Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

[Rightguide]

Scam and being rigged seems like cultish terminology. So does the contents of the article I sourced for background info.

This results in men crossing the oceans to find virgins that accept male domination in exchange for sexual services and creating offspring. That's man's latest fascination for this group of sexual isolationists?

When they arrive overseas, what are they looking for? The same racial traits, mental capacity, healthy genes, and subservient women traits? Do they expect their new women to come to America and not receive the gift of citizenship and its entitlements as a result?

From what I read in that article those men eventually aspire to be a male collective without female associations. That's contrary to human nature and certainly would lead to extinction.

If you are within that sphere of reasoning, that's not a healthy mental state of being.

All most successful men want are feminine women who are not masculine and who can accept the role of wife and mother and his role as sole protector and provider. That does mean a virgin who is not beholding to two other baby daddies and or their offspring. If women in this country want to sell their bodies on TikTok, fuck every man they can, or have multiple men on standby hookup schedules, I'm fine with it. It's there life. But if they expect to marry any successful men after sharing their wombs with countless men, and having children out of wedlock any man worth his salt is going to consider that a deal breaker. That's all I'm saying. I'm not saying women have to change their behavior if they don't want to. All I'm saying is, that behavior has its costs if they want to get married.

 

[Rightguide]

Scam and being rigged seems like cultish terminology. So does the contents of the article I sourced for background info.

This results in men crossing the oceans to find virgins that accept male domination in exchange for sexual services and creating offspring. That's man's latest fascination for this group of sexual isolationists?

When they arrive overseas, what are they looking for? The same racial traits, mental capacity, healthy genes, and subservient women traits? Do they expect their new women to come to America and not receive the gift of citizenship and its entitlements as a result?

From what I read in that article those men eventually aspire to be a male collective without female associations. That's contrary to human nature and certainly would lead to extinction.

If you are within that sphere of reasoning, that's not a healthy mental state of being.

Well there is this search result:

• As of 2022, approximately 46.8% of households had married couples2.

So more than half of said households are not married. That's not to say there aren't a load of bastard children running around. So society can move forward in a more corrupted fashion.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

That is far from the truth, very far. I support and admire all the women in my life and many accomplished women who are not.

number of women in life = 0

I care because what they say poisons the minds of so many young women to the detriment of the country and harms the numbers and availability of good feminine women suitable for marriage to American men.

likes the 1950's version of a woman....

 

[Fuzzy1975]

All most successful men want are feminine women who are not masculine and who can accept the role of wife and mother and his role as sole protector and provider.

Sorry wrongway, but you don't get to speak for all successful men. Own your desire, don't try and pass it on to others...

 

[ll74]

The truth is you're a programmed liar.

You hate women.

My worldview is today's worldview.

Your worldview is that you hate today's factual worldview.

 

[icanhelp1]

Well there is this search result:

• As of 2022, approximately 46.8% of households had married couples2.

So more than half of said households are not married. That's not to say there aren't a load of bastard children running around. So society can move forward in a more corrupted fashion.

Costello adds a new wrinkle to the Bragg case. I wonder if holding back exculpatory evidence is illegal

 

[RoryN]

we will go elsewhere in search of good women to marry. They exist everywhere outside the US.

^^^
The last guy I heard say something similar was on television, looking for a Russian bride. He had an enormous gut that his button-down shirt could not contain, he was a gigantic dork, and he talked like Kermit the Frog.

Eventually, he found a woman who was willing to use him. She looked physically ill whenever she glanced at him.

That's you on a good day, Reichguide.

 

[Rightguide]

Depends upon your perception of society and how it operates. If you accept that men have the monopoly of power and force in society, then they bear the lion's share of responsibility of how society is. If you let your kid loose throughout your house and they trash the place while you sit there and watch, there's arguably some limit to how much blame you put on the kid.

Women may seem to have the reins of power in a lot of ways, but that's only because men handed them over and haven't taken them back.

