeland Security…have counsel to represent them in legal proceedings” and free legal counsel for any illegal alien who a judge determines is mentally “incompetent.” Mandates that the government provide legal counsel for UACs 13 years old and under. (SEC. 3512-3513)

1. EXPANDS PAROLE INSTEAD OF LIMITING IT: Does nothing to meaningfully limit President Biden’s abuse of parole. The language makes a fake exemption that seems to sanction Mayorkas' current abuse of parole. Under this bill, Mayorkas can parole in all these groups with the implicit approval of Congress. It also creates a dangerous EXPANSION of parole by saying it can now be granted for anyone the DHS Secretary determines has an “urgent humanitarian reason” to stay and any “culturally important purpose warranting the alien’s presence in the United States on Tribal land located at or near an international land border.” (SEC. 3146)

1. INCREASES GREEN CARDS BY 50,000 PER YEAR FOR FIVE YEARS: This includes 32,000 family-based green cards and 18,000 employment-based green cards. Hurts American workers by importing cheap foreign labor. (SEC. 3402)

1. WORK PERMIT FOR ADULT CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS: Hurts American workers by providing indefinite work permits to an estimated 250,000 adult children of H-1B nonimmigrant visa holders who will be competing for jobs with recent college graduates. (SEC. 3403)

1. IMMEDIATE WORK PERMITS TO EVERY ILLEGAL RELEASED FROM CUSTODY AFTER THEY PASS AN INITIAL SCREENING: Current law requires a 6 months waiting period after filing an asylum claim before you can apply for a work permit. Under this bill, applicants are granted an IMMEDIATE work permit if they pass the initial asylum credible fear screening. (SEC. 235C)

1. NOTHING TO DEPORT ILLEGALS: Does not require the President or Secretary of Homeland Security to deport anyone.

1. AFGHAN ADJUSTMENT ACT: Creates a pathway to citizenship for over 60,000 poorly vetted Afghans who were brought to the country due to President Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. (SEC. 331)

1. WEAKENS ASYLUM SCREENING BY CODIFYING BIDEN POLICY: Codifies the Biden asylum officer regulation and empowers USCIS asylum officers to grant asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture without review by an Immigration Judge, ensuring significantly higher approval rates. (SEC. 3141)

1. NO IMMEDIATE FUNDING FOR THE WALL: The bill claims to give $650 million for “building the border wall.” This is a budgeting gimmick without any new money. The bill would simply rescind current money and then put it back in with a later date (FY2028) so that President Biden and Sec. Mayorkas don’t have to build any wall and can delay spending money on the border wall. (SEC. 205)

 

[icanhelp1]

They are not in agreement about the toughness of the bill. They are in agreement that 45 doesn't want it passed and will do his bidding.


There is no path to citizenship in the Senate bill.

I stand

You're correct, I meant to edit that statement, there is at this time no path to citizenship as the bill stands now.

 

[jomar]

Why because she's making Smith follow the law, because she exposed the FBI plan to use deadly force against Donald Trump and his USS security detail, or because she exposed the fact that Jack Smith had himself mishandled and tampered with classified documents and evidence?

No, because she’s slow walking things which is a trump delay MO

 

[ll74]

You're correct, I meant to edit that statement, there is at this time no path to citizenship as the bill stands now.

That is the only bill negotiated and agreed upon by a bipartisan group of Senators. There is no other bill being considered that would provide a path to citizenship..

 

[SmokingFap]

I will call it what the jury said it was unless and until the appeals court overturns the verdict. YOU can unlawfully defame Trump all on your own.

Freedom of speech, fuckwad. He's a public figure who has been found liable if sexual assault, at a minimum. The judge in the case and I both call it rape. So suck it.

 

[SmokingFap]

Why because she's making Smith follow the law, because she exposed the FBI plan to use deadly force against Donald Trump and his USS security detail, or because she exposed the fact that Jack Smith had himself mishandled and tampered with classified documents and evidence?

You're funny.

