stickygirl
All the witches
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Posts
- 22,930
The biggest issue I have is not so much with the report but the consequences, in that the government has decided to intervene in the medical process by banning blockers and hormone treatment for U-18s. While Cass pointed out that evidence has been poorly recorded, she acknowledged their effectiveness for some trans people and against a blanket ban. The blockers pre-date the upsurge in numbers by at least twenty years and were first used in the Netherlands in 1998.
Having had time to read more of the report, I get the sense that Cass sees trans people as broken and not as valuable as cis gender people - that's based on omission than any expression of approval. It's as though she's burst into the building and demanded to see the clinical trials, stats, graphs and scientific evidence, which is indeed lacking. She places little weight in anecdotal evidence - you know, happy trans people living meaningful lives.
I listened to a podcast earlier including one trans person who'd waited three years for a GiDs appointment, but then got a letter saying they were now too old for GiDs and would have to re-apply for the adult service. Most of that comes down to lack of funding. I hope the next Labour govt will simply put a penny on income tax specifically for the NHS - no one, apart from those on private health, will object.
On the topic of de-transitioning the numbers need analysis not simply totalled. Many de-transition because they face social pressure ( lets just call that bullying ), some may delay transitioning for economic or other reasons so they intended to come back to it later, and some may find they can't tolerate hormone drugs. Additionally, stats can be furthered distorted by setting a false start point for their transition - when does a person actually start their transition?
Here's a decent review from Stonewall that does a better job than me.
Having had time to read more of the report, I get the sense that Cass sees trans people as broken and not as valuable as cis gender people - that's based on omission than any expression of approval. It's as though she's burst into the building and demanded to see the clinical trials, stats, graphs and scientific evidence, which is indeed lacking. She places little weight in anecdotal evidence - you know, happy trans people living meaningful lives.
I listened to a podcast earlier including one trans person who'd waited three years for a GiDs appointment, but then got a letter saying they were now too old for GiDs and would have to re-apply for the adult service. Most of that comes down to lack of funding. I hope the next Labour govt will simply put a penny on income tax specifically for the NHS - no one, apart from those on private health, will object.
On the topic of de-transitioning the numbers need analysis not simply totalled. Many de-transition because they face social pressure ( lets just call that bullying ), some may delay transitioning for economic or other reasons so they intended to come back to it later, and some may find they can't tolerate hormone drugs. Additionally, stats can be furthered distorted by setting a false start point for their transition - when does a person actually start their transition?
Here's a decent review from Stonewall that does a better job than me.