For better or worse the feminist movement has driven a wedge between men and women and the institution of traditional marriage. What that portends for society going forward is defined by the declining marriage rates in the US. For instance:

1. Never Married: About 47% of Black women have never been married. This is a big difference when compared to all women in America, of whom only 31% have never been married.
2. Currently Married: Only 26% of Black women are currently married. This is quite different from all women in America, where 47% are currently married.
3. Separated or Divorced:
   • Separated: Black women are slightly more likely to be separated from their spouses, with a rate of 3%, compared to 2% for all women.
   • Divorced: The rates are closer when it comes to being divorced. About 13% of Black women are divorced, which is just a bit higher than the 12% rate for all women.

https://blackdemographics.com/population/black-women-statistics/

BTW we can see when this all began to change to where they are today:

https://blackdemographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Black-Women-Historical-Marriage-1890-to-2010.jpg

Right about the time the feminist movement was in full throttle and the big federal welfare programs began to kick in and many black women were forced to marry the government and drive the men out of their homes. Until then black women married at a higher rate than white women: https://blackdemographics.com/population/black-women-statistics/

If you're interested about who started this site, go here:

https://blackdemographics.com/contact-me/

 

[TastySuckToy]

*snip*

All valid points and accurate from what I've seen myself. However, the feminist movement didn't take up arms or force men to submit to these demands, they were given to women and enforced by men in society.

 

[Rightguide]

All valid points and accurate from what I've seen myself. However, the feminist movement didn't take up arms or force men to submit to these demands, they were given to women and enforced by men in society.

This is true for a whole lot of reasons. At present women who say they don't need men should contemplate the fact that it is men who enforce the rules of society that protect women but the system cannot succeed if they oppress men. The fact remains that men have the right to choose who they will marry. In the here and now with no consideration for posterity, men do not need women to survive. It's the other way around, and for a lot of reasons, some dumb some real, men are walking away from the present legal structure of marriage because it oppresses men and has influenced the behavior of women making them less desirable for marriage. So those affected men are deciding to seek women who are more compatible with their concepts of marriage, who want a family, and who are willing to accept their role as sole protector and provider. Some are deciding against marriage altogether because the rules are stacked against them. What society cannot survive is households headed by women producing fatherless, undisciplined, unsocialized male children, because where they dominate chaos rules. So there you have it, change the laws, change female behavior, go elsewhere to find a suitable wife, or forget it altogether and let society devolve into chaos.

 

[TastySuckToy]

*snip*

I agree with all your points stated here, I'm simply pointing out any attempt to blame women as the primary cause of these issues is flawed. At best, they would share half the blame, and that's ignoring my argument of men being the authorities and source of force that rules society.

 

[Rightguide]

Costello adds a new wrinkle to the Bragg case. I wonder if holding back exculpatory evidence is illegal

New Evidence Reveals Michael Cohen Admitting ‘I Swear to God, I Don’t Have Anything on Donald Trump.’​

Disgraced and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen admitted to his former legal counsel, Robert Costello, that he had no evidence of crimes committed by former President Donald J. Trump. Costello told Members of Congress on Wednesday that his former client lied on the witness stand in the ongoing hush money trial against the former President.

“I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week,” Costello told lawmakers. He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

Costello served as Micahel Cohen‘s criminal defense attorney before the serial perjurer accepted Lanny Davis’s counsel instead. According to his former attorney, Cohen repeatedly claimed that he had no evidence against former President Trump.

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,'” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

More here: https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/0...-to-god-i-dont-have-anything-on-donald-trump/

He will blow Cohen out of the water.

 

[icanhelp1]

New Evidence Reveals Michael Cohen Admitting ‘I Swear to God, I Don’t Have Anything on Donald Trump.’​

Disgraced and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen admitted to his former legal counsel, Robert Costello, that he had no evidence of crimes committed by former President Donald J. Trump. Costello told Members of Congress on Wednesday that his former client lied on the witness stand in the ongoing hush money trial against the former President.