 

[SmokingFap]

Only in your convoluted mind. The left-wing fact-checkers at Newsweek I linked say otherwise. Wiki is not a reliable source.

And NEWSWEEK, the epitome of the lamestream media, is credible? I guess only if you think it supports your fake reality.

 

[Rightguide]

And NEWSWEEK, the epitome of the lamestream media, is credible? I guess only if you think it supports your fake reality.

It is a leftwing source.

 

[Rightguide]

You're funny.

...and correct as well.

 

[SmokingFap]

It is a leftwing source.

So aren't they LYING? You posted a lefty lie?

 

[SmokingFap]

...and correct as well.

In your own private alternative reality bubble.

 

[Rightguide]

In your own private alternative reality bubble.

You have yet to prove me wrong, butt squeak.

 

[Rightguide]

Democrats’ lawfare campaign against Trump backfires​

ByJ.T. Young

May 23, 2024 11:43 am
.
https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php...ats-lawfare-campaign-against-trump-backfires/
Lately, Democrats’ lawfare campaign against former President Donald Trump hasn’t just gone nowhere; it’s gone backward.
At least, that’s the verdict since Trump’s hush-money trial in New York began. And it comes as President Joe Biden’s campaign has made a concerted effort to ramp up their candidate’s exposure — to no avail.

Together, these raise the question as to what else Democrats can do if their strategy of driving down Trump continues to fail to gain traction.
It is hard to track all the court cases Democrats have triggered for the former president. Democrat prosecutors have brought four criminal cases against him, there have been two civil cases, and Colorado’s attempt to bar Trump from the ballot prompted another court case by Trump to gain ballot access.

In contrast, Trump’s polling numbers during this litigation are easy to assess. While they fell through the spring, since the New York case regarding the claim that Trump paid “hush money” to pornographic film star Stormy Daniels has gone to trial, Trump’s numbers have gone up.

According to Real Clear Politics’ averaging of national polls, on Jan. 1, Trump led Biden by 2.3 percentage points (46.6-44.3%) in a two-way race, by 5 percentage points (40.6-35.6%) in a five-way race, and by 3.7 percentage points (46.8-43.1%) in the battleground states.

More here: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ats-lawfare-campaign-against-trump-backfires/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ts-lawfare-campaign-against-trump-backfires/#

https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=...ats-lawfare-campaign-against-trump-backfires/
https://www.linkedin.com/shareArtic...ats’+lawfare+campaign+against+Trump+backfires

 

[TastySuckToy]

Democrats’ lawfare campaign against Trump backfires​

All the democrats can do is yell anti Trump rhetoric, they have absolutely nothing to actually offer themselves to the American people.

 

[Rightguide]

All the democrats can do is yell anti Trump rhetoric, they have absolutely nothing to actually offer themselves to the American people.

They've demonstrated their failed vision to the nation these last three and a half years. They have nothing but continued failure to offer.

 

[adrina]

I told you I did break down the senate bill and pointed out what I disliked about it. I never wrote that the whole bill had no merit, just that the cons outweighed pros.

First Biden and democrats created the worst border crisis in our history and they own it. It's ironic that Schumer is bringing it up the failed bill for a vote again. This time there is no republican support for the bill. This is slimebag Schumer's attempt to blame republicans for the mess at the border and point the finger at republicans as not being interested in border security. Anyone with a brain could see right through that political diarrhea, so that leaves you out.

Senate republicans are right now in agreement that the senate bill is not tough enough.

The senate bill would provide a path to citizenship for illegals. poison pill. Not fair for those immigrants that did it the right way.

No border wall no bill.

Is not specific enough on parole regulations, still gives to much authority to the executive branch and DHS to abuse parole.

It funds more border patrol agents but to assist in processing illegals not patrolling in between points of entry.

Then there's this:

https://www.lee.senate.gov/2024/2/s...irty-dozen-disasters-in-so-called-border-deal.

No. I'm not searching for any analysis in the past. Especially since it's likely to be a copy and paste job. If you want to post it here groovy. But no you haven't.

