Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

Twice wrong. Not only wasn't he criminally charged for rape but he wasn't found liable for it either.

You need a new newsfeed. Preferably one that publishes the truth.
You're wrong. The judge said that Trump raped her. Dismissed.
 
I’m sorry it took so long to reply, had to pick myself up off the floor from laughing so hard. You truly are one delusional cream filled cupcake. :D

Again back to derision, the standard trumper fallback, without addressing a single point I made.

Just like you did with HR2 vs the bipartisan senate bill.

You're pathetic.
 
Oh look, someone who always tries to get attention from me showing up in a thread I've been active in and tries to take pot shots getting me to respond. So he can fulfill some weird cuck fantasy.

Sick fuck.
And you call us triggered. ROTFLMFAO
 
Again back to derision, the standard trumper fallback, without addressing a single point I made.

Just like you did with HR2 vs the bipartisan senate bill.

You're pathetic.
I’m not going to continuously repost past postings. Like I’ve written previously the Senate bill codifies into law what’s wrong with present border issues.
 
And you call us triggered. ROTFLMFAO

Yes. You are.

Simply and directly calling you pathetic isn't me being triggered. It's me stating an objective reality.

But again, laugh it off. That's all you trumpers ever do when cornered.
 
I’m not going to continuously repost past postings. Like I’ve written previously the Senate bill codifies into law what’s wrong with present border issues.

No you didn't. Saying it codifies it doesn't say how. Doesn't spell out the specific issues.

Again, border patrol agents and agency endorsed the senate bill but not HR2.

You seem to think you know more than border patrol. Interesting.
 
The JURY said that he didn't. Once that happened that the judge's words are his personal opinion.
The jury didn't say that. They just conceded that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that it was his penis that Trump forced inside her. They did agree that at a MINIMUM, he shoved his fingers inside her. You can just call it sexual assault, but the rest of us will call it rape, and Trump a rapist.
 
The jury didn't say that. They just conceded that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that it was his penis that Trump forced inside her. They did agree that at a MINIMUM, he shoved his fingers inside her. You can just call it sexual assault, but the rest of us will call it rape, and Trump a rapist.
And within days, he will have been judged to be a felon for falsification of business records. So you're supporting an insurrectionist pedophile rapist felon for president.
 
No you didn't. Saying it codifies it doesn't say how. Doesn't spell out the specific issues.

Again, border patrol agents and agency endorsed the senate bill but not HR2.

You seem to think you know more than border patrol. Interesting.
  • requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;
  • prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;
  • limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;
  • S that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;
  • expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;
  • authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;
  • prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;
  • authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;
  • imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and
  • requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.
  • . H.R. 2 would limit the ability of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide parole to aliens (non-U.S. nationals), which allows them to temporarily enter the United States, in part by defining the reasons for which that parole may be granted.
 
  • requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;
  • prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;
  • limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;
  • S that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;
  • expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;
  • authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;
  • prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;
  • authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;
  • imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and
  • requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.
  • . H.R. 2 would limit the ability of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide parole to aliens (non-U.S. nationals), which allows them to temporarily enter the United States, in part by defining the reasons for which that parole may be granted.
Partisan bill that has no chance of passing is partisan.

The Senate bill is being brought to a vote next week.
 
  • requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;
  • prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;
  • limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;
  • S that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;
  • expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;
  • authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;
  • prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;
  • authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;
  • imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and
  • requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.
  • . H.R. 2 would limit the ability of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide parole to aliens (non-U.S. nationals), which allows them to temporarily enter the United States, in part by defining the reasons for which that parole may be granted.
Yes that's HR2.

In your usual fashion you did not process what was being asked of you. I asked you to take apart the Senate bill which is favored by the border agents. You continue to blather on about the partisan HR2 DOA bill.

Catch up baby tomato.
 
The jury didn't say that. They just conceded that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that it was his penis that Trump forced inside her. They did agree that at a MINIMUM, he shoved his fingers inside her. You can just call it sexual assault, but the rest of us will call it rape, and Trump a rapist.


I will call it what the jury said it was unless and until the appeals court overturns the verdict. YOU can unlawfully defame Trump all on your own.
 
Oh, and I guess "reporting" me didn't get the results you were looking for, bitch.


Lol, you had to go and HIDE for a few days because you were so fucking scared of being banned.

Keep it up you little cucky coward. Maybe you'll get bold enough some day to threaten me some more.
 
The judge did clarify after the trial that Trump indeed was found to have "raped" Ms. Carroll.

"Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll's vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm".[143][144] Kaplan affirmed that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common meaning of the word[d] and ruled against altering the award amount."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump#:~:text=Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated,against altering the award amount.

still rape, and Trump will forever be a rapist.

The judge did clarify and affirm that Trump indeed was found to have "raped" Ms. Carroll.



"Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll's vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm".[143][144] Kaplan affirmed that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common meaning of the word and ruled against altering the award amount."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump#:~:text=Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated,against altering the award amount.

So it was indeed rape, and Trump will forever be a rapist.
Only in your convoluted mind. The left-wing fact-checkers at Newsweek I linked say otherwise. Wiki is not a reliable source.
 
I agree, Judge Cannon is very biased.
Why because she's making Smith follow the law, because she exposed the FBI plan to use deadly force against Donald Trump and his USS security detail, or because she exposed the fact that Jack Smith had himself mishandled and tampered with classified documents and evidence?
 
Back
Top