“I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week,” Costello told lawmakers. He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

Costello served as Micahel Cohen‘s criminal defense attorney before the serial perjurer accepted Lanny Davis’s counsel instead. According to his former attorney, Cohen repeatedly claimed that he had no evidence against former President Trump.

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,'” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

More here: https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/0...-to-god-i-dont-have-anything-on-donald-trump/

He will blow Cohen out of the water.

Waiting for a *directed verdict *

 

[Rightguide]

Waiting for a *directed verdict *

As soon as the Prosecution finished.

 

[Bn2f]

New Evidence Reveals Michael Cohen Admitting ‘I Swear to God, I Don’t Have Anything on Donald Trump.’​

Disgraced and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen admitted to his former legal counsel, Robert Costello, that he had no evidence of crimes committed by former President Donald J. Trump. Costello told Members of Congress on Wednesday that his former client lied on the witness stand in the ongoing hush money trial against the former President.

“I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week,” Costello told lawmakers. He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

Costello served as Micahel Cohen‘s criminal defense attorney before the serial perjurer accepted Lanny Davis’s counsel instead. According to his former attorney, Cohen repeatedly claimed that he had no evidence against former President Trump.

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,'” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

More here: https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/0...-to-god-i-dont-have-anything-on-donald-trump/

He will blow Cohen out of the water.

Wouldn’t it be nice if you could proclaim that trump was a faithful husband and therefore innocent of these allegations?

Michael Cohen was found guilty and went to prison as co-conspirator #2. Lemme repeat that. Michael Cohen was found guilty and went to prison as co-conspirator #2. One would imagine that supporters of trump, co-conspirator #1, claiming that no crime was committed would therefore also demand a retrial and redeeming justice for Cohen. Why have we not ever seen that??? Hmmmm.

 

[HisArpy]

Waiting for a *directed verdict *

It will be denied. The judge has no choice except to deny it after everything he's done to hamstring and gag Trump. Granting the motion would be a rebuke of his own actions and decisions during the trial.

 

[icanhelp1]

It will be denied. The judge has no choice except to deny it after everything he's done to hamstring and gag Trump. Granting the motion would be a rebuke of his own actions and decisions during the trial.

Yah, I agree. It will be interesting to see if the jury lets their hatred for Trump bias their decision. With two lawyers on the jury it will be interesting.

 

[Bn2f]

Yah, I agree. It will be interesting to see if the jury lets their hatred for Trump bias their decision. With two lawyers on the jury it will be interesting.

Interesting how?
Explain.

 

[icanhelp1]

Interesting how?
Explain.

It’s self explanatory.

 

[Bn2f]

It’s self explanatory.

Indulge me since it’s so easily explained.
I honestly want to know how, in your view, these 2 may influence the rest of jurors.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yah, I agree. It will be interesting to see if the jury lets their hatred for Trump bias their decision. With two lawyers on the jury it will be interesting.

I’m curious why Trump’s attorneys allowed the entire jury to be composed of Trump haters.

 

[icanhelp1]

Indulge me since it’s so easily explained.
I honestly want to know how, in your view, these 2 may influence the rest of jurors.

They, being lawyers, understand the law and can guide the rest of the jurors on this convoluted sham of a trial.

 

[icanhelp1]

I’m curious why Trump’s attorneys allowed the entire jury to be composed of Trump haters.

I don’t think the question as to whether they were Trump haters or not was on the questionnaire.

 

[Bn2f]

My question is legit cos you just played out the scenario that is confusing to me that you insinuate that these 2 lawyers can clarify.

Say I am juror number three and you are juror number one and you are a lawyer. Juror number two, and I must stress this is a hypothetical, is a lawyer as well and is HisArpy. You call for a directed verdict and he disagrees. Who am I to believe and why?

 

[ll74]

I don’t think the question as to whether they were Trump haters or not was on the questionnaire.

It wouldn't matter who they were...you'd find a way to denigrate their ability to be objective towards the case.