No the Biden administration and the Democrats did not create the worst board of crisis ever. This is just more of the same over the top drama that you always engage in.

No, the Senate Republicans are in agreement that they must supplicate to Donald Trump. And they bent the knee and killed the bill because he wanted to exploit your hysteria. And those like you.

Again, Trump did not lower illegal immigration. At all. Ever. The reality is if you don't manage immigration then immigration will manage you. We have people that seek to come to this country through multiple channels. Always saying no isn't practical or good for america.

Mike Lee thinks Trump won 2020.

Also you essentially just copied and pasted his list from his website. This isn't your work, this is just you being a mouthpiece for propaganda.

Now again, why do you think the border agents and agency supported the bipartisan Senate bill but not HR2?

 

[icanhelp1]

No, because she’s slow walking things which is a trump delay MO

One thing about Garland he's setting quite a few new precedents, and not very good ones.

No. I'm not searching for any analysis in the past. Especially since it's likely to be a copy and paste job. If you want to post it here groovy. But no you haven't.

No the Biden administration and the Democrats did not create the worst board of crisis ever. This is just more of the same over the top drama that you always engage in.

No, the Senate Republicans are in agreement that they must supplicate to Donald Trump. And they bent the knee and killed the bill because he wanted to exploit your hysteria. And those like you.

And democrats are falling all over themselves competing for who can put the biggest hickey on Biden's ass.

Again, Trump did not lower illegal immigration. At all. Ever. The reality is if you don't manage immigration then immigration will manage you. We have people that seek to come to this country through multiple channels. Always saying no isn't practical or good for america.

Mike Lee thinks Trump won 2020.

Also you essentially just copied and pasted his list from his website. This isn't your work, this is just you being a mouthpiece for propaganda.

Now again, why do you think the border agents and agency supported the bipartisan Senate bill but not HR2?

Because border agents suffered at the hands of Biden's incompetent border policy. They were overwhelmed for 3 years with no relief. Frustrated they believed any bill was better than what they were exposed to for the last three years. Biden got border patrol to cry uncle.

You're delusional. Trump's wait in Mexico policy was very effective to stemming the flow. There is a reason why border control garners the highest numbers.

It was easier to copy and paste, I agree with everything senator Lee pointed out.

City mayors are being overrun by migrants who don't belong here. Budgets are being blown out of the water. Biden is an incompetent fool and is going to lose the election primarily over his border policy if he doesn't get us involved in WWIII

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

They've demonstrated their failed vision to the nation these last three and a half years. They have nothing but continued failure to offer.

4 years ago we were all locked down under curfew when Trump was president.
Things are much better now.

 

[SmokingFap]

All the democrats can do is yell anti Trump rhetoric, they have absolutely nothing to actually offer themselves to the American people.

What do Republicans have to offer, other than blowjobs for Trump?

Oh. Right. More tax cuts for the super rich and profiteering corporations. Great!

 

[HisArpy]

Freedom of speech, fuckwad. He's a public figure who has been found liable if sexual assault, at a minimum. The judge in the case and I both call it rape. So suck it.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. Defamation carries consequences.

Being a public figure means that in addition to the defamation (which is per se in this case) he also has to prove malice on your part. Not too hard to do given your posting history and content.

Enjoy hanging on to the end of that thin branch all by yourself.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Because border agents suffered at the hands of Biden's incompetent border policy. They were overwhelmed for 3 years with no relief. Frustrated they believed any bill was better than what they were exposed to for the last three years. Biden got border patrol to cry uncle.

So by your own words, you state this bill if enacted would be better than the current status quo, but you're against that change. Why? Because you suck Trump's cock just like the rest of RWCJ.

Maybe your pea sized brain might think, "this bill is an improvement" "helps address some problems, if not all" and if Trump gets elected he can write a new bill which will make you feel all the border issues will be address....

 

[HisArpy]

All the democrats can do is yell anti Trump rhetoric, they have absolutely nothing to actually offer themselves to the American people.

The violent rhetoric and vitriol are ramping up because they're scared of what they know is